Showing posts with label multiculturalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label multiculturalism. Show all posts

Monday, March 6, 2023

We (Nous)





 













Director Alice Diop










WE (Nous)        B                                                                                                                        France  (115 mi)  2021  d: Alice Diop

I will love whoever hears that I am screaming.                                                                      —Marguerite Duras from her short film Les Mains Negatives (The Negative Hands), 1978

Inspired by Les Passagers du Roissy Express by François Maspero, published in 1990, which was awarded the Prix Décembre, one of France’s premiere literary awards, where Maspero, a member of the French Communist Party and an influential publisher of radical works in the 70’s, chronicled his experiences along the RER express subway (Réseau Express Régional), the rail network linking Paris to its suburbs, known as the banlieues, which are far more diverse than the urban ghettos of American cities, yet Diop was particularly impressed that the author took the time to observe the people who live there, preserving their dignity.  Yet what stood out in her memory is an accompanying photograph of an eight-year-old black girl that was taken near the shopping mall she grew up next to, with Maspero photographing and talking to people she knew, quite literally transposing her life into the book.  A former bastion of leftist communists working in the factories, the de-industrialization of the 1970’s was catastrophic for this region, leading to rampant unemployment in the 80’s, voter indifference, and the implosion of communism and the radical left during the François Mitterrand years, replaced by a growing support for the far-right National Rally, also known as the National Front.  Presenting a picture of daily life seldom seen by tourists, with immigrants living in cement blocks of run-down housing projects that resemble the faceless style of Soviet architecture, yet there are also vivid memories of the Drancy internment camp when Vichy government officials cooperated with the Gestapo and sent nearly a hundred thousand Jews to Auschwitz, where social problems and the collapsed political horizons are balanced against the backdrop of China’s brutal suppression of the pro-democracy protests and the dissolution of the Soviet Union.  Influenced by the Claire Denis film 2010 Top Ten Films of the Year: #1 35 Shots of Rum (2008), featuring a protagonist who drives the RER trains, Franco-Senegalese filmmaker Alice Diop, who is from an Aulnay-sous-Bois housing project in the northeast suburbs of Paris, returns fifteen years after she left and journeyed on the RER Line B to document the changes in this region 30 years later, expanding a theme she began with an earlier 2017 short, Les minutes du GREC - RER B d'Alice Diop - Vidéo Dailymotion YouTube (1:15).  Presented as a series of disconnected encounters, the railway line cuts through the city from north to south and is itself a featured component, much like Ozu shots of trains are an identifying signature of Japanese identity, yet what immediately stands out is a working class reliance on mass transit, as we see hordes of mostly black people standing en masse awaiting these trains to go to work, cloaked in a cloud of invisibility, recalling similar scenes in Akerman’s D'Est (1993) observing life behind the Iron Curtain, providing a stark image that differentiates a class division, already suggesting a landscape of exclusion.  While France applauds multiculturalism, yet under the microscope a different reality exists beneath the slogans, as the diversity of stories and memories have really been negated, with the film exposing invisible lives that remain outside the purview of traditional prototypes.  Born out of the November 2015 Paris attacks that shocked Paris, signaling a newly fractured French society, where the terrorists were descendants of postcolonial immigration, growing up in the same banlieue neighborhoods, so there was something about them Diop could recognize, a theme that also prevails in Saint Omer (2022).  The director’s voice can be heard asking questions from behind the camera, yet in this search to forge a new French identity, there is no attempt to provide a commentary that links these various segments together, with no single experience holding a special privilege, as they are all part of the same fabric.  Little by little, however, under these seemingly innocuous images, links are made, always observed discreetly, without necessarily asking for clear explanations, becoming a cinematic representation of diversity and memory, gradually becoming an essay on the social realities of life in postcolonial France.  Opening and closing in the Fontainebleau Forests 35 miles south of Paris, known for the opulent Château de Fontainebleau built by French royalty dating back to the 1100’s, a favorite residence and hunting lodge of the Kings of France because of the abundant game in the surrounding forest, we see images of an exclusive all-white hunting club dressed in antiquated attire and blowing hunting horns on horses, indicative of a leisurely activity for aristocrats, with some following on foot, bicycles, and cars, resembling the fox hunt scenes in Jean Renoir’s RULES OF THE GAME (1939), as hounds and horns announce their presence in the woods as they terrify roaming deer, with the dogs chasing them down into exhaustion before closing in for the kill.  Hunting with dogs is a barbaric practice outlawed in Germany in 1936, Belgium in 1995, and Great Britain in 2005, yet it’s an age-old practice that still exists in France, inherited from the days of a monarchy, with hundreds of cars following on weekends, where hunting tours are organized like safari adventures in Africa.    

Today the term banlieue has become a euphemism for the “racial other,” or the “Other Paris,” as it’s often referred to by journalists, carrying with it a social stigma, embodying stereotypes that plague their residents, many of whom are working class immigrants of Middle Eastern and North African descent.  In France, as it is elsewhere, it becomes a political issue when deciding whose story we tell, whose story gets to be told, with Diop imprinting these images onscreen to suggest a vastly enlarged canvas.  Stringing together a kaleidoscopic portrait of largely black and immigrant communities, intermingled with aging white residents who rely upon their services, we are introduced to Ismael Soumaïla Sissoko, a car mechanic from Mali living in his beat-up truck, listening to the music of Ivory Coast reggae singer Alpha Blondy - Cocody Rock YouTube (4:47), hooking up a television screen to the car battery, and speaking to his mother back home as he works under the hood, informing her “They’re mean to us,” also suggesting it’s too cold, indicating he’d like to go home after spending 20 years working in France.  Diop accompanies her own sister, Ndeye Sighane Diop, a geriatric nurse, as she makes various house calls to the aging, mostly white clientele living in working class neighborhoods.  One elderly woman from Brittany recalls how she met her husband, as she was very depressed at the time, determined to jump off a bridge into the Seine River, but he grabbed her, insisting that he walk her safely home, a practice that continued each night after work, eventually going to the cinema together until they got married.  She recalls how they never had money, as he sent nearly all his earnings to his family back home in Italy, yet this is a common practice for immigrants working abroad.  Diop interjects her own family history through low-grade home videos, with her parents offering her a life they never had, as her father came to France from Dakar in 1966, claiming he was never out of work for 40 years, and she can be heard accompanying him on visits to nearby Sausset Park where they would watch the birds in a tranquil setting, though she’s frustrated that so little evidence of her mother remains, always appearing on the edge of the frame, wishing there was more, as memories of her are fading.  As she expounds on her reflections, adding a narration only for her own personal experiences, she poignantly adds, “I regret all that is vanished, all that has been erased,” which segues to 1950’s images of Marlon Brando as the leader of a motorcycle gang in THE WILD ONE (1953), a cultural icon synonymous with the 1950’s, presumably the movie playing which was taped over by the family videos.  Going even further back in time, an all-white Catholic congregation in the Basilica of Saint-Denis, where French royalty is buried, listens to a royalist ceremony reading the prison testament of Louis XVI, the last King in France, proclaiming his innocence in 1792 (The Last Will and Testament of Louis XVI | andrewcusack.com), knowing his end is near, as he attempts to frame his place in history before they abolish the monarchy and execute him by guillotine during the French Revolution.  It’s curious to hear the words of a monarch in the hallowed grounds of a church, where he is viewed as a religious figure, a heroic Catholic King who came face to face with the wickedness of his subjects who sought to overthrow the Catholic Church and everything it stood for, as Roman Catholicism was the official state religion of France.  When news of his death reached Rome, Pope Pius VI condemned the Revolution and shared his view that Louis was indeed among the blessed martyrs in heaven, with a modern era church service centuries later still having the power to move many to tears, suggesting this was the beginning of a rejection of God and His Church, leading to mass secularization.  This is an astoundingly revisionist view that could only happen in France, where the Church, aligned with the monarchy, are viewed as united in Christ, claiming to be the victim of a historical blunder that somehow opened the doors to freedom and democracy.  One could say the same about Charlemagne, who was engaged in almost constant warfare throughout his 40-year reign, yet was revered as a saint and anointed Holy Roman Emperor in 800 A.D. with his royal ordinances quoted by generations of future Popes.  Diop captures this with no editorializing, utilizing a verité approach where viewers are empowered to make their own judgments and assessments. 

The camera shifts its attention to the Shoah Memorial in Drancy, with an authentic boxcar on display, taking us inside the empty hall with a video installation revealing constantly shifting faces, wordless images selected at random, with names, images, and lifespan listed, including many children, where around 10,000 children were interned in the Drancy camp before being deported, writing letters that were never delivered, some thrown out of the train windows, expressing an evocative requiem for the dead, offering a solemn remembrance that has a prayer-like reverence.  France has a real problem with historical memory, as the Drancy camp was turned into a low-income housing project immediately after the war, eventually building the museum, but it’s poorly attended, mostly by tourists, primarily Americans.  While France can celebrate the memory of Louis XVI for 250 years, the complicity of the French government in the Holocaust just 70 years ago has nearly been erased.  In contrast to the quiet, what follows are lively images of neighborhood kids playing, with the banlieue project towers looming behind them, as boys can be seen sliding down a short hill on cutout cardboard while a group of high school girls are playing cards.  Young men appear in lawn chairs or lying in the grass along a riverbank, drinking beer and listening to music, dancing in a comical manner, mimicking the old-time music of Édith Piaf, Édith Piaf - La Foule (''Que nadie sepa mi sufrir'') YouTube (3:09).  Recalling a similar scene with philosopher Brice Parain in Godard’s My Life to Live (Vivre Sa Vie: Film en douze tableaux) (1962), Diop also appears before the cameras in a conversation with French writer/philosopher Pierre Bergounioux, living in one of the poorest regions in France, as he reads aloud from his diaries.  As they discuss Molière, Rousseau, and the functions of an artist, both acknowledge how entire groups of humanity have been excluded in the past from the world of literature, film, and art, expounding upon centuries of French history and inequity, as only the dominant classes are represented, while ordinary people go unrecognized.  Diop explains that part of her purpose is “to conserve the existence of ordinary lives,” providing a voice for the underrepresented in the maligned outskirts of Paris.  Diop noted in an interview that Libération, the daily newspaper, had run a headline, “We are one people,” asking herself “who this ‘we’ was for them … What ‘people’ was the newspaper talking about?”  The whole film recontextualizes this question, making herself part of the “we” in question, with Diop revealing the aim of the film is “to right the wrong done to all the people who have been overlooked, and to give voice to ‘small lives.’  Lives that have disappeared without a trace, as my parents’ did.”  She alluded to her “obsessive need to collect and preserve the traces of all these lives, to prevent them from disappearing and to archive them in French history.  To send a strong, and political, message that they are part of it.”  The personal and the collective are woven together in this film, providing a tapestry of experiences, where the filming is an act of remembrance.  With an influx of black and African immigrants, residents are regarded as aimless delinquents at best, and imminent terrorists at worst, where the high-density pockets of public housing have become islands of social exclusion.   Being from the banlieues is a serious impediment to employability, as nearly every resident has a story about discrimination, as it prevents residents from getting jobs and getting into good schools, often complaining that journalists drop in only to report on car burnings and drug shootings.  The implication is that people with darker skin are not fully French, which is especially true for Muslims.  It speaks to the neo-colonial attitude, as the legacy of colonialism and slavery persist in the way these urban spaces are policed today, requiring a stricter presence.  The least digestible aspect of France’s colonial past is Algeria, fighting an 8-year war where 700,000 people died.  One cannot overstate how heavily this history has been repressed.  Gillo Pontecorvo’s neo-realist The Battle of Algiers (1965) was banned in France for five years after its release, still remaining a touchy subject.  During pro-independent celebrations in 1961, French police killed some two hundred people, throwing their bodies off bridges into the Seine. It took forty years for France to acknowledge that this massacre had occurred, and the incident is barely mentioned in schools.  According to young people in the banlieues, colonial history is scarcely taught, and literature from former colonies is almost completely ignored.  France is a country ruled by graduates of the prestigious École nationale d'administration in Strasbourg, training heads of state and industry leaders, creating a tier system that largely excludes anyone from the banlieues.  A resurgence of anti-Semitism and anti-immigration has fueled the politics of the far-right National Rally, becoming so pervasive that it’s now part of the popular culture.  Part of this was inflamed by the French law declaring it illegal to wear Muslim face-covering veils in public, prohibiting girls from wearing a hijab while playing sports, with the far-right advocating a ban on Muslim women wearing head scarves in public.  The intimacy of the film is startling, with a handheld camera and a distinct subtlety of direction, but what makes this film special is the sensitivity and empathy it encompasses towards all Parisians, from children, senior citizens, to the upper echelon of French society, with Jean Ferrat’s song Jean Ferrat - Ma France - YouTube (3:49) playing over the closing credits. 

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

The Workshop (L’Atelier)














The Workshop (L’Atelier)       C+                                                     
France (114 mi) 2017  d:  Laurent Cantet     

Not nearly as much fun, or as deeply insightful as TIME OUT (2001), HEADING SOUTH (2005), or Cantet’s Palme d’Or winning film The Class (Entre Les Murs) (2008), where the director has had a hard time re-establishing his relevancy ever since.  Despite a terrific performance by Marina Foïs (always good) at the center of the picture, playing a well-known Parisian novelist, Olivia Dejazet, who starts a writing workshop in the working class town of La Ciotat, on the southern Mediterranean coast near Marseille, filled with a multiculturalist group of seven promising high school students, the film becomes bogged down by paying so much attention to one white nationalist student Antoine (Matthieu Lucci) who hogs the limelight with petulant soliloquys that are more of a rebuke of his fellow classmates, resulting in endless arguments that go nowhere, while the concept that this racially divisive group, including white, African, Arabic, and Spanish students, none with a propensity for writing, could actually sit down one summer and spontaneously compose a novel is incredibly far-fetched.  Premiering at Un Certain Regard at Cannes, this is another example of a humanist ideal that never lives up to its promise, having to deliver more than what seems credible.  Cantet, and his co-writer Robin Campillo, simply take this premise too far, accentuating the extreme over reality.  Surrounding Foïs with a group of non-professionals is, in itself, an actor’s workshop, each from La Ciotat developing characters that come from differing backgrounds, but few have anything in common other than a similar residence, with every one thoroughly disenchanted with living there, as they can’t wait to get out, finding it a run-down and economically depressed town with no jobs since the huge shipyards at the dock were closed down 25 years ago, still standing, but deserted and empty, an industrial wasteland, a remnant of the past, becoming more of an eye-sore, yet still the most significant landmark of the city, where they all believe they inhabit a ghost town, a shell of its former self.           

While these kids are fairly typical of teenagers today, what seems to fascinate the director is the way they use slang to so easily put each other down, the ordinary insults about hair or clothing, what someone’s wearing, who they were seen with, which also translates to what they have to say, where part of being a kid is instantly rejecting anything that does not fit their world view.  With kids coming from different ethnic backgrounds, what’s clearly evident is so few of them have ever left town, still completely unfamiliar with the world around them, even in their own country.  While they all use cellphones, the Internet is their only connection to the outside world.  Reading is not something we see anyone but Olivia doing, as she carries a book with her everywhere she goes.  Initially the students do not embrace Olivia, finding her elitist, thinking she has no connection to their lives, wondering why she would ever leave the far more interesting sophistication of Paris to be with them, feeling like they’re some kind of charity case, but Olivia makes it clear this is simply part of her interest, sharing knowledge about literature with the younger generation of today so that there is a continued link to the future.  Once they get started, we realize how difficult it is to get a group to agree on anything, even the simplest ideas, where the only real guideline is to write a noir fiction associated with their town.  Immediately Antoine suggests a murder, and is one of the first to actually offer a writing sample, yet the others quickly condemn what he writes as he seems to relish the idea, overly fascinated by killing terrorists and exhibiting extreme levels of violence, yet is completely removed from the subject, like he couldn’t care less about the ramifications.  This quickly escalates the discussion, however, with blacks and Muslims quickly offended by the idea that they are being projected as the terrorists.  While Antoine seems intelligent, he’s also aggressively confrontational, as he seems to enjoy baiting his fellow classmates with white supremist ideas and denouncing anything they come up with, where they only end up butting heads with each other.      

The film essentially evolves around two characters, Olivia and Antoine, only exploring their personal lives with any detail, as Antoine has a habit of hanging out on the rocks overlooking the sea, where he goes swimming each and every day, while Olivia retreats to a comfortable upscale residence, reading with an everpresent glass of wine, and communicating with her husband by Skype.  At some point Antoine develops the habit of spying on his teacher at night, hiding in the surrounding foliage, while Olivia explores Antoine’s personal life on the Internet, discovering he belongs to a white nationalist group with a fascination with guns who brazenly post videos on their website, one of which includes a pretend rehearsal for an assassination plot.  As their narratives intersect, Olivia grows curious about what’s driving Antoine, thinking she could interview him for potential material in her next novel, but Antoine has a surprise of his own, analyzing his teacher’s own psychology and position of privilege by dissecting various passages from one of her novels.  Antoine’s provocation grows more alarming, becoming such a repeated distraction in class that he eventually has to leave, but he’s fuming inside with inner conflict and turmoil, mirroring the problems of contemporary French society, pitting the well-educated intellectuals of Paris against the working class views in industrial towns, the ultra-right nationalists against the socialist left, and the changing perception of Muslims in France, still arguing over the aftereffects of the Bataclan massacre in Paris where now every Muslim is deemed a terrorist.  Antoine’s stalking habits continue, as lurking underneath is a dangerous predator, veering into darker territory when fantasy and reality intersect, revealed in an extended nighttime sequence out on the rocks where he anticipates a brutal crime, coming close to carrying it out, where viewers aren’t sure what’s going to happen.  In the end, he returns to class, like a prodigal son, reading his chilling account of a dispassionate murder that could very easily have actually happened, before departing once again, where his shadow presence continues to remain lurking just under the surface of French consciousness, with a potential to loom even larger had Marine Le Pen won the most recent Presidential election.