Showing posts with label Philippe Djian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philippe Djian. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Elle
















ELLE              C-                   
France  Germany  Belgium  (130 mi)  2016  ‘Scope  d:  Paul Verhoeven 

One sick fuck of a movie, one filled with disturbingly violent, adolescent male sex fantasies that degrade women, creating an ugly, highly exploitive, misogynistic atmosphere throughout, that is redeemed somewhat by a stupefyingly dark performance by Isabelle Huppert that is so over-the-top that it has comical elements, but honestly, despite all the accolades, this is a mindlessly excessive provocation that will end up doing more harm than good, as it normalizes criminal behavior, makes it blend in with normal bourgeois society where the participants often can’t tell the difference.  While that should be ridiculous, or hilarious, it is neither, as instead it sets a fatalistic tone of gloom that pervades throughout the entire picture, as if saturated by toxic air.  When considering the source, Dutch film director Paul Verhoeven, this is par for the course, as he seems to specialize in morally transgressive material, usually crossing the line into distasteful territory, where some obviously have no problem with it, but it remains surprising how something this revoltingly emptyheaded can be dressed up in arthouse production values, a stellar cast, and somehow the offensive material is considered acceptable.  Sorry, but it falls into the crassly exploitive territory, where this is one of the overrated films of the year, including Huppert’s performance, which is all show and surface texture, more a display of the grotesque, as the film has little redeeming value.  The film shows a rape scene not once, twice, or even three times, but four times, showcasing it for exploitive purposes, then immediately shifting gears, turning to Huppert’s blasé attitude afterwards, ordering sushi by phone, asking incredibly, “What is a holiday roll?,” before somehow blending rape into normalized sexual relations with people preferring a hard-edged, sadomasochistic kick in the head for their pleasure.  On top of this, the rape victim (Huppert) owns a video-game company that saturates its graphic content with increasingly violent, sadistic rape imagery that she criticizes at one point as “too timid,” where we then have to deal with the startlingly shallow, comic book personalities of the few insipid characters that create this kind of junk for a living. Before long, all of this has been mixed into an acceptable middle class attitude, where repeated rape attacks go unreported to the police, where violent sex becomes normalized in existing relationships, where the bottom line portrayal of men is so cliché driven, as if all they have is a penis, and nothing else matters or defines their character, as if this pervasive culture is contaminated by nothing but sick and disgusting men, suggesting the world would be better off without them, as who really needs them?  End of story.  And to further delineate a line of demarcation, let’s call the picture ELLE (She).  

The idea that one can tastefully trivialize and make a mockery of rape culture in glossy arthouse cinema is simply a bad idea, as is the idea of Huppert being an appropriate feminist response to violently inflicted trauma, applying vigilante justice to her perpetrator, encouraging him to do it without the mask on, as her character is too internally damaged to be relatable or believable, but again remains in the comic book world of delusion and adolescent fantasy, where the ridiculous nature of the film simply can’t be taken seriously.  Overall, people are getting sucker punched with this one.  Ostensibly a film about a middle-aged businesswoman Michèle Leblanc (Huppert), seen at the opening getting brutally raped in her own home by a man coming through the window in a ski mask dressed all in black, leaving her battered and bloodied.  But instead of going to the police, we learn she distrusts and despises them due to her past history, as her father is a convicted serial killer from the 1970’s who forced her, at the age of ten, to assist in the burning of all their belongings afterwards, where she was literally covered in ash when discovered by the police, becoming a subject of harassment, with her father serving out the rest of his life in prison, though he does have parole hearings every ten years.  Whenever her father’s infamous deeds appear in the news, Michèle is dragged through the mud as well, with the public reviling her and expressing their scorn.  As if in protest to good taste, Michèle along with her best friend Anna (Anne Consigny) are literary book editors who develop a brutally violent video-game business catering to teenage boys that exploits grotesque rape imagery, complete with ecstatic moans, appealing to the lowest element of male fantasia and delusion, which, of course, makes them highly successful, allowing her to live alone, along with her cat, in a lavish home surrounded by dozens of open windows allowing the intruder to appear.  As if to place her in a moral purgatory for which there is no escape, she is sleeping with her best friend’s husband, Robert (Christian Berkel), while separated from her own, Richard (Charles Berling), while raising an oblivious grown son who seems to have more psychological issues than anyone else in the film, which of course remain completely unaddressed.  At the same time, her elderly mother (Judith Magre) relies upon plastic surgery and paid young male escorts to make her feel young, a habit Michèle finds revolting and disgusting.  While this rapist is on the loose, he chooses to continue to send sick and twisted messages on her phone and in her bed, all of which suggest she remains a target, along with crude, mocking messages from within her own company, affixing her face to the animated female character getting raped, which is sent to the working computers of the entire staff. 

Everything described thus far is simply the set-up, the terms of the game from which Michèle must maneuver and operate in order to turn the tables and regain a position of power, changing all the locks in her home, buying a small axe and some toxic spray while taking target practice at a gun range in order to protect herself, while Verhoeven has surrounded her with a myriad of possible subjects, any one of which have a strong reason to hate her, while also protruding into her dreams, where we see various revenge scenarios playing out in her imagination.  As for Michèle herself, she thrives on other people’s discomfort, exploiting their weaknesses, developing a casual disregard for conventional morality and has no problem snooping into the computers of her coworkers searching for clues, masturbating in a Buñuelian moment while watching a neighboring couple set up a Nativity scene, reaching orgasm exactly when the lights come on, or launching into a lengthy discourse on her own personal role in her father’s infamous deeds that she relates dispassionately at a party to one of her neighbors, Patrick (Laurent Lafitte), a stock trader with a beautiful but devoutly Catholic wife, Rebecca (Virginie Efira), where she may as well be describing a list of items on a shopping list, acting as if there is nothing inappropriate about it while at the same time carefully gauging his response.  Rather than offer any relevant comment on rape or societal conventions, Verhoeven is content to see the world through the disfigured life of Michèle, a tragic figure in every respect, considering what happened to her at a young age, yet the director refuses to see her as a victim and instead uses her psychological trauma as an excuse to explore all manner of human degradation, including sexual humiliation or those who are aroused by being beaten and raped, where he is trivializing human behavior, suggesting it’s all part of a wide-ranging collection of bizarre sexual behavior, suggesting I’m OK if you’re OK, yet it’s an excuse to display sadomasochistic male fantasies onscreen, suggesting what’s taking place behind closed doors could be anything, aberrant or otherwise, suggesting it’s all part of the human face.  What this adds to any discussion on human behavior is negligible, as it’s all been done to much better effect by Olivier Assayas in Demonlover (2002), one of the few artists to examine the detrimental effects of brutally violating porn on the Internet, suggesting it goes beyond mere desensitizing but is more about dehumanization, combining the deep-seeded ramifications of a soulless Internet entity with the ruthless ambitions of capitalism.  By comparison, Verhoeven’s revenge saga is deceptively shallow and a major disappointment, working in the French language for the first time in the director’s career, reduced to an offensive onslaught of hateful and demeaning imagery, yet it is a rather faithful adaptation of the 2012 Philippe Djian novel Oh…, the same writer who wrote Betty Blue (37°2 Le Matin) (1986), an author who is extremely popular in Europe but utterly overlooked in the United States, where there are few revelations anywhere to be found that distinguish this from typical male sexist content, instead becoming an opportunity to plaster the screen with exploitation genre, fetishistic rape imagery that is meant to be shocking, all in the name of entertainment.  Perhaps Dr. Verhoeven could move into pedophilia next.     

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Betty Blue (37°2 Le Matin)
















BETTY BLUE                        A-                   
aka:  37°2 Le Matin
France  (120 mi)  1986  d:  Jean-Jacques Beineix       Director’s Cut:  (185 mi)

I had known Betty for a week ... The forecast was for storms
—Zorg (Jean-Hughes Anglade)

Roger Ebert and his ilk dismiss this as nothing more than soft-core porn disguised as an art film, listed at one time as one of his most hated films, but viewers should look further. First and foremost, this is Béatrice Dalle’s first film, an incendiary French actress who always pushes her characters to the edge and sometimes beyond, and this is no exception.  She rivals Isabelle Huppert not in the quality of films she’s made, but in finding roles that are unusually “out there” and in her devastatingly unique performances of damaged souls.  Her relationship with Jean-Hughes Anglade, as Betty and Zorg, is idealistically intense.  And as they both prance around the set naked for a good portion of the film, drinking, having sex, eating, laughing, arguing, or just enjoying one another’s company, they certainly come across as a free-spirited couple, which is telegraphed right from the outset.  Some may remember the graphic eye-opening sex scene, but what I remember is the gorgeous setting on a beach in a run down, yet idyllic beach house perfectly captured in sumptuous photography by Jean-Francois Robin.  It is a perfect sunny day where the colors couldn’t be more captivating, the tone is utterly clear and bright, and this is the setting where the audience is drawn into the lives of Betty and Zorg, a young couple that believe they were made for each other.  Also of unusual interest is the hauntingly beautiful musical theme that Zorg introduces on the piano, a simple melody that feels like it’s floating on air and recurs throughout the rest of the film, utterly gorgeous, a lilting melody we can’t seem to get out of our heads.  As it turns out, it bears a striking similarity to a similar theme used in Abderrahmane Sissako’s WAITING FOR HAPPINESS (2002), which is among the most beautiful songs I’ve ever heard, “Djôrôlen” by Oumou Sangare oumou sangare djorolen (worry anxiety) YouTube (6:43) from Mali on her 1996 album “Worotan” which was released ten years after this film.  On the film soundtrack, written by Gabriel Yared, the song is listed twice in different versions under the song names “C’est le vent, Betty” and “Bungalow Zen.”  But the simple piano melody without any elaborate orchestration expresses it best, Betty Blue (37°2 Le Matin) YouTube (2:36).

The film is based on the Philippe Djian novel 37 Degrees 2 Le Matin, a writer whose every novel according to Amazon sells a million copies in France alone, also popular in both Germany and Great Britain, but is utterly overlooked in the United States.  This is essentially a love story told in two film versions, where the shorter version accentuates Betty while the longer Director’s Cut more prominently features Zorg, a strategy also utilized in Fassbinder’s BOLWEISER (The Stationmaster’s Wife) in 1977, which similarly features a longer three hour film version of a dissolution of a marriage in two parts that accentuates the cuckolded husband (Kurt Raab in his final Fassbinder performance), eventually revised to a shorter two hour TV version that accentuates the cheating wife (Elisabeth Trissenaar).  In each case I prefer the longer versions, as the style of filmmaking is exceptionally high quality and the devastation at the end of each is ultimately more powerful with the longer, slower build up which accentuates character and mood.  The two hour version of BETTY BLUE feels like it’s rushing to its ominous conclusion, feeling somehow overwhelmed, while the director’s cut emphasizes the slowness of the recurring musical refrain alongside unbearably long silences.  No explanation is given for Betty’s sudden retreat from reality, but the audience is able to share in Zorg’s own equally bizarre mood swings which border on the surreal. 

Beineix has a painterly eye for composition, freely moving his camera around to match the mood and energy of this breezy young couple barely in their twenties, intermixing solitary houses and landscapes with populated urban street scenes along with the more intimate intermingling of faces and bodies.  Dalle and Anglade are both terrific at making their relationship feel effortless and natural with simple gestures like eye contact, embraces, body language, their shared appreciation for food and incessant humor with one another, where they are clearly inordinately close and genuinely captivated by being in love, even as Betty exhibits a volatile temper prone to acts of violence.  From the outset on the beach, remembering how Betty sauntered into that door with breathtaking sexuality and allure, one would think this had the makings of an idyllic relationship, but far from it, the film turns the tables and really features in intimate detail one of the more dysfunctional couples ever captured onscreen, as Betty’s happiness turned tortuous behavior defies comprehension, especially for the man who loves her, who’s twisted all out of sorts himself trying to cope with her outrageously difficult demands, confounded by her irrepressible beauty and childlike vulnerability.  Dalle’s Betty is the kind of woman who completely embraces life to the fullest, whose effervescent spirit and boundless energy make her the object of every man’s desire, the center of attention, a woman impossible to resist, and God created woman, leaving Zorg no choice in the matter except to love her whole-heartedly every second of every day.  It’s a mad world where nothing makes sense except being in the throes of love.  Very few films capture that “need to love” quite like this one, especially that soaring elevation where we’re suddenly left flying without a net wondering how in the world we ever got up there, completely clueless how to get back down.