Showing posts with label performance art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label performance art. Show all posts

Thursday, February 1, 2024

Stop Making Sense



 























Jonathan Demme on camera near the end of the film

Director Jonathan Demme and David Byrne

Talking Heads 1977
Talking Heads 1984
      








































STOP MAKING SENSE       A                                                                                                USA  (88 mi)  1984  d: Jonathan Demme

STOP MAKING SENSE creates an energetic synthesis of music and imagery, filled with the rhythmic, off-kilter, and poetic interpretations of Talking Heads who seemed a little out of the mainstream, capturing what feels like a spontaneous artistic vision that still stands alone as a concert film, though it’s impossible not to think of Prince’s Sign 'o' the Times (1987), which is funkier and more soulful, featuring a master showman.  Eliminating interviews, crowd shots, historians and other experts, this is all about the art of the performance, literally transporting viewers to a place they never knew existed, led by lead singer David Byrne’s unbridled energy and quirky mannerisms, but backed up by some extraordinary musicians, this comes across as otherworldly, yet it’s all about capturing the exhilaration of a live performance, where cinematographer Jordan Cronenweth, already infamous for the futuristic look of Blade Runner (1982), used six mounted cameras, one handheld, and one Steadicam.  Made on money that was raised by the group itself, the singular defining quality of the film is that aesthetic considerations superseded marketing decisions, taking viewers on a journey with a soulful mixture of retro pop and rock ’n’ roll, with a little bit of R&B thrown in, turning songs into individual set pieces, each with its own distinct choreography and expressionist lighting, praised for its tight editing and pacing, at times feeling bizarre, yet wildly theatrical and unpretentious, studied in film schools as an example of innovative documentary filmmaking, and added to the Complete National Film Registry Listing in 2021.  The rock ‘n’ roll documentary first developed recognition with the groundbreaking work of D.A. Pennebaker’s DON’T LOOK BACK (1967) and MONTEREY POP (1968) with a makeshift mix of concert footage, cinéma vérité backstage chatter, and scattered glimpses in the crowd of enraptured fans, reaching further heights with Michael Wadleigh’s euphoric counterculture testament to peace and love in WOODSTOCK (1970), with its adulating fans writhing in ecstasy, immersing viewers in the historical era in which these musical festivals took place, followed by the apocalyptic freefall into nightmare and disillusionment from the Maysles’ Gimme Shelter (1970), when a music documentary about a rock band at the height of their power turns into a tragic stabbing death of a young black man at the hands of a Hell’s Angel during an outdoor Rolling Stones performance at Altamont, merging concert footage with real-life horror, all but spelling the end of an era.  Throughout the next decade rock documentaries were largely self-inflated vanity projects of little interest to anyone except those already worshipping at the altar of a few notable bands, with Prince doing something of an iconic revival appearing as a movie character based on his own life in Albert Magnoli’s PURPLE RAIN (1984), which is more of a music film than a documentary, following in the footsteps of Adrian Lyne’s FLASHDANCE (1983) and Herbert Ross’ FOOTLOOSE (1984), where infectious music blares with its identification with youth.  By this time MTV was officially launched on a cable TV channel devoted entirely to music, offering neverending clips of performers in artfully staged yet commercially driven music videos, which saturated the airwaves, with the novelty quickly wearing off, each one looking very much like the next, almost exclusively catering to popular tastes, devoting much of their attention to Michael Jackson, Madonna, Bruce Springsteen, Prince, U2, the Police, and R.E.M. with a few glam rock or heavy metal bands thrown in, and a sprinkling of others.  The time was ripe for something new.   

Enter the minimalist concept of Jonathan Demme, still a relative unknown, who defers to the modernist theatricality and artistic persona of Scottish-born lead singer David Byrne, just in his early 30’s, offering a best-seat-in-the-house vantage point, creating an immersive experience for viewers, which is key, stripping down the production to the bare essentials, accentuating stage design, lighting, constant movement, and layers of sound, essentially capturing the sheer joy of the band’s dazzling December 1983 stage show shot over four nights from Hollywood’s Pantages Theater in Los Angeles to create the feeling of a continuous performance, avoiding the jump-cut style of editing associated with music videos.  While the original group, three of whom met at the Rhode Island School of Design, consists of guitarist, songwriter, and vocalist David Byrne, drummer Chris Franz, guitarist and keyboardist Jerry Harrison (who was an architecture student at Harvard), and on bass, Tina Weymouth (married to the drummer), there are some notable all-black additions, marked by the band’s growing fascination with West African and black American funk rhythms, adding guitarist Alex Weir from the Brothers Johnson, keyboardist Bernie Worrell from George Clinton’s Parliament-Funkadelic, percussionist Steve Scales, and dancers and backup vocalists extraordinaire Lynn Mabry, also from P-Funk, and Ednah Holt, adding plenty of 70’s soulful funk to what was viewed as a white 80’s punk band who got their start opening for the Ramones doing mid-70’s CBGB shows, a dive bar in the Bowery that served as the breeding ground of punk.  Byrne also collaborated with dancer and choreographer Twyla Tharp by writing the music for her 1981 Broadway show The Catherine Wheel, a mix of ballet and modern dance, while also making a number of music videos with choreographer Toni Basil, which may have played a part in his developing stage persona.  The film begins with a close-up on Byrne’s white shoes as he approaches an empty stage alone in his gray boxy suit, introducing himself with the brief remark, “Hi, I got a tape I want to play,” as he places a boombox on the floor before launching into Psycho Killer, Talking Heads - Psycho Killer (Stop Making Sense 84) [4K] YouTube (5:22).  While the programmed drum beats are coming from a control booth, Byrne’s quick, staccato-like rhythmic guitar offers a piercing counterbalance to the shock lyrics delving into a stream-of-consciousness mindset of a deranged killer, “I’m tense and nervous and I can’t relax,” who seems to get some strange satisfaction by mixing in a few esoteric French lyrics into the chorus, but what stands out is the upbeat new wave arrangement of such a downbeat subject.  It’s a bizarre experience, as the lead singer is doing things that are profoundly odd, but strangely inventive, very serious and intent on what he’s doing.  The sound is astonishingly clear, attributed to the pioneering use of 24-track digital recording for the first time in movie history, while shots of people, doors, ladders, stairs, and unused equipment can be seen in the wings of the stage as he performs a wildly ebullient version of the song, bringing an artsy cool to the rendition, which certainly gets us in the mood for what follows.  The New York Times magazine did a cover story on Byrne in 1985 proclaiming him the “thinking man’s rock star” (THE CREATIVE MIND; DAVID BYRNE: THINKING MAN'S ...), while he was also featured on the cover of Time magazine, which called Byrne “rock’s renaissance man” (Rock's Renaissance Man - TIME), so superlatives are in order just from the very first song. 

Featuring unbounded energy and musical excellence, the film places an emphasis on the artist’s identity even over the songs themselves, led by frontman David Byrne, who is almost always the center of attention, measured but eccentric, paving the way for American new wave music with his own idiosyncratic style, doing a kind of jerky, back-and-forth dance to the rich mesh of African percussion, guitars, basslines, and synthesizers.  Scorsese’s The Last Waltz (1978) celebrates the legacy of the band and their accomplishments while providing background interview footage to establish an emotional connection.  None of that exists here, with nothing to break the musical momentum, almost never leaving the stage and the performers themselves, with none of those angled-up shots from below the stage that form the backbone of other concert documentaries, no swooping overhead shots, or a reliance upon fixed positions, instead transporting viewers to the stage, with the camera engaging with the band itself, always staying at eye level with its subjects, where the beauty of this film is that such a dazzling performance can actually be experienced at home, or in an IMAX theater, giving viewers an option, where there’s no definitive way to perceive what it’s about, as each viewer can be moved in their own way by the power of the music and the sheer artistry involved, putting on the best show possible, where you never know what’s coming next.  One thing that immediately stands out is that you don’t need a psychedelic light show or artificial add-ons to create an atmosphere, instead there is a simplicity to the progression of the show, as the music’s complexity builds from number to number, as one by one musicians are added to the stage, while a clearly visible yet silent road crew dressed in black sets up equipment in plain sight of viewers, yet existing in the shadows, bringing on a platform for the drums, amplifiers, and two sets of keyboards, stretching all the way to the edge of the stage, while also taking guitars from the hands of performers, exchanging new ones for the next song.  With matching costumes and choreography, no one is ever seen drinking water or any other beverage, as there are simply no distractions, yet the level of energy is consistently ramped up, with Byrne acting out each song as a distinct mini-drama, looking a bit like Norman Bates from Psycho (1960), where his lanky, free-floating body movements defy the laws of gravity, exhibiting a range of nervous expression that is thoroughly captivating.  As bassist Tina Weymouth arrives for the calm after the storm, adding a softening presence from the jarring sounds that we just heard, the next song is a duet, TALKING HEADS Heaven (Live 1983) [HQ] YouTube (3:50), adding a layered vocal harmony, feeling like an evocative lullaby, yet the female voice is heard but not seen, as it turns out to be Lynn Mabry mysteriously singing offstage.  It’s an unusual choice not to visibly feature her, as her perfectly harmonious voice is so significant, yet it’s part of the overall cinematic symmetry of geometric progression adding new members one by one, where the change is gradual but obvious, adding the drums, then the guitar, until finally adding the keyboard with the band fully functioning with Slippery People Live in Stereo David Byrne & Talking Heads ... YouTube (4:40), and the result is electrifying, just a wall of sound, with Byrne dancing with the backup singers, who add a fresh jolt of kinetic energy to the group, where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.  By the time we get to Talking Heads - Burning Down The House (Stop Making Sense 84) [4K] YouTube (4:02), the stage is filled with unbridled joy, culminating in a thunderous full-band arrangement of their biggest hit, with Byrne literally going into a trance from the furiously hypnotic beat before finally sprinting in place with Alex Weir.   

While there are a multitude of close-ups, or groups of interactions together, wide shots are scattered throughout the film, using as few cameras as possible to keep them from appearing in the frame, where the use of dissolves and stark lighting choices add a cinematic intensity, while offering the feel of cameras floating around the stage.  Few other concert films have exhibited flawless control over its music and visuals to create such an intimate experience as this one does, where according to Demme, “This isn’t a concert film, it’s a performance film,” but the intensity reaches new heights once all band members are onstage together, where you’d think it’s impossible to sustain the amped-up energy level, yet the film segways into a true showstopper, Life During Wartime Live by Talking Heads in Stop ... - YouTube (5:48), reminding us “This ain’t no party, this ain’t no disco, this ain’t no fooling around,” featuring more running in place, this time including the entire frontline, all in synch with the thundering rhythm, with Byrne flapping his arms, as if attempting to take flight, before weaving his body in strange contortions, somehow resembling a bobble head, even writhing on the floor, where by this time they are really cutting it loose, revving up the crowd, where it’s a party of epic proportions before Byrne starts running around the stage, literally doing laps as the stomping music reminds us once again just how to have fun.  There are drastic lighting changes designed by Byrne, turning into a red backdrop, as if for the coming apocalypse in Talking Heads - Swamp (Stop Making Sense) YouTube (4:33), with a very nerdy-looking Byrne subversively poking fun at the nation state (it was the Reagan years, an era when anything weird was labeled “gay”), suggesting a tenuous balance in the works with this funky tune.  Byrne introduces a lampshade in Talking Heads - This Must Be The Place (Naive Melody) [Stop Making Sense, 1984] YouTube (5:31), with bookshelves in the back, as if sitting in the study surrounded by the comforts of home, before close-up images of various body parts are projected onto a screen behind them, while also creating distorted shadows from the lamp.  Despite the soothing calm, there is a funky bassline that prevails throughout in a thumping rhythm before Byrne does a marvelous little dance with the lamp, literally bringing viewers into the light, apparently lifted from Fred Astaire in ROYAL WEDDING (1951), though not nearly so stylish, Dancing With A Hat Rack 1951 (Fred Astaire) - YouTube (4:13), but eloquent just the same.  Once again we’re reeled into the infectious sounds of another signature work, mostly filmed in a single shot until he deftly pulls others into the picture, Talking Heads - Once In A Lifetime (Stop Making Sense 84) [4k] YouTube (5:34), listed at #28 on the 2021 Rolling Stone list of 500 Greatest Songs of All Time, with that celestial opening, where the bass is repetitive throughout, never changing, manipulating the space between darkness and light through evangelic phrases, featuring iconic lyrics that will forever be associated with this particular band, co-written by Brian Eno, (And you may find yourself in a beautiful house, with a beautiful wife, and you may ask yourself, ‘Well, how did I get here?’), sung by a perpetually confused Byrne in glasses as the personification of a working stiff’s midlife crisis, described by The Guardian as the most perfect song of all time (David Bridie: Once in a Lifetime by Talking Heads is ...).  It’s a pained yet intoxicating vision of middle class malaise, told from the point of view of a poor schmuck living in the suburbs, one of millions of people who felt disconnected from their materially comfortable lives, filled with spiraling debt and disenchantment, drowning under the weight of stress and uncertainty, suddenly waking to an existential nightmare, where this feeling of alienation stretches across time, “same as it ever was.” 

Certainly part of Demme’s masterful direction is revealing the interactions between various performers, a collective of individual artists in sync with each other, or even with a lamp, where there is sheer wonderment, as viewers are treated to the shock of surprise from what happens next, as seemingly ordinary camera shots turn into creative angles that only enhance the intensity of the performance overall, with visual consultant Sandy McLeod communicating the best shots to use via headphones during the shooting.  There are subtle shifts in the setting to keep viewers offguard, but only slightly, as Byrne brings out the big, oversized suit in Talking Heads - Girlfriend Is Better (Stop Making Sense 84) [4k] YouTube (5:08), with his tiny head sticking out, which has a comical effect, as if suddenly immersed in a cartoon.  While he is the frontman, attracting all the attention, what’s irrefutable is that every member contributes to the whole, each one recognizable from the other, with Byrne seemingly bringing out their best with his wiggly arms, spontaneously interacting with the lighting and camera guys who help out with the chorus of “Stop Making Sense.” while plenty of rap and funk makes their way into this song.  Audiences are inevitably comparing studio versions against concert performances, where this film makes the case that the concert footage is better in every respect.  Rarely has a live performance surpassed the studio version of this many songs, as the added visuals literally revitalize every moment with newfound discoveries which simply weren’t there before.  A perfect example is the cover version of Al Green’s Take Me to the River, the only cover the band recorded over its entire career, a song that merges gospel with more earthly interests, played as slow as possible before adding their own special twists, Talking Heads - Take Me To The River-1984 [HD] YouTube (8:08), flooded in a green and blue light, becoming a baptismal by fire, a call and response hymn, where Byrne has stripped off the big suit jacket but still has on the puffy pants, looking even weirder when he puts on the red cap.  Nonetheless, this song has a hypnotic quality to it, where the baseline and backup vocals really carry the song, with a minimalist yet glorious synthesizer adding a scorching effect.  The crowd isn’t even shown until the last song of the show, Crosseyed and Painless (HD) - Talking Heads Live from Stop Making Sense YouTube (7:14), a rhythmic rant of abstract ideas with plenty of percussion and a Frank Zappa-like jazz-infused melodic theme.  Unfortunately, in a sign of the ephemeral nature of things, though the Talking Heads never officially announced a breakup, by 1989 the group had essentially split.  The inevitable conclusion to draw is that this is not just a concert film, but an experience, where even decades later there has never been anything like this.  A fusing of the minds of both Demme and Byrne, both venerated artists in their own right, but brought together to achieve a common goal, the artistic aesthetic is off the charts.  Understanding that the stage is more than something to perform on, what stands out is the innovative storytelling approach and meticulous attention to detail, where the proof is in the small decisions that were collectively made to produce such an enthralling, one-of-a-kind experience that has become a time capsule for concert films, removing all distance between viewer and performer, effortlessly inspiring audience interaction, evoking a spirit of community and celebration, while transcending all cultural boundaries.

Saturday, October 21, 2017

The Square














THE SQUARE           B-                                                       
Sweden (145 mi) 2017  d:  Ruben Östlund   

How much inhumanity does it take before we access your humanity?
—Marketing slogan showing a child being blown to smithereens while in “The Square” for an upcoming art exhibit

Ruben Östlund has an extremely provocative style of satirical filmmaking, bordering on cruel, that is not for everyone, known as an overcontrolling director specializing in what might be described as a theater of discomfort, where he’s intentionally creating cringe-inducing set-ups that will make viewers squirm.  While in his earlier films, Play (2011) and Force Majeure (Turist) (2014), he is very adept in tapping into humiliating personal circumstances, enlarging them into a broader societal context, actually making an incisive social comment about how easily we misjudge the world around us, which might look a little differently when seen in this light.  With THE SQUARE, however, all bets are off, as he takes aim at the wealthy, specifically how privilege allows them to live in an artificial bubble of the culturally elite, completely protected from the outside world, living by values they pretend to believe in, but completely abandon when threatened or when the moment suits them, becoming not an indictment of those values, but their misappropriation by the privileged and powerful in a Western society that depends upon them.  The film centers on Christian (Claes Bang), an erudite and educated man of manners who is the chief curator of a modern art museum, Stockholm’s X-Royal Museum, while also divorced, a devoted father of two daughters, living in an upscale apartment, driving an environment-friendly electric car, and a supporter of liberal causes.  While you’d think he’s in an enviable position, wielding power and influence, through a series of unfortunate incidents, for which he has no one but himself to blame, he is reduced to a cowardly mush before the film is through, exposed as a total hypocrite in every respect, thinking he’s the smartest man in the room and can weasel his way out of tight jams due to his privileged status as a man of letters, but ends up thoroughly disgraced.  With a screenplay written by the director himself, the film moves from one outrageous set piece to the next, bordering on the surreal, clearly crossing the line of bad taste, growing deliriously out of control in a grotesque spectacle by the end, revealing a darker underside of the human condition, suggesting complacency leads to an overall cowardice in Western democratic societies to actually stand up for what’s right, forcing others to fight your battles for you.  Christian is in the middle of it all, thinking he is above the fray, yet is powerless to exert his so-called influence when it matters, losing all perspective of what it means to be a decent and respectable citizen.    

At issue is one of the museum’s upcoming installations known as “The Square,” which is simply a small designated space in front of the museum which is continually lit up and marked off as a safe zone.  Along with the artist’s name, an inscription around it reads, “The Square is a sanctuary of trust and caring. Within it, we all share equal rights and obligations.”  While this kind of hollow manifesto rings false, as it’s largely meaningless, yet the museum is forced to promote it like it would any other exhibit, requiring resources and ingenuity, hiring a team of young media experts to find the best way to draw in an interested public.  Mirroring this exhibit is one already taking up an entire room in the museum, with the constant presence of a lone security guard hovering nearby, comprised of small pyramid-like piles of gravel.  The irony of that exhibit is that people tend to peep around the corner to have a look, but inevitably walk away without so much as a visit, as it simply doesn’t catch their eye.  What makes this a truly modern era movie, however, is the promotion campaign thinks the bigger the better, as the exhibit will draw more attention that way.  But this covers up the soulless superficiality of modern existence, where opinion polls define the issues, and instead of a well-written article enhancing interest, word gets spread through social media, reducing analytic thought to a herd mentality of what’s currently liked on Facebook, where people respond to other like-minded views, never really challenging themselves, but simply agreeing with others that agree with them.  This comfortable aloofness may reflect an inherent emptiness at the heart of modern sensibility, defined by a short attention span, and a detached inability to capture one’s interest unless something goes viral on the Internet, which for many constitutes approval, as without that brief flair of artificially generated interest, no one would be paying attention.  If much of this feels like an advertising technique, it is.  Much of the film is told with that in mind, filled with an obsession with performance art that is littered throughout the film, actually becoming one giant spectacle of performance art, using cinema as the provocation.         

Winner of the prestigious Palme d’Or (First prize) at Cannes, which is certainly an honor, but it seems like a make-up call for not awarding Maren Ade’s Toni Erdmann (2016) the year before, an equally cringeworthy effort, a dazzling choreography of awkward and uncomfortable moments, reaching unseen heights of comic farce and outrageous spectacle, the likes of which we haven’t seen in decades, which left the festival emptyhanded.  While decidedly unfair, the world works like this.  Away from the spectacle that is Cannes, however, this film may not play so well, though much of it is hilariously funny, well written and acted, and the director exerts his usual mastery behind the camera, but the ostentatiousness of the director is a bit like the Wizard in THE WIZARD OF OZ (1939), who presents himself as all-powerful, but is little more than a middle-aged man behind a curtain pulling the levers, where the derisive tone may leave many viewers thinking the joke is on them, as if the director on high is making fun of the little people below, where viewers are reduced to peons that can be easily controlled and manipulated.  This ultimately takes the fun out of the picture, where many viewers may find this smug and overly pretentious, perhaps even cruel.  The problem is the uncomfortable feel of emotional manipulation, as viewers become rats in a cage, a behavior experiment taking place in the lab intending to provoke a reaction, using crass, mass-market advertisement techniques that amount to bullying, feeling similarly manipulative and emotionally contrived, using his characters (and the audience as well) as a punching bag, sending wave after wave of what amounts to the most humiliating and degrading situations possible, and then asking everyone what they would do under similar circumstances?  This actually feels more like a game than a film, like Haneke’s Funny Games (1997), where the director already knows the answers, or has some preconceived idea, but pushes the buttons beyond any point of social acceptability, like being subjected to electric shock treatments, each one a bigger jolt than the last, which actually changes the rules of the game, as the director wants his audience to suffer uncontrollably, like wetting one’s pants, and only then will he feel satisfied.  If people reject his idea, as they refuse to play along, claiming free will, he’ll simply call them part of the status quo, claiming we’re all numbed into complacency, suggesting we need to wake up.  Occasionally this method works, just not when it’s so overly contrived and obvious, as it feels like the director is pulling the strings, and we’re being used as his puppets.  He’s actually cramming it down the audience’s throat, premiering at Cannes with an elite, upper echelon patron audience comprised very much like the invited-guests-only awards gala dinner depicted in the film, where they apparently ate it up.  Audiences apparently love to see themselves depicted onscreen.  As it turns out, often the film that screams the loudest is the only one heard.