Showing posts with label subjectivity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label subjectivity. Show all posts

Saturday, October 11, 2025

Ingrid Bergman Tribute: Notorious




 
































Director Alfred Hitchcock

Hitchcock with Ingrid Bergman and costume designer Edith Head

Hitchcock and Bergman on the set

in London

Hitchcock and Bergman with Cary Grant



celebrating Cary Grant's 42nd birthday






















NOTORIOUS                 A                                                                                                       USA  (102 mi)  1946  d: Alfred Hitchcock

The death of his mother, the apparently maternal relationship he had with his wife Alma, and the crush he’d developed on Ingrid Bergman “all released a flood of conflicting feelings that made Notorious not only possible but necessary... [it was] the artistic rendition of an inner life that might have exploded if denied expression.”                                                                          —The Dark Side of Genius: The Life of Alfred Hitchcock, by Donald Spoto (594 pages), 1983

Arguably Ingrid Bergman’s greatest performance, developing a personal rapport with director Alfred Hitchcock, where the playfulness of the opening and the midriff-exposing zebra-print outfit she wears is a stark contrast from the grim territory of where this film goes.  Among the most extraordinary actresses of all-time, where her private life to leave her success in Hollywood to work with Roberto Rossellini in Italy for Stromboli (1950), Europa '51 (1952), and Journey to Italy (1954), making five films in all, entering into a scandalous affair with the married director, eventually getting married and having three children with him, was as dramatic as anything happening onscreen, as not only was she beautiful and intelligent, but more than anything, she had a conscience, wanting to make films that reflected that.  Her work was more important than the money, something rare in artists working today, wanting to be part of the Italian neorealism movement, making films that pondered issues of complex psychology, as seeing Rossellini’s OPEN CITY (1946) was an experience that changed her life, suddenly open to the spread of realism in world cinema.  You don’t think of Hitchcock as a political director, yet this film falls into that territory, a remarkably modern story, diving into wartime espionage, romance, and suspense, using a lurid premise where government agent Cary Grant persuades Bergman into infiltrating a WWII Nazi spy ring, a film where a monstrous demand is made on the heroine in order to achieve a political objective.  In order to satisfy J. Edgar Hoover’s objections of disparaging depictions of FBI personnel, the FBI agents were changed to the more generic term of government agents.  If neo-realism consistently engenders the structure of anxiety into the structure of the plot, then Hitchcock could accentuate the suspense factor.  According to François Truffaut, who published a 1962 book of interviews with Hitchcock about all his films, NOTORIOUS represents “the very quintessence of Hitchcock.”  Reuniting the team of Ingrid Bergman and Oscar-nominated screenwriter Ben Hecht from Hitchcock’s psychoanalytic drama SPELLBOUND (1945), while also bringing over Claude Rains from Ingrid Bergman Tribute: Casablanca (1942), with producer David O. Selznick selling his studio to RKO, while allowing Hitchcock to produce the film himself.  According to Selznick’s biographer, David Thomson, he was barred from visiting the set or seeing the rushes, where the legendary producer’s absence may explain why this film is as good as it is, as he wasn’t there to interfere and ruin it.  Hitchcock, in particular, was happy to be out from under his seven-year contract, which he described as being “held in slavery,” becoming the first American movie the filmmaker could really call his own, featuring psychologically complex and solidly developed characters.  What Hitchcock persistently examines in his best films are the ways an audience can be manipulated in and out of morally ambiguous situations, with the audience feeling threatened, suffering along with the protagonists, as the story plays with the audience’s sympathies, exhibiting exceptional domestic psychology, a resourceful use of silence, and a strong sense of place, while the overall pessimism veers into film noir territory, as our capacity for inhumanity is the engine that drives this picture.  The complexity and technical mastery of the filmmaking represented a turning point of Hitchcock’s career, marking his stylistic maturity, a time in his legendary career when he finally came into his own.  The story may have drawn inspiration from the short story The Song of the Dragon by John Taintor Foote which had appeared as a two-part serial in the Saturday Evening Post in November 1921, The Song of the Dragon : Foote, John Taintor, 1881-1950, where a theatrical producer is approached by federal agents during the war who want his assistance in recruiting a young actress he once had a relationship with to seduce the leader of a gang of enemy saboteurs in order to get hold of valuable information.   

Shooting began just a month after the war ended, blending a compelling spy mission with a romantic love story, set in postwar Miami Beach, when the threat of Nazis was still present in viewer’s minds, opening with a court finding John Huberman guilty of treason as a Nazi sympathizer, sentenced to 20 years in prison, with his daughter Alicia Huberman (Ingrid Bergman), a German naturalized citizen, seen coolly walking out of the courtroom afterwards avoiding the press.  Cutting to a house party, Alicia Huberman is drinking heavily with friends and is quite the hostess, passing drinks around, speaking glib dialogue, revealing a cynical side of the actress we’ve simply never seen, standing out from all the other Hitchcock actresses, kind of a spoiled socialite with a scandalous reputation, exhibiting a loose-living, wild and carefree nature, where she’s simply the life of an otherwise dreary party, where it’s clear right from the outset that she is the emotional center, the magnet that draws our attention.  But as guests start to leave (some passed out on the couch) what she describes as “a perfectly hideous party,” one lone figure remains, seen only in shadow as a silhouetted stranger with his back to the camera, with Hitchcock adding an aura of mystery to this unseen character, who is constantly observing, yet Alicia calls him a party crasher and says she likes him, attracted, no doubt, by his handsome face and debonair manner, eventually identified as Devlin (played with minimalist perfection by Cary Grant) after everyone else has gone.  The two are nothing less than brilliant together, every nuance, every facial gesture, and every witty phrase, where their relationship has a real spark, like a reiteration of Grant and Katharine Hepburn in the Howard Hawks screwball comedy BRINGING UP BABY (1938), yet somehow both were overlooked for Academy Award nominations.  With her warmth and vulnerability on full display, she invites him to take a drive, despite the fact she’s obviously tipsy, where her drunken joyride driving, speeding while dangerously swirling around the road, “I want to make it 80 and wipe that grin off your face.  I don’t like gentlemen who grin at me,” is an attempt to get a reaction out of him, like fear, but it’s more of an alert that something is deeply troubling inside.  When a police officer stops her, Devlin calmly offers some credentials that quickly resolves the situation, which infuriates her, believing he’s a cop, as she has no love lost for the police, suggesting the way they treated her father remains a sore spot, Notorious (1946) Movie Clip - Car Driving scene YouTube (3:06).  Punching her in the face and knocking her out to get himself behind the wheel is a scene that simply doesn’t sit well today.  Yet when she awakens in the morning in full hangover mode, he’s still there, though upside down and out of focus in a first-person shot.  Tired, unkempt, and with her hair down, for these few moments she’s perhaps more relatable to viewers than any other role, disgusted with herself, and with him, yet she’s completely believable - - not some glamorous movie star.  Yet behind the mask, she’s an intelligent, sensible, and powerful young woman, but the discovery of her father’s secrets causes her to have trust issues, losing all self-respect, developing a self-destructive side and a reputation for promiscuity, while she has to overcome her tainted past as a “notorious” woman and find her place in the patriarchal society of the 1940’s.  Devlin appears to offer her that opportunity, as she’s enlisted to spy on a ring of Nazi exiles in postwar Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, with Hitchcock sustaining their relationship with great sensitivity and insight.  While it’s a dangerous mission, more than a little out of her league, the connection to her infamous father leads them to believe the Nazis would trust her.  While essentially posing as a love story, NOTORIOUS is as frightening an exploration of sexual and emotional abuse, as well as political manipulation, as you can find in an American film.  Part of its fascination is the complex shift in power dynamics, continually changing the narrational point of view, moving from dominance and helplessness by use of subjective camera shots, making the tension personal, then transferring it to the audience, as the heroine must suffer before she can redeem herself through self-sacrifice.  Hitchcock is not for everyone, as many feminists consider his persistent depictions of victimized women to be indicative of blatant misogyny, yet there is also a subversive, oftentimes even progressive, approach to gender evident throughout Hitchcock’s work, especially here, where the melodrama is a dangerous place, a dark, loveless, and brutal world where the viewer is an emotional accomplice to the unfolding crimes. 

Alicia is the enigma, the missing piece of the entire film whose code must be cracked to make sense of it all, yet after the imprisonment of her father, who immediately commits suicide in his cell, she’s completely alone in the world, with no one to really talk to about her deeper problems.  The contrast between her father’s values and her own couldn’t be more starkly different, as she’s a believer in the American ideals, feeling guilty about her father’s crimes and tries to make up for them by punishing herself, yet Devlin believes she will make a convincing undercover agent.  While the mission he ultimately enlists her for is to worm her way into the household of a nest of Nazi spies in order to find out who they are and what they are up to, it gets more complicated when they have a torrid love affair before she is assigned, but as soon as his superiors, led by spy chief Prescott (Louis Calhern), get involved in organizing the specific details and the plan is about to go into effect, Devlin takes a back seat, as love could compromise the mission and actually endanger her life, though he’s the agent she will continue to report to, with his character exhibiting ominous undertones, which have deepened even more since his role in Suspicion (1941).  By allowing his superiors to make all the significant decisions, Devlin is heartsick and out of sorts, as they have no real interest in Alicia, who is stereotypically viewed as an immoral woman who drinks heavily with a sexually promiscuous past, showing all the signs of a Fallen woman, a perfect example of what happens when a woman’s sexual history frames the totality of her identity, yet she’s not what any of them think.  Hitchcock reveals a marked skepticism about the ethics of government agents, viewed as a group of opportunistic and unscrupulous officials, a move that is both surprising and daring considering the fact the film was made at the end of the Second World War, a time when patriotism was in high gear.  Devlin and Alicia are both feeling lost for different reasons, while also extremely attracted to each other.  Knowing the importance of the mission, Devlin hates the idea of sending her in there, and has a hard time living with himself, continuing to conceal his feelings, the embodiment of the emotionally repressed man, as he’s consumed by an overwhelming sense of guilt and self-loathing, playing aloof and treating her badly to cover up his own personal conflicts, while Alicia’s life abruptly changes, vowing to stop drinking, where her job is to ingratiate herself with a Nazi associate of her father’s in South America, a man who was once, and may still be, in love with her.  Her assignment involves resuming a romance with a German agent in Rio, Alexander Sebastian (Claude Rains, who was nominated for an Oscar), a reserved and cautious man who is extremely human and personally sympathetic, yet ideologically evil, living in a chilly, luxurious mansion with a grand staircase along with his smothering mother (Austrian actress Madame Leopoldine Konstantin, one of prewar Germany’s greatest actresses, who is simply unforgettable in her only American movie appearance), holding regular meetings with his evil cabal, where her job is to infiltrate this circle of scientists, diplomats, and spies who congregate at his mansion, curiously introduced to them by a series of hand kisses, each one seen leering at her, smitten by her beauty.  Yet when one of their group briefly questions what they’re doing, he is quickly eliminated as being a weak link.  This is how they operate.  Once Alicia enters their lair, greeted by an almost spectral presence of Madame Konstantin, the film turns into a claustrophobic chamber drama, where the suffocating interiors have an overwhelming influence, much like the giant Gothic mansion in Hitchcock’s Rebecca (1940).  Essentially this amounts to a love triangle, with both men belonging to powerful political organizations, where the intense drama forces viewers to constantly change their feelings about the three leads, while it’s also a sumptuous romance between Bergman and Grant, sharing what was at that time the screen’s longest close-up kiss, Notorious (1946) -- (Movie Clip) Strange Love Affair YouTube, broken up into a series of erotically charged short kisses and teasing small talk, a cleverly innovative way to avoid the Hays Code censors forbidding “lustful” kisses that last more than three seconds.  As an undercover operative, Alicia meets her handler Devlin at a Rio race track, providing the details of who she is watching, reminding him of the ultimate sacrifice she is making by sleeping with the enemy, which hits Devlin like a ton of bricks, as it only makes him angry at himself and her for agreeing to such an ethically-challenged idea and actually going through with it, until they are interrupted by a jealously suspicious Sebastian, Notorious (1946) -- (Movie Clip) My List Of Playmates - Turner ... YouTube (3:51).  Among the more complicated relationships in movie history, both are extremely conflicted by the roles they play, deferring the personal for the professional, yet it keeps them both alert and on edge.  Disappointed by Devlin’s indifference, she ends up marrying Sebastian, believing she has no other choice.  

When Alicia suspects they’re keeping something secret in a locked wine cellar, with Sebastian holding the only key, they devise a plan to hold a fabulous dinner party, where Devlin can get himself on the invite list and she can find a way to get him the key, with Hitchcock turning up the cinematic tricks with one of the more clever shots in movie history, where the skill and precision that Hitchcock employs is exemplary, with a crane shot swooping down the stairs to the main floor as the camera zooms in on the key she’s holding in her hand, a scene that ends with Hitchcock’s cameo appearance quickly taking a glass of champagne from the table, Notorious - Key exchange scene YouTube (2:26).  The suspense is only ratcheted up as they make their way down to the wine cellar where Devlin accidentally breaks a bottle, discovering black sand in several of the bottles, which is later discovered to be uranium ore, a key ingredient used in the making of nuclear weapons.  It’s important to remember this was actually filmed a year before Hiroshima, a time when people had no idea about the significance of uranium.  Sebastian discovers their absence from the party and finds them in the wine cellar, quickly concocting an explanation, which leads him to discover the missing key from his key ring, which is reattached the next morning.  Returning to the cellar afterwards, he finds remnants of glass and sand from the broken bottle, knowing he’s been compromised, and that he’s married to an American agent.  Discussing the matter with his monstrously controlling mother, she devises a vile plan to have Alicia “die slowly” from arsenic poisoning, which leaves her too weak to defend herself once she realizes the horrible game she’s gotten herself into, suddenly becoming life-threatening, where she’s viewed as little more than disposable goods, A Scene from NOTORIOUS YouTube (2:01), like a gloomy, nightmarish sequence out of Polanski’s horrifying ROSEMARY’S BABY (1968).  Confined to her room with the telephone removed, she is at their mercy, yet Devlin, who incidentally asked to be reassigned to Spain after the reported marriage, suspects something is up as she appears sick and frail, which he mistakenly believes is that she’s returned to drinking, then goes missing altogether, where she keeps missing their appointments, yet he fails to grasp that he loves her until he realizes something has gone terribly wrong, sensing her mortal danger, and that he's in danger of losing her for good.  Gorgeously shot by Ted Tetzlaff in luminous monochrome, tinged in dark tones, creating an elaborate choreography where even the most minute gestures are charged with eroticism and violent potential, Hitchcock has crafted an emotionally tortuous love story, with the stars looking and acting their best, where the evolution of Alicia’s character from a carefree woman with no purpose to a highly skilled operative is at the center of the picture, where she generates such an erotic intensity to the screen, subverting the detective role of male film noir counterparts like Bogart, Mitchum, or Glenn Ford, bringing such an electric screen magnetism and personal intimacy to the role.  Hitchcock places the blame of violence against women on the male abusers and the patriarchal system which enables them.  Alicia is a complex figure who boldly resists that patriarchal structure, yet Devlin must prove that he’s evolved as well, developing a more compassionate understanding of the deadly predicament that he sent her into.  The finale is extremely unnerving, with silence punctuating the suspense of a sweeping romantic gesture, as Devlin sneaks into the upstairs room and rescues her in plain sight of the invited guests, who wonder what Sebastian is up to, allowing his wife to be carried out by another man in a long descent down the stairway, as clearly things are not right, pointing an accusatory finger at Sebastian, who will have to answer for this, poetic justice perhaps, where she’s being rescued from much more than a gang of spies, leading to a passionate, protecting embrace in a riveting finale, Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious - Final Scene YouTube (7:56).  Along with Shadow of a Doubt (1943), this is a nasty piece of work that reaches the highest echelon of Hitchcock films, among his richest and most seductive efforts, a perfect combination of styliza­tion and simplicity, perhaps his most fully achieved film at this point.  While Vertigo (1958) is generally regarded as Hitchcock’s most critically acclaimed film, yet the star power of the leads in this film suggests more perfect casting, more compelling performances by Bergman and Grant, in combination with Claude Rains, who by the end is actually a sympathetic Nazi, and let’s not forget the hovering presence of Madame Konstantin, who are much more emotionally and dramatically impactful than Kim Novak and Jimmy Stewart, though the self-obsessed psychological aspect may go to VERTIGO.  NOTORIOUS, in fact, may be Hitchcock’s greatest achievement.  

Notorious (1946) Film In English | Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman ...  HD version, YouTube (1:39:09)

Cristina Álvarez López and Adrian Martin  video essay on a scene from Hitchcock’s Notorious (6:27)

Friday, May 21, 2021

Uncle Yanco (Oncle Yanco)


 



























Jean Varda


Agnès Varda












UNCLE YANCO (Oncle Yanco)           B-                                                                               France  USA  (18 mi)  1967  d: Agnès Varda

Varda’s cinema is one of subjective inclusion:  she includes herself, her friends, and her family directly and indirectly in her films.  She honestly admits, “I am always very precisely implicated in my films, not through narcissism but through honesty in my approach.”  Varda’s honesty in this context reflects her belief that the filmmaker is always implicated in his/her work and should admit that involvement, that subjective stance, rather than perpeptuate the myth of artistic objectivity.                                                                                                                                                               —Ruth Hottell from Including Ourselves: the role of female spectators in Agnès Varda’s Le Bonheur and L’Une chante, l’autre pas, by Ruth Hottell from Cinema Journal, (page 60), 1999 (pdf), Including Ourselves: The Role of Female Spectators ... - JSTOR 

Working for more than 60 years making films, though never really embraced as part of the French New Wave, Agnès Varda established a fiece reputation as an independent artist making films and art instillations, early on studying art history at the prestigious École du Louvre, working as a professional photographer for the Théâtre National Populaire (TNP), a famous French theater company directed by Jean Vilar from 1951 to 1963.  By the time this film was made Varda had already completed a dozen films, including two features, Cléo from 5 to 7 (Cléo de 5 à 7) (1962) and LE BONHEUR (1965), the others short documentaries alternating between commissioned and personal shorts that already reflected her lifelong style of mixed mediums, bright color schemes, and a connection to the sea.  Varda assimilated with the Left Bank intellectuals known as the Rive gauche group, associated with feminist cinema of the 1970’s, becoming the best-known female French cineaste both in France and abroad, working in a minimalist style.  As a woman she remained an outsider and was never taken seriously by the male camaraderie of the Cahiers du Cinéma group of Godard, Rivette, Truffaut, and Chabrol who are generally regarded as the founders of the French New Wave, and is rarely mentioned in any discussion about the film movement, which only motivated her to assert her own individuality even more, with a career defined by artistic innovation, continually re-inventing herself.  Her early films were initially viewed as minor or forgotten, deemed of little critical interest, but their place in history is being reevaluated, particularly her role as a female artist uniquely presenting the female point of view, where her stature has only grown since her death at the age of 90 in 2019.  Known for blurring the lines between fiction and documentary, often putting herself front and center in front of the frame, making her presence felt, creating a dialogue with characters in her films, interjecting her own voice with voice-over commentary or posing questions that can be heard off camera, with onscreen characters responding directly to the director, Varda also accentuates the geographical space being observed while examining the relationship between people and their environment, where of particular interest is a living female subjectivity that seems to embody the spirit of her work.  Whether it be Cléo in Cléo from 5 to 7 (Cléo de 5 à 7) (1962) or Mona in Vagabond (Sans toit ni loi) (1985), their subjective female viewpoint remains paramount as they walk throught the city or countryside, viewing the world around them through their own existential perspective, which was a counterpoint to the distinctive masculine quality in the majority of movies made during her lifetime.  Anyone who spent any time with her in lectures or seminars, or were fortunate to experience her company, realize what a force of nature she was in terms of embracing life, where her bubbly personality and gracious style endeared her to the populace, becoming a kind of Earth Mother (and later Grandmother) to the entire film industry, as she lived and worked through periods of extraordinary change in cinema, so when she regurgitated her knowledge, people listened.     

This is the first of Varda’s California films, having moved to Los Angeles with her husband Jacques Demy who was invited to Hollywood to make MODEL SHOP (1969), a box office failure that now has the distinction of being listed in the 2007 BFI Sight and Sound list of 75 Most Neglected Films, Sight & Sound's 75 Hidden Gems – Movies List on MUBI.  1967 was the year of the Human Be-In in Golden Gate Park, a prelude to San Francisco’s Summer of Love, a musical gathering of 100,000 hippies and flower children merging folk and psychedelic rock music in outdoor settings, embodied by the Monterey Pop Festival with Jimi Hendrix and Otis Redding in one of his last appearances and popularized by the Scott McKenzie song, San Francisco (Be Sure To Wear Flowers In Your Hair), introduced here by Mama Cass Elliot of the Mama’s and Papa’s in the final set of the Monterey Pop Festival Scott McKenzie - San Francisco - Monterey 1967 (live) YouTube (4:06).  Varda identified with the American youth movement and intended to make a film about American hippies entitled PEACE AND LOVE, but it was never made as producers refused to give her a final cut, so we have this short film instead, accentuating a bright and sunny color palette as she discovers a long, lost relative living on a houseboat in Sausalito, just over the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco.  Introduced by a very young Tom Luddy (in French), an American producer friend of Varda’s and co-founder of the Telluride Film Festival, she discovers Jean Varda, her father’s cousin who she affectionally calls her Uncle Yanco, a Greek émigré living a bohemian lifestyle as a painter and collage artist while offering weekend boat tours to young people on a non-motorized boat on the San Francisco Bay.  The introduction is artificially staged and repeated, shot through a red and yellow colored heart-shaped filter, adding a whimsical element, but it also decorates the auspicious moment, as one might while celebrating a birthday, both greeting one another with open arms and an affectionate embrace.  Opening with a psychedelic art montage, complete with pop art posters of the time, it references San Francisco as the “City of Love,” in contrast to his home country of Greece, run by a far-right military junta (Junta of the Colonels 1967-1974), a brutal police state that represses free speech by making frequent arrests, relying upon interrogation and torture tactics to silence any political dissent.  Similarly, peaceful American students protesting the Vietnam War are often beaten by the police with billyclubs and shields in a violent demonstration of overreaction, yet Yanco describes it as “a revolution without bloodshed.”  The town of Sausalito was a collective haven of artists and outcasts, with a prominent houseboat community, where Otis Redding wrote the song Otis Redding - (Sittin' On) The Dock Of The Bay (Official Music ... YouTube (2:46) while living on Fillmore Auditorium owner and rock concert promoter Bill Graham’s Sausalito houseboat at Waldo Point in 1967.  Yanco describes the houseboat culture in Sausalito, calling it “aquatic suburbia,” each boat an expression of diverse lifestyles and personalities, yet it allows the quirky individual space and refuge each person is seeking.

Shot in just three days, a delightfully lighthearted short, featuring the Allegro movement from Tomaso Albinoni: Concerto San Marco, for trumpet ... - YouTube (2:32) as the accompanying soundtrack, the film is a colorful and sun-drenched ode to a heartfelt family reunion.  Shot in tableau style in front of many of his paintings, which he describes as an individual exploration, they are literally bursting with life and color, distinctive for displaying his own unique flair for life, Yanco also serves as a pleasantly upbeat raconteur, easily telling stories of his life and times, where he exudes a welcoming flair for friendship, answering questions heard offscreen from the director, warmly greeting Varda’s daughter Rosalie, where he just appears to be a man at ease with himself, comfortable in his own environment, yet transfer him to a different locale and you’d likely find him filled with anxiety.  But his houseboat is his home, duly reflecting his ebullient personality, with paintings on the floor stretched across all four walls, and a glass-enclosed studio with a 360 degree view of the bay filled with easels and paint, with brightly colored collages hanging from the ceiling.  He’s made mosaics with different kinds of material strung together to form unique shapes, and he’s sold them to buyers, but it appears he’s more comfortable painting a blank canvas, where he’s particularly drawn to the opulence of the sea and to landscapes, suggesting painting nourishes the soul, offering his own philosophy that “In the realm of God there are no shadows, only light.”  He can’t imagine living in a world without color, believing color is ecstasy.  He completed a series of 30 Heavenly cities, each in bright pastel colors depicting a transcendent spiritual splendor, all of which are hanging in someone else’s home, yet they maintain a sense of vital urgency with him, as he comes from an orthodox religious background, always returning to that source for inspiration.  On Sundays he has an open house where he’s visited by an eclectic group of young people, mostly hippies with long hair and colorful clothes, one meditatively plays the flute, where he takes them out into the bay for a sailing excursion, always reconnecting to the sea.  He seems to enjoy the collective innocence they bring, perhaps reminding him of his own youth, assuming the role of a community patriarch, meeting them all, making the rounds, telling stores, embracing their spirit, where they sing songs and speak the poetry of love, where it replenishes his own spirit, using the art of creation to continually feel young again.  Varda herself is obviously charmed by Yanco’s youthful zest for living, a free spirit and larger-than-life figure who still speaks French sharing many of his same artistic qualities, including his love of color and connection to the sea, finding a brethren and kindred spirit in the making of this playful examination of her roots.  While it’s not in the film, Jean Varda used to build sailboats, and moved onto the old ferryboat Vallejo on the Sausalito waterfront in the late 1940’s (the same boat seen in the film), and was an avid sailor, living on the Vallejo in the early 60’s with Alan Watts, the Zen writer and philosopher, where they would routinely ask friends as well as singers and musicians to come join them when they would spend Sundays sailing on the bay, well supplied with bread, cold chicken, and gallons of wine.