Showing posts with label ensemble. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ensemble. Show all posts

Monday, July 1, 2024

Totem (Tótem)


 














Director Lila Avilés

Director on the set with Naíma Sentíes











TOTEM (Tótem)                     B-                                                                                                Mexico  France  Denmark  Netherlands  (95 mi)  2023  d: Lila Avilés  

While this is a hauntingly despairing film about death, told from the perspective of a young child, the naturalistic approach deviates from the norm, mixing tones of comedy and drama, using the Robert Altman template of a revolving ensemble cast, adding plenty of character and nuance, all taking place in the course of a single day, yet there’s also something uniquely uncomfortable about the set-up, where all the bells and whistles ignore the elephant in the room, as all the attention is paid to planning a surprise birthday party of family and friends for a sickly father suffering from the end stages of cancer, and while the intentions are well-meaning, it’s an extremely difficult watch.  If you know anyone who’s suffered from the effects of cancer, then you know how much effort it takes to engage and socialize with others, to have to put on a brave face for the public, to ignore every fiber in your body that tells you how much pain you are in.  While this is meant to be a farewell/celebratory event, it puts way too much pressure on the honoree, who feels more like a ghostly presence and simply doesn’t have the energy to participate, yet there are nonetheless demands being made in the name of love, which is literally an imposed dance with death.  Resembling a high-energy wake before the person is even dead, loving tributes are paid, which feel heartfelt, but at what price?  The weakness of the film is this is more of an idealistic vision than real life, as it’s doubtful the loved one could summon this kind of energy.  It would make more sense to visit the infirmed in a more restful state of lying down, saving one’s strength, where individuals or small groups of people could come visit one at a time instead of one giant gathering.  To pretend to be happy and overlook all the suffering is just not a good look for a film, even if it’s told through innocent eyes, as no one seems to really care what they’re putting him through or comprehend the severity of the toll this will take.  Without a narrative storyline, this instead moves within an existential framework, yet there’s something very unpleasant about the way this is presented, given a look of authenticity without a hint of sentimentality, but it has the effect of dropping the hammer on his head, where he is blocked into a corner and given no other recourse.  The entire film documents the preparations taking place in one frenetic day, with everything leading to a single event, yet everyone in the family appears far too busy among themselves, perhaps fending off the inevitable, exposing the ritual of human behavior, where there are side effects for good intentions, and this film about family love and loss feels more like a blessing and a curse, though it pales in comparison to the depth and classical elegance of Edward Yang’s Yi Yi: A One and a Two... (2000).  Yet there is also something to be said for so many people who die alone, who have no one paying tributes or reflecting on their life, and it must be one of the saddest things in the world to die alone. 

Based upon a deeply personal experience of her own, Avilés recreates this heartbreaking event with a dispassionate eye, giving viewers the opportunity to experience it for themselves.  At the center of the film is 7-year old Sol (Naíma Sentíes in a remarkable performance), an impressionable young girl who loves animals and is very informed about minute details associated with them, loving to share her knowledge with anyone who will listen.  When she and her mother drive through a tunnel, they hold their breath and make a wish, with Sol solemnly wishing “for Daddy not to die.”  That gets us right into the heart of the matter, as she’s trying to come to terms with his eminent death, where everything else revolves around that one single thought.  Since her mother Lucía (Iazura Larios) works as a theater actress, and has an afternoon matinee performance, she drops her off at her grandfather’s house, Roberto (Alberto Almador), who uses a voicebox to speak from his own episode with throat cancer (his wife succumbed to the disease), spending most of his time tending to a bonsai tree that he’s been attentively working on for eight years, but it’s also the home of her Aunt Nuri (Monserrat Marañon) and little cousin Esther (Saori Gurza), idly spending the afternoon hours awaiting a chance to see her father Tona (Mateo García Elizondo), yet she is continually ushered away from his door, claiming he’s not ready yet, creating an anxiousness, where her biggest fear is that he doesn’t want to see her because he doesn’t love her anymore.  In the quiet of the darkened room behind the scenes, alone with his caregiver nurse Cruz (Teresita Sánchez), it’s clear Tona has difficulty standing and walking, needing assistance for nearly every aspect of his life at this point, where he literally has to drag himself out of his room to finally make an appearance.  Basically a snapshot of a single day, revealing the chaos and everyday life, with the dulled familiarity of the family routine, the film offers a surprising intimacy, taking us into bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchens, and living rooms, with the camera eavesdropping on various conversations, where people are going through their daily lives, but constantly bickering amongst themselves, offering insight into the difficulties the family is having in coping with the inevitable reality of a pending death, where they each have their own stressful situations to deal with.  In something of a hilarious turn, another one of the nutty aunts, the chain-smoking Alejandra (Marisol Gasé), brings a spiritualist into the home to supernaturally eradicate bad spirits, trying to smoke them out with a burning loaf of bread on a stick, charging extra due to the severity of his condition (“I also sell Tupperware”), but then refuses to leave until she gets paid.  The same could be said for Cruz, who hasn’t been paid in weeks, yet her services are indispensable.  In the eyes of a young child, that fire on a stick just seems strange, making little sense to anyone except Alejandra, who views the spiritualist as essential, but it only ends up getting on everyone’s nerves.  The priorities are all out of whack, as medical expenses have drained all financial accounts, where a collection is taken at the party, accepting any and all donations.  This film is like an archaeological construction, where there are scenes behind the scenes, and detours along the way, but the final outcome is certain, becoming an elegy of death.    

The film title holds a special meaning, representing a series of sacred symbols around the Mexican Aztec or Nahua mythology that symbolizes the relationship between animals and nature, and their relationship to the family, as there are literally dozens of references of plants and animals around the house, with Sol taking extreme pleasure in caring for animals in all forms, which emphasizes a cycle of life and death, and while there are plenty of foreshadowing signs along the way, where the preparation in anticipation of the party is actually more important than the party itself, becoming a metaphor for the preparation of death, still the gravity of the situation slowly creeps up on you.  Tona, short for the Indigenous name Tonatiuh, which according to Aztec mythology is the god of fire, the sun, is still a relatively young man, an artist whose paintings are seen all around the house, like Mesoamerican historical artifacts carrying an extension of his legacy, nonetheless they are pulled out of a hallway, with a truck coming to take many of his artworks away, something discreetly done quietly off to the side, where they’re likely being sold off to pay for the medical expenses.  Perhaps the strongest message is that you never know what’s going to happen in life, or when death may come, as things happen so unexpectedly, so it’s important to live life to the fullest.  As if to accentuate that, the movie amplifies the most banal details that family members cling to, yet given the circumstances, they are only magnified, part of the lasting memory of what happens with this massive emotional outpouring.  Watching this film is like sifting through those moments, leaving an indelible impression, where it’s not any one thing that stands out, but the collective sum of what they mean that matters, like discovering your true and authentic self.  Surrounded only by those closest to him, their tributes leave a lasting legacy, as what they have to say is meant only for him, like making amends, and perhaps only he understands the essential truth in that given moment.  Emblematic of those expressions is Sol lip-synching to a dramatic aria from the mad scene of Donizetti’s Lucia di Lammermoor, “Spargi d’amaro pianto” (“Sprinkle with bitter tears my earthly remains”), Maria Callas - Lucia di Lammermoor - Spargi d'amaro pianto YouTube (4:04).  Taking it further, this film is emblematic of the transition from life to death, specifically the spiritual space that needs to be healed and cleansed, getting rid of all negativity, where all is forgiven by the final chapter.  Given the age of Sol, there’s so much that remains incomprehensible and out of her reach, perhaps growing sadder and more reflective when she comes closer to realizing the finality, which especially hits home when Tona hasn’t the strength to blow out the birthday candles in a sequence that simply lingers in our imaginations, yet there’s something unmistakable about creating lasting impressions, where she may not remember exactly how it happened, but she will remember how it felt.  The audience is in a similar position, having just been introduced to these characters, where the attention to detail is extraordinary, with a series of hand-drawn animals appearing over the end credits.  As a point of interest, the director didn’t attend film school, becoming a mother at a young age and worked her way behind-the-scenes with various roles in theater and later in cinema, such as wardrobe, production, and the art department, having a hand in all aspects of the film including writing, directing, and producing, as well as the casting, becoming a distinctive voice in independent Mexican cinema, claiming John Cassavetes as an influence, where this film, dedicated “for my daughter,” may be seen as a love letter to her. 

Monday, June 5, 2023

Babylon










 

























Director Damien Chazelle on the set

Chazelle with cinematographer Linus Sandgren

Chazelle with Brad Pitt and Diego Calva

Chazelle with musical composer Justin Hurwitz














































BABYLON                B                                                                                                                 USA  (189 mi)  2022  ‘Scope  d: Damien Chazelle

A child born in fifty years will stumble across your image flickering on a screen and feel he knows you, like a friend, even though you breathed your last before he breathed his first.  You’ve been given a gift.  Be grateful.  Your time today is through, but you’ll spend eternity with angels and ghosts.                   —Elinor St. John (Jean Smart)

From the maker of Guy and Madeline on a Park Bench (2009), Whiplash (2014), and 2016 Top Ten List #10 La La Land, which soared to 14 Oscar nominations, becoming the youngest ever Oscar winner for Best Director, this $80 million dollar extravaganza is not for the faint of heart, as this could also be known as Sodom and Gomorrah goes to Hollywood, becoming an exposé on the outsized ambition and outrageous excess in the early days of Hollywood, tracing the rise and fall of multiple characters during an era of unbridled decadence and depravity, where this bombastic saga takes on the grand-scale myths of Hollywood lore from yesteryear, like a Cecil B. DeMille extravaganza selling a grotesquely exaggerated vision of reckless hedonism, becoming a walking travelogue through the hidden pre-Code secrets of an out-of-control industry.  Setting its sights on exposing the sordid, darker underbelly of Hollywood history, which they have been so adept at sweeping under the rug, the film bombed at the box office, where the more than three-hour run time for a Christmas release might be a factor, along with poor marketing, while historical films tend to be hit or miss with movie audiences, but the ostentatiousness and grandiose spectacle on display is much like Ruben Östlund in Triangle of Sadness (Sans Filtre) (2022), as both use projectile vomiting and diarrhea scenes for grotesque humor, seemingly on a similar wavelength of crude condescension, and while LA LA LAND was a love letter to the hopeful dreamers of Tinseltown, this feels more like a “Fuck you” letter to the industry, pushing the limits beyond all established limits, where it’s doubtful Chazelle will ever get the same opportunity again, so he shot the wad with this one.  While much has been made about matching certain fictional characters to their real-life counterparts, that’s not really a factor, as the boundaries between imagination and reality are blurred, where it neither enhances nor detracts from the storyline, becoming a multi-character tragicomic epic set at the twilight of the silent era, where if we learn anything it’s that Hollywood is a place of dreams and pain in equal measure.  Spanning from 1926 to 1952, this is an uneven, yet outlandish film that’s hugely ambitious, but never lives up to expectations, as there’s an emotional disconnect with all the characters, with blatant attempts at humor that mostly fall flat, and while there are moments of brilliance, much of this ends up feeling overly trite and predictable.  Bearing some resemblance to David Fincher’s Mank (2020), with both offering inside glimpses into a world of often drunk, drugged out, and chaotic individuals who thrive in the industry, each establishing behind-the-scenes connections to the lavish weekend parties of William Randolph Hearst, where his Hearst Castle becomes a resort for Hollywood’s royalty during the Roaring Twenties and into the 30’s, including stars, directors, producers, and writers, where California is viewed as both a Garden of Eden and a land of material opportunity, ultimately satirized by Orson Welles in CITIZEN KANE (1941).  On a desolate hilltop in the Bel Air desert, inside the fairytale mansion of Hollywood producer Don Wallach (Jeff Garlin, bearing more than a passing resemblance to Harvey Weinstein), we are witness early on to the orgiastic frenzy of a 30-minute party sequence set to the exhilarating music written by Chazelle’s longtime musical composer Justin Hurwitz, Voodoo Mama (Official Audio) – Babylon Original ... - YouTube (3:59), which sets the tempo, something you might expect from Baz Luhrmann in The Great Gatsby (2013), a filmmaker known for his lavish extravagance, but this is an unrivaled, no-holds-barred scenario with quick cuts combined with longer takes that feels breathtaking in the way Linus Sandgren’s bravura 35mm camerawork simply glides through the Felliniesque bacchanal festivities like poetry in motion, where viewers are literally immersed in the excess, debauchery, and revulsion of the experience.  Shown on 70mm in a few theaters, yet compared to this, what went on in Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) seems relatively tame.      

While we have seen this kind of satiric Hollywood history rehash before in the Coen brother’s Hail, Caesar! (2016), nothing really prepares us for the exaggerated histrionics and massive scale of this film, which dares to go where others refused to go, elevating bad taste to an operatic artform while luridly swinging for the fences in attempting to capture the shallowness and moral void at the center of this business.  Three central characters are introduced early on, Manny Torres (Diego Calva), a star-gazing Mexican emigrant who dreams of making his way up the Hollywood ladder (“I just want to be part of something bigger!”) but remains stuck on the outskirts of fame, employed as an errand boy for media mogul William Randolph Hearst (Pat Skipper), where he runs into Nellie LaRoy (Margot Robbie), a loud and brashly impulsive, would-be actress from New Jersey appropriately dressed for the occasion, but she’s not on the invite list, so Manny whisks her inside where they partake in a mountainous pile of readily available cocaine before hitting the dance floor.  Manny falls instantly in love, enamored by all the stardom and glamor, but she’s just there for a wild time, becoming an instant hit, dazzling the eyes of party revelers and viewers, where the intoxicating sequence goes for the juggler, driven by the furious pace of the music, taking us on a roller coaster ride, setting the tone for what follows, Babylon (2022) - The Orgy Dance Scene | Movieclips YouTube (2:30).  While they are merely periphery players, the grand entrance is reserved for Jack Conrad (Brad Pitt), a matinee idol whose extreme arrogance and eccentric personality is modeled after John Gilbert, MGM’s biggest silent movie star and producer at the peak of his star power, the man who helped build Hollywood into the multi-billion dollar conglomerate that it is today.  Jack is the face of the movie industry, fawned over by adoring fans, with everyone trying to get into his ear, but he’s an unflappable character, clearly in his element in the midst of the delirium of surrounding chaos, with a propensity for getting wildly inebriated, yet shows up on the set the next morning ready to work.  In addition, the sequence features black jazz trumpeter Sidney Palmer (Jovan Adepo) and Lady Fay Zhu (Li Jun Li), a lesbian Chinese-American cabaret singer modeled after Anna May Wong, dressed in a top hat and tuxedo singing “My Girl’s Pussy,” My Girl's Pussy by Justin Hurwitz in Babylon (2022) Cabaret ... YouTube (2:30), with both also craving the spotlight, while Elinor St. John (Jean Smart), a gossip columnist turned grand dame of Hollywood journalists, offers her own first-hand accounts of the day-to-day trials and tribulations, providing a checkered history that is filled with looming themes of transience and sadness, with Chazelle and his editor Tom Cross cleverly weaving these stories together while referencing some of the classic ensemble films.  Manny proves his meddle by devising an ingenious diversionary plan to escort a dead woman who has overdosed out of the party in plain view without anyone noticing, with Nellie chosen to take her place on the set the next day.  Jack takes Manny under his wing as his personal assistant, driving him home to his own palatial estate, becoming a trusted confidant, an everyman bearing witness to the idiosyncratic methods of making movies on an outdoor set with multiple productions shot simultaneously, fascinated by the pandemonium and complete disarray in what he sees, with a timeline separating distinctly different sets in operation, including a sprawling action sequence directed by Otto Von Strassberger (Spike Jonze in a German accent) that goes haywire, killing one of the actors (turned into a sight gag), as real weapons are used, suggesting it’s a Wild West out there, destroying all their existing cameras as well, but all that matters is that they got the shot, Getting The Shot Of The Soldiers Fighting - Babylon (2022) Scene YouTube (2:42).  Erupting out of this chaos, occasional magic occurs, as Manny saves the day by making an emergency run afterwards to secure another operating camera, a scene that borders on the ridiculous, and the miraculous, revealing the remarkable spirit of an era that has come and gone, BABYLON - First 8 Minutes Opening Scene (2022) YouTube (8:20).

Jack sends Manny to New York to see Al Jolson in THE JAZZ SINGER (1927) and report back on the new sensation of talking pictures, which would change the industry, driving most of the silent era actors out of business as their overdramatic theatrics don’t play so well in sound pictures.  While Jack wants to be part of the future and make accommodations to the changing times, his wooden acting doesn’t play so well with audiences, which throws him for a loop, as he’s never tasted anything but success before.  Nellie becomes an instant silent film success, a rags to riches character based on starlet Clara Bow, the scandalous “It-Girl,” but her shrill Jersey accent never plays well in the tightly restricted atmosphere of a sound studio, where she is the living example of the growing pains that came with the transition into unchartered territory, Babylon (2022) Retake Scene Over & Over Again YouTube (3:05).  The film depicts a time when Los Angeles was a desert community of rootless transplants growing into a world-class city, where Hollywood in particular was operating in a no-holds-barred kind of world, wilder, more aggressive, while still tinkering and experimenting with an industry format that was still being built.  For instance, there’s an early scene of the beginning stages of the infamous number that would eventually end up in Gene Kelly and Stanley Donan’s Singin' in the Rain (1952), regarded today as a masterpiece of the classical Hollywood musical.  But in the early stages actors were used to simply standing in place and singing, not moving around or dancing, where motion was not yet integrated into the medium.  In this side-by-side comparison, Jack reveals his personal reservations as Chazelle’s film is seen juxtaposed against Charles Reisner’s THE HOLLYWOOD REVUE OF 1929, Singin In the Rain 1929. Babylon comparación. - YouTube (1:14), while there is yet another version of the same song, Singing in the Rain - YouTube (4:18), offering an unusual historical perspective.  Chazelle unabashedly shows the dark side of the industry where even the mighty must fall, viewed as inevitable, as gossip columnist Elinor St. John will explain to a devastated Jack Conrad why his career is over and how insignificant that ending will be to Hollywood history, Best scene of Babylon YouTube (4:50), which is even more tragic considering ninety percent of all silent films are estimated to be lost.  Manny eventually finds a place as a movie executive, but does so at the expense of his moral integrity and racial identity, as he ends up passing for white, ignoring his own family for years, though they live nearby.  This plays out in devastating fashion when it comes to musician Sidney Palmer, a black man who actually made it in Hollywood, until the moment when the powers that be decide his skin is too light for the camera, and may not play well in the South, setting the stage for the indignity of “blackface,” a racial subtext within the industry that still lingers today.  As Palmer, Jovan Adepo is able to express all the humiliation and psychological damage that Hollywood has inflicted for generations, Manny Makes Sidney Palmer DARKEN HIS FACE - Babylon (2022) Movie Scene YouTube (3:00), transitioning perfectly into another sequence, Sidney Palmer Plays The Babylon Theme Tune Perfectly - Babylon (2022) Scene YouTube (2:30), offering a poignant eulogy for a forgotten era.  One of the most grotesque twists is a surrealistic descent into the dark underbelly of the beast, a subterranean dungeon where the layers of Hell resemble Dante’s Inferno, described as the “asshole of Los Angeles,” where the depravity of the industry on steroids is a fantasy crime scene selling its soul to the highest bidder.  For the finale the film jumps ahead thirty years and finds an aging Manny revisiting his former stomping grounds, where its cleaned-up image turns into a CINEMA PARADISO (1988) moment of movie rapture with a spellbinding montage of movie clips that is nothing short of sensational, Babylon (2022) - The Ending Montage Scene | Movieclips YouTube (2:57), offering a one-of-a-kind exposé that can be as stupefying as it is enthralling.  

Note

Prior to shooting the film, from the fall of 2018 through the spring of 2019, Chazelle and executive producer Matthew Plouffe organized private screenings in empty theaters to screen 35mm prints of films they felt consciously tried to push the boundaries of cinema while expanding the viewing experience.  Included in this eclectic mix were the following films, D. W. Griffith’s INTOLERANCE (1916), William Wellman’s WINGS (1927), G. W. Pabst’s Pandora's Box (Die Büchse der Pandora) (1928), Jean Renoir’s THE RULES OF THE GAME (1939), Orson Welles’ CITIZEN KANE (1941) and TOUCH OF EVIL (1958), Federico Fellini’s LA DOLCE VITA (1960), Luchino Visconti’s THE LEOPARD (1963), Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Conformist (Il Conformista) (1970), Bob Fosse’s CABARET (1972), Martin Scorsese’s Mean Streets (1973) and Goodfellas (1990), Roman Polanski’s CHINATOWN (1974), Francis Ford Coppola’s THE GODFATHER Part II (1974) and APOCALYPSE NOW (1979), Stanley Kubrick’s BARRY LYNDON (1975), Robert Altman’s Nashville (1975), Terrence Malick’s DAYS OF HEAVEN (1978), Michael Cimino’s THE DEER HUNTER (1978), Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie Nights (1997) and There Will Be Blood (2007), and Wong Kar-wai’s IN THE MOOD FOR LOVE (2000).

Every movie referenced in the 'Babylon' ending montage  Calum Russell from Far Out magazine

  • The Horse in Motion (Eadweard Muybridge, 1878)
  • Cat Galloping (Eadweard Muybridge, 1887)
  • The Arrival of a Train (Auguste and Louis Lumière, 1895)
  • Annie Oakley (1894) – Thomas Edison’s earliest Kinetoscope
  • Birth of the Pearl (F.S. Armitage, 1901)
  • A Trip to the Moon (Georges Méliès, 1902)
  • Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves (Ferdinand Zecca, 1902)
  • The Great Train Robbery (Edwin S. Porter, 1903)
  • Little Nemo (Winsor McCay, 1911)
  • Intolerance (D.W. Griffith, 1916)
  • The Champion (Charlie Chaplin, 1915)
  • The Vampires (Louis Feuillade, 1915–1916)
  • Joan the Woman (Cecil B. DeMille, 1916)
  • Within Our Gates (Oscar Micheaux, 1920)
  • Voice of the Nightingale (Ladislaw Starewicz, 1925)
  • Le Ballet Mécanique (Fernand Léger, Dudley Murphy, 1924)
  • The Jazz Singer (Alan Crosland, 1927)
  • Black and Tan (Dudley Murphy, 1929)
  • Hollywood Review of 1929 (Charles Reisner, 1929)
  • Piccadilly (Ewald André Dupont, 1929)
  • The Wizard of Oz (Victor Fleming, 1939)
  • Ivan the Terrible, Part 2 (Sergi Eisenstein, 1944)
  • Tarantella (Mary Ellen Bute, Norman McLaren & Ted Nemeth, 1940)
  • Love Letter (Kinuyo Tanaka, 1953)
  • Pather Panchali (Satyajit Ray, 1955)
  • Duck Amuck (Chuck Jones, Merrie Melodies, 1953)
  • This is Cinerama (Mike Todd, Michael Todd, Jr., Walter A. Thompson and Fred Rickey, 1952)
  • Ben-Hur (William Wyler, 1959) 
  • Un Chien Andalou (Luis Buñuel, 1929) 
  • Psycho (Alfred Hitchcock, 1969) 
  • Dreams That Money Can Buy (Hans Richter, 1947)
  • Meshes of the Afternoon (Maya Deren, Alexandr Hackenschmied, 1943)
  • The Passion of Joan of Arc (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1928)
  • My Life to Live (Jean-Luc Godard, 1962) 
  • Lucia (Humberto Solás, 1968)
  • NY. NY. (Francis Thompson, 1947) 
  • Borom Sarret (Ousmane Sembène, 1963) 
  • Le Ballet Mécanique (Fernand Léger, Dudley Murphy, 1924)
  • The Black Vampire (Román Viñoly Barreto, 1953) 
  • 2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick, 1968)
  • Week-End (Jean-Luc Godard, 1967)
  • Matrix 1 (John Whitney, Sr., 1971)
  • 0–45 (TV Cultura de São Paulo, 1974) 
  • Sunstone (Ed Emshwiller, Alvy Ray Smith, Lance Williams, Garland Stern, 1979)
  • Raiders of the Lost Ark (Steven Spielberg, 1981)
  • Tron (Steven Lisberger, 1982)
  • Terminator 2: Judgement Day (James Cameron, 1991)
  • Jurassic Park (Steven Spielberg, 1993)
  • The Matrix (Lana and Lilly Wachowski, 1999)
  • Avatar (James Cameron, 2009)
  • Persona (Ingmar Bergman, 1965)