Showing posts with label Pedro Costa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pedro Costa. Show all posts

Sunday, November 3, 2019

Vitalina Varela





Director Pedro Costa




Costa with lead actress Vitalina Varela















VITALINA VARELA           C+                  
Portugal  (124)  2019  d: Pedro Costa            Official site [Portugal]

Defiantly different, uncompromisingly bleak, existing in a world of its own creation, it represents a kind of dream slumber, drawn almost completely from the imagination, as there’s little here people can actually relate to in their own lives, instead feeling overly literary, much of it coming from the reading of letters, long speeches bearing little resemblance to life as we know it.  Comprised of extremely long drawn-out shots, people barely move in this film, instead they sit or stand and confess their innermost thoughts on camera, shrouded almost completely in darkness, shot almost exclusively at night, with barely any light creeping in.  This is the kind of film that draws plenty of praise from critics yet produces droves of walk-outs, as there is little else in the cinema tradition that compares, leaving viewers unnerved and confused, even a bit despondent, as they want to appreciate what they don’t particularly care for.  This kind of filmmaking is so out of the mainstream that audiences should be forewarned before entering the theater, as it’s not what you suspect, and can barely be called cinema at all, instead it more closely resembles a dialogue-driven living theater, a highly individualized staged expression, where theater audiences are much more likely to endure the kinds of extremes shown with this production.  While there is a small group of admirers who know who they are, this kind of heavily stylized filmmaking is for them, conceived with film festivals in mind, with absolutely no commercial prospects whatsoever.  While there may have been 100 viewers when the film began, it was closer to 60 or 70 who stayed to the end, and far fewer who actually liked it.  Existing in its own realm, utterly uncompromising, it comes with plenty of accolades, having won the Golden Leopard Grand Prize (1st place) at the Locarno Film Festival, while also winning a Best Actress Award for the actress bearing the same name as the film title.  If you’ve seen even one of Pedro Costa’s films, then you know what to expect, as the pace of the film is exasperatingly slow.  Except for a stunningly beautiful more traditional documentary entitled NE CHANGE RIEN (Change Nothing) (2009) that is shot completely in black and white, mostly in the studio with barely any trace of movement, capturing rehearsal sessions of actress/musical performer Jeanne Balibar, though revealed in fragments, never hearing an entire song, his other films are just plain difficult, most of them shot in the reconstructed realms of the now demolished Fontaínhas housing project, a home to largely immigrant communities located just outside Lisbon.    

Costa’s films follow a group of émigré’s originally from the rocky and volcanic Cape Verde Islands, a former Portuguese colony established to serve the African slave trade, who come to the mainland to find a better life but are relegated to segregated lives in the poorest slums, living in dilapidated shacks, eking out an existence of day labor jobs that leaves them ensnared in a web of neverending poverty.  While they may originally have dreams of transporting their families, those dreams die over time, as even their language is not really Portuguese or a Cape Verdian dialect, but seems of a different world, reflective of their lost identity that dissipates even further as the futility of their displaced lives becomes even more apparent.  The dominant impression is the staged artificiality of the style, maximizing the photogenic impact of every shot by the filmmaker himself or his longtime cinematographer Leonardo Simões, where shadowy figures emerge from a darkness, lifeless and bitterly deprived, appearing like ghosts, forced to confront their grim lives, yet a vividly animated life can be heard offscreen, whether it be babies crying or dogs barking, yet what’s captured onscreen is the utter stillness and solemnity of isolated lives who are now dreadfully alone, cut off from the rest of the world, downcast and spiritually depleted.  Expanded from her earlier brief appearance in HORSE MONEY (2014), the film is based on the true story of its protagonist, the entitled character Vitalina Varela, a non-professional actress who was born on Cape Verde Island, who arrives at the airport in Lisbon three days after her husband’s funeral.  In the opening few sequences, a slow funeral parade of weary bodies weaves its way past the walls of the cemetery into the narrow alleyways of their decrepit homes while the camera follows each one of the men as they open and close the metal doors of their crumbling concrete homes, one after another, shot from a dizzying array of angles, like a choreography of doors closing, yet the collective images suggest they are sealing themselves into tomb-like coffins where they will likely die in places just like this.  Arriving several days later, Vitalina is immediately told to go home, that there is nothing for her in Portugal, signs of warning that feel just a bit disingenuous, but may represent their own struggles with self-loathing, as the rundown neighborhood is hardly a picture of success.  Her view is that she waited 25 years to get here, so she might as well stay, clearing out the empty liquor bottles from her husband’s dingy home. 

What we quickly learn is that Vitalina is a strong-willed woman of extraordinary strength and resilience.  Flashback sequences reveal she married her husband Joaquim on the island, happily building their own home brick by brick before he ventured to Lisbon seeking work, returning briefly once, but then disappeared altogether, with Vitalina learning he was in prison at some point, never knowing why, or why he never fixed the leaky roof in this ramshackle home.  What follows is a period of mourning, reduced to lengthy monologues directed at her dead husband, whose spirit looms over the entire landscape, exploring the traces he left behind while remaining embittered for all the years he left her waiting alone without sending for her.  He’s not the only casualty here, however, with men reduced to scrounging through supermarket dumpsters or salvaging scraps of metal, it’s a neighborhood where people are devoid of all hope.  Even the local priest (Ventura, a Costa regular) has lost his faith, with Vitalina remembering him from the island, aware of the excruciatingly sad circumstances that gnaw at his ailing soul, having what’s left of a tiny church with no parishioners, where she is the only one who bothers to show up.  Shot in long, unbroken shots of her dimly lit face, revealing unfathomable depths of anguish and pain, ghosts of the past comingle with the shadowy world of the present, with Vitalina speaking in soliloquies, mostly seething with anger at her husband’s  philandering ways and broken promises, struggling with her own regrets, anxieties, and grief, looking around at this godforsaken place, wondering why he stayed, addressing him mournfully, “Here there is only bitterness.  Here we are nobody.”  An underlying message in Vitalina’s embattled relationship with her husband mirrors the complex relationship Portugal has with its former colony, leaving Cape Verdian immigrants displaced from either shore, tainted by the toxic effects of the mother country that never lives up to its promise as a homeland.  The film takes a nostalgic twist at the end, emerging from the cavernous darkness into the light of day, even under openly blue skies, recalling that time she and her husband built their house together in Cape Verde.  Even if much of the film is exasperating, feeling more like a slow death march, Costa has found an original method to imprint his vision into our subconscious, literally keeping the mood of his images in our heads long after the film is over.  Add to that the somber reality of the people who inhabit this human purgatory, where much of what we remember feels like an elegy or a requiem, providing an almost classical frame for this highly individualized and in many ways unpleasant journey.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Ne Change Rien (Change Nothing)

















NE CHANGE RIEN (Change Nothing)              B                   
Portugal  France  (100 mi)  2009  d:  Pedro Costa

France especially, with the familiar sound of the accordion heard throughout the streets of Paris, at least in the movies, is a musical city, and one whose culture thrives in the familiar art of the chansons, perhaps best depicted by Édith Piaf.  One of the best film references is hearing Bernadette Lafont drown her sorrows by repeatedly listening to Piaf sing “Les Amants de Paris” (YouTube - La maman et la putain on YouTube 3:05), a 1948 recording in Eustache’s mammoth masterwork The Mother and the Whore (La Maman et la Putain) (1972).  The tradition of actors that also have singing careers is hardly unique to France, as names that come to mind are Paul Robeson, Frank Sinatra, Judy Garland, Barbra Streisand, Panamanian salsa star Rubén Blades, or even Jennifer Lopez, while French popularity calls to mind Marlene Dietrich, Jacques Brel, Yves Montand, Charles Aznavour, Françoise Hardy, Anna Karina, hell, even Gérard Depardieu played an old broken down crooner in a recent film, while any number of current European actresses also have recording careers, as it’s a lucrative business.  It might sound surprising to hear the name Jeanne Balibar mixed in with this group, as she’s considered a serious dramatic actress that works fairly regularly with Jacques Rivette, Olivier Assayas, or Arnaud Desplechin. 

Nonetheless, here she is in a documentary as a singer being filmed mostly in the studio by Portuguese director Pedro Costa, no less, an intensely challenging artist, an experimenter and stark minimalist, as anti-commercial a director as there is working today, known for his lyrical yet near documentary sense of realism depicting socially downbeat subject matter.  Typically in his films, nothing moves, as the director’s eye for film composition reveals everything the viewer needs to know.  Here as well, shot entirely in Black and White by the director himself, the camera sits completely motionless as Balibar sits in a chair or stands at a mike with a cigarette, as there is barely any sign of movement.  Amusingly a cat enters the picture midway through and provides more action than anything previously seen.  However, each frame is carefully constructed, a blend of shadow and light where the prominent themes reflect feelings that live in the dark, songs of isolation and alienation, each one immersed in a melancholic wistfulness that sounds like a hushed quiet, as Balibar doesn’t sing so much as dramatically whisper or speak her songs.

Don’t expect Jonathan Demme here, as these are not completed works ready for the stage, instead this is a behind the scenes glimpse of the punishingly endless repetition required to get it stage ready.  This is like listening to scales being played on the piano, where that’s all you get to hear, as the film is about the learning process, where guitarist/composer Rodolphe Burger seems like a driving musical force behind the operations, as the arrangements are stunning, all about tone and texture.  Balibar bravely exposes herself in preliminary phases, where at times she flubs the words, or sings flat or off key, or in one particularly hypnotic number, the title number, doesn’t even sing at all, but just hums as she can’t find the natural rhythm of the piece, despite the musicians counting out the numbers of the beat, or hearing several playbacks which focus on a different musical instrument.  Balibar’s timing does not reflect natural rhythm, as she’s continually off just a bit, which is why the endlessly repetitive rehearsal time is needed.  For the viewer, however, this can get frustrating and may strain the limits and feel excessively monotonous, as we only hear individual sections, never the whole, so there were many walk outs during the screening, where entire rows disappeared.  But the song, which we never hear in its entirety, is instead heard in various layers where either the voice or the musicians are isolated, experimenting and blending together different arrangements.  My own personal favorite was the uncredited similarity to Curtis Mayfield - Superfly (on YouTube 3:53), accentuating the soul percussive intro and the funk horn arrangement, which they most likely tossed by the end.
    
What’s especially gratifying are the musical selections themselves, as they do reflect the imagination of a cinephile and a stage dramatist, including an eclectic grouping that ranges from the muted emptiness of Nico (Jeanne Balibar - These Days on YouTube 3:58) or the smoldering sexuality of Marlene Dietrich in heavily accented English (Jeanne Balibar - Torture on YouTube 3:11), where the all inclusive cigarette is her act as Balibar is nervous and not yet comfortable with her own rendition, to an operatic number from Offenbach’s La Périchole, where a voice coach never lets her get through more than a line or two without immediate criticisms and corrections, while also offering praise where indicated, but these constant interruptions go on through the entire song, which feels, from Balibar’s view, like it will never end.  This is also shown in a live performance of some kind, but from a view behind the curtain of the piano player and a few of the singer’s backs.  This was the closest we came to a finished product, as the hauntingly sad, socially relevant Brecht Mother Courage style lyrics were especially poignant.  Perhaps the strangest choice was the eerie Peggy Lee theme to the film JOHNNY GUITAR (1954), barely recognizable in the film, offered here in an alternate take (not in the film, but on YouTube 4:07), Johnny Guitar, as opposed to previous versions Johnny Guitar (Title Song)  sung by Peggy Lee (on YouTube 3:12), or an exotic instrumental here Johnny Guitar  (on YouTube 3:17), or here Amaro Del - Johnny Guitar  (on YouTube 3:20).  For actual scenes from the film, Ne Change Rien (2005) [SHORT] 1/2 is on YouTube (6:30), where the opening song Rose (4:20) is in the film, while the rest is not.  Unlike a YouTube rendition, however, nothing in the film ever feels that complete, but instead feels like the Basement Tapes rendition of scenes on the becoming of an artist.  Never once do we feel Balibar is ready, but her quiet charm is effusive. 

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Dissolution (Hitparkut)

















DISSOLUTION  (Hitparkut)                           D                    
Israel  (88 mi)  2010  d:  Nina Menkes

While it’s immediately clear we’re in Dostoyevsky Crime and Punishment territory, shot in Black and White in long, static shots that could easily be mistaken for Béla Tarr or the marginalized territory of Pedro Costa, where the protagonist (Didi Fire) is a man of few words, and fewer friends, as he’s seen having a difficult conversation with an associate who makes him repeat what he’s trying to say, suggesting the possibility of ghosts exist, and not just because only sick people can see them, but perhaps because only in that weakened state are they allowed to be seen.  He then gets in a quick confrontation trying to avoid his landlord, has an eerie visit with a pawnbroker where he continually asks inappropriately personal questions, and also buys the cheapest meat possible from the butcher, which turns out to be cow lungs, which we see him cook up, a truly gross display of what is presumed inedible.  Shot in Israel in a mixed race neighborhood of Tel Aviv called Yafo where Arabs and Jews contentiously live side by side, where no one seems to like one another, as expressed with a car that continues to chase after Didi throughout the movie, where he’s continually seen running away.  Menkes shoots Didi in long darkened shots laying in his bed, which his landlord calls a tomb, for long periods of time, or we see him off to the side of the screen, sitting in a bar where pieces of light intermingle with the shadows, where another unidentified figure sits prominently in the center of the picture drinking alone and smoking a cigarette.  This oppressive sense of isolation is potent, especially when we see him return to the home of the pawnbroker, where we know what happens through offscreen sound, and later a pool of blood can be seen as he peruses through her personal belongings. 

Senseless murder is one thing, but this film attempts to deal with the haunting aftereffects, as if Didi is somehow punishing himself for his crime.  But there’s little evidence of this, as the mood is simply too detached, and nonprofessional Didi shows just as little afterwards as he did prior to the event, so for all practical purposes, there’s a disinterest that permeates all throughout this film.  There’s no emotional connection anywhere to be found, no underlying motivation to kill the pawnbroker, and no conceivable punishment harsh enough to fit the crime, as instead he spends his time in a self-imposed solitary confinement cut off from the rest of the world around him.  But that’s exactly as he was living beforehand, so what’s changed?  Does he become unhinged, more restlessly anxious, or panic with guilt?  The answer is no he doesn’t.  Instead the portrait is one of disconnection and alienation with the world, and not through any social stigma such as poverty or lack of education, but simply a man who is completely disconnected with himself and can find no meaning in the world.  Unfortunately, throughout the film there’s little movement, nothing to pull the audience into this picture, instead there’s a stifling stillness, as there is little evidence of trauma or psychosis, and only a scant few flashbacks or hallucination sequences showing a surrealistic or altered view of the world.  There is an intriguing final image, but everything suggests people can’t wait to get away from this man fast enough, where the impression is one of a different kind of emptiness, as his dull malaise leaves the audience wondering why they should show the slightest interest.  Dostoevsky is meant to be brooding and melancholy, miserablist even, and darkly disturbing, but this film proves the dramatic power of literature does not always transfer to the screen.