WALTZES FROM VIENNA
C
aka: Strauss’ Great Waltz
aka: Strauss’ Great Waltz
Great Britain (80
mi) 1934
d: Alfred Hitchcock
Coming on the heels of two flops, Hitchcock was ready for
any work just to have something to do, calling it the “lowest ebb” in his
career, where he was receiving no constructive criticism and was displeased
with his own work, especially on this film, calling WALTZES FROM VIENNA and Champagne
(1928) the two worst films he ever
made. In the case of Champagne
he was wrong, as it features hilarious slapstick comedy routines that don’t
exist anywhere else in the Hitchcock catalogue, while he’s dead on with this
film, which is a real old-fashioned costume drama that was already out of date
at the time it was being made, pulled out of mothballs in this cheaply made
musical without any music, though the blunders of this film apparently taught
Hitchcock to appreciate the value of a good musical score, which was something
he emphasized in his later work. Anxious
to finish off his contract with British International Pictures, Alfred
Hitchcock agreed to make this schmaltzy light-hearted comedy set in 19th
century Vienna that spends much of its time indulging in the sweets from the pastry
section of a confectionery shop, making every stereotypical reference it can
about the snobbishness of the highbrow, upper crust elite, who bear titles and
wear elaborate costumes with wigs, calling themselves Princes and Countesses in
a congratulatory aura of pompous self-importance. Had Groucho Marx appeared, we might have
looked forward to some snide and satirical references to the haughtiness of it
all, but this one takes itself much too seriously, despite the overwrought
attempts at lowbrow humor that dot the film.
Opening on a horse-drawn fire carriage racing at breakneck speed only to
run into a slow moving street parade playing Johann Strauss’s “Radetzky March” Johann Strauss Sr. "Radetzky
March" performed by Vienna ... (YouTube, 7:07, with Franz Welser-Möst
conducting the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra), where nobody budges to allow
them through, turning into a slow motion version of really old slapstick
comedy, like the kind they used in the silent era of the teens. By the time they arrive to the café/bakery
where the fire is taking place, the building has been evacuated but the inside
tables and place settings are being rearranged on the sidewalk, as if nothing
has happened, while also immune to it all, caught up in the rapture of love, Johann
Strauss Jr. (Esmond Knight) and Rasi the baker’s daughter (Jessie Matthews) are
upstairs having a music lesson in a small studio above the bakery where the
younger Strauss is dedicating another piece of music to her. The baker’s assistant, Leopold (Hindle
Edgar), however, arrives through the window and insists upon carrying her down
a ladder to safety, even though the fire has been put out by this time,
apparently a minor detail. Nonetheless,
he insists, tearing her dress along the way, an artificially contrived noble
gesture gone wrong. This bumbleheaded
farce of mis-direction, however, dictates the tone of the film.
The real dilemma here is told in parallel stories, the
budding musical talent of young Johann is told right alongside his head over
heels love affair for Rasi, while his father (Edmund Gwenn), the elder Johann
Strauss’s utter contempt for the idea that any of his sons would follow in his
footsteps and enter the music business is matched by Rasi’s refusal to accept
any suitor that refuses to work in her father’s bakery. So while Rasi is flattered that Johann’s
music is dedicated to her, she has no interest in hearing it. She could care less whether the young man has
any musical talent, as all she wants is a man to follow in her own father’s
footsteps and run his bakery. Despite
Johann’s obvious musical interest and aptitude, it is ignored not only by his
father but by his beloved who insists that he wear a baker’s cap and work in
the shop getting his hand’s dirty like a real working man. Of course, Johann never looks more
ridiculously out of place, showing no aptitude whatsoever for a baker’s life,
as his mind is always wandering to music.
It is this image of a young Johann slaving away in the bakery shop that
becomes a turning point in the film, as in his head while he sees and hears all
the bakery machinery grinding away, it becomes music to his ears, all swaying
to the rhythm of a waltz that would eventually become the epic Blue Danube Waltz 2001: A Space Odyssey-Strauss
- YouTube (5:34) that is iconically featured in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001:
A Space Odyssey (1968), basically coopting the music for time
immemorial. In comparison, of course,
this Hitchcock confectionery daydream is a piece of lightweight fluff that will
have little impact on anybody’s life. Nonetheless,
we hear stands of the music straining to be heard, where the people that matter
most in the young composer’s life have no interest whatsoever—case closed. Enter Countess Helga von Stahl (Fay Compton),
surely a rival for the heart (and pocketbook) of Groucho’s legendary foil, Margaret
Dumont, where her title suggests access to power and money, taking an interest
in the young Johann, believing the obvious, that the man is obsessed with
music that was meant for the public to hear, knowing instantly that he’s
wasting his life with that selfish little tart who has no idea what she’s
depriving the world.
On a similar note, Johann’s father has no idea what lurks in
his son’s heart and imagination, but is too busy handling his own business
matters, rehearsing his orchestra relentlessly while schmoozing with the
aristocratic moneybrokers that might make precious donations to his cause. The heartless manner in which the father
refuses to even consider playing his son’s Blue
Danube Waltz only further condemns him to that hellhole of a bakery. The film gets bogged down in jealous asides,
where Rasi can’t bear the thought of anyone else taking an interest in her man,
or attempting to persuade him to come out from slaving away in that underground
lair of a bakery where he’s little more than a lackey under her hypnotic mind
control, while the Prince (Frank Vosper), husband of the Countess, whose dreams
consist of continually winning pistol duals, is warned of his wife’s special
interest in this young musician. The
Countess is then forced to conspire and outwit not only her husband, but the
elder Strauss in the protection of her musical protégé, convinced that his
future would be an instant success if the public could only hear his music,
where it might come down to a musical battle royale pitting one Viennese waltz
king against the other. But instead it
becomes the elder Strauss with control over the orchestra pitted against young
Rasi who doesn’t want Junior anywhere near the orchestra pit, becoming a battle
of selfish wills, each one more detestable than the other. Like the fire engine stalled in the opening
scene that eventually manages to get through, it’s only a matter of time before
the waltz is heard, even if the Countess has to lead the interference through
deceptive means. The waltz is instantly
adored by the public, as the elder Strauss was inadvertently detained elsewhere,
but sees the success of his misjudged son, initially thinking the crowd is
calling for him to take the stand, but the adulation is for the young maestro
whose career was to become an overnight success. While the arrogance of the wealthy is served
on a platter by Hitchcock’s stinging rebuke, but nothing is more contemptible
than the shrill note of vain mirror adoration from the completely self-absorbed
Jessie Matthews as Rasi, who was not liked by Hitchcock on the set, and the
wretchedness of her performance proves that, as she comes to represent the
shallow blindness of the thoroughly outclassed and manipulated working
class. While this may have been the low
point in Hitchcock’s career, where his 20’s silent films appear to be more
accomplished than his early 30’s talkies, thankfully that’s all about to change,
as his films in the latter half of the decade would only punctuate his
greatness.
Note – no Hitchcock cameos.