Santa’s house
Thursday, December 25, 2014
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Top Five
Chris Rock, named the heir apparent to Richard Pryor early
in his career after his HBO stand-up special CHRIS ROCK: BRING THE PAIN (1996), while at age 34 he was
also named “the funniest man in America” in September 1999 by Time magazine, Seriously
Funny - TIME, which places a lot of pressure on a guy to have to be funny
all the time. With the recent suicide of
brilliant comic Robin Williams, who often joked about his addiction, or before
him Freddie
Prinze, or Richard Jeni, one looks at the troubled childhoods of so
many comedians who learn to make fun of themselves at an early age, developing
a unique ability to make others laugh, often to protect themselves from real
life traumas that haunt them throughout their lives. But imagine the weight on one’s shoulders to
be labeled the funniest man in America, where the spotlight is always going to
be pointed at you even when you least desire it. Rock has always handled his stardom
admirably, maintaining a center of balance, refusing to serve as a role model
while he satirizes and excoriates public figures onstage, as expressed in his
1997 memoir Rock This, “Why does the
public expect entertainers to behave better than everybody else? It’s ridiculous...Of course, this is just for
black entertainers. You don’t see anyone
telling Jerry Seinfeld he’s a good role model.
Because everyone expects whites to behave themselves...Nowadays, you’ve
got to be an entertainer and a leader.
It’s too much.” In the open and
freewheeling observational style of Lenny Bruce and Richard Pryor, comedians
are actors and stand-up entertainers that offer scorching social commentary,
off color jokes, biting satire, and personal autobiographical revelations while
also challenging the limits of free speech. All the best comedians go through a comedy
circuit where they do bits and pieces of their stand-up routines in small
clubs, which seems to be the Holy Grail of comedy, as it receives far greater
adulation and acclaim for actually being funny than movie roles, where Woody
Allen has made over 70 motion pictures, but people still persist in believing that
his earliest movies that were the closest to his stand-up routines were his
funniest.
To his credit, Rock loves all comedians, past and present,
where he’s probably stolen from the best of them, but he continues to showcase his
own unique flair onscreen, where his stream-of-conscious style of outrageous
humor is simply hilarious, and this film, which he writes, directs, and stars
in front of the camera, bears some autobiographical resemblance to Woody
Allen’s Stardust
Memories (1980), where Allen’s character Sandy Bates is a highly successful
film director known for making hilarious comedies, but confesses, “I don’t want
to make funny movies any more, they can’t force me to. I don’t feel funny. I look around the world and all I see is human
suffering.” In Rock’s film, his
character Andre Allen interestingly reveals he was high or drunk at the height
of his professional comedy career, and now that he’s sober, the world doesn’t
appear so damn funny anymore. Trying to
make more of a positive difference, he makes a serious film where he plays a Django
Unchained style, real-life historical figure Dutty Boukman, the leader of a Haitian slave rebellion
called UPRIZE, where he’s hoping to make a serious statement without comedy,
but it’s flopping miserably as all anyone wants to talk about is Hammy, a
crime-fighting bear, a character that he played in three successive blockbuster
films, the last one grossing about $600 million dollars, even though he’s done
with the role, insisting upon moving on, but reporters aren’t the least bit
interested in his sidestepping their questions, knowing their readers can’t get
enough of Hammy. Shot in New York, where
much of the film is openly walking down the streets, fixated cries of “Hammy!”
can be heard throughout, much like the “Birdman” calls in Birdman
or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014). No matter how much these guys try to ignore
their past, it follows them everywhere, like an embarrassing nickname or a foul
rumor they can’t shed, but the real surprise of the film is the complexity of
the role written for Rosario Dawson as New
York Times journalist Chelsea Brown, who spends a day following Allen
around in order to write an extended profile piece on his life. While he’s obviously at a crossroads in his
life and career, where all the tabloids are writing about his upcoming marriage
to be broadcast live on Bravo with
Reality TV star Erica Long (Gabrielle Union), seemingly matching the pattern of
co-producer Kanye West’s marriage to Kim Kardashian, but what’s most intriguing
is that Dawson’s more complicated life is exposed right alongside his own, a
beautiful contrast to the vapid imagery seen in tabloid journalism, creating
one of her best, most down-to-earth and intelligent roles since Spike Lee’s 25th
HOUR (2002).
Actually, the complexity of the secondary roles is equally
outstanding, from his loyal bodyguard and chauffeur, JB Smooth as Silk, who’s
been his longtime friend since childhood, to the outlandishly freakish role of
Cedric the Entertainer as Jazzy Dee, the underground black market mayor of
Houston, the guy who can procure anything, anytime, anywhere, where he’s also
like a Get Out of Jail Free card, even though hanging around with him is what
gets your ass thrown in jail in the first place, where in any other movie his
scene-stealing antics would be the highlight, but this film features an
overabundance of stars. Kevin Hart’s
scene as Andre’s manager is equally hilarious, where over the phone the two get
into an N-word contest, where they delve into the idea of a black man getting
into trouble for calling another black man the N-word, which unleashes a
barrage of expletives that could only exist in black culture. Perhaps the highlight of the film is when
Andre brings Chelsea into the housing project where he grew up, where we meet
Ben Vereen as his alcoholic father and Sherri Shepherd as his mother, where his
old friends from the neighborhood are like a who’s who of black stand-up
comedy, including Tracy Morgan (before his recent accident), Jay Pharoah, Hassan
Johnson, and Leslie Jones, all playing to the journalist, each stepping all
over the other to try to offer the real dirt on Andre, where it’s the only
scene where the nonstop laughter feels so authentically natural, as this group
takes such pleasure in teasing and ribbing one other, where it feels like
they’ve been doing it for years, with the group wondering whether Tupac
Shakur would be a U.S. Senator today had he lived, or maybe, as Andre
suggests, he just might be “playing the bad, dark-skinned boyfriend in a Tyler
Perry movie.” It’s here that they happen
upon the theme of the top five rappers of all time, which is like the listing
for a nonexistent black hall of fame, yet each distinct choice offers an eye
into each personality, as it’s like defining what it is to be black. Within the context of this enveloping humor,
there’s a surprisingly effective “smallness” brought into the film that simply
hones in on Andre and Chelsea walking through the streets of New York while
opening up about their lives, offering some of the more astute insight into
alcoholism, where part of the recovery program is “rigorous honesty.” Chelsea’s shrewd insight into her own life,
remaining honest and forthright throughout, but also flirtatious and funny, is
the unexpected star of the film. While
initially the two protect themselves with lies and carefully guarded secrets,
but as the film progresses the guard comes down and what we’re treated to is an
unexpectedly smart and comically inventive film that veers into an equally
clever relationship movie that feels extremely close to the real Chris Rock,
which as we all know is nothing short of amazing.
Labels:
alcoholism,
Cedric the Entertainer,
Chris Rock,
comedy,
Gabrielle Union,
JB Smooth,
Kevin Hart,
prison,
Richard Pryor,
romance,
Rosario Dawson,
satire,
stream-of-conscious,
Woody Allen
Sunday, December 21, 2014
The Imitation Game
Alan Turing (left) and actor Benedict Cumberbatch
Alan Turing at age 16
Sometimes it is the
people who no one imagines anything of, who do the things that no one can
imagine.
Morton Tyldum is the Norwegian director of Headhunters
(Hodejegerne) (2011), a stylish crime thriller running on high octane that
treats the audience to a savagely vicious world of unleashed villainy, while
here he exposes one of the dark secrets of Great Britain’s past, their
ill-advised persecution of the one man that nearly single-handedly invented a
machine that decrypted the German messages in World War II and helped the
Allies win the war. While most of us
didn’t read about this in our history books, that’s because the information
remained classified for the next 50 years.
The subject of the film is the great British mathematician Alan Turing,
a brilliantly educated gay man of genius (modestly comparing himself poorly to
the academic exploits of Einstein in the film) who devised a number of
groundbreaking techniques for breaking German codes. Winston Churchill said Turing made the single
biggest contribution to the Allied victory in the war against Nazi Germany,
where historians now believe he may have helped advance the end of the war by
two years and in the process save 14 million lives. Despite his status as a war hero (which was
not recognized publicly due to continued government secrecy), Turing was prosecuted
for homosexuality in 1952, which remained against the law in Britain
until decriminalization in the mid 60’s.
In something out of Kubrick’s A
Clockwork Orange (1971), as an alternative to prison, he accepted what
amounts to chemical castration by taking female hormone injections, dying two
years later at the age of 41 from self-inflicted suicide by cyanide poisoning. It took until 2009 for Prime Minister Gordon
Brown to make an official government apology for “the appalling way he was
treated,” while the Queen also granted him a posthumous pardon in 2013. Based on the Andrew Hodges book, Alan Turing:
The Enigma, which he began writing in 1977, released in 1983, it’s
interesting that the book was written by a mathematician, currently a Research
Fellow of Wolfson College at Oxford University,
where his interest developed from his similar background, but also from his
participation in the gay liberation movement of the 1970’s.
Despite his notoriety today, Turing remained a mysterious
figure during his lifetime, a man shrouded in secrecy, where MI6 Secret
Intelligence Agent Stewart Menzies (Mark Strong) points out he would have been
a perfect candidate as a spy, telling him he was exactly the man he hoped he
would turn out to be when he recruited him.
The film is told during three periods of his life, his teenage schooldays,
wartime service, and his final years in the early 1950’s, continually moving
back and forth in time, opening with the scratchy recording of the 1939 radio
broadcast of King George VI declaring war on Germany, which is the same speech
from Tom Hooper’s Academy Award winning picture THE KING’S SPEECH (2010). As that film relied upon a superb performance
by Colin Firth as the stuttering King, this does the same with Benedict
Cumberbatch as the brilliant Turing, where what both films have in common is
they are handsome, well-made, informative, dignified, yet also exceedingly
bland. While this is a highly unconventional
subject matter, the film itself couldn’t be more safely conventional, where any
reference to homosexuality has been so deeply eliminated and hidden from view,
mentioned only through coded references, that this could easily pass for a
Disney film. In other words, it helps if
you’re familiar with the subject matter ahead of time, as there is little
mention of actually “being” gay. This is
a far cry from the dreaded anguished realms of Hell described by impeccably
educated, Catholic-bred, fellow Brit Terence Davies in his intensely personal
ode to his hometown of Liverpool, Of
Time and the City (2008), a much more emotionally devastating work where he
bashes the Catholic Church for instilling in him an overwhelming sense of fear
and guilt while growing up gay, eventually rejecting the church altogether,
where he admittedly now lives an asexual lifestyle. Turing, unfortunately, never survived to
appreciate the benefits of his own tiresome efforts, where he basically
invented an initial model for what we now commonly call computers. Had he survived the socially repressive era
of the 50’s, he would be lauded and celebrated on a number of fronts today, and
while hardly the definitive Alan Turing film, leaving out huge gaps in his
life, hopefully this is not the last word on the subject.
Certainly the main problem with the film is the detached
unlikability of the main character as he works in near isolation at Bletchley
Park, a secret British cryptography unit at the Government Code and Cypher
School that was formed to crack Germany’s Enigma
machine code, where despite the horrors that are foisted upon him early in
life, including being brutally bullied by others at school, he remains
unsympathetic throughout because of the routine way he’s so dismissive of
others, His callous disregard for other
people, particularly during wartime when nerves are already on edge from
nightly bombings, is beyond offensive and near psychotic. While the film attributes it to how much
smarter he is than others, his hubris and extreme arrogance are symptomatic of
deeper psychological problems that are left unexplored. Instead, the film counterbalances his
sneering coldness with a warmhearted figure in Keira Knightley as his sole
friend, Joan Clarke, a woman he hires because of her own brilliance in solving
puzzles. But she provides all the social
etiquette that he’s incapable of, which includes graciously smiling and being
friendly, while Turing criticizes and belittles the ineffectiveness of his
coworkers while continually alienating them.
His indifference is reminiscent of Stephen Hawking’s portrayal in The
Theory of Everything (2014), who is seen in a much more positive light
through the loving eyes of his wife whose book was adapted for the film. Except for those private moments when Turing
is seen with Clarke, he is almost exclusively alone, though the person having
the greatest impact on his life was his only friend at Sherborne
School, Christopher Morcom (Jack Banner), his first love, where the two
were the smartest students in class, but his untimely death from tuberculosis
shattered Turing’s religious faith, sparking a career as a mathematician,
logician, cryptanalyst, and computer scientist, but also the idea of whether a
machine might contain the intelligence of a human being, where he named his
code-breaking machine after Christopher, while also inventing the “Turin test,”
or “Imitation game,” a series of questions designed to determine whether you
were speaking to a person or a “thinking” machine. Near the end of his life Turing is portrayed
as a lone eccentric, having lost all his family and friends, where all that’s
left is Christopher looming inside his apartment taking up an entire wall, like
a place of worship, or the monolith in Kubrick’s 2001:
A Space Odyssey (1968), where the accompanying music by Alexandre Desplat
might actually be described as exalting.
Turing’s life was portrayed earlier by Derek Jacobi in a
made-for-television movie called BREAKING THE CODE (1996), and who can forget
Dougray Scott as the tortured codebreaker in a fictionalized version, with Kate
Winslet and Jeremy Northram along for window dressing in ENIGMA (2001), but
this Hollywood version with Cumberbatch offering the intellectualized,
award-worthy performance will have a much greater impact. It’s been a banner year for science in
movies, with portrayals of real life scientists Alan Turing and Stephen Hawking, and let’s not
forget the fictionalized NASA pilot turned space traveler Cooper (Matthew
McConaughey) in Interstellar
(2014).
Labels:
Alan Turing,
Alexandre Desplat,
Benedict Cumberbatch,
Bletchley Park,
bullying,
computer,
Enigma machine,
gay,
guilt,
Keira Knightley,
Kubrick,
Morton Tyldum,
suicide,
Terence Davies,
World War II
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Once Upon a Time Verônica (Era uma vez eu, Verônica)
ONCE UPON A TIME VERÔNICA (Era uma vez eu, Verônica) C
Brazil France (91 mi)
2012 d: Marcelo Gomes
The problems inherent with this film are reflective of the
current lackluster state of malaise in the Brazilian film industry overall which
seemingly lags behind the quality of other major Latin American cinema cultures
at the moment, where Mexico (Carlos Reygadas, Guillermo del Toro, Alejandro
González Iñárritu, Alfonso Cuarón, Francisco Vargas, Fernando Eimbcke, and Amat
Escalante) and Argentina (Lisandro Alonso, Lucretia Martel, Fabián Bielinsky, Adrián
Caetano, Carlos Sorín, Albertina Carri, Martín Rejtman, and Pablo Trapero) in
particular lead the way, but even the smaller film industries of Chile, and
perhaps even Cuba, Uruguay, and Peru are producing more innovative films than
Brazil, where the variance in quality is rather sizeable, subject to horrendously
bad movies featuring “Telenova” actors, others copying the latest aesthetic of indie
style films, while billionaire producer Walter Salles wields considerable power
and influence after the critical success of CITY OF GOD (2002) over a decade
ago, but the films he has written, directed or produced in the past ten years
have often just been bad films, where he tends to choose topical issues but the
focus is on artificiality and surface qualities, often relying upon nude scenes,
rarely getting under the surface into complex character development. CINEMA, ASPIRINS AND VULTURES (2005), an
earlier film by Marcelo Gomes premiered at the Un Certain Regard section of
Cannes, but this film, despite a brave effort by lead actress Hermila Guedes as
the title character Verônica, a psychologist working at a public hospital, is
ridiculously simplistic and an insult to the mental health profession in its
lackadaisical presentation. Even the
sitcom television comedy The Bob Newhart
Show (1972 – 78) offered greater respect and in depth insight for patients
showing signs of depression and various other psychological ailments than this
film, even though a good part of it is realistically shot during treatment
sessions.
Opening and closing on a swirling montage of nude bathers at
the beach, Verônica is seen as one of the party revelers, where the continual
movement of bodies and camera are woven into an orgiastic frenzy of sexual
freedom, becoming a dreamy image of personal liberation that may only be a
fantasy, especially as the camera then moves indoors to a couple having sex, where
the bodies exist in an impressionistic mosaic of nudity, but other than
cliché’d verbal responses, it’s hard to find any real passion in the room. Afterwards, as if sizing herself up in the
mirror, Verônica speaks into a handheld tape recorder and offers detached,
diary-like thoughts about her impassive state of mind, identifying herself in
the third person, “Patient: Verônica. Had some great sex last night. Or at least she thinks she did.” This recurring motif describes the adolescent
self-absorption of her thoughts, continually calling attention to herself, but
also the lack of any real insight into her own character. In a Grey’s
Anatomy (2005 – present) moment, Verônica is seen celebrating with other
members of her graduating class from medical school in Recife, where
what’s immediately apparent is the difference between book knowledge and patient
knowledge, as she’s thrust into the sprawling overcrowded population of
patients waiting to be seen in a public hospital, where it’s hard to believe
she’s actually “helping” anyone.
Nonetheless she walks past this ever expanding line of patients to get
to her office each day, where a variety of ailments present themselves to her,
but realistically she always feels like a fish out of water, as there’s little
actual interaction with patients when all she does is sit there writing
prescriptions all day. Away from work,
she spends the majority of her time with her elderly father (W.J. Solha), a
retired banker with a love for listening to old Brazilian records, but whose
declining health worries her, seen tenderly taking care of him even though his
continual advice for his daughter is to head for the beach or go out with
friends and live her own life instead of being stuck with him.
The one constant throughout is Verônica resorting to sex as
the only outlet for all her internal struggles, spending most of the time with
her boyfriend Gustavo (João Miguel), but she continues to express self-doubts,
offering vacuous comments like “I, patient Verônica, uncertain about life, like
everybody else.” She even seems to
believe she has a heart of stone, as she freely has sex with others as well and
has difficulty making emotional commitments.
You get the feeling that every aspect of her life is self-analyzed, that
perhaps the only reason she became a psychiatrist was to analyze herself, as
she remains indifferent to everyone else except her father, the one man she can
depend on. The dreary and downbeat tone
at work and in her life feels monotonous and suffocating, growing even worse
when she discovers her father is dying, but this is contrasted by street scenes
of the two of them walking slowly through Recife recalling past memories while
a blossoming vitality of life exists all around them. When they’re forced to move to a new
location, due to needed building repairs, it’s a rather overt metaphor for
having to rebuild their own lives. Real
life is overly grim, where there’s simply nothing to lure the audience into
this perpetual aloofness except the sensuousness of the music heard throughout,
where in Verônica’s early onset midlife crisis she has thoughts of becoming a
professional singer. While this seems
little more than a dream, it does give the director an excuse to film whatever
passes through her head, resorting to multiple sex scenes as well as a
nightclub singer singing one of those songs you can’t seem to get out of your
head, that Verônica actually sings to one of her disgruntled patients, “It’s
all standardized in our hearts/ Our way of loving doesn’t seem to be ours at
all/ Forever moving love to a new address.”
This shifting focus of attention and inability to concentrate on
anything except the sensuousness of the beach, sex, music, and dreams does
reflect the Brazilian state of mind, as if stuck in a reverie, but in this film
she’s imprisoned by it.
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Into the Woods (2014)
Into the woods,
It’s time to go,
I hate to leave,
I have to, though.
Into the woods-
It’s time, and so
I must begin my journey.
It’s time to go,
I hate to leave,
I have to, though.
Into the woods-
It’s time, and so
I must begin my journey.
Into the woods
And through the trees
To where I am
Expected ma’am,
Into the woods
To Grandmother’s house-
And through the trees
To where I am
Expected ma’am,
Into the woods
To Grandmother’s house-
—Little Red Riding Hood (Lilla Crawford)
When you’re dead,
you’re dead. —The Witch (Meryl Streep)
One of the most beloved musicals in the Sondheim repertoire,
one that inverts the childlike innocence of fairy tales, ingeniously combining
several classic fairy tales into a single story, Cinderella, Little Red Riding Hood, Rapunzel, and Jack and the Beanstalk, allowing
tragedy, heartache, and death to intrude, creating a post apocalyptic feel that
mirrors today’s post 9/11 world where unspeakable horrors continue to plague
and traumatize a harrowed worldwide population, especially each new generation
of children. Originally opening on
Broadway on November 5, 1987, the production won three Tony Awards, Best Score
(Sondheim), Best Book (or Story, James Lapine), and Best Actress in a Musical
(Joanna Gleason as the Baker’s wife) in a year dominated by The Phantom of the Opera, winner of seven Tony awards, becoming
the longest running Broadway show in history.
While the original film version, Into
the Woods (1991), directed by Lapine was simply filming a live performance
of the original Broadway cast in front of an audience, the original singers are
far superior, especially Bernadette Peters, who simply exudes greater complexity,
bringing more humor and anguished personality into the Witch, while the comic
timing throughout is more free flowing as well, but this is a much more
entertaining version as the camera isn't so suffocatingly confined to fixed
positions, though the direction does feel distracting at times. More importantly, in both productions the
Sondheim complexity really does shine through, where the theatrical experience
is not only among the best Sondheim productions of his entire career, rivaling West Side Story (1957) and Company (1970), but among the most
transforming theatrical experiences ever.
Nonetheless, the film underwent many changes to be brought to the screen
by Disney, which will invariably be questioned, especially by Sondheim purists
who wouldn’t change a thing, but it does streamline a three-hour production,
with an Intermission, into a two-hour film.
First off, it eliminates about ten songs, including two new songs
written by Sondheim specifically for the film that were also dropped. Additionally, there is no narrator standing
off to the side of the stage, which is seen as more of a theatrical device, instead
the narration is provided by the Baker (James Corden) from the opening scene,
which adds a bit of symmetry as he is again telling a story at the end of the
movie.
While Into
the Woods (1991) *is* the definitive stage version, after the passing of 25
years, perhaps it’s due for a reassessment.
It’s worth noting that the legendary Bob Fosse took the stage version of
Cabaret and completely changed it for
the film, which won 8 Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Best Director, beating
out Francis Ford Coppola in the process for THE GODFATHER (1972), Best Actress,
and Best Supporting Actor. Fosse cut two
major characters, remade the lead into an American, and cut most of the
material except for the songs in the nightclub, and for that the man is
considered a genius. Comparatively
speaking, these are only minor alterations, none of which change the tone of
the original, except perhaps it’s darker, as none of the characters who are
killed off return to the stage for a rousing final number before the curtain
falls. As something of a quest movie, the
opening ten minutes or so are a rush of exhilaration built around a single
musical theme of “Into the Woods,” which introduces the central characters, the
childless Baker (Corden) and his wife (Emily Blunt, probably the best thing in
the entire show), who have been cursed by the Witch (Meryl Streep in a less
comic, much meaner version), who has herself been cursed into ugliness, demanding
that they retrieve certain items to reverse the spell in order to conceive a
child, where they continue to interact with other storybook characters
throughout their journey. Nearby the
poor and not so bright farm boy Jack (Daniel Huddlestone) is scolded by his
mother (Tracey Ullman) when he hesitates to take his best friend, a cow named
Milky White, to the market for needed money, while Cinderella (Anna Kendrick)
is continually humiliated and mistreated at home as she dreams of attending the
luxurious Prince’s ball, but visiting her sick grandmother is Little Red Riding
Hood (Lilla Crawford) who gathers as many cookies from the Baker as she can,
stuffing them into a basket before she skips along into the woods, meeting a
devious wolf (Johnny Depp) who has other ideas along the way. Often you can’t really tell where one musical
number ends and another begins, continually moving in and out of dialogue,
where film allows much of the story to be told in flashback, something you
can’t do on stage.
Stage shows are notoriously difficult to bring to the
screen, where Sondheim’s earlier A LITTLE NIGHT MUSIC (1977) fell short of
audience’s expectations, while Tim Burton’s dark-themed SWEENEY TODD (2007) had
flashes of brilliance but catered to a distinct few, quickly leaving the
theaters after a short run. But unlike
earlier failed attempts, like CAMELOT (1967) or MAN OF LA MANCHA (1972), the
inspiring magic of the Sondheim source material remains intact and can be
enthralling, especially for those experiencing it for the first time. The film is an alluring mix of absurdism and
childhood fantasy with real life themes, where the stark seriousness can catch
unsuspecting viewers off guard, yet the beauty of the music can literally be
enchanting. There’s a broad attempt to
turn this into a Shakespearean Midsummer
Night’s Dream, an exotic place where a little magic dust gets everything
mixed up, including the two Prince Charmings, Star Trek’s
Chris Pine as Cinderella’s Prince and Billy Magnussen as Rapunzel’s Prince,
both hamming it up to excessively vulgar and distasteful delight while singing
“Agony” like a cologne advertising shoot along some artificial waterfalls, each
complaining bitterly about the difficulties encountered in their attempts at
romance, eventually marrying their destined fairybook sweethearts before time
creates a rift between them, where both cheat on their wives with little to no
remorse. This incident in particular
plagues the Baker’s wife, succumbing to the Prince’s charms in a momentary
lapse of reason, who feels as if a kind of madness has taken over, as the world
around her is quickly coming apart at the seams before she finally comes to her
senses, but it’s too late, a victim of the unpredictable violence of the
times. The film retains the brilliance
of the original story, which has not only a fascinating interplay between
what’s real and what’s imagined, but has another interesting dynamic where
children are seen through the eyes of Little Red Riding Hood and Jack, while
the emphasis on the Bakers shifts the importance to the views of expectant
parents, where the disasters occurring throughout reflect a kind of imaginary
world that they both need to navigate their way through together. When the Witch sings “Stay with Me” to her
daughter Rapunzel as she’s about to leave with her Prince, it’s one of the best
songs about parental loss ever written.
Perhaps more emphasized in the film are the anxieties associated with
parenthood, where the Baker encounters the spirit of his father more as a
reflection of his own fear of fatherhood, which is paralleled later near the
end when the Baker encounters the spirit of his dead wife, offering him tender
but encouraging words of advice about his ability to handle such a complex
situation on his own.
Perhaps no contemporary American composer has broken more
rules than Sondheim, who views humankind as potentially problem solving. To that end, the opening is stuffed full of
complicated situations, with each character drawn into this internal whirlwind
of the story. But as the film
progresses, the concept of time expands with age, becoming more contemplative,
where the marvel of the story is how the characters interact with one another,
where their shared conflicts help them grow as they ask questions about what to
do. According to Mark Eden Horowitz’s Sondheim on Music: Minor Details and Major
Decisions, “wishing” is the key character in Into the Woods, wishing for love, for a child, for understanding,
which connects the characters not only to one another but to the audience. The initial fantasies are elaborated upon
through a sophisticated musical score that initially charms and delights before
growing more somberly reflective.
Sondheim was himself abandoned by his father at age ten and had a
psychologically abusive mother, eventually becoming an institutionalized child
having little contact with his original family.
When his mother died in 1992, Sondheim did not attend the funeral. This dark world of feeling abandoned and
disconnected from the world around you is the setting of the film, where the
songs literally bring the viewer inside these fragile moments of tragedy and
personal loss that become nothing less than heartbreaking in the song “No One
Is Alone,” No One Is Alone
by Bernadette Peters - YouTube (5:15), where Cinderella, separated from her
Prince, comforts Little Red Riding Hood while the Baker, who has lost his wife,
consoles Jack after he’s lost his mother.
The film is preoccupied by the tragedy of the times we live in, which
has become a much more unstable and threatening world. Visited by the spirits of the ones they (and
we) have lost, it’s the Witch who uncannily sees through this myriad of missed
connections, unraveling lives and broken dreams, and as if in a haze delivers
one of the most hauntingly beautiful songs, “Children Will Listen,” Children Will Listen by
Bernadette Peters - YouTube (3:05), that somehow magically and triumphantly
reconnects us all to each other, from one generation to the next, literally
transforming this fairy tale about inexplicable loss into a transcendent passion
play on love, forgiveness, and human redemption.
Labels:
Anna Kendrick,
apocalypse,
Bernadette Peters,
character study,
death,
dream,
Emily Blunt,
fairy tale,
illusion,
love,
Meryl Streep,
musical,
post 9/11,
redemption,
Rob Marshall,
Stephen Sondheim,
transcendence
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)