Showing posts with label poverty porn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty porn. Show all posts

Sunday, November 13, 2022

Return to Dust (Yin ru chen yan)














Writer/director Li Ruijun













RETURN TO DUST (Yin ru chen yan)                     B                                                                China  (131 mi)  2012  d: Li Ruijun

Not since Lee Chang-dong’s Oasis (2002) have we seen a more downbeat couple, featured in nearly every scene of this film, becoming a despairing portrait of an impoverished rural life in China that seemed to have made the Chinese government uncomfortable, strangely pulling it from all movie theaters and streaming services in China in the last week of September after developing a following, earning nearly $16 million since its July release.  According to the director, who also writes and edits the film, while also serving as the art director, “Everyone knows there are lots of poor people, but the government doesn’t want Chinese people to see too much of it.”  Shot on a modest budget, the film is set in the small, rural village of Huaqiangzi, the director’s hometown, in the distant province of Gansu, which borders Mongolia and the Great Gobi Desert.  All of the actors are local villagers, except for the leading female character.  The mud brick houses that distinguish the look of this film can be found everywhere in the region.  Wu Renlin, the lead actor in this film, is the uncle (husband of his mother’s sister) of director Li Ruijun.  Painfully honest and unsentimentalized, the film accentuates the gap between an indifferent wealthy class who drive luxurious cars and poor farmers who remain rooted to the land, recalling Youssef Chahine’s trailblazing early Egyptian film The Blazing Sun (Siraa Fil-Wadi) (1954), both identifying with the arduous work in the fields of the farmers, whose steadfast devotion to producing seasonal crops is a labor of love, yet they are continuously harassed and exploited by the rich, who view them as less than human, inflicting immeasurable suffering with no hesitation whatsoever, typically viewed as an impediment to their own path to success.  This epic film humanizes the downtrodden, the poorest of the poor, painting a portrait of two outcasts who are brought together in an arranged marriage, an improbable middle-aged pair, the fourth brother, the reserved Ma (Wu Renlin), a poor farmer who only owns one donkey, and the disabled and unmarried Guiying (Hai Quing), who are both openly spoken about as a burden to their families.  He is a reticent farmer, the last of his family to remain unmarried, while she is severely crippled, enduring a long history of inflicted family abuse where she was tortured and beaten by her brothers, unable to have children, walking with a limp, barely able to move her right arm, with uncontrollable bladder issues, well past what is considered to be a marrying age in rural China.  Glad to be rid of them, their families view the marital resolution as a relief, an answer to their own problems, no longer concerning themselves with either one of them.  Left on their own, they can be a pitiful sight, rarely ever saying a word, showing no familiarity whatsoever in their wedding photograph, where their first night together is a disaster.  Something of a slow and plodding film, the film details how farmers borrow from landowners before planting their crops, mostly wheat or corn, then sell their harvested goods back to the owners, who keep for themselves a tidy profit, setting prices that often reflect their own avarice and greed, in stark opposition to the unassuming modesty of this couple, whose humble origins are never in doubt, defined by the backbreaking hard work they perform day in and day out. 

With so many American films using computer generated effects as the gold standard, there is something refreshing about the physicality and harsh realism of the landscapes, transporting viewers to a different time and space.  Recalling the fifth generation of Chinese cinema, this is a return to the visual poetry of Chen Kaige’s YELLOW EARTH (1984), the rural traditions of Zhang Yimou’s RED SORGHUM (1988) and the peasant realism of THE STORY OF QIU JU (1992), as the brutal realism and poetic tenderness of this story merge into an elegiac drama, a delicate and touching parable about human nature that takes a rather pessimistic look at contemporary China, which is at odds between modernity and tradition, as rarely do viewers get to see the lives of people living in such remote surroundings.  It is important for them to be seen and understood, as the best of centuries-old local traditions are disappearing due to rapid urbanization, providing preserved memories hidden under the dust.  Despite the humanist depiction, the misery and poverty porn index can feel one note, feeling overlong and overly predictable, grating on one’s patience, literally immersing viewers in the dire situation of their lives, never having any time for themselves  Persistently seen selflessly toiling in the fields where adversity is almost always present, a seasonal rhythm of their lives is established through their grueling work, plowing a field in the spring, flooding it, then planting the seeds, nurturing their growth during the heat of the summer before harvesting the crops in the fall, all in unison with their tireless donkey, who becomes part of the family, eventually expanding to include chickens and pigs.  Viewing simplicity as a virtue, these rituals not only show how time-consuming and exhausting this work is, but also how carefully it is carried out, with the work bringing them closer together, as does food, which is an everpresent aspect of their lives, routinely seen eating steamed buns, with Guiying often bringing him fresh water in the fields.  There is an oddly intrusive presence that continually interrupts their lives when the wealthy landowner falls ill and needs so-called “Panda” blood, a rare Rh-negative blood type, with Ma the only one in the village with matching blood, so an extravagant silver BMW car is sent to fetch him each time he needs more blood, a cruel metaphor that symbolizes his continuing exploitation, used for their own self-serving purposes.  As a reward for donating blood, they are told to move into a newly built urban apartment complex that is cold and unwelcoming, used strictly for propaganda purposes, with the media capturing this gesture as an act of good will helping bridge the divide between the past and the future, yet when Ma views the apartment, he is less than thrilled, as there is no place for the farm animals, and he’s nowhere near his land, so this would essentially be an exile from where he wants to be.  This same subject was thoroughly explored in Jia Zhang-ke’s STILL LIFE (2006), and again during the recent Winter Olympics in Beijing, when many villages and settlements had to be demolished to make way for newly constructed sports facilities.  What this accentuates is how little the rich actually understand about the poor, as Ma is not ungrateful, but he doesn’t need a new apartment, which would be utterly meaningless to him, as he’s not an urban businessman, but a farmer who makes his living tending to the soil.  This old-fashioned occupation is completely inconceivable to the wealthy classes, never giving it a thought, as it’s simply not part of their mindset.  Making money is all that matters to them.  Ma may as well be invisible.       

In keeping with this theme, a rural exodus has caused a vacancy crisis in poorly built and unoccupied houses that have been abandoned, with owners migrating to the cities in search of work, leaving too many unused, dilapidated houses, so the government implements a plan to improve the appearance of the village, offering a cash incentive to owners who allow the demolition of their homes.  Ma and Guiying are forced to move from building to building, as owners return requesting the money, with the homes destroyed the instant they leave.  Not only do they bring their belongings, but they also transport a swallow’s nest, continuing a connection with the natural world around them.  Tired of continually having to move, Ma decides to build his own home, making the mud bricks himself, along with old wooden posts salvaged from the demolitions.  This is a painstakingly slow process that becomes the centerpiece of the film, accentuating each and every step, forming them into bricks, laying them out into the sun, building block by block as they laboriously construct their home, the first sign of their own freedom, with both never imagining they would have their own home.  This is the closest they ever come to happiness, yet when the bricks are threatened from a torrential rain, they struggle to cover and protect them, seen splashing around together in the puddles on the ground, probably the first sign we see of laughter.  A burgeoning tenderness can be found in small, everyday gestures, like Ma finding his wife a warm coat, or handing her food, or when Guiying runs to meet her husband on the road late at night after an excursion into the city in frozen wintry conditions, handing him a hot water bottle to help fend against the cold, something she’s repeatedly reheated to keep it warm.  Yet the most striking image that stands out is the moment they hatch their first eggs, placed in a cardboard box with holes in it, with the light reflecting on the darkened walls of their home, appearing like a constellation of stars, both marveling at the beauty they have created by such a simple gesture, with the birth of the chicks emulating warmth and hope for the future.  Another heartbreaking moment is the liberation of the donkey, something of a Bressonian Au Hasard Balthazar (1966) moment, as Ma releases him and sets him free, “You were used by others for most of your life, haven’t you had enough,” but it has no idea what is happening, seen returning back to the home on its own, knowing only a world that shows little compassion for him, one often dominated by human cruelty.  Essentially a love story, a heartfelt tribute to the human ability to find comfort in one another, the film is marked by the passing of the seasons, developing a symbiotic relationship with the natural world around them.  There are some noticeable editing lapses near the end, perhaps representative of forced changes made at the last minute, as the film was a target of China’s censors, creating alternate endings before the film was pulled from theaters.  Yet it is these two essential characters that dominate the screen time, taking viewers on a distant journey.  Ma is righteous, loyal, hardworking, and true to his word, yet as hard as their simple lives are, Ma and Guiying almost never complain, conscientiously carrying out their activities dutifully and stoically. Working together in such close proximity only makes them appreciate the other more, as both are selflessly devoted.  The care, warmth, and muted tenderness that they wordlessly express to each other is supported by close-ups, while also characterized by natural light and warm colors, beautifully captured by cinematographer Wang Weihua, shot over the course of a year, making extensive use of wide shots, showing a surprising restraint, reminding viewers of what really matters, as it’s not so much what you have, but who you have in your life.     

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Sorry We Missed You









Director Ken Loach

















SORRY WE MISSED YOU             B-                   
Great Britain France  Belgium  (100 mi)  2019  d: Ken Loach

Not making the same mistake as the theatrical release of I, Daniel Blake (2016) which was NOT subtitled, leaving plenty of missed dialogue, though it was subtitled at Cannes when it won the Palme d’Or for the second time in Loach’s career after previously winning for The Wind That Shakes the Barley (2006).  While the subtitling was extremely helpful, this is probably the most by-the-numbers Ken Loach film ever seen, easily the most predictable, where the outcome is known within the first few minutes of the film, so despite some tender moments, any emotional connection with the story may be lacking, as you’ve heard it and seen it before.  While it’s an attempt to be a blistering indictment of an economic system doomed to fail, an examination of the 2008 financial crisis in Great Britain, as experienced by a debt-ridden family, where the working class gets short-changed by temporary positions and a part-time living wage, Loach never connects this particular example to the system overall, as much of this is simply too individualized to the specific circumstances of this largely dysfunctional family, despite their best efforts, offering no way out, mired instead in a downbeat portrait of misery porn.  Shot on 16mm by Robbie Ryan, who also works with Andrea Arnold, Ricky (Kris Hitchen) is a middle-aged father recently out of work, an everyman losing his construction job and his home to the economic crash, while his warmhearted wife Abbie (Debbie Honeywood) is a nurse providing in-home care, visiting dozens of elderly or disabled people every day, providing meals, baths, clean-ups when needed, and “tuck-ins,” which is really just spending a little one-on-one with lonely people who have no one else, where her golden rule is “Treat them like your mum.”  They have a 15-year old teenage son Seb (Rhys Stone) who exhibits artistic talent, but displays it rebelliously through graffiti signing, which gets him in trouble with the law, while 12-year old Liza Jane (Katie Proctor) has all the smarts, excelling in school.  When one of his friends urges him to sign on with a big delivery company that resembles Amazon, with the promise of free same-day, one-day, and two-day shipping, he explores the options of becoming a self-employed contractor.  Lured by the wonders of a life of autonomy and financial stability, he gets the message straight from the hard-nosed depot boss, Gavin Maloney (Ross Brewster), buying into the sales pitch, “You don’t get hired here, you come on board.  We call it on-boarding…You don’t work for us, you work with us,” or so goes the sloganistic sales pitch to get you to sign your life away on the dotted line and with it all your inalienable rights.  It’s an opportunity to become “the master of your own destiny,” a franchise owner, freed from wage slavery, where you can work your own hours and be your own boss, as everything here “is your choice.”  Or so they would have you believe, clearly glorifying the job in its most glowing terms.        

What Ricky quickly discovers is that the devil is in the details, mindboggling in its complexity, as he needs a van, which they can rent at an exorbitant daily rate, or lease, but requires a £1,000 deposit, which they don’t have, until Ricky gets the bright idea to sell his wife’s car, which she needs to make her rounds, already overstretched as is, where you don’t get paid for all the time lost waiting for public transportation, which really slows her down, streamlining the time available to spend with each client, basically forcing her to work longer hours into the night.  Nonetheless, Ricky is obsessed with the opportunity, quickly discovering he has all the responsibilities of an employee, but none of the privileges, as in reality, he’s signed over all his rights, allowing him to be ruthlessly exploited by the company, deprived of any of the rights and protections that ordinary workers enjoy, like mandatory breaks where you can use a lavatory (drivers have to bring plastic pee bottles with them) or an 8-hour day subject to overtime, even protections if you’re injured on the job.  Here there are tickets and fines incurred that are simply associated with driving, with an additional hundreds of pounds lost in penalties if he’s late or can’t show up, subject to a draconian penalty process that may even get him ousted from the program, while he’s responsible for lost parcels, even if he gets robbed.  More importantly, his time is monitored on the handheld tracking device drivers carry with them, called “a gun,” so employers know exactly where they are at all hours of the day.  These devices also include built-in delivery targets to meet which are strictly enforced.  In no time, both Ricky and Abbie are working 14-hour days, six days a week, with no overtime pay, often returning home well after dinner, or when their kids should be or are already in bed, so the kids are essentially raising themselves, as every waking hour is devoured by work.  The problem with this completely filled work schedule where you’re already stretched to the limits is you’re doomed if you need a day off for any reason, be it an injury, a broken window, a family funeral, police arrests, a court appearance, school meetings or events, doctor appointments, or just getting sick, as there’s no wiggle room for any of the kinds of things that happen in the real world, things that are bound to happen, which simply send them into a downward spiral before pushing them into crisis mode where all hell breaks loose. 

Resembling the trials and tribulations of Job or the endless futility of Sisyphus, this family is tested like no other, becoming a rather monotonous journey into a minefield of continuous turmoil, where there’s simply no saving grace, or anything resembling hope.  Grim realities set in as Seb runs into trouble with authorities, seen receiving a lecture from a stern policeman who comes across as one of the good guys, yet their son only grows more aloof, missing school, while spending reckless hours away from home at night, completely unaccounted for, where his parents are clueless where he’s gone, becoming more of a problem than they have time for.  Arguments at home end up as scream fests, which only upset Liza Jane, who can’t sleep anymore, filled with pent-up anxieties from being home alone all the time, faced with grown-up responsibilities.  As Ricky attempts to negotiate some time off to deal with some of these family issues, Maloney, who boasts that he is ”patron saint of nasty bastards,” is a brick wall of resistance, obsessed only with meeting delivery targets, where even catastrophic circumstances leave him immune to sympathy, as he’s a company man through and through.  With accumulating debt, and a tragic accident that leaves him among the walking wounded, Ricky refuses to cut the cord, even faced with the realization that he’s basically a slave to the company, little more than owned property.  So what we have is the intractable company man and the tireless worker who continues putting himself in harm’s way as he views work as his only salvation, even as he’s driving full-speed into a brick wall.  With two working parents, if you’re not allowed time off to care for troubled family members, when you know you have children with disturbing emotional episodes, you’re probably in the wrong job.  Knowing that at the outset, the story is set up to fail, with predictable results.  The much bigger mistake made is the patriarchal bullying, allowing the father to make all the decisions (more and more an unsympathetic figure), as if we’re still living in the 1950’s.  The best “family” decision was obviously not made early on, which they come to regret, with the husband telling the wife what to do in order to meet his own needs, quickly sending them down a sinkhole of debt and unending problems, where they lost any flexibility to address family issues at home, which oftentimes supersedes financial needs.  Sometimes you need to be there for kids during episodic growing pains, as otherwise it can get worse, becoming a more permanent affliction, but this family simply couldn’t adjust to their own internal dysfunction, and it cost them, making this as much an indictment of this specific family and the poor decisions they made as opposed to the inflexible economic system that would not budge when they needed a break.  Viewers certainly get the point, as it’s drilled into them from the outset, where despite an affectionately compelling performance by Debbie Honeywood who constantly puts her client’s needs before her own, this is sadly one of Loach’s weaker films, predetermined and overly fatalistic, feeling mechanically overwritten, offering plenty of punishment to fit the crime.