Showing posts with label espionage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label espionage. Show all posts

Thursday, April 10, 2025

Black Bag



 










Director Steven Soderbergh

Soderbergh behind the camera

Soderbergh on the set with Michael Fassbender

Soderbergh with screenwriter David Koepp

screenwriter David Koepp

musical composer David Holmes
































































BLACK BAG             B+                                                                                                             USA  (93 mi)  2025  d: Steven Soderbergh

Whatever you may say about the films of Steven Soderbergh, one thing you can count on is that they will be stylishly entertaining, in this case like being immersed in the middle of a John Le Carré spy novel.  The maker of SEX, LIES, AND VIDEOTAPE (1989), one of the most influential catalysts of the 1990’s independent film movement, leading to Out of Sight (1998), The Limey (1999), and Traffic (2000), which remain among Soderbergh’s best films, all made at the height of his creative peak, yet this feels more along the lines of Haywire (2011), moving invisibly through a world of espionage, double agents, government cover ups, and secret identities, where the one certainty is never trusting anyone.  Soderbergh indicated he wanted this film to feel like the espionage version of Mike Nichols’ Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966), but it doesn’t have that kind of verbal pyrotechnics, as it’s much too sublimated for that, avoiding the high-octane action sequences typical of spy thrillers, instead there’s a unique focus on the interior psychology of the characters, where it actually feels more like an Agatha Christie novel, a spy thriller that’s also an interpersonal relationship movie, with a terrific ensemble cast that continuously plays mind games with each other, where Soderbergh’s bag of tricks is in stark contrast to Tomas Alfredson’s much more somber and subdued Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011).  Given the state of the world at the moment, where lying and disinformation have become the new normal, with nations sabotaging and undermining their own people to prevent the truth from ever coming out, we are living by new rules of engagement, where we suddenly find ourselves mired in a labyrinthian sci-fi dystopia, where we may never see the light of day, as the odds are continually stacked against us, with Soderbergh having a little fun at our expense, poking holes in our perceived covers, twisting the knife in what was once conceived as an open democracy.  Nowadays all bets are off, with this film demonstrating just how convoluted and confusing it has become, with the power brokers dangling the strings, making us believe whatever the hell they want us to believe, closing off all avenues of the real truth, while wrapping it all up in a mirage of freedom and democracy.  Having written three of the director’s last four movies, including his minimalist ghost story PRESENCE (2024), released just two months ago, the ridiculously talented and successful screenwriter David Koepp has written more than thirty feature films, including a wide variety of genres, with U.S. box office receipts grossing over $2.6 billion, making him the fourth most successful American screenwriter of all time (Top Grossing Screenwriter at the Domestic Box Office), though evaluating who is “best” is another story (The 100 Best Screenwriters of All Time), consulting with actual spies to write this movie, which is simply immersed in the culture of keeping secrets, which extends into personal relationships, including marriage, where confidential things that are off-limits for discussion are kept in a “black bag.”  That’s the amusing premise for the film, with Soderbergh having fun subverting genre expectations, becoming a puzzle piece that turns into fun and games, where if you can lie about everything, then how do you tell the truth about anything?  Perhaps unintentionally, that’s the real dilemma of living in America at the moment, where it’s like living under the Russian KGB, as everything is filtered through a wall of authoritative threats and manipulated disinformation.  Lies and cover-ups, along with a blatantly racist disregard for even the barest trace of historical diversity, are the cultural cornerstones that have literally replaced truth and honesty in American politics, the exact opposite of the Watergate era of the 1970’s, which opened a new door of ethics reform along with journalistic integrity and transparency.          

Using chapter headings counting down the days, one by one, this moody, atmospheric film is driven by a remarkable soundtrack written by Irish musician David Holmes, who has written the music for dozens of films going back to Soderbergh’s Out of Sight working with the director on and off for decades, Black Bag 2025 Soundtrack | Black Bag - David Holmes ... YouTube (1:09).  The super-modern, stylish look of the film is captured by none other than the director as cinematographer, working under a lifelong pseudonym Peter Andrews, while also editing the film under the pseudonym Mary Ann Bernard, where the sterile rooms and office spaces of Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) are void of color or personality, much of it mimicking the sepia tones of David Fincher’s Se7en (1995), swamped by an uneasiness that persists throughout, like an underlying gloom that permeates through every character.  In a superbly constructed opening sequence filled with suspense, the camera follows British intelligence office George Woodhouse (Michael Fassbender) in a Scorsese-like, single-take opening shot through the underground walkways of an upscale, carefully guarded London nightclub, leading to a private VIP vaping room, with darkness saturating every frame, as his superior, Mr. Meacham (Gustaf Skarsgård), contends “There’s a stranger in our house,” ordering him to investigate a leak in the intelligence service, specifically the theft of a top secret cyberweapon code-named Severus, a biological weapon capable of killing thousands, where one of the five suspects who have access to it is his wife, Kathryn (Cate Blanchett), given one week to find the culprit before it activates.  Adding to the intrigue, Meacham is poisoned and killed by morning, made to look like a heart attack, with a covert murder operation suddenly infiltrating the picture, where clearly there is trouble in the ranks.  Something of a twisty cat and mouse tale, perhaps the oddest juxtaposition is an early scene of the Woodhouse’s hosting a dinner party inviting all the suspects to their swanky townhouse, including a smug intelligence analyst Freddie Smalls (Tom Burke) and his sharp and savvy girlfriend Clarrisa Dubose (Marisa Abela), a junior agent and cyber technology expert, also the ever-observant, in-house psychiatrist Dr. Zoe Vaughn (Naomie Harris) and her dapperly dressed, recently promoted, second-in-command boyfriend Col. James Stokes (Regé-Jean Page).  This social gathering with fellow spies allows George to secretly place a psychotropic drug in the curry, lowering their inhibitions, creating an opportunity to observe their reactions, as interactions among the group frequently spark subtle shifts in the mood, where a brief glance, a subtle change in tone, or a hesitant remark speaks volumes, enriching the overall fabric of the narrative.  This opportunity allows secrets to be revealed, most of a private nature, exposing cracks and infidelities in each relationship, where a culture trained to deceive simply makes cheating too easy, growing very testy with one another, often driven by their own personal ambitions, featuring stellar dialogue that is delivered at a crisp pace, almost like a screwball comedy, Black Bag Movie Clip - Nothing I Couldn't Handle (2025) YouTube (1:04), recalling the infamous dinner parties hosted by married couple Nick and Nora Charles, a romantically involved detective duo known for their witty banter in W.S. Van Dyke’s THE THIN MAN (1934), where the dinner invite was a glamorous way to flush out the decisive clues to solve a case.  Outing Freddie as a serial cheater, George meticulously details his predictable sexual promiscuity, a provocation that prompts Clarissa to furiously retaliate by stabbing him on his hand with a steak knife.  Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.  While it’s a brilliantly conceived scene, allowing deeply repressed emotions to suddenly erupt to the surface, it also sets the stage for what follows, exposing what has to be the ultimate in workplace romances with the potential for dire consequences, as we’re dealing with clandestine operations that rarely see the light of day, so the film literally toys with the possibilities, poking fun of the somber nature of the business, but also cleverly finding humor at every turn with witty insinuations and quick retorts.       

The sanctity of marriage is broken when George finds a theater ticket stub in his wife’s trash, contradicting her version of events, so he breaks into her office and learns she’s secretly traveling to Zurich without telling him, testing the loyalty to his wife or his country.  His response, completely reflective of their power dynamic, is one of the more ingeniously conceived, diabolically clever scenes of the film, requiring the expertise of Clarissa to redirect a spy satellite while deceiving the agency’s satellite video screens, watched like a hawk by the man in charge, a silver-haired Pierce Brosnan (a playful take on his late 90’s version of 007 himself!) as Arthur Steiglitz, going offscreen for a mere minute or so to allow George to spy on his wife in Zurich meeting someone of interest, a hilarious example of the extent marital partners are willing to go to find out what they want about the other, Black Bag Movie Clip - It's the Only Way - video Dailymotion YouTube (45 seconds), where the wrinkle is a split-second glitch exposing their shenanigans, a subliminal moment and potentially disastrous occurrence that could expose his dirty tricks.  This marital relationship is at the heart of the picture, as it thrives on secrets and lies, yet relies upon trust, a kind of marriage that is unique to cinema, held together by a mutual understanding of the lies they live in, where the wheels of power are forever changing, as both are deliberate, smooth, rarely cracking a smile, where a certain frostiness and cold precision is required in their profession.  George is a cold and clinical character, robotic, seemingly inhuman, like an A.I. invention, never revealing an inner life, yet super intelligent, as his views are rarely challenged, while Kathryn is more socially amenable, a master of disguise moving about with an icy calmness, with a wardrobe right out of Todd Haynes’ 2015 Top Ten List #6 Carol, where her natural disposition tends to put people at ease, allowing her to more easily gain people’s trust, including her husband, but the open question is whether there’s been a breach in their marriage, and whether she’s undermined official state secrets, becoming that mole in their midst.  This see-saw affair of shifting perspectives is the engine that generates the understated power of the picture, where everyone’s a suspect, yet the more George investigates, the more all the clues lead to his wife, delving into moral complications, yet what’s a spy thriller without the spies spying on each other?  When George and Kathryn compare notes and suspect they’re being set up, using each against the other, George shrewdly conducts polygraphs tests that mix the personal with the professional, anything to make each suspect feel precariously offguard, yet his interview with Clarissa, with Abela stealing every scene she’s in, is drop dead hilarious, as she’s devised bizarre methods to beat the test, which truly impresses the usually unflappable George, who is supposedly unparalleled in the art of psychological manipulation, taking this into unfamiliar territory while adding a bit of spice to the mix, Black Bag Exclusive Movie Clip - Polygraph Tests (2025) YouTube (59 seconds).  This sequence is cleverly edited, moving rapidly between agents, merging the personalities of everyone involved, like a musical crescendo, leading to yet another classic dinner sequence designed to catch the culprit, with Kathryn remarking, “It’s been a while since we’ve had a traitor to dinner, at least knowingly,” Black Bag | Official Clip | Cate Blanchett, Michael Fassbender YouTube (1:06), a wonderful return to form for Soderbergh, whose cinematic sophistication really shines.  Something of a throwback to those paranoid conspiracy flicks of the 1970’s, deliciously entertaining at every turn, this is masterful filmmaking, immersing viewers in a sordid universe that we are typically excluded from, yet here we’re given a front row seat in what is easily one of Soderbergh’s best films in years.

Monday, September 27, 2021

North By Northwest
















































working on the designed set



Director Alfred Hitchcock

Hitchcock arriving in Rapid City ahead of the shoot   

Cary Grant and Hitchcock on the set

setting up the crop duster scene

James Mason, Eva Marie Saint, and Cary Grant

The actors relaxing behind the scenes
















 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NORTH BY NORTHWEST            B+                                                                                         USA  (136 mi)  1959  d:  Alfred Hitchcock

I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know the difference between a hawk and a handsaw.                                                                                                                       —Hamlet from Shakespeare, Hamlet 2.2, SCENE II. A room in the castle. - Shakespeare (MIT)

Coming on the heels of Vertigo (1958), this comedy of errors is a sunny antidote to the gloomy puzzle-piece that preceded it, among Hitchcock’s most commercially successful films, arguably the most viewed, currently listed at #4 on his all-time list (Alfred Hitchcock's most popular movies - MSN), just above NOTORIOUS (1946), REAR WINDOW (1954), and Psycho (1960), while also listed at #4 on AFI’s list of top American thrillers, AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills.  This is vintage Hitchcock at the peak of his creative powers, making Psycho (1960) immediately afterwards, and then The Birds (1963), all among his most successful films and all uniquely different from one another.  His only film made for MGM, this notably thrives on incorporating the shooting of the film with prominent sites that include national monuments like the United Nations building and Mount Rushmore, neither of which are real (though the arrival sequence to the UN was secretly shot), as they weren’t allowed to shoot on the premises, so the United Nations interior is a matte painting, yet the film is shot on location in New York, Chicago, and South Dakota.  Accentuating the trappings of wealth, power, and prestige, the film opens with examples of 1950’s luxury in the crowded elegance of Manhattan buildings like the Plaza Hotel near Central Park and Grand Central Station, with a side journey to the Phipps Estate on Long Island (Old Westbury Gardens), followed by the 20th Century Limited train along the Hudson to Chicago, a quick jaunt to the Ambassador East Hotel, an out-of-the-way bus stop on a vast and empty plain of cornfields in Indiana, to the backdrop of the Mount Rushmore monument, where a full-scale replica was designed on a studio back lot along with a fabricated home (another matte painting) meant to look like a modernist Frank Lloyd Wright house, as in the late 50’s he was the most prominent architect in the world, making this one of the first films to openly highlight the sophistication and luxury of modernist architecture.  Added to the mix is the daunting presence of 1958 white Lincoln Continental Mark III convertible, a sure sign of flaunted prosperity and extravagance, and a capitalist symbol of the Eisenhower era American identity in the 50’s, which was wrapped around the idea of consumerism and wealth, all an illusion, as the country’s failure to come to grips with contentious social issues, like a separate but unequal racial and economic divide, left a sizeable moral vacuum that would define the struggles of the next decade.  However, the playfulness of the film is the most endearing quality, where much of the humor is tongue-in-cheek, displaying a sparkling wit that resembles 1930’s screwball comedy, with Cary Grant (in his 4th and final Hitchcock film) being the suave and sophisticated model of efficiency that defined that era, strangely mirroring BRINGING UP BABY (1938), where Grant goes from being strait-laced and professorial to utterly bonkers and completely irresponsible, while here he evolves from a snarky Madison Avenue wise-ass advertising executive continually making snide remarks over cocktails into a mature and capably responsible human being, ultimately redeeming himself for his earlier complacency.  Buoyed by Bernard Herrmann’s exhilarating musical score, this became Hitchcock’s most successful melding of espionage, comedy, and romance, becoming a surprisingly prophetic template for the James Bond movies that would follow only a few years later.  Made at the height of the Cold War, the intrigue of an international spy scandal was all the rage, allowing Hitchcock to introduce darker and more menacing elements to what is otherwise a thoroughly entertaining romance and adventure-on-the-run picture, combining darkness with light comedy, where witty humor, a love story, suspense, and mortal danger harmoniously merge in this espionage thriller, with the director displaying a mastery of building tension and creating plot twists, becoming a commercially financed luxury model for Godard’s more low-budget Breathless (À Bout de Souffle) (1959) made the same year, with main characters in each caught up in the existential angst of the times.  

Hitchcock’s films exist entirely within a highly stylized, artifical cinematic universe, as they bear no resemblance whatsoever to reality, yet he utilizes the talents of a collective team of creative artists that draw and replicate locations that they could not legally access, using drawings, miniatures, and fake sets.  Viewed by some critics as a lighthearted and trifling work when it was released, the massive popularity surrounding the film has only elevated its status over time.  While it lacks the depth of some of his best films, many believe the models for the film are the British and American spy thrillers The 39 Steps (1935) and SABOTEUR (1942) respectively, yet Hitchcock has effectively improved upon a more endearing characterization of the hero, integrating him more harmoniously into the whole, using humor and charm to beguile audiences, which certainly adds to the overall appeal.  The film follows the incredible story of Roger O. Thornhill (Cary Grant), whose name is a riff off of American producer David O. Selznick, who produced Hitchcock’s first American film Rebecca (1940), where in each the “O” stands for nothing.  Caught up in a case of mistaken identity, believing he is secret agent George Kaplan, he is immediately thrust into a game of high stakes when an ignominious spy agency headed by a villainous Phillip Vandamm (James Mason) and his strong-armed henchman Leonard (Martin Landau, who seems to relish his role of being one of the first gay characters to inhabit a mainstream film) kidnap him in broad daylight and whisk him off to a reclusive estate that belongs to Lester Townsend (Philip Ober), a United Nations diplomat.  When he refuses to divulge state secrets, feigning ignorance, caught up in a Kafkaesque nightmare, they force a quart of bourbon down his throat and send him down a winding coastal road in a car overlooking cliffs where they expect him to crash at his own peril.  But he somehow defies the odds and survives, only to be arrested for drunken driving by the police, who refuse to believe his incredible story, especially when testimony against him has been fabricated.  Thinking the only way to get out of this dilemma is to find the killers himself, he only inflames the situation when he meets the real Lester Townsend at the United Nations, immediately realizing he has been set-up, as Townsend is assassinated on the spot (though he was actually the target!), while he’s photographed holding the murder weapon, making nationwide front-page news, as a police dragnet searches for him.  It’s 40-minutes into the film before viewers realize what’s really behind this cloak and dagger affair, as the Professor (Leo G. Carroll) is seen consorting with his CIA colleagues, realizing Thornhill is just an innocent bystander, but they risk endangering their own agent who has infiltrated Vandamm’s organization, so they keep a safe distance, which leaves Thornhill precariously on his own.  Preferring a train to an airplane, as there are more places to hide, he sneaks aboard an overnight train to Chicago without a ticket, somehow avoiding detection, accidentally encountering Eve Kendall (Eva Marie Saint, another Hitchcock blonde), sitting across from her at dinner, where the sophisticated banter becomes sexually provocative, where she actually offers him help, allowing him a safe place to hide while rewarding him handsomely, as she helps him escape the next morning, only to discover, after nearly paying the ultimate price, that she’s in cahoots with Vandamm.  Still believing she’s an ally, however, he follows her instructions to meet the real George Kaplan (who doesn’t exist), but he ends up out in the open in the middle of nowhere where he has no means of escape, only to be attacked by a crop duster plane that relentlessly circles back after him, creating one of the most iconic of all Hitchcock set pieces, becoming one of the most analyzed and studied scenes in the entire Hitchcock repertoire, (NORTH BY NORTHWEST: Deconstruction of a Scene (The ...).  A surreal auction scene in Chicago turned into a farce leads to the murky chase finale taking place on the granite stone faces of the Presidents on Mount Rushmore, measuring some sixty feet from chin to forehead, about the same size as the head of the Giza Sphynx, where their constant presence looms over what transpires, as if offering their silent countenance. 

Unlike Erich von Stroheim and Orson Welles, who were destroyed by the studio system, as it stifled and thwarted their profound individualism and extreme originality, Hitchcock was largely a master craftsman, extremely well organized, preferring to shoot in a studio than actual locations, expertly navigating his way through a strangulating studio system by becoming a consummate technician, finishing his films on time without going over budget, rarely discussing the ideas his films generate, preferring instead to describe how each shot was ingeniously set-up.  Written by Ernest Lehman in a rare original story for Hitchcock, ambitiously describing it as “the Hitchcock picture to end all Hitchcock pictures,” sumptuously shot in dazzling color by Robert Burks on VistaVision, one of the most effective Hitchcock techniques here is leaving out huge chunks of information regarding each character’s true motives, identities, and intentions.  Eve Kendall, for instance, continually changes in the eyes of viewers as well as to Thornhill as the story progresses, where her accidental appearance in Thornhill’s life proves to be anything but.  She obviously knows all about him while the clueless Thornhill knows literally nothing about her, so her real intentions (until the end) are never clear.  With the director skillfully controlling access to information, he uses distortion and exaggeration to change how characters perceive each other, emphasizing an atmosphere of deceit and distrust, which perfectly defines how it felt living through the Cold War era.  This constantly changing tonal shift effectively keeps viewers off balance, continually altering the balance of alignment, where no one is safe in this Kafkaesque universe of irrationalities and absurdities.  Hitchcock does achieve his primary goal of demonstrating how easily an average person can undergo a dangerous and traumatizing experience, such as a near-death tragedy, that becomes a life-altering and transforming event.  Having no identity to speak of, Thornhill immerses himself in the assumed identity of George Kaplan, a man of action, one who accepts no excuses while taking on massive risks, and in the process discovers himself.  Despite his star power, Cary Grant comes to resemble that average person caught up in a whirlwind of events that forever changes who they are, where it’s easy for viewers to sympathize with him, a blatantly open Mama’s boy, still attached to his mother (Jessie Royce Landis), where her constant presence continually follows him, like a good luck charm, or is it just the opposite?  Hitchcock, on the other hand, seems to relish the pleasure of putting his star in constant jeopardy, literally twisting him into a pretzel and expecting him to become a contortionist to escape the perilous danger hovering around him, like a bad dream.  It’s a strange twist to make a spy thriller where the lead character is an innocent bystander, knowing nothing about the spy business, drawing parallels between espionage and advertising, early on heard muttering the mantra, “In the world of advertising there is no such thing as a lie.  There’s only expedient exaggeration,” yet in both worlds their ultimate success depends on their ability to manipulate and deceive others.  In this film he is continually bent out of shape, caught up in a wringer and sent through the spin cycle, continually lied to and fed disinformation, yet has to remain calm and clear-headed while under constant distress.  Grant has always been a character who remains cool under pressure, where his sophisticated dexterity with words allows him plenty of leeway, often getting him into and out of trouble, while Eva Marie Saint offers an alluring feminine counterbalance to his masculinity.  They work well together.  It’s the shadowy interjection of the Professor as a narrative device that feels weirdly off-putting and nebulous, continually recapitulating the strange plot twists for viewers and explaining things that might otherwise feel wildly convoluted, as he never really feels like part of the story, but there he is calming the waters that he has continually stirred up, always leaving Thornhill on the verge of drowning.  It’s a seductive formula, feeling more like a fantasy adventure than real life, yet the romantic elements endure, feeling hard earned and well deserved.   

Note – Hitchcock’s appearance comes early as he arrives too late for a bus, the door slammed in his face.