Thursday, January 27, 2022

Synecdoche, New York


Writer/director Charlie Kaufman

Kaufman with Hoffman on the set

Kaufman with Michelle Williams





















SYNECDOCHE, NEW YORK             B+                                                                                     USA  (124 mi)  2008  ‘Scope  d: Charlie Kaufman  

If the year is a life, then September, the beginning of fall                                                             is when the bloom is off the rose and things start to die.                                                              It’s a melancholy month and maybe because of that, quite beautiful.

Whoever has no house now, will never have one.                                                                        Whoever is alone will stay alone,                                                                                                will sit, read, write long letters through the evening,                                                                  and wander the boulevards, up and down,                                                                              restlessly, while the dry leaves are blowing. 

— Elke Putzkammer, Professor of literature at Union College heard on the clock radio in the opening reading an excerpt from Rainer Maria Rilke’s Herbsstag, translation by Stephen Mitchell, TRANSLATIONS OF RAINER MARIA RILKE'S "HERBSTTAG"

Wistfully sad and melancholic with more than a touch of irreverent humor, yet more than anything this is a film of astonishing imagination that will challenge any viewer, something of a brilliant head trip subject to multiple interpretations, a multi-layered puzzle piece that exacts a price from your brain, yet is meant to test even the most acutely aware among us, offering a mirror to our soulless modern existence.  Grap a rope, as this film takes us to the precipice.  Wildly off-the-wall, this can elevate poetically to one of the most ambitious films ever seen, mad beyond all expectations, yet also remain confusing and frustrating, perhaps overly autobiographical in tone, too drenched in miserablism and self-loathing to really like or appreciate, feeling more like a dirge for many, making it easy to dismiss, but enthusiastically hot-wired nonetheless, where the magnitude and scope is beyond essential, even if most of the surreal thought and effort put into this sprawling work may ultimately be lost on the audience, failing miserably at the box office, generating an onslaught of negative reviews, yet entering the cultural consciousness with its staggering originality, where over time the right audiences have discovered this momentous film.  What is most appreciated is the sensational acting throughout, especially the women, and the lilting musical score by Jon Brion which casts a serious pall on the entire affair, turning this into a ghostly, scorchingly morose version of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, a piece of iconic Americana that continuously plays out in the lead character’s head, as if on automatic replay.  The use of younger actors in his revival play is a controversial move, not something everyone will appreciate, as not all will see that they too are destined to live lives that are exhausted and worn out, conveying a life full of despair, as Willy Loman’s fate is already sealed, a tragedy of epic proportions, with suggestions that this is the kind of thing young theater directors should aspire to do.  Unfortunately, sometimes a writer’s worst enemy is writing itself, becoming too cutesy, word-obsessed, obliquely clever, and even veering towards the obscure in order to hide behind a cloud of unfathomability, which may, in essence, describe exactly how this film is conceived.  Much of it plays out like a sci-fi time traveling movie, with time moving forward at such a fast clip in the early scenes, where months go by in minutes, as the first eight minutes are like a film-within-a-film, nearly indecipherable when initially seen, yet revealing kernels of truth in unlocking key aspects of what follows, unraveling throughout the entirety of the film, where the world changes around our insufferable lead character, constantly commiserating over his failing health, until it simply leaves him behind, wallowing in his own pathetic misery, yet the actors playing certain characters keep getting replaced by other actors, where sometimes two or even three are onstage at the same time, similar to Shane Carruth’s PRIMER (2004), or the multiple Dylan characters in Todd Haynes’ I’M NOT THERE (2007), but this musical chairs in character development may initially feel forced, yet the performances eventually take on a curious significance.  There are two halves to this film, one that takes place in the real world and one that takes place within the mind of the director behind the scenes making an unwieldly and overly cumbersome play, veering into a mindset where one ages but otherwise loses all concept of time, as the director attempts to come to grips with his own mortality, where this has a vaguely clever stream-of-conscious feel, exploring a subjective reality, yet seen through the eyes of one man’s experiences as he hurtles towards his own death, yet distinguishing between the established reality and the fiction of the characters’ performances can prove confusing, as the distinctions between reality and the imagination are never clear.  Philip Seymour Hoffman as community theater director Caden Cotard is not so much the lead character in this film but a medium for Kaufman to communicate his thoughts.  His obsession with dying is met in equal proportions with an intense fear of love, becoming infatuated with the box-office girl, Hazel (Samantha Morton), after getting dumped by his wife, becoming a surrealistic nightmare, as she moves into a house smoldering in fire and smoke, where any personal connection seems doomed from the outset, as she quickly tires of his insufferable gloominess and moves on, yet Caden can never move on, still haunted by all the precious memories that brought him to this point in time, where what feels like a week for him is actually a year, yet Hazel is someone he never forgets, becoming the love of his life, the object of all his yearning, but he lacks the courage to act upon his feelings, overwhelmed by his anxieties, with theater being the only way he can project his true self, veering instead into an ill-advised marriage with his leading actress Claire (Michelle Williams), whose initial fascination turns sour, as their lives resemble a staged play, with Caden assuming more and more of Claire’s role, who suddenly realizes Caden’s only interested in himself, no longer able to fulfill her role as the compliant and content housewife, with Caden resorting to writing small notes offering inspirational suggestions to his cast, but ultimately returns to Hazel, where the two remain inseparable even into old age, at least in his mind.  As he ages, a stand-in takes his place, Tom Noonan as Sammy, a stalker who has followed him nearly all his adult life, who knows him better than he knows himself, eventually acting on his impulses in ways Caden never could, routinely flirting and having sex with Hazel, while Caden is stuck with a stand-in version of Hazel, Emily Watson as Tammy, where this revolving carousel of characters is an emotional roller coaster with exposed feelings on display, yet Caden never sees in himself what he’s transparently able to see in Sammy, needing others to finally do and say what he cannot, stuck living a life of perpetual observation, needing others to live his life for him.      

Having already written extraordinary screenplays for such a dizzying array of films as Being John Malkovich (1999), ADAPTATION (2002), CONFESSIONS OF A DANGEROUS MIND (2002), and ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND (2004), surely Kaufman is the film writer of our generation, with a reputation for avoiding clarity at all costs, spinning entangled webs that only grow darker and more complex, yet here he just lets it fly in an exhilarating attempt to reach for the skies, reminiscent of the absurdist Before the Law parable so brilliantly expressed in the opening sequence of Orson Welles’ version of Kafka’s THE TRIAL (1962), a vast metaphor for the struggle of life itself, where the trials of living offer a nagging sense of guilt for some vague and unspecified sin or wrongdoing that can never be traced or identified, yet the feeling persists throughout one’s lifetime, even at the hour of one’s death, with vague references to The Myth of Sisyphus, where an artist’s work is never completed, or viewed as successful, yet he persists, claiming “I won’t accept anything but the brutal truth.”  Perhaps he was referring to his wife’s eviscerating comments, “I can’t get excited about your restaging someone else’s old play.  There’s nothing personal in it,” calling him a “tool of suburban, blue-haired regional theater subscribers.”  How’s that for blunt honesty?  So on-target that it left ‘Hoffman as Kaufman’ with a bull’s-eye on his back, his tail between his legs, leaving him to pursue an endlessly futile search for grand existential themes, which may as well be a mythical search for the Golden Fleece.  Much of this feels oddly self-absorbed and obsessed with itself, taking on a kind of 8 ½ (1963) or All That Jazz (1979) vanity project, where the world revolves around a single man and his work, at nearly all times conflicted and at odds with each other, where Caden’s world is shattered early on by the loss of his family that ran out on him, as his wife Adele (Katherine Keener) becomes a hugely successful miniature artist in Berlin, taking their young daughter Olive with her under the pretense that she would return, but discovers she’s never been happier since she separated from Caden, who’s emotional core remains forever damaged, guilty that he was too self-involved to really connect with Olive, becoming truly devastated by her absence, as he rarely if ever has sex anymore without tears.  Some may actively dislike this kind of confessional self-hatred, where insecurities and paranoia take on a life of their own, presenting the life of an artist as incredibly tortured, tragically unfulfilled, and profoundly depressing, where Caden’s body when stressed out seems to turn against him, becoming a grotesque physical specimen with his mysteriously degenerative medical conditions, neurotically obsessed with the idea of dying, leaving him feeling like a pathetic outcast, where all he can do is apologize for being such an unlikable wretch of a human being.  For such gorgeous women to fall for such an unendurably miserable man who reeks of failure and self-pity in every aspect of his life feels like the most unrealistic kind of wish fulfillment, something out of Keith Gordon’s THE SINGING DETECTIVE (2003), making this all a projected fantasy world that has pretenses of realism and inner reflection.  In other words, it’s hard to take this seriously.  However it’s hard not to take seriously the complexities and multi-dimensional performances of the actors, all of which seem to be extensions of this single man’s thoughts and imagination.  While Caden takes great pains at identifying himself as such an ordinary man, a heavily flawed man who is subject to a wealth of fantasies and a wrath of medical ailments in equal measure, when he wins a MacArthur Grant for sheer inventiveness and originality, this feels totally preposterous and is certainly at odds with the Walter Mitty-like man we see onscreen who is wracked with guilt and self-doubt, and who humiliates himself in such bizarre fashion.  In an unusual form of storytelling, everything Caden does couldn’t be less interesting, yet the people around him remain fascinating, notably Samantha Morton, Tom Noonan, Emily Watson, Catherine Keener, the almost unrecognizable Jennifer Jason Leigh, and Dianne Wiest, all of whom are sheer marvels of invention.  Using a top notch cast and a touch of surrealism, we follow Caden along his path to glory, only the journey he takes and the characters he encounters have an inventive, visually expressive flair, though as a cohesive whole it’s not always dramatically engaging, as he continually retreats into a more submissive role, apologizing for his loathsome existence, living almost entirely in an interior existence that wants to reflect upon the world around him, but can’t see past his own deficiencies.  There are no flashback sequences in the film, only forgotten memories, yet they always occur in the present, as this is a film where time is always present, and may leap forward, or may constantly repeat itself, causing a huge discomfort, where especially baffling is the time at the end of the film is mysteriously linked to the same time as the beginning.  Yet this eternal present is continually lived until the body expires, as Caden’s own mega-colossal creation is on a repeating loop.  The death bed sequence with his grown-up daughter Olive (Robin Weigert) is among the more emotionally excruciating scenes, as he’s forced to come to terms with all the pathological lies, full body tattoos, and disturbing behavioral incidents that she’s been force-fed to explain her father’s absence, leaving her hating him with a ferocious vengeance, unable to forgive what she perceives as all the wrongs he has perpetrated, easily becoming the bleakest scene in the entire film, as he’s helpless to change the outcome, yet he still views her as an innocent 4-year old girl who had her entire future in front of her, somehow stolen out from under her.   

Not an easy film to digest with its cliché’d philosophical meanderings, blending the horrific with the terrific in its obsession with not being good enough, expressing all the hopes and dreams Caden always dreamed of wanting but unfortunately could never pull off, leaving him with an exasperating  sense of loss, alienated even from himself, left as if on an island, a man alone with his ambitions unfulfilled, where it’s hard to enjoy much of the morbidity in the more comic first half of the film, while the last half is near brilliant, as it re-examines everything that came before, much like Stanley Kwan’s film Rouge (Yan zhi kou)  (1988), where a ghost from the past searches through the present with such an incredible sense of longing for what was missing in her life.  Similarly, Caden becomes a ghost from his past searching through a netherworld between life and death.  In dreams, it is said that all the characters in the dream actually represent the dreamer.  Here as well, Caden becomes all of the characters on the set, all of the people in his life, a living metaphor for all the thoughts and aspirations that people have that go unnoticed.  As he attempts to make sense of it all, to find his real and authentic self through a colossally expansive theatrical production, a myriad of plays-within-a-play that are in a perpetual state of endless rehearsals all taking place simultaneously for years on end under an enormous Xanadu-like warehouse in the Manhattan theater district where he recreates a smaller model version of the burgeoning city around him, yet his megalomaniacal conception on a massive scale is the exact opposite of his ex-wife Adele whose paintings get tinier and tinier, where you need a magnifying glass to see them.  Fueled by his doubts and insecurities, he lacks the artistic security of Adele, who is comfortable in her own skin, free to express her feelings in her own life and comfortably interacts with the artistic community around her, continually breaking boundaries through her work, while Caden instead feels the need to make grander and ever-expanding spectacles with towering sets of the city, one stacked upon another, creating enormous rooms with endless space, yet he’s never comfortable filling the empty space, as all sense of capturing the truth has been lost in an extended succession of disconnected scenes that lead nowhere, exhibiting very little connectiveness with people, never able to successfully complete what he sets out to do.  Adding to the absurdity of his creation, he hires actors not just to play the people in his life, but also actors to play the actors, so what we see is a musical chairs of regurgitated moments from Caden’s past, reiterating the same themes over and over again, never finding anything new to say about them, growing agitated when actors change the lines, arguing that may be what he was thinking, but not what he actually said, remaining completely oblivious to the way the world has changed outside this bubble existence.  A telling moment occurs when hired actors begin to die, creating a series of funerals, each one bringing Caden closer to his own death, but he outlives nearly everyone.  In old age he rediscovers Hazel, finally re-taking the reins from Sammy, and discovers a kind of earnest simplicity, which is especially heartfelt because of what both have gone through in the intervening years, as she’s always been his one true love, but just as quickly, at the point he realizes what he’s been missing, she’s gone, in the flick of an eye, leaving him to fend off the hideousness of his existence alone, yet he surprisingly makes the claim afterwards that he knows how to do the play now, “There are nearly thirteen million people in the world.  None of those people is an extra.  They’re all the leads of their own stories.  They have to be given their due,” which reasserts the “Attention must be paid” theme from Death of a Salesman, a direct cry for human dignity, a fanfare for the common man, where if he wants to do the play right, he’ll have to achieve the impossible and give everyone their due attention.  Among the more conscientious revelations is that Caden, like Willy Loman before him, was never that rare and exceptional artist that comes along once in a lifetime, but is a more ordinary person, representative of each and every one of us. 

What was once before you, an exciting, mysterious future, is now behind you.  Lived; understood; disappointing.  You realize you are not special.  You have struggled into existence, and are now slipping silently out of it.  This is everyone’s experience.  Every single one.  The specifics hardly matter.  Everyone’s everyone.  So you are Adele, Hazel, Claire, Olive.  You are Ellen.  All her meager sadnesses are yours; all her loneliness; the gray, straw-like hair; her red raw hands.  It’s yours.  It is time for you to understand this.  As the people who adore you stop adoring you; as they die; as they move on; as you shed them; as you shed your beauty; your youth; as the world forgets you; as you recognize your transience; as you begin to lose your characteristics one by one; as you learn there is no-one watching you, and there never was, you think only about driving, not coming from any place; not arriving any place.  Just driving, counting off time.  Now you are here, at 7:43.  Now you are here, at 7:44.

After seventeen years of endless rehearsals he loses track of time, never once performing before a live audience, as he only grows older and more tired, where others eventually have to help him along the way, and instead of giving directions, he finally has to accept direction.  Dianne Wiest, in particular, elevates the last 30 minutes of this film with her phenomenal presence as Ellen, who grows from a simple washer woman to the director taking the place of Caden, re-imagining and conceptualizing things differently, strangely producing greater results, more emotionally charged, which most of all surprises Caden, moved beyond belief, where the tragedy is that he lacked the originality to stake new ground.  And though he yearned to leave behind something monumental, he never really gained any original insight during a lifetime of directing.  Yet even more astonishing, Wiest assumes the thoughts and voice of Caden himself—not really thoughts so much as his final spiritual direction, like the voice of God.  Beautifully expressed by the end credits reprise of Deanna Storey’s ultra downbeat rendition of the song “I’m Just a Little Person,” Deanna Storey - Little Person (Synecdoche New York) YouTube (3:53), blending all of the characters and the musical soundtrack into a single unified mood that has a sublime similarity to the use of the Aimee Mann song “Save Me” Aimee Mann - Save Me YouTube (4:27) in Magnolia (1999), which beautifully encapsulates the sadness that permeates throughout each film.  What stands out is a magnum opus feel to the finale, like a summation of all the previous parts, yet the final moments, especially, breathe sadness, where all that has come before slowly slips away in an apocalyptic finale where everyone appears to be dead or incinerated, blending into a forgotten landscape of thoughts and dreams that are slowly disappearing from the earth, becoming a uniquely quiet and sorrowful expression of acceptance given a grim, desolate look before one goes peacefully into the night, while the final chapter is more like an epilogue or an elegy, as it carries with it a prayerful tone of transcendence.

Synecdoche, New York - Looking Through Caden's Eyes  Film Radar, Daniel Netzel video analysis (12:47)

Saturday, January 22, 2022

25th Hour


Edward Norton, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Spike Lee

25th HOUR       A                                                                                                                       USA  (135 mi)  2002  ‘Scope  d: Spike Lee

A love letter to New York City and an existential meditation on trauma, offering a definitive portrait of the city after 9/11, while also expressing a personal and poetic response to the lives of those 9/11 victims, whose lives will forever be entangled in that one event, where everything changed after that day, where the future was no longer the future, where hope disappeared, where all the things that could have happened would, for certain, no longer happen.  In an instant, it was taken away.  Largely overlooked at the time of its release, this faithful adaptation of David Benioff’s debut novel of 2001 was actually written before the terrorist atrocity, yet this is Hollywood's first contemplation of an openly raw national trauma produced by the attacks of September 11, 2001, released just sixteen months after the event, with the New York setting paying tribute, as the opening credits are a memorial to the terror attacks by projecting two powerful Tribute in Light beams into the New York night sky from the site where the Twin Towers used to stand.  It’s significant to note that no other Hollywood filmmaker would address this crisis until nearly five years after the attacks, and one might argue it’s still the only one that really matters, the one that best connects with the acutely felt psychic devastation from the massive scope of the tragedy, with most Hollywood studios deleting all references to the Twin Towers, supposedly not wanting to remind audiences of a city in deep mourning and shock, though by that time any citizen or non-citizen, criminal or non-criminal, risked being treated by U.S. authorities as a potential terrorist.  Often described as Spike Lee’s white film, along with Summer of Sam (1999), as it was his first to extensively focus on a white protagonist, set in a predominantly white environment, a departure for this director, deviating from his focus on black protagonists and settings.  Brilliantly conceived even prior to the attacks, the film is more about a moral reckoning than any narrative focus on 9/11, which is never talked about directly, only dealing with it on a peripheral level, beautifully filmed by Rodrigo Prieto in Super 35mm widescreen on location in the five boroughs of New York City, yet incorporating the Ground Zero excavation site into the filming, as Lee made the wise decision to subtly integrate the destruction of that day into his absorbing story, exercising surprising control and restraint, attributes Lee is not known for, constructing a raw and poignant look at the underbelly of America, as seen through some of the soiled and seamy lives of a few individuals in New York, all searching for redemption, for another chance to do it right, with some terrific performances all around, but easily what is most powerful are the poetic references to 9/11, and how the strength of the characters are so indelibly rooted to New York City.  For instance, during the infamous “Rant Scene,” a long monologue entitled the “fuck monologue” where Edward Norton as Monty Brogan (named after Montgomery Clift) stares into a bathroom mirror at his father’s bar and curses the five boroughs of New York and the people living in it (which also strangely highlights the city’s diversity), even cursing his father, a bar owner for “selling whiskey to firemen, and cheering the Bronx Bombers.”  In that bar, there’s a memorial to 11 fallen first responders on the wall, a tribute to actual firefighters from Rescue 5 based out of Staten Island, New York (each named in the closing credits) who tragically lost their lives at the World Trade Center on 9/11.  Monty’s riveting speech may be the most memorable sequence in the film, offering a quintessential connection with all New Yorkers who live and breathe through that speech, as he’s summing up a citywide anger that flows from every street corner, becoming a time capsule reflection of how they felt at that time, maligned and scorned, left for dead, yet rising from the ashes of the collective dead.  This film is basically a contrast between the verticality of the skyscrapers, representative of wealth and prestige, and an unseen criminal underground, defined by Monty as a successful drug pusher, until caught, becoming a battle of the two souls of the city.  Thankfully, there are no drug deals in the movie, which does include guns and thugs, but no shootouts.  Instead, the visual display of the rivers and city bridges is astonishing, from the East River and the Hudson, showcasing the Brooklyn, Manhattan, Verrazzano, Williamsburg, and George Washington Bridges, with visits to Central Park and Carl Schurz Park, while also taking place in Brooklyn, specifically Dumbo, and Manhattan, highlighting Yorkville, accentuating the architectural beauty and diversity of the city, while the other man-made counterparts are Wall Street’s skyscrapers, a citadel of power and a gateway to opportunities, and Ground Zero, a decimated reminder of a catastrophe hanging over New York with apocalyptic implications, while Jersey-boy Bruce Springsteen (whose mother was from Bay Ridge in Brooklyn) sings over the end credits, Bruce Springsteen - The Fuse (RARE "25th Hour Remix") YouTube (5:29).

Some of the most suggestive scenes of both the film and the novel are the clever insights in the use of New York waterfront areas, namely the Yorkville esplanade on the East River, where most of the 8000 Moses Benches designed for the 1939 World’s Fair still remain offering choice views of the East River, while nearby the luxurious brownstone homes on the Upper East Side where Monty lives offer an oasis of tranquility, allowing him a momentary escape from reality, where his quiet 2-room apartment offers a sanctuary from the street noise and jarring congestion of urban life.  Monty and his father James (Brian Cox) are Irish immigrants from the Bay Ridge neighborhood in Brooklyn, where his father, a former firefighter and recovering alcoholic, still lives and works in his bar, while Monty’s best friend from childhood, Frank (Barry Pepper), works as a stockbroker on Wall Street.  Monty’s girlfriend Naturelle (Rosario Dawson) is Puerto Rican and from the Bronx, where her mother still lives, while his other best friend Jacob (Philip Seymour Hoffman), born to wealthy Jewish parents from Park Avenue, is a sheepish prep school English teacher.  With the exception of Jacob, all come from working-class backgrounds representing the American Dream metaphor for upward mobility, making the most out of their opportunities, yet with each it comes with a cost, as Monty is a drug dealer connected to the Russian mafia, where his father’s bar was paid for from drug money.  Frank has no private life from working such long exhaustive hours, while Naturelle could never afford to live in Yorkville were it not for Monty’s money.  They are connected to changing neighborhoods, a mosaic of different ethnic groups, as Bensonhurst is now primarily an Italian neighborhood, while the Bronx is part of the postwar migration of blacks and Puerto Ricans coming from East Harlem.  This culture mix is not without conflicts, racial and otherwise, as represented in Monty’s extended “Fuck You rant,” Edward Norton Rant 25th Hour YouTube (5:14), among the more blistering scenes in both the book and film, where the words “Fuck you” are written on a bathroom mirror, triggering an angry tirade against all the ethnic groups, social classes, and neighborhoods, “from the projects in the Bronx to the lofts in SoHo, from the tenements in Alphabet City to the brownstones in Park Slope, to the split-levels in Staten Island,” lambasting Pakistani and Sikh cab drivers, gays, panhandlers, Korean grocers, Russian mobsters, Wall Street brokers, Hasidic Jewish jewelers, Upper East Side wives, brothers playing basketball, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Italians, the poor, the wealthy, blacks, the NYPD, Catholic priests, Jesus himself, Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, and his friends and father, an insightful reworking of the underlying racial fears that dominate those changing neighborhoods, always afraid some new group will ultimately push them out or redefine the distinctive character of the neighborhood.  After a prolonged stereotypical rant blaming all the others, conceived as a montage of horizontal tracking shots of ethnic groups that draw his ire, where his contempt is met with an equal amount of ardor and love, as these are the experiences that define him, he finally turns to himself, suggesting he screwed up and got caught because he got too greedy, saving much of the vitriol for himself, as he had it all and threw it away, claiming he blew it, mirroring a fatalistic refrain heard at the end of Easy Rider (1969), now staring down a seven year stretch in prison, where the story is essentially his last 24-hours of freedom, with another hour added on to travel to the prison and turn himself in. One essential, underlying truth behind this prolonged and highly personalized invective is that what he’ll miss most is the city itself.  A flashback sequence reveals the day authorities searched his apartment, knowing full well where everything was stashed, apparently sold down the river by one of his closest friends.  With so much compressed into so little time, it portrays a lifetime lived and lost, consumed by guilt over the sudden finality of it all, feeling as if he betrayed his friends and family, yet ultimately has no one to blame but himself.  Essentially the psychological examination of a convicted drug dealer serves as a microcosm of New York City’s post 9/11 psyche, addressing the here and now in ways that took audiences by surprise, as things weren’t going to be the same for either Monty Brogan or for the city, where Monty’s attempts to come to terms with a future in prison parallels the city’s attempt to readjust to the changes wrought by 9/11.  The mournful Terrence Blanchard score was the only Academy Award nomination, as Hollywood was simply not yet ready to confront such a reality-based provocation that so profoundly touched a raw nerve.  

Offering a brief window into the lives of Frank and Jacob, we see Frank is something of a hotshot cowboy hopped up on Red Bull, a lone wolf taking huge chances with other people’s money, defying the cautionary measures installed by his employer to prevent that sort of thing, so he’s already living on the edge, while Jacob listens to Mary D’Annunzio (Anna Paquin), one of his students read a literary passage, yet his entire focus is on an exposed belly tattoo, utterly fascinated, unable to take his eyes off of it, as she reveals a fierce individualism that seems to possess an irresistible sensuality, inconspicuously flirting openly with him.  Despite his rather reserved and introverted exterior, he’s already creating sexual fantasies in his head.  In each instance, the question is will they cross the line?  Before they meet Monty, Jacob meets Frank in his 32nd floor window apartment overlooking Ground Zero, an ominous view that resembles the surface of the moon, with both chatting casually, yet that backdrop has unmistakable meaning that supersedes anything else in the film, becoming a defining moment and one of the more uniquely creative shots in any Spike Lee film, as it can’t be confused or mistaken for anything else.  It’s a literal shock to the system.  Meeting afterwards at the Bridge Nightclub, a packed house in the Dumbo warehouse district in Brooklyn with a line down the block waiting to get in, Monty has VIP status, with a complimentary bottle of champagne gifted to a special table.  Borrowing a line from Francis Bacon, Monty offers a toast, “Champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends,” where an open wound of suspicion regarding who turned him in still haunts him, suspecting Naturelle, but she has no motive, depending on him entirely.  Remove the gravy train and she moves back in with her mother in the Bronx.  Nonetheless, he remains anxious and openly suspicious of everyone.  The long nightclub sequence is the centerpiece of the film, much of it shot in a blue hue, where Naturelle and Mary hit the dance floor with jazz funk music pulsating in the background, Cymande performing "Bra" Live on KCRW YouTube (4:29), given a relaxed and evocative subterranean vibe that veers from in-your-face to the surreal.  Downing shots and drinking heavily, their defenses are lowered, where Monty has an appointment with club owner Uncle Nikolai (Levan Uchaneishvili), the sleazy Russian mobster behind the drug operation, testing the waters, so to speak, to see where his loyalties lie, a sequence that explodes in unanticipated violence, yet there are hauntingly surreal moments of Jacob finally acting on his impulses with Mary, a lost innocence that only ends up sending shivers of guilt, while Frank, laden with his own guilt and self-loathing for never once trying to stop his best friend, while also thinking he somehow had it coming, has a blowup with Naturelle while attempting to reconcile Monty’s fall from grace and their respective roles in it, both reeling in their own complicity, yet when he obnoxiously starts to pin the blame on her she righteously puts him in his place and refuses to be associated with the invectives coming out of his mouth.  In this scenario, there is plenty of blame to go around, as the conflicted family and closest associates are all playing mind games and psychologically incriminating themselves for what were essentially Monty’s own decisions.  By dawn, Frank has to do the unthinkable, in a scene of escalating tension as Monty asks him to pulverize his face, as he refuses to enter prison “looking good,” knowing he would make an easy sexual target, an extension of his biggest fear.  It’s a repugnant scene, utterly raw and uncompromising, a challenge of manhood and a thorough reckoning with one’s conscience, yet emblematic of the underlying violence perpetuated throughout the criminal underworld, and an ugly picture of what awaits Monty in prison, where you can be scared of the future and haunted by the past at the same time.  It also mirrors the opening scene, as Monty’s beaten face recalls the grotesque body of a bloodied and battered dog at the beginning of the film that Monty suspects still has life within him (a metaphor for his own future), taking him in and nursing him back to health, becoming inseparable, always seen together on the benches overlooking the East River, creating an indelible image to revisit countless times while incarcerated.  But as his father arrives to drive him to prison, it leads to one of the most extraordinarily powerful sequences seen in years, with his father offering to turn West and take him as far away as possible, where he can build a new life, with a long monologue that becomes a poetic reverie offering a “What if?” scenario, creating a rapturous montage of utterly breathtaking cinema.  Blurring the boundaries between dream and reality, reiterating the myth of freedom on the open road, this sequence offers a rarified glimpse of unfilled ambition.  But at what cost?  This film accentuates neither black nor white, but focuses on human beings, as if the collective sum of the consequences of their individual choices represents a vision of a newly developing morality.

“...This life came so close to never happening.”

In a brilliant and unparalleled ending, what a searing sequence of images, so exquisitely haunted by the chilling reminder of the unspoken, unseen ghosts of those missing lives, and the lives that will never be, filled with such an appreciation for life, that continually promises a world that might have been, before reminding us, instead, with a kind of effortless sock-in-the face, of how frail and vulnerable we really are, particularly in the devastating aftermath of 9/11, despite our swaggering bravado.  Loss figures prominently in this film, lamenting the loss of a loved one, a son, a friend, while also expounding on lost opportunities, saturated with regrets about the past, and nostalgia for a life that is now irrevocably over, making this is a farewell to freedom, from the world we once thought we knew, revealing instead such a powerful portrait of people struggling to overcome their own personal traumas, both internally and externally.  This is a shining testament to the resiliency of the human soul, as what we have, ultimately, is a transcendent work that provides a moving and enduring spirit of humanity.


Also, a few differences between the book and the film.  In the book Monty drives a Corvette instead of the 1970 bright yellow Dodge Coronet Super Bee (1970 Dodge Coronet Super Bee Spike Lee 25Th Hour Film Mopar For Sale Auction Connecticut Mohegan Sun), he’s 27, it’s his last night before prison, there’s no pitbull jokes, the 4 DEA agents are all white and they don’t catch Monty and Naturelle in the bath tub.  Naturelle is a long distance runner, not a basketball player, which of course Spike couldn’t help changing.  But overall the movie is fairly faithful to the book.  The Victoria Secret joke is there, Naturelle has the Puerto Rican flag tattooed on her ankle, the teacher is in the 62nd percentile.  One interesting difference is the 3 options speech of the trader.  In the book option number 2 has the trader blatantly imitating suicide putting his fore-finger to his temple and squeezing his thumb down, while in the movie it was taking a bullet with his teeth.  Does suicide need to be softened for the masses?  The fuck you speech, which is on pages 111 – 113, goes on a bit longer and his fucks directed towards the Knicks and Michael Jordan were of course purged by ardent courtside Knicks fan Spike.  The student’s tattoo was on her wrist rather than her navel, though her teacher does ask her what her mother’s reaction was to it.  And the teacher stares at her white knees through the holes in her jeans rather than staring at her bare belly.  The crying after sex anecdote is told in a slightly different context.  Monty’s seduction of Naturelle is much more prolonged and involved, and the end monologue doesn’t include Naturelle, who he will never see again while he is hiding, instead he mates with the bar owner’s daughter.  In the original novel, Monty never doubts Naturelle’s loyalty to him, as a subplot of Monty mistrusting Naturelle was added for dramatic effect.