CLOUDS OF SILS MARIA A
France Switzerland Germany (123 mi) 2014 ‘Scope d: Olivier Assayas
France Switzerland Germany (123 mi) 2014 ‘Scope d: Olivier Assayas
His best film in years, known only as SILS MARIA in France, Assayas stunningly returns to peak
form in this modernized twist of his earlier film Irma Vep
(1996), a film about the making of film, this time starring Juliette Binoche
instead of Maggie Cheung, written by Assayas specifically for her in a project
he describes as “A Juliette Binoche movie about Juliette Binoche with Juliette
Binoche” in a film about an international theatrical star Maria Enders
(Binoche) who is asked to perform in a film adaptation of the play that made
her famous twenty years ago, but this time switching roles, no longer playing
the beguiling 18-year old rising star actress in the part that made her famous,
but the older leading lady, a tired, middle-aged business woman having an
affair with the manipulative young female ingénue who eventually drives her weak-willed
boss to suicide. Partially financed by
Chanel, which supplied the actresses with clothes, jewelry, accessories and
makeup, this also allowed the director to shoot this sumptuously looking film on
35 mm. Shot on location by
cinematographer Yorick Le Saux in the mountainous Swiss Alps towns of Sils Maria
as well as Zurich, Switzerland, Leipzig, Germany and South Tyrol, Italy, the
locations are an integral part of the story, as Wilhelm Melchior, the author of
the aforementioned play Maloja Snake,
is a creature of those spectacular mountains, filled with their own secrets and
mysteries and naturally occurring phenomenon which begin to take on human
characteristics while also offering its own commentary on the changing nature
of time passing, which is visibly seen in a fog-like cloud formation that
drifts through the valley between the mountains in the form of a snake. Melchior becomes an unseen central force in
the film as Maria, at the height of her stardom but also in the middle of a
contentious divorce, is accompanied by her more laid back American personal
attendant Valentine, Kristen Stewart in Converse shoes, while traveling to
Zurich by train to accept an award on behalf of Melchior, where on route they
learn of his sudden death. Assayas
immediately shows us the back side of a famous artist, the side we never see,
as Maria seems terribly dependent on the expert social media skills of
Valentine, who meticulously plans everything out for her ahead of time, but
also acts as a human receptacle for her more candid comments that the public
never hears.
While Maria is obviously shaken by the unexpected death,
this doesn’t stop her from doing a planned Chanel dress photo shoot once she
arrives at the hotel, where her immediate transformation from ordinary train
passenger to international diva is a bit stunning. Much to her chagrin, they have also invited
actor Henryk Walk, Hanns Zischler, a self-centered, autocratic older man in the
manner of Erich von Stroheim who took full sexual advantage of the young
actress at the beginning of her career, which she has never forgiven, to
provide his commentary about Melchior, as they were also close personal
friends. After the Awards ceremony, she
meets an in vogue German movie
director, Klaus Diesterweg (Lars Eidinger), considered hot property due to his
series of successful films, who offers her the older role of his adaptation
of Melchior’s play. While she initially
expresses no interest, Val talks her into taking the role, suggesting she would
reach an entirely new audience, and with this decision comes the title card
announcing “Part 2,” which takes the audience completely by surprise, as there
was never any “Part 1.” This idea of an
actress reaching a point in her career (Binoche is 50) when she is no longer
considered young and desirable for leading roles, but becomes thought of only
for less desirable parts as a character actor, is considered the death of their
careers to some actresses, and has been explored before by John Cassavetes and
Gena Rowlands (in her late 40’s) in Opening
Night (1977), one of the gutsiest films about theater ever made, right alongside
Chaplin’s LIMELIGHT (1952) and Desplechin’s ESTHER KHAN (2000). All are dialogue-driven vehicles featuring
extraordinary performances, where Rowlands (whose name Binoche amusingly appropriates
when disguising her identity) was pathologically reticent to take the part, not
yet ready to cross the threshold, while Binoche is clearly more comfortable as
an aging actress, partly because she has continued to work with all the best
directors and still receives scripts that are written with her in mind. She couldn’t appear more natural in a film
while still playing a role, always seen as warmhearted and charismatic, but the
real surprise is Stewart, who matches her scene for scene throughout the entire
film by completely underplaying Binoche’s theatrics. What’s particularly interesting is how
quietly reserved and contemplative Binoche is in English, as if always holding
something back, while saving her more extroverted outbursts for French language
scenes.
Some of the best scenes in the film are reserved for Binoche
and Stewart who work brilliantly together, retaining a hint of the sexual
undercurrent expressed in Melchior’s play while also expressing their own
unique feminine personalities quite differently, as they retreat to the
Melchior estate in the mountains to prepare for the role, which the
playwright’s widow Rosa (Angela Winkler) has graciously offered, as she needs
to get away to avoid all the constant reminders of his presence. As they read through the play’s scenes,
offering fresh extemporaneous comments as they go, Assayas intelligently
dissects the present through the past, with both women displaying strong-willed
characters with probing intelligence and an acerbic wit, but also an
affectionate side where they’re simply happy to be in each other’s company. As they weave in and out of the play, while
also preparing elaborate meals or taking long walks through the picturesque
mountainside, it’s impossible to tell where the play ends and reality begins,
as they seamlessly intersect with a surgical precision. While both women have their own star power,
which is beautifully utilized by Assayas, it’s curiously deferred to the ideas
of the play, as if they are mere players in the world of art, expressed without
an ounce of pretension. This honesty is
then contrasted with the director’s shrewdly calculating choice to play the
ambitious young girl, Chloë Grace Moretz as Jo-Ann Ellis, an actress Maria has
never heard of. As Val thumbs through
Google searches, hilarious YouTube videos, and even more demented celebrity
interviews where Ellis comes off as a teenage prima donna and a full-time party
animal whose center of the universe is never far from herself, Maria finds this
ghastly while Val is impressed by her ability to hold the audience through each
of these arrest records and real life disasters, where she remains exactly who
she is without any hint of compromise.
The fact that she’s a walking disaster in real life means nothing, as
she knows how to command the screen.
This contextualization couldn’t be more hilariously insightful about
what Hollywood is today, while the scene of the film that takes one’s breath
away is the appearance of the snake, which finally appears at a crucial stage
in the film, expressed through the eloquence of Arnold Frank’s 1924 ten-minute
silent short film CLOUD PHENOMENA OF MALOJA (Das Wolkenphänomen von Maloja),
which is an awesome declaration of the artistic significance of cinema in its
purest form, literally dwarfing what we see today, given such a beautifully
sophisticated articulation by Assayas who has made another truly exhilarating
film.











