Showing posts with label Julia Stiles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Julia Stiles. Show all posts

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Hustlers









Samantha Barbash




Samantha Barbash and Jennifer Lopez




Roselyn Keo and Constance Wu




Jennifer Lopez on the set













HUSTLERS                C                    
USA  (110 mi)  2019  ‘Scope  d:  Lorene Scafaria                  Official Site

Chris Rock once claimed in his stand-up comedy routine that “As a father, you have only one job to do:  Keep your daughter off the pole!...If she’s dancin’ on a pole, you fucked up!”  What he was talking about is the subject of this film, though glamorized and viewed with a sense of female empowerment, much of which can be traced back to Jennifer Beals in FLASHDANCE (1983), a glorified crowd pleaser.  Throw Jennifer Lopez into the mix and we have another titillating experience that sensualizes the art of pole dancing, given the glamor treatment, somehow making it chic, transforming prostitution into a Vegas act of girl power.  Not sure any of this ever meets the bar of relevancy, feeling more like a fairy tale, but it’s designed to be another audience pleaser.  The main problem with commercial filmmaking is that it follows trends instead of staking out new material, where this is an attempt at political correct filmmaking, adding a female writer/director, supposedly offering a female’s perspective, but the film feels exactly like a male-written movie, the only difference being women are committing the crimes instead of men, where they are basically interchangeable.  Even though inspired by real events, it’s like watching a female mafia, as they have no moral values, where it’s all about making money, and when they get caught, they justify their behavior by claiming everybody does it.  This is exactly how criminals think, believing the world is filled with cheaters, so why not take advantage when given the chance?  Designed purely for commercial entertainment, there’s nothing about this film, and that includes the performances, that rise above the fray, as it never introduces any element of complexity and is instead content to play by the numbers, where it’s little more than conventional filmmaking, demonstrating no cinematic flair, looking more like an extended music video  It’s kind of a weird film in that it doesn’t generate fun or excitement, like the big personality Rat Pack stealing money from the Las Vegas coffers, delving instead into a sleazy, male-dominated business that couldn’t be more corrupt, as strip clubs aren’t glamorous, they’re dark and depressing places, where it’s about throwing your money away just about as fast as you can spend it, where the amoral actions of the female lead characters are simply deplorable, drugging people with the intent to make them forget whatever happened, basically stealing their credit cards for trumped up charges, where it’s highway robbery in the form of kidnapping, as you knock them out for a few hours with the sole purpose of robbing them blind, like the ultimate date rape crime.  There’s nothing fun about this, as it’s a contemptible crime performed by half-naked women dressed in glamorous designer outfits, made to look like they’re being clever, but it’s an utterly revolting practice, just another selfish, get rich quick scheme that takes people for suckers, ultimately leaving a sour taste in one’s mouth. Equally relevant, the real-life women being portrayed in this film didn’t receive compensation from the movie, so the film steals their lives, portrays them onscreen, inaccurately, by the way, and then pays them nothing.  There’s something underhanded about that which deserves to be mentioned.         

Inspired by an original article written by Jessica Presser in New York magazine December 28, 2015, The Hustlers at Scores -- The Cut, the film transfers this device into the movie, where the actions are presented as a flashback from an interview given to an investigative journalist, though the reason for the interview is never clear, as she’s revealing information about a group of strippers gone rogue, operating their own criminal ring on the side, using drugs to knock out their clients, taking as much from their credit cards as was humanly possible, all without having any sex and very little work, where the actual science involved was finding the right guy to fleece, serving him a single drink with a group of attractive women dressed to the nines, treating him like a king, getting his hopes up about the wonderful time he’s about to have, and then sucker punch him, believing this kind of set-up is an actual business transaction, though it’s theft, perhaps something this group of women wouldn’t want published, where talking to the press seems like an act of betrayal, a she’s basically ratting out herself and her friends with nothing apparently to gain.  As it turns out the reporter talked to more than one of the girls, but it’s never clear why they exposed themselves to the public, airing all their dirty laundry in public.  Perhaps they were proud of themselves, thinking they were so deviously clever.  This is equally confusing in the film, making little sense, though without these personal revelations there’d be no material for the film, which might have worked better portraying a completely fictional group of scam artists, leaving out the interviews.  Instead what we have is a group of former strippers fed up with a system designed purely to exploit the girls, where the men running the clubs made all the money, deciding instead to turn the tables on the clients by excluding the strip clubs as the middle men and sharing all of the profits themselves.  Even if it turns out to be grand larceny, these women think the men have it coming, as they’re mostly super aggressive Wall Street types with money coming out of their ears, where degrading women is their stock and trade, so they simply reverse engineer a system designed to steal all their money based upon a fictitious evening’s entertainment that never materializes.  For this kind of film to become a popular sensation only reveals the extent of our moral abyss and our fascination with narcissism, as this kind of one-way, self-serving behavior, whether initiated by men or women, is simply revolting, mirroring the actions of entertainer Bill Cosby, currently serving 3 to 10 years for his extensive date rape practice of drugging women, though we have seen this sort of thing before, in Mary Harron’s over-the-top use of surreal horror in American Psycho (2000) or Scorsese’s The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), both of which demonstrated much more cinematic flair than this film, as did Steve McQueen’s Widows (2018), where this has much more in common with Sofia Coppola’s equally airheaded celebrity worship in The Bling Ring (2013).

At the film’s center is Constance Wu as Dolores aka Destiny (modeled after Roselyn Keo, who in reality was the business mastermind, not the innocent projected here), a single mom who takes up stripping to support her family, becoming mesmerized by watching the performance of a seasoned pro, Jennifer Lopez as Ramona Vega (modeled after Samantha Barbash, aka Samantha Foxx, aka Miss Foxita), who commands attention with a pole routine that produces maximum results, drawing plenty of attention (and money) from the men, even though she’s a decade older than most of the girls, who she mentors, showing them the ropes, taking Destiny under her wing, actually developing a routine together, becoming her personal trainer and choreographer.  Adding to this collective is Cardi B as Diamond, a Bronx-born stripper loosely based on her own stripping career, who also helps to mentor Destiny, Kiki Palmer as Mercedes (modeled after Marsi Rosen), and Lili Reinhart as Annabelle (modeled after Karina Pascucci), the latter two joining Destiny in Ramona’s inner circle after she hatches a plan to steal thousands of dollars from their clients.  The investigative journalist is Julia Stiles (modeled after Jessica Presser).  With the film essentially highlighting the rise and fall of Destiny, we see the film through her eyes, adding a personal narration about getting into the business, establishing some degree of success and economic independence before the economic disaster in 2008 when the stock market collapse left half of Wall Street unemployed.  Having to reinvent their careers when the club business went dead, with girls resorting to prostitution instead of dance acts, desperate times called for desperate measures, resorting to a powdered substance spiking a customer’s drink, a combination of ecstasy, creating a dreamlike reverie, and ketamine, an animal tranquilizer that makes them forget, often ending up totally blacked out, with the girls ringing up fictitious charges on their credit cards before sending them home in a cab.  “Easy peasy,” as Ramona describes it, an untraceable crime that leaves the men too humiliated and embarrassed to do anything about it, as most are married men with families, or have high profiles where this kind of information will never be made public.  Initially it works like a charm, but they get greedy, hiring more girls, some of whom are unreliable or on drugs, as they extend their operations.  Instead of leaving something for a follow-up scam, they take it all, emptying accounts for the credit card maximum, like $50,000, which would be considered a gold mine, quickly using up their best clientele, forcing them into more dangerous territory, reaching into the unknown.  While the camaraderie of the women is the centerpiece of the film, it mostly features the friendship of Ramona and Destiny, though we never learn much about any of the women, as there’s not a lot of character development, instead this accentuates the murky atmosphere of the clubs and the scantily clad women who work there, growing euphoric at what they’ve discovered, a way to get rich by barely doing any work at all, though Ramona (in real life it was Destiny) is viewed as a master at getting the personal details needed for credit card transactions, which might include passwords or security questions.  While it’s given the sleek look of a well-executed scam, using slow-motion to accentuate each of the women, with wall-to-wall music, there’s no covering up the fact that what they’re doing can destroy lives.  Nonetheless, they maintain their position that these men are assholes who deserve done to them what they routinely do to others, no regrets, no questions asked.  While it’s presented as a breezy, lightweight comedy, by the end, with the cops reluctantly breaking the case (from a tape recording by one of the clients), Destiny starts to reflect on what she’s done, yet there’s never any sense of remorse, leaving a dull empty feeling afterwards, never providing a hint of complexity or a sense that any of this matters.  For a much better film, view Andrea Arnold’s revelatory and much more emotionally devastating American Honey (2016).

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Silver Linings Playbook














SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK        B+                  
USA  (117 mi)  2012  ‘Scope  d:  David O. Russell                  Official site

Winner of the People’s Choice Award at the Toronto Film Festival and the Audience Award at Austin, this is another candidate for the feel good movie of the year, where mainstream audiences will love the quirky romance with a happy ending, while cinephiles will love the originality of the characters and the honesty of the script, as this is a compelling story that uses contrivances like good luck charms, not afraid to make the most of oddball plot twists, with terrific performances, excellent musical choices and solid direction, where the ensemble cast shines throughout.  Nonetheless, initially this story only goes so far, something of a portrait of an eccentric, following the exploits of an excitable young man, Bradley Cooper as Pat, a guy that became unhinged when he saw his wife in the shower with another man, causing such a violent reaction that he placed himself under the mercy of the court with a plea bargain, losing his job, his house, and his wife, spending 8 months in a mental institution attempting to regroup before his mother finally brings him back home to his parents, Robert De Niro as Pat Sr. and Jacki Weaver as Dolores.  His father’s undergone a few recent changes of his own, losing his regular job and now runs a bookie operation, trying to raise money for his restaurant by taking bets on sports events, as he is a rabid Philadelphia Eagle fan, where Sunday afternoon’s in front of the TV watching an Eagle game is sacred territory, using a lucky handkerchief and any other black magic mojo he can think of to improve his odds.  Pat has other things on his mind after the hospital, and all he can think about is developing a positive mental attitude about his life in order to win his wife Nikki (Brea Bee) back, believing this is his silver lining, getting in shape and losing weight like she requested and changing his life for the better, while everyone else refuses to mention the obvious, that he’s had no contact with her since the hospitalization and she’s likely moved on without him.      

Much like his father, Pat lives by his obsessions, much of it triggered however by his untreated bipolar mood swings, where he feels guilty about taking the psychotropic medicine, goes for long periods unmedicated hoping he can improve on his own, but inevitably suffers recurrent roadblocks, such as violating restraining orders, where he is simply unable to deal with his uncontrollable anger, beautifully juxtaposed with the mind-altering music of Led Zeppelin.  Adapting the material from Matthew Quick’s novel, the director has written a very clever script, as the quirky individuality of the character is often hilarious, especially the means by which he attempts to adapt to the real world, such as his angry discovery of Hemingway’s ending of The Sun Also Rises, where it’s more about social alienation than mental illness, where the director has to carefully straddle the line not to poke fun of people with serious mental health issues.  Russell’s stroke of genius is introducing Jennifer Lawrence as Tiffany, another person who’s gone through her own depression issues, having recently lost her husband to a senseless death, where the directness of their language together couldn’t be more refreshing, especially when talking about the reactions to various prescribed medications at a family dinner, where they’re like two peas in a pod, both seen as oddballs within their own families, but their heightened state of vulnerability gives their characters a unique perspective.  Having seen Lawrence now in three pictures, including 2010 Top Ten Films of the Year: #3 Winter's Bone (2010) and Like Crazy (2011), she has literally stolen all three movies with the exceptional nature of her performances, and here she simply *makes* the movie, which would be nowhere without her, picking up the pieces left behind by Pat’s distinctively unsettled life and continually maneuvering him into a better place, without him realizing it.  She brings the dramatic conflict of authentic language and stark emotion directly into the focus, tenderly accepting him with all his flaws intact even as Pat continues to dream of his perfect life with his wife Nikki.  

There’s a nice contrast between the idealized and obsessive fantasy in Pat’s head and the supposed perfect marriage of Pat’s brother-in-law (John Ortiz) with ice princess Julia Stiles as Veronica, Nikki’s sister, where she’s equally obsessed that everything in her house has to be in proper order, adding additional pressure to their marriage, where missteps are simply not allowed.  At the same time, Pat’s father obsessively plays the numbers, betting his family’s livelihood on the outcomes, while Tiffany at times seems equally deluded about turning Pat’s life around, where she gets him to promise to be her dance partner in a heavily stylized ballroom dance contest which requires plenty of strenuous rehearsal time.  Perhaps the best sequence in the film is set to Bob Dylan & Johnny Cash - Girl From The North Country - YouTube (3:42), where the mixed moods of the two unique characters strangely and appealingly come together, as they do in the song.  A few trailer sequences are set to “Silver Lining (Crazy Bout You)” by Jessie J, Silver Linings Playbook Music Video (2012) - Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence Movie HD YouTube (2:39).  The beauty of Tiffany’s character is Jennifer Lawrence’s nuanced performance, showing extraordinary range in an Oscar touted performance, bringing sympathy to such a complicated and misunderstood life, always remaining true to her feminine nature by defying the easy road, continually doing the unexpected because that’s what’s required, as people are that complicated to deal with.  Adding to the mix are several side characters, like Chris Tucker as a fellow inmate from the hospital, perhaps Pat’s best friend in the movie, who tries to “blacken up” their dance moves, or Anupam Kher as Pat’s psychiatrist, who is also, inexplicably, another obsessed Eagle’s fan.  Yes, the contrivances are fast and furious, but here they hardly matter, as they’re beautifully integrated into the mysteriously jagged storyline which brings these two improbable characters into our lives and makes them worth caring about, turning this into a highly entertaining Christmas holiday classic, bringing the indie world of David. O. Russell into the mainstream, providing comic inspiration with plenty of internalized soul searching, where it’s all about spending Sunday afternoons with the family, with Mom in the kitchen fixing crab fries and Dad sweating out the point spread.        

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

No Strings Attached
















NO STRINGS ATTACHED                           C+                  
USA   (110 mi)  2011  d:  Ivan Reitman 

If we were in a relationship, I'd become a weird, scary version of myself.    —Emma (Natalie Portman)

I suppose a lot of what you get out of a movie like this depends on what you bring into the theater with you, such as preconceived notions.  Certainly the draw here is seeing Natalie Portman lower herself to this dreck, where she’s actually named as a producer and beaming with a smile on her face, actually looking happy right on the heels of her Academy Award nominating role which couldn’t have been more dramatically challenging in the psychic horror thriller BLACK SWAN (2010) where she took a deep descent into madness.   Having low expectations is the key to enjoying a movie like this, after all, it’s directed by the guy who made GHOSTBUSTERS (1984) more than 25 years ago, which was cheesy even then - - so if you get a little something to enjoy, be grateful.  I still remember sex columnist Dan Savage’s infatuation with teen throb Ashton Kutcher wearing whities, so don’t expect much else out of a guy who’s more a Hollywood celebrity than an actor, accurately described in the film as annoyingly happy.  If the entire plot feels borrowed from a Friends TV sitcom episode where Natalie Portman’s role is interchangeable with Jennifer Aniston, well perhaps it is.  The jury is still out on whether Natalie Portman can carry a film alone, as she is surrounded by a sizable secondary cast which keeps popping their heads in and out of the picture, usually for comic relief in order to keep re-energizing the film with easy laughs.  There’s not much doubt that this is another formulaic film, but one wonders if Portman’s presence will add anything different, like Jodie Foster or Julia Stiles, young attractive women who also brought an edge of smartness and strength to their roles.  I suppose playing opposite Kutchner tells us all we need to know, as he continues to be a grown up adolescent, and he ends up being the responsible one in their relationship. 

Kutchner and Portman initially grow attracted as sex buddies, where due to Portman’s hectic schedule working at a hospital she simply has no time for dates and small talk, preferring a few moments in the sack until it’s time to go back to work again.  Kutchner plays along, thinking this is any guy’s dream, but he soon wants more out of it, and he’s not afraid to say so.  Portman on the other hand has an aversion to cuddling and commitment, thinking somebody always gets hurt, so she avoids all the small stuff.  Of course, this plays out in obvious fashion, where initially there’s a rush of sexual attraction and interest.  One of the things the film does best is express this candidly through cell phones, gossip, and the Internet age, so soon all their friends who weren’t supposed to know have heard all about it.  They’re the talk of the town, as they seem so grown up about a relationship without emotional attachments, except they get disturbed at the thought of their so-called partner seeing someone else.  So it’s a little more complicated than they let on.  When they have a falling out, the energy sags and the film sinks, where in no time at all we have nearly forgotten what we liked about this film.  Thoroughly predictable, the secondary characters are terrific, especially Portman’s roommate Greta Gerwig, also Kutcher’s buddy Ludacris, who themselves feel like a couple with possibilities.  This is a breezy, light-hearted romantic comedy that accentuates the lifestyles of the rich and the famous, and being single, where people are rarely if ever seen at work, but the focus is on all the fun and extracurricular activities in their lives, as if the audience can re-live their youth vicariously through this virtual reality world where relationships require no commitment whatsoever.  That premise is intriguing, but this is Hollywood, where artifice reigns supreme, so girls aren’t allowed to have fun and be in love without first recognizing the error of their ways and quickly correcting it, showing maturity, wisdom, and of course, providing the moral of the story.