Showing posts with label Margaret Thatcher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Margaret Thatcher. Show all posts

Monday, March 16, 2020

Life Is Sweet














LIFE IS SWEET                    B                    
Great Britain  (103 mi)  1990  d:  Mike Leigh

Cinema of discomfort by way of comedic farce, striking a wonderful balance between despair and comedy, this is Mike Leigh’s third film, mostly working in theater and television at the time, introducing his own Third Man production company which is the vehicle for all his future film releases.  Relying upon a stalwart cast, anchored by his own wife at the time, Alison Steadman as Wendy, the irrepressible matriarch of a middle-class suburban family, seen in an amusing prologue introduction, featuring that rare thing never shown in Mike Leigh films – young children.  It’s a bubbly, upbeat intro filled with a kind of colorful joie de vivre from the always sunny Wendy, encouraging young primary school kids to shake their bums and raise their arms in joyous motion, letting off a little steam, where they need a little persuasion, not easily letting themselves go.  Made at the end of the Margaret Thatcher era of British conservatism, with Leigh at the time branded as “The Scourge of the Middle Classes,” the film is anything but sunny, with people stuck in dead-end lives, not exactly miserable, just hating the way their lives turned out.  A young Jim Broadbent is Wendy’s husband Andy, a professional cook in an industrial kitchen, who takes a lot of flak at home for not carrying out a few home improvement projects, never really motivated to take the time, preferring to hang out in pubs with his exasperatingly manipulative friend Patsy (Stephen Rea), who plies him with alcohol before surprising him with supposedly cheap deals on retail items for sale, which includes a broken down mobile snack bar that he might convert to a food truck, but it needs a lot of work.  Nonetheless, his dreams of getting out from under the horrible weight of his present job inspires him to dream of something better, hoping a food truck is the way to go, but it simply sits outside his front door like a broken down boat with a hole in it forever anchored on land, never once making it out to sea.  Basically a good-natured guy, he’s too polite to admit he’s been snookered, yet every scene together with Patsy produces the same irrepressible gullibility, as he always falls for the latest swindle.  Their children are twins in their early 20’s, two girls at opposite ends of the spectrum, Natalie (Claire Skinner), bookish and clear-headed, easily mistaken for a boy, yet quite comfortable working as a plumber, saving up for a vacation trip to America, and Nicola (Jane Horrocks), an ill-tempered layabout with an acerbic tongue, contemptuously dismissive of others, quick to call people “Capitalists” or “Fascists,” fancying herself as an ardent feminist, yet her everpresent dour mood is unshakeable, completely isolating herself in self-destructive behavior, smoking excessively to suppress the appetite, but showing signs of bulimia, refusing to eat all day, then stuffing herself with sweets in the late night hours, retching into the night, while her sister in the room next door overhears all. 

A typical working family (Wendy works as a clerk in a maternity clothing store), three of them are off to work in the morning while the disgruntled Nicola shows no signs of ambition, refusing to be an exploited worker, so she does no work at all, remaining aimless and bored for the most part, yet perfectly miserable, anxiously filled with nervous twitches, hair drawn down over her face, hiding behind her glasses, sneaking in a boyfriend during the day to have sex when everyone else is out, who turns out to be David Thewlis in a thankless role, always asked to leave immediately afterwards, never sticking around for anything more.  Making a rather eccentric entrance is Timothy Spall as Aubrey, seemingly an old friend of the family, viewing himself as a Bohemian cool cat from the 50’s, yet he’s always restless and overanxious, flirting inappropriately with Nicola before making his way to the back yard.  Andy and Aubrey share something in common, both food chefs aspiring to work for themselves, but going about it very differently.  Both are hampered by the realities of life, stuck with who they are, limited and constrained, with a narrowing window of opportunity to realize their dreams.  Andy dreams of a life away from the boring routine, stupidly investing in a broken-down food truck, while Aubrey’s plan is to open a nouveau cuisine restaurant, thinking he’s a “genius” chef, that if he builds it they will come in droves.  So he opens the Regret Rien restaurant in the heart of town, asking Wendy to come waitress for him, as his regular waitress skipped off to Prague with her boyfriend, working with the ever dour sous-chef Paula (Moya Brady), who would be out of place in any environment, whose glum hangdog expression suggests a life of woe, the picture of the downtrodden, with no apparent concerns for health violations.  Opening night has a customary anticipation to it, yet the unappetizing menu that Aubrey reads sounds utterly unthinkable, as it’s completely inedible, yet Aubrey is so confident of his culinary expertise.  As Aubrey and Wendy share a glass of wine to help calm the nerves, Aubrey never stops drinking, first making the moves on the sous-chef in the kitchen, whose face never changes expression, before drinking himself into a stupor, making a complete ass of himself, screaming at the top of his lungs on the street in utter contempt for all the customers who never showed up before stripping off his clothes and expressing his lustful desires for Wendy.  While she fends him off, he goes into grotesque mode, thoroughly exaggerated, destroying all the tables, turning them upside down, creating a chaotic mess as the night turns into an unmitigated disaster, with Aubrey left passed out on the restaurant floor (mumbling the name of Nicola) while Wendy makes a hasty exit, attempting to save Paula as well, but she’s clearly fixated on earlier fictitious promises made by Aubrey, both apparent soulmates of delusion and dysfunction.

Working for the first time with cinematographer Dick Pope, who would go on to shoot all of Leigh’s subsequent films, this is the first film to reach an international audience, establishing Leigh’s realist, working class style, where the rhythms of this family’s existence are informed by a dull routine, by a repetition of trained habits, which leads to a certain stagnation, feeling stifled by the banality of it all.  Leigh resorts to comic exaggerations in how characters are depicted, yet this is a theatrical device that hides and often overshadows the humanity contained within.  While the musical score is written by Rachel Portman, it repeats with a monotonous omnipresence, growing deliriously repetitive, which may have your brain seeking an alternative refuge, but it drives in the discomfort associated with this film, which Leigh has described as his least favorite.  In contrast, Wendy always looks at the bright side, possessing an ability to turn any disaster into a positive experience.   Unashamedly cheerful, she and the perpetually disillusioned Andy make a happy couple, proud of both of their girls, even as they are routinely the targets of Nicola’s ire.  She receives her own comeuppance in the form of her boyfriend’s refusal to engage in the same sex routine, standing his ground, insisting on having a decent conversation instead, challenging Nicola to articulate her feelings and utter coherent thoughts in sentences instead of bitter critiques that sound more like slogans.  This catches her offguard, even humiliated, which he takes full advantage of, finding herself at the end of a mercilessly critical tirade, which leaves her flummoxed.  Even after the disastrous restaurant opening, Wendy comforts her daughter that she finds in tears, talking some sense into her, confronting how joyless and unhappy she has become (in stark contrast to that opening dance sequence with the kids), becoming the dramatic center of the film, as it’s done with such tender and loving care, urging her to rejoin the human race and become part of the living, none of whom have it easy, but at least they’re trying.  Somehow countering all her deeply troubled, self-loathing critiques, Wendy’s affectionate concern for others is the star of the show, becoming an emotional revelation that reverberates with heartfelt intimacy.  Embracing flaws and inadequacies as part of the human character, Wendy offers the thoughts of a mature being, someone who has lived through and survived her own share of personal crises, yet maintains a sweet optimism that includes an affirmation for life.  As it turns out, more disasters are lurking, as if part of the life cycle, yet the manner in which you address these inevitable setbacks determines one’s quality of life, where you can become paralyzed and easily give up, griping over every issue and calling it all unfair, or you can roll with the punches and give yourself another shot at experiencing joy and happiness, embracing it when it comes, knowing how fleeting it can be, where what ultimately matters is a willingness to accept the bitter with the sweet.  

Monday, February 1, 2016

45 Years














45 YEARS                              B+           
Great Britain  (95 mi)  2016  d:  Andrew Haigh                    Official site

Pomp and circumstances, where we have curiously grown into a society that loves to celebrate ourselves, which seems like an excuse to cover up the lengthy periods of emptiness and disenchantment that define our lives, unhappy with our jobs, our nation’s leaders, and the inexplicable violence that continues to erupt around the globe, instead throwing a good party for ourselves, claiming we deserve it.  This is a curiously understated, beautifully acted, slowly developing portrait of a longstanding marriage, where the length of time together would seem to suggest solid footing, but we’re on especially delicate grounds here.  Underneath the storyline is a crumbling dissection of class differentiation covering a veneer of happiness, where settling into the customs and habits of the bourgeoisie isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be, where there are longstanding disappointments on the limitations of so-called success.  That being said, the film is set in the rural outlying areas of Norfolk, England, where we’re witness to the established routines of an aging couple that’s been together for nearly half a century, Kate (Charlotte Rampling) and Geoff Mercer (Tom Courtenay), where Kate rises early in the morning to give the dog a nice, long walk through the mostly unpopulated territories of the region, where Geoff is about through with breakfast by the time they arrive back, where she dutifully cleans up afterwards.  We’re privy to the smaller aspects of their day, chatting about nothing in particular before she heads into town to run errands while he sets about performing needed chores around the house, where they each exist in a comfort zone with as little confrontation as possible.  After dinner, having discussed whatever needs to be discussed, they head upstairs where they’re in bed by 10:30, only to do it all over again the very next day.  Living a comfortable existence in retirement, the film itself is a series of collected minutiae, where we’re able to surmise little dissension in the ranks, but within the week they’re expected to celebrate their 45th wedding anniversary, an event that’s been planned for weeks and months, where they stand up before a gathering of family and friends and honor their marital stability, performed by the standard bearers of British theater, where Rampling was the recipient of a 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award from the European Film Awards, while Courtenay was honored with knighthood in February 2001 for his contribution to the nation’s theater and cinema. 

While on the surface, what could be simpler?  Part of the film’s fascination is that it appears to be driven by offscreen issues, by something we’re never familiar with, which can be an unsettling experience for the audience, as whatever truth there is to be found remains ambiguous.  What sets this apart is the influence of the writer/director, whose acclaimed earlier film Weekend (2011) is considered one of the more naturalistic portrayals of gay romance, where one might expect something altogether different going on underneath the surface of this film.  Adapting a short story by David Constantine called In Another Country, Haigh resets the time period, making the couple a bit younger, where their paths initially meet in the 60’s, a time of social upheaval, changing the overall context of the story, adding the anniversary story at the end while altering the central psychological point of view from the husband to the wife.  Setting the story in motion is the receipt of a letter, where Geoff has to pull out an old foreign-language dictionary just to be able to read it, coming from Swiss authorities announcing the discovery of a dead body in the Swiss Alps they believe is Katya, his former lover before he met Kate, whose frozen body has been perfectly preserved in the glacier ice from a hiking accident that happened in the early 60’s.  While initially this revelation from his past seems to stir little to no reaction at all, by the end of the week, however, the impact has the makings of potentially undermining their marriage.  The film follows the day-by-day developments in their lives as they approach the celebration, where ever so slowly there is a shift in their understanding of one another, where this single event has a way of eroding their trust and confidence, though on the surface things stay primarily the same.  It’s an interesting take on the fragility of relationships, even with long-established couples, where sometimes the least expected thing can cause irrational ebbs and flows, where it may not necessarily even make sense, but it certainly happens.  The premise here is that it’s not supposed to happen, as couples like this are the bedrock of the community, having endured their share of adversity, supposedly setting an example for others.  But even they are susceptible to unexpected surprises, despite having built a good life for themselves, with a dog filling the spaces of children they never had, where there’s a noticeable absence of family photos, no smiling pictures of grandchildren, with most of their personal memorabilia tucked away in the attic somewhere.   

Memories of Katya start infiltrating their lives, where Geoff ruminates over his lost dreams, remembering a time in his life when he still held convictions, associating Katya’s death with his own resurrected youth, where he certainly anticipated a different life, filled with progressive young ideals about social change, while now he finds himself surrounded by people that reflect that status quo, exactly what he once railed against.  When he sneaks into the attic at night to sneak a peek of old photographs, Kate grows concerned by a change in habits, where he starts sneaking cigarettes as well, suddenly viewed as the forbidden fruit, something they both decided long ago to overcome, making a pact to stop smoking.  While distressing, it’s not altogether earthshaking, yet Geoff, it seems, is going through a period of mourning, where remembering the dead is part of the expression of grief.  This is not something Kate sympathizes with, as she is and has always been consumed by bourgeois values, with social expectations suggesting she may be more worried about what others think than the man sitting across from her, where her emotional state of repression and icy reserve is guarded like the national treasury, rarely exhibiting any feelings of spontaneity or even charisma, where her over-controlling manner sets her apart from others, but it’s based on presumed middle class security, where she’s rarely, if ever, been under threat.  Nonetheless, it’s her dog that is seen as her loyal companion, while Geoff continues to surprise her and do the unexpected, which she thinks is getting away from her, where she’s losing all control.  In her mind, her husband’s feelings are borderline infidelity, as he insists on re-experiencing faded memories, where Katya’s spirit is like an unexpected ghost that is now terrorizing and haunting her, allowing doubts to creep in, where Geoff does little to dispel her growing anxiety.  Instead she grows tired of smelling Katya’s perfume, seeing her pictures, the preserved diary with dried flower petals, or feeling the hold she still has on her husband, growing increasingly frustrated, where she’s beginning to think she doesn’t even know the man she’s been married to all these years.  In an impetuous moment, Geoff calls Kate’s best friend a fascist for being a Margaret Thatcher apologist.  Mind you, this is the lady that’s springing for the party, so courtesy suggests a certain amount of gratitude, but it’s symptomatic of a fissure that’s grown between them, where long-frozen secrets are suddenly springing to life.  Who’s more of a domineering Thatcherite than Kate, making an ultimatum about how it’s going to be the night before their anniversary party, adding pressure to a crucial speaking appearance before the distinguished guests, where it’s as if Geoff is delivering a speech before the House of Lords.  Meanwhile Kate, suddenly exposed and vulnerable, reacts angrily, thinking the unthinkable, as love is illusive, subject to unalterable shifts, but only because their unspoken feelings have been left to fester for so long.  Much of the viewer’s take on this film is highly subjective, as it all comes down to how you read the characters, where the real intrigue is how quietly devastating the final sequence becomes.