Showing posts with label Issa Perica. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Issa Perica. Show all posts

Saturday, October 15, 2022

Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement)









 










Director Claire Denis





novelist Christine Angot

Denis with Angot and Juliette Binoche

Denis with Vincent Lindon and Binoche

Juliette Binoche and Vincent Lindon















 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BOTH SIDES OF THE BLADE (Avec amour et acharnement)         B+                                       aka:  Fire                                                                                                                                  France  (116 mi)  2022  ‘Scope  d: Claire Denis

She had lost herself somewhere along the frontier between her inventions, her stories, her fantasies and her true self.  The boundaries had become effaced, the tracks lost; she had walked into pure chaos, and not a chaos which carried her like the galloping of romantic riders in operas and legends, but which suddenly revealed the stage props: A papier-mache horse.   —Anaïs Nin, A Spy in the House of Love, 1954

A film that may haunt you for days, somehow changing the French title from With Love and Fury, which works extremely well, to the entitled Tindersticks song that concludes the film, Tindersticks - Both Sides of the Blade (Official Video) - YouTube (4:05), Claire Denis has made yet another boldly provocative film that dissects modern relationships with a curious eye, emphasizing betrayal and the fractious state of our lives, revealing how easily the past protrudes into the present, rupturing the status quo with a destabilizing force.  Premiering at the Berlin Film Festival, Denis won the Silver Bear as Best Director, with the film introduced under the title Fire, yet Denis strongly objected, claiming it was not fitting, choosing a better title that represented what the film is about.  Using familiar faces in Claire Denis films, co-written (with Denis) and adapted from Christine Angot’s 2018 novel, Un tournant de la vie, or A Turning Point in Life, Angot’s influence is built around introspective studies of women’s desire for men, as she is the same playwright of Let the Sunshine In (Un Beau Soleil Intérieur) (2017), both starring Juliette Binoche, among the more courageous actresses of our era, again playing a flawed woman making questionable choices, bringing back Vincent Lindon from VENDREDI SOIR (2002) and 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds), Mati Diop from 2010 Top Ten Films of the Year: #1 35 Shots of Rum (2008), while in the same film Grégoire Colin was her boyfriend, making this his eighth appearance in a Denis film, only 16 when he first worked with her, also appearing in Nenette and Boni (Nénette et Boni) (1996), Beau Travail (1999), The Intruder (L’intrus) (2004), and 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds).  Hardly a happy reunion, what starts out as an affectionate portrait of a healthy relationship suddenly turns sour, as Sara (Juliette Binoche) is a middle-age Parisian radio host who engages in constructive on-air social justice commentary, hosting real-life commentators that include Lebanese educator Hind Darwish and French soccer star-turned-activist Lilian Thuram, who discusses the idea of being locked into “white thinking,” a topic that turns into the disruptive impact of the French colonial past and how it continues to wreak havoc on the present, troublesome subjects that mirror the unraveling of this seemingly perfect relationship.  Sara is financially and professionally secure in her decade-long relationship with her unemployed boyfriend Jean (Vincent Lindon), a former professional rugby player with a prison record, but everything changes when Sara catches a random glance on the street of her ex-boyfriend François, Grégoire Colin, a heartthrob in DREAMLIFE FOR ANGELS (1998) and since then almost always playing the object of desire, unexpectedly reemerging after a ten-year absence, sending her into an emotional tailspin, bringing in a rush of new sensations that completely disrupt and alter her world, violating the opening Edenesque tranquility on the beaches of Corsica (apparently shot with an iPhone) that is so eloquently presented.  A long single take through a dark railway tunnel as the couple returns to Paris seems to have ominous implications, completely darkening their outlook, like one of those playful twists in Rivette’s CÉLINE AND JULIE GO BOATING (1974).  Ostensibly an elaborate character study constructed around the derailing repercussions spiraling out of control emanating from the dubiously shady François, a kind of nefarious film noir character that feels more like an apparition or a figment of the imagination, yet he forges a business relationship with Jean (deftly avoiding the prison sentence that Jean served), working as a talent scout identifying young developing rugby players.  The couple is haunted by his reappearance, not just a former lover of Sara’s but a former best friend of Jean’s, having left François for Jean, yet Sara is understandably ecstatic as she holds her emotions in check, with Binoche’s head poking through the bathroom door like an eerie reference to Jack Nicholson in THE SHINING (1980), Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement) new clip official from Berlin Film Festival 1/2 YouTube (1:27), outwardly pretending she has no ulterior motive while encouraging Jean that this might present an excellent opportunity, both dancing around the topic like a hot potato, each one hiding something.  Immediately red flags are raised, as a growing suspicion develops between the lead couple, yet never acknowledged, as they become more testy with each other, where there are signs everywhere that they blindly ignore, like Jean and François regularly meeting on the corner outside their apartment, never inviting him up, almost always conducting their business at night, Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement) new clip official from Berlin Film Festival 2/2 YouTube (44 seconds), creating a brooding, underlying tension that borders on a thriller.

Few filmmakers have been able to demonstrate the kind of range that Denis has managed to achieve throughout her career, from post-colonial explorations to innovative experimentations within various genres, a director who tends to work instinctively, developing relationships with her collaborators, and refuses to spell things out for her audience, yet broadens the reach of the “female gaze” in every picture while remaining an essential part of the contemporary landscape of cinema.  Part of her skill is amassing sensual detail as she poetically realizes texture and rhythm in establishing continually shifting moods, often wordlessly, leaving gaping holes in the narrative while finding new ways to tell stories, moving her characters around like chess pieces, yet one constant is just how intelligently she imbues each film with her own existentialist perspective.  While Christine Angot’s earlier work was a sex comedy, this is a darker subject, more exasperating, with Denis adding a female counterpoint to her male-dominated 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds), plunging into the depths of personal destruction, exploring the intensely personal interiority of a love triangle, with Sara at the center, as her startled reaction at seeing François sets the story in motion, more of a melodramatic swoon, arousing something deeply unsettling stirring inside, drawing all three lives into a web of deception and desire as François tries to wedge his way back into her life, yet the obvious question is why does he matter so much?  Denis spares us the details, and only slowly provides any backstory, as all that matters is that her life implodes with a stunning force as she starts living a lie, exploring how love moves in unpredictable ways, often from one partner to the next.  It’s like watching poetry in motion to see the extent that Binoche becomes a master of artful deception, a heroine in distress yearning to test the waters once again, with the past coming back with a ferocity, reminding her of memories that have been missing in her life, though it happens imperceptibly at first.  The way she immediately succumbs at seeing him only heightens the significance of the mysterious François, kept out of sight mostly, allowing the inexplicable allure of his murky character to literally inhabit the couple, each in their own way, carefully concealing their private thoughts from the other, seemingly dwelling in darker spaces.  Creating a sports agency, they eventually choose a location for their business, having an opening night party with friends and family invited, yet Jean hesitates to invite Sara, as if afraid a spark might reignite, so he downplays this decision with Sara, acting casual, like she can certainly come if she wants, but he’ll be busy with invited guests, not really having time to spend with her.  This only heightens her anticipation, getting all worked up, vacillating between love and fury, unable to set foot inside, disturbed by what she’s really feeling, as she could publicly lose herself in the moment, so instead she remains outside, calling Jean, who puts François on the phone, and all bets are off, as she literally melts at the sound of his voice.  Agnès Godard has been the regular cinematographer for Claire Denis since 1990, providing that lushly visualized poetic texture she is known for, yet she was unavailable in 2021, so this is the director’s first venture with Éric Gautier, who worked on and off with Olivier Assayas, Arnaud Desplechin, and Alain Resnais, more recently with Jia Zhang-ke in Ash Is Purest White (Jiang hu er nv) (2018), utilizing close-ups with a sense of urgency, especially during heated arguments, with the camera holding close to Binoche’s remarkable reactions filled with naked emotion, a wise choice, subjecting each character with a sense of scrutiny, as it tells the interior story, seemingly trapped by the moment, exposing all underlying tensions.  Shot during the Covid pandemic, using only a few locations, revealing a somewhat desolate city, requiring occasional scenes with masks, one recurring visual motif is the use of the apartment balcony overlooking the rooftops of Paris, like a character unto itself, with the Basilica of the Sacré Cœur seen off in the distance, as Jean typically takes business calls from François out there as his own private domain, yet the invasion of that territorial space leads to disastrous consequences, culminating into a series of excruciating fights.       

Jean is a complex character, yet always authentic, carrying the weight of a man who has struggled in his life and found it difficult to be happy, with Lindon, at times, on the verge of bashing in walls from frustration, while also showing a surprising amount of restraint, especially how he interacts with his biracial son Marcus, Issa Perica from Ladj Ly’s Les Misérables (2019), who is being raised by Jean’s very sweet elderly mother (Bulle Ogier), given custody after his ex-wife took off when he went to jail, both having difficulties with him, as he’s restless and wanders the streets, yet also on the verge of being expelled from school, another example of how the past comes back to haunt the present.  Yet it’s revealing how he tries to take control over the poor decisions Marcus is making, hoping he’ll realize the error of his ways, though hardly setting a good example himself, framing his arguments by suggesting his son has to make his own decisions, an apparent contradiction when he’s attempting to make the best decisions for him, with Jean distanced and estranged from the racial circumstances Marcus is facing, blinded by his own white perspective, feeling more like a helpless outsider watching his son’s life fall apart, the same role he unfortunately takes with Sara, becoming something of a jealous spectator.  This family visit, however, offers insight into his own tenuous relationship with Sara, where he also tries to control the narrative through his passive/aggressive tendencies, always suspecting she’s cheating on him, but she’s quick to deny his accusations through her own sense of moral outrage, indignant at his insinuations, leading to a kind of charade of changing emotions, as she always reassures him of her love even as she’s cheating behind his back.  What really stands out is the grown-up feel to this film, sparing nothing, exposing the vulnerabilities of each character, though much of it is told from a female perspective, with the initial pangs of desire felt so intensely by Sara, yet anxiety develops about decisions made in the past that now lead to recklessly impulsive acts, featuring interior passages from Binoche that no other director would have included, like continually murmuring his name in an elevator, or finding herself in the bathroom at night with rhapsodic soliloquies of sexual infatuation, suggesting “old loves never really die,” fearlessly surrendering to a resurgence of former passions, like blood rushing to her head, while at the same time betraying her partner, yet she’s one of the few major female stars who would allow their reputations to be stained by a duplicitous character like this.  It seems a bit like a newly revised version of VENDREDI SOIR, which also featured Vincent Lindon in a spontaneous one night stand, appearing here 20 years later in a more mature context, infused with adult responsibilities, yet he’s embroiled in another morality tale, but instead of falling for someone new, this film explores the eruptive force of an old flame.  Both rely upon a poetic female perspective, visually impressive, psychologically astute observations, featuring strong naturalistic performances, with a vibrant soundtrack by Stuart Staples from Tindersticks, a British alt-rock band that has composed every one of the director’s film scores except one (Beau Travail in 1999) since Nenette and Boni (Nénette et Boni) (1996), yet Denis always finds a unique angle to subvert familiar stories, going off the rails with blistering back and forth arguments at the heart of the drama that become a scream fest of unleashed fears, all initiated by a betrayal that was covered up in a wealth of lies.  Her own confusion feels outrageously melodramatic, yet that’s the novelty of the film, so over-exposed, so vulnerable, with so much to lose, yet she can’t help herself, lying every step of the way, creating a corrosive fissure in their built-up trust, blowing it wide open, where the more she’s caught, the more she covers up, ultimately ensnared by her own deceit.  While the brutality from the verbal fireworks can feel exhaustive, recalling the cruel explosions in Ingmar Bergman’s Scenes from a Marriage (Scener ur ett äktenskap) (1973), there’s also an element of humor, as her phone, the instrument of her betrayal, making appointments and leaving text messages, has all the contents erased after she accidentally on purpose drops it in the bathwater while attempting to conceal the evidence.  It’s only fitting, perhaps, that her darkly acerbic day of reckoning quite literally disconnects her from her past, with the picture continuing to play out as the closing credits roll, adding another interesting development, a clever device rarely utilized in cinema.    

Claire Denis and Jim Jarmusch In Conversation - YouTube  Rendez-Vous with French Cinema at Film at Lincoln Center, March 2022 (1:07:03)

Monday, October 28, 2019

Les Misérables




Director Ladj Ly















LES MISÉRABLES       B+             
France  (103 mi)  2019 ‘Scope d:  Ladj Ly

There are no such things as bad plants or bad men.  There are only bad cultivators.
―Victor Hugo, Les Misérables, 1862

While the film is not a retelling of the Victor Hugo classic, it is set in the eastern Parisian working-class suburb of Montfermeil where Ly was born and grew up, which is also a key setting in Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables, yet the impoverished district today is pretty much exactly as it was more than 100 years ago, where misery still prevails in the area, comprised of multi-cultural housing projects where three in five children live below the poverty line, a region filled with civil unrest, economically bleak with few available options, where police violence remains a factor.  The prevailing sentiment from the Hugo novel that continues to the present is that there is simply no hope for the future.  Loosely based on the 2005 riots that started in the French suburbs of Clichy-sous-Bois following the deaths of two teenagers who were electrocuted attempting to escape the police, a state of emergency was declared, with nearly 3000 arrests and significant material damage to neighborhood infrastructure, from buildings to local businesses, much of it from the burning of more than 9000 cars.  According to the director, nothing has changed since then, supported by an accompanying article from The Guardian ('Nothing's changed': 10 years after French riots, banlieues ...), suggesting other filmmakers will be making similar films just like this in another twenty years.  There is already a cinematic trail, originating with the Mathieu Kassovitz film LA HAINE (1995), Jean-François Richet’s MA 6-T VA CRACK-ER (1997) and more recently Jacques Audiard’s Dheepan (2015), all films shot in the projects, or suburban banlieue regions, where people are routinely stigmatized as criminals, with racial tensions between residents and police continually on high alert, using raw language, quick edits, and an ultra-realistic cinéma vérité shooting style to convey the immediacy of each moment, as these are tinderboxes of violence continually on the verge of erupting into a firestorm of violence.  Winner of the Jury Prize (3rd place) at Cannes, tied with another film, while technical awards were handed out to Flora Volpelière for editing and Julien Poupard for the cinematography, which is on full display in the impressive opening sequence, a massive celebration of national unity along the Champs-Élysées in Paris under the Arc de Triomphe, with young kids in particular of Arab and African descent streaming out of the projects draped in the blue-white-red flags of Les Bleus after France won the soccer World Cup in the summer of 2018, all in agreement over the superlative skills of young French striker Kylian Mbappé, of Algerian and Cameroonian descent.  The entire nation was enthusiastically euphoric, beautifully captured by these documentary style images, but by the film’s end, in stark contrast, these same kids, harassed and unwelcome at home, are leading a violent insurrection in Montfermeil against the police and other authoritative powers within their neighborhood, an explosive revolt that captures the French revolutionary spirit of the Hugo novel. 
   
Set over the course of two days, Stéphane, Damien Bonnard from Alain Guiraudie’s Staying Vertical (Rester vertical) (2016), has recently joined the Anti-Crime Squad in Montfermeil that already includes the more easy going Gwada (Djebril Zonga), who grew up in these suburbs, and hyper-aggressive Chris (Alexis Manenti, co-writer of the film), both experienced members of the team, with Chris the hot-headed de facto leader of the squad, though his unconventional tactics seem to fly in the face of reason, responding spontaneously, using his instincts in deciding what to do, basically making up the rules as he goes along, which doesn’t exactly endear him to the young populace that he’s hired to serve and protect, as they’ve grown used to his harassment techniques.  Nonetheless they must act as a unit if they expect to be effective, where their primary mission is to deter criminal activity, as they are the eyes and ears of the police department.  In this massive housing project, kids are policed by the local Muslim Brotherhood who attempt to change behavior by instilling Islamic values, like staying clean, being smart, and respecting one’s elders, where the leader is a reformed convict named Salah (Almamy Kanouté), mild-mannered yet serious to the core, while the secular kids are run by the Mayor (Steve Tientcheu), a kind of mob boss that rules the old-fashioned way, guns, weapons, and brute power.  The police are kind of the odd men out, as they don’t live in the projects and they’re not viewed as trustworthy, and though they can act friendly or at least sympathetic at times, checking up on the kids at soccer games or asking about their families, they’re not anybody’s friend, as they also rule by intimidation.  Kids routinely get arrested for petty crimes from time to time, so they have run-ins with these cops, but don’t want to get criminal records, as that affects their future.  But very few of these kids ever thinks about the future, as they’re too busy dealing with the day-to-day, which is hard enough, as everyone seems to be conspiring against them, where no one’s really interested in anything they have to say, believing they’re too young.  The film almost exclusively features young elementary school kids, as anyone high school age or older is mysteriously missing, likely already in adult trouble, while the youth of today have yet to enter the world of felonies and serious criminal behavior.  As a result, there’s a definite LORD OF THE FLIES (1963) element to this story, a hierarchy within the ranks of the kids, where from the opening the central focus is upon Issa (Issa Perica), a leader of the pack seen earlier celebrating Les Bleus, also picked up for petty offenses, where he’s starting to establish a reputation among his friends as a reliable leader, creating a huge fuss when a steals a lion cub from the circus run by Gypsies, who don’t take too kindly to the offense, initiating an all-out race war against the blacks, where all the parties convene in a mad rage of accusations and racial insults, with the Anti-Crime Squad caught in the middle hoping to contain the rage, promising a return of the baby lion. 

What’s immediately clear is the extent to which Chris routinely crosses the line, where harassment is his specialty, the life blood of his police work, which doesn’t sit well with newcomer Stéphane, finding it difficult to work with a guy who basically ignores every rule in the book, creating friction wherever he goes, taking his dangerous high-wire act into the neighborhoods on his rounds, creating resentment and open defiance.  Whenever his authority gets questioned, or trouble lurks, Chris only amps up the challenging and confrontational tone, becoming a voice of belligerence, sending fear into the hearts of the kids, but they’ve grown tired of it.  As kids are questioned about the missing animal, they rally in defense, supporting their friend and ally, throwing bottles and rocks at the cops, screaming at the top of their lungs, threatening to retaliate.  The intensity level is off the charts when panic sets in, with Gwada inadvertently firing his precautionary weapon, a stun gun that hits Issa, bloodying his face while knocking him unconscious.  Clearly the police screwed up, but making matters worse, it was all captured by a hovering drone that makes a hasty retreat.  Chris’s inclination is to find that drone at all costs, as their lives and careers will depend upon it, where the health of the kid becomes secondary, refusing to take him to a hospital, instead sending an all-out search for the owner of the drone.  This sets the wheels in motion for an extremely well-choreographed manhunt sequence, with different factions having their own motives and intentions, each racing against time, all tracking the same device, where the poor kid that recorded the whole thing knows they’ll all be coming for him.  It’s a thrilling footrace through the inner passageways of the projects, each trying to outrun the others, all culminating in another stand-off between the various parties, with the cops, the Mayor, and Salah now shielding the kid, requiring intense negotiations, with huge repercussions, depending on the outcome.   This high-voltage, visceral footage is extremely impressive, especially in a first-time feature, drawing plenty of accolades, creating a thrilling and highly entertaining film.  And just when the cops think they may be off the hook, where there’s a calm after the storm, another storm hits, this time out of nowhere, where there’s no way it could have been anticipated, as the kids in the projects literally explode into the faces of the police squad, penning them down in the stairways of the projects, their own turf, their own battlegrounds, reaching incendiary levels of kinetic intensity that will surprise even the most experienced movie-watchers, becoming an insurrection of epic proportions, with the kids providing the revolutionary sentiment, storming the barracks in the hallways of their own homes, fighting tooth and nail in life or death matters that may haunt them for the rest of their lives, but it is clearly a turning point, a reckoning, a warning sign of what’s to come, where it’s a rush of unleashed virulence and hostility all headed in your direction.  Clearly an incendiary and testosterone-driven film where women get shortchanged, as they barely grace the screen, but the powerful message at the heart of the film could just as easily have come from The Fire Next Time, a book of essays written by James Baldwin in 1963 that presaged the race riots that inflamed Watts, Newark, Detroit, Chicago and other cities throughout the rest of the 60’s, where he writes, among other things, that “The most dangerous creation of any society is the man who has nothing to lose.”