Showing posts with label Marie Rivière. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marie Rivière. Show all posts

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Down By Love (Éperdument)












DOWN BY LOVE (Éperdument)        D+               
France  Belgium  (110 mi)  2016  ‘Scope  d:  Pierre Godeau

It’s surprising how far the mighty have fallen, as just three years ago, actress Adèle Exarchopoulos, along with co-star Léa Seydoux, both made history by being given a Cannes Palme d’Or, the first instance that it was awarded to the two lead actresses as well as the director for Abdellatif Kechiche’s award winning film Blue Is the Warmest Color (La Vie d'Adèle, Chapitres 1 et 2) (2013), becoming the only women besides Jane Campion to have won the festival’s top award.  As there was some fallout after the announcement with the actresses claiming they were bullied on the set, complaining the director’s style was sexually abusive, making them feel like “prostitutes,” it’s perhaps not surprising that the director has not worked since and has no planned films in the works, where it appears he’s been blacklisted by the industry.  Both actresses, on the other hand, have worked steadily.  But if this is any indication of the material chosen by Exarchopoulos, who in 2014 was voted Most Promising Actress in the French César awards, her career is on a downward descent, as this film is something of a disgrace, with the worst offensive being it’s pretentious and sexually exploitive.  While it’s basically a prison B-movie, where in America a prestigious director like Jonathan Demme began his directing career making a Roger Corman produced women’s prison exploitation flick called Caged Heat (1974), leave it to the French to take it completely seriously, where the young actress has shown little growth in her role, but instead retreats to familiar grounds where in the most sexually explicit scenes she once again takes her clothes off.  While she’s a beautiful young woman, the problem is there’s little else worth talking about, as the film otherwise exposes a lackluster indifference and is one of the least engaging films seen all year.  While not impressed with Nolwenn Lemesle’s Pieces of Me (Des morceaux de moi) (2012), a very average earlier film Exarchopoulos made prior to working with Kechiche, this film is actually much worse, and while her performance is not the primary cause of embarrassment, it does leave plenty of doubts about this actress’s ability to carry a film. 

Adapted from the autobiographical book Défense d’aimer by Florent Gonçalvez, the former director of the French Versailles prison describing his scandalous 2011 affair with an inmate, most will find the movie version incredulous, especially the pernicious behavior of the prison director, whose obsessional behavior is so out of line that it’s difficult to take his actions seriously.  Bogged down by the shoddy work of a director that refuses to make a single scene inventive or interesting, instead it’s a routine, by-the-numbers scenario that would describe the kind of predictable social drama screened on television on a nightly basis with Exarchopoulos once more assigned a role largely playing to the male gaze.  Much like David Fincher’s Gone Girl (2014), which is infinitely more interesting than this, but both are the stuff of relatively light reading airport novels that accentuate salacious material.  In this film, viewers may squirm in their seats and grow uncomfortable not from any build-up of suspense, but from how emotionally dull and inert the characters are with one another, where there’s simply no sexual chemistry to justify such a major risk, in this case destroying a marriage, a family, and a career, where the audience has to keep asking themselves—for what?  Anna Amari (Exarchopoulos) is seen arriving at a new prison facility, where she’s being transferred to be closer to her mother, Marie Rivière from Rohmer’s Le Rayon Vert (Summer) (1986) and An Autumn Tale (Conte D’Automne) (1998).  Receiving the standard new girl treatment, she’s called a variety of offensive names, becoming the target of vicious attacks, eventually forced to defend herself, where enemies are established early on.  Unlike real prisons, however, this one is exceedingly quiet, with prisoners often seen roaming the hallways without any guard present, where this film actually suggests there is a great deal of privacy to be found inside prison compounds.  Enter Jean Firmino (Guillaume Gallienne), who is initially viewed as a social worker.  There is nothing in his character to suggest he is anything more, as one never suspects he runs the institution.  He’s middle-aged, happily married, and has a young daughter who seems to idolize him.  A visit to his daughter’s school confirms that he is viewed more as a civil servant than an authority figure.    

Firmino takes an interest in Anna’s case, helping to prepare her for her upcoming trial, with the film leaving out any backstory about her supposed crime.  We never learn what she is convicted of, but surprisingly spends four years in prison even before her sentencing, about half of her time, where she’ll still be under age 25 by her expected release.  Firmino, on the other hand, is likely to be in his forties, so there’s about a twenty year age difference.  Nonetheless, Firmino continually arranges private time for Anna, though it’s not really all that private, as guards deliver her for every visit, though she’s often left alone on the premises completely unguarded afterwards, and would have to be considered a security risk.  What’s perhaps most preposterous, yet so decidedly French, is the assignment of dramatic texts for the prisoners, where Anna is being taught Racine’s Phèdra, a 17th century ancient Greek mythological play written in Alexandrine verse where the lead character is driven to incestuous desires, a  victim of her own impulses, consumed by jealousy and guilt afterwards.  However, in her family, descended from the Gods, morality is not really an issue, where death remains the ultimate tragedy, as well as the accompanying fall from grace.  A blunt reminder of what’s in store, there’s nothing subtle about this over-hyped drama, moving quickly into acts of sexual taboo, where neither one seems the least bit phased by the potential consequences, showing no conscious whatsoever as they plunge headlong into a scandalous affair, often unable to tell illusion from reality, becoming the talk of the prison, as they spend so much time together.  Even Firmino’s wife (Stéphanie Cléau) knows exactly what’s going on, but does nothing to stop it.  While it’s more of a cheap and tawdry melodrama without an ounce of passion anywhere, perhaps the only reason to stick around is to see if it will ever end, as it seems to go on forever, where the degree of risk borders on spectacle.  Nothing, however, can resuscitate this film from the drivel it descends to, a sick power game with no real balls to speak of, as both apparently lose their minds to an obsession that they foolishly delude themselves into thinking is love.  It crossed my mind that one possible ending may be both imprisoned for long durations, holed up in cells at the same facility in different compounds separated by gender, with a view of the other across a spacious courtyard, where they could go on imagining one another while stuck in their own inescapable purgatories.  A much better directed version of this is the flamboyant sexual indulgence of Christophe Honoré’s MA MÈRE (2004), a bombastic adaptation of the Georges Bataille philosophical novel that contrasts base sexuality with the divine, striving for transcendence through complete sexual indulgence.  This pathetic little misfire is a pale comparison and a candidate for worst film of the year.  Surprising that this was chosen for export, but hopefully it won’t ruin anyone’s career.  

Sunday, September 21, 2014

An Autumn Tale (Conte D’Automne)






Rohmer on the set with Béatrice Romand









AN AUTUMN TALE (Conte D’Automne)         A-                
from Rohmer’s Tales of the Four Seasons
France  (112 mi)  1998  d:  Éric Rohmer

I want all men to love me—especially those I don’t love.  —Isabelle (Marie Rivière)

The final installment of Rohmer’s Tales of Four Seasons (Contes des quatre saisons, 1990–98) is vintage Rohmer, as the subject itself is the art of conversation, where one might think of this as the endless dinner conversation of Louis Malle’s MY DINNER WITH ANDRÉ (1981), but instead taking place between three women in the pastoral elegance of rural France nestled in the sun-lit, open air vineyards of the Rhône valley.  The film is almost entirely told in light-hearted conversation and in the light of day, usually accentuating the female point of view.  Of interest, probably as much to Rohmer as to the audience, the director has brought back two women who played lead roles in earlier Rohmer films while in the full bloom of youth, now returning as mature adults, including Béatrice Romand, who played the alluring 17-year old teenager in CLAIRE’S KNEE (1970), while Marie Rivière began her collaboration in THE AVIATOR’S WIFE (1981) while also starring in Le Rayon Vert (Summer) (1986), both now in their 40’s.  What they bring to this film is a sense of effortlessness working with Rohmer, where a fictionalized story very much resembles the realism of a documentary from the extensive degree of naturalism displayed throughout, which is essential in a charming, short story kind of way, where meticulous attention to details is what makes it so interesting. 

Romand plays Magali, a widow on her own with wild, unattended hair who spends all her time tinkering around her small vineyard left to her by her family, hoping she can create a work of art, never venturing out much to socialize or reacquaint herself with the opposite sex, while Rivière plays her best friend Isabelle, who runs a bookstore in town but is rarely if ever there, instead spending as much free time in the country as she can.  She’s happily married and her daughter is about to be married, a major event in any small town, yet it’s barely mentioned except as an excuse to get Magali out of the house.  Magali’s son Léo has a girl friend Rosine, the irrepressibly gorgeous Alexia Portal, a student who had been conducting an affair with one of her professors, Étienne (Didier Sandre), a pleasant but emotionally unappealing intellectual, so now she prefers Magali’s company to Léo’s, claiming it was she that interested her in the first place, that Léo was only an afterthought.  Unforced, relaxed, and self-assured, the film oozes charm and witty intellect from the 78-year old filmmaker, where the emphasis is on the conversation between the characters, who reveal their feelings and how they relate to each other and the world around them at this particular point in their lives.

The gist of the story involves matchmaking, females plotting behind other people’s backs, planning and scheming and mapping out people’s lives for their own devious purposes while of course claiming good intentions.  Both Isabelle and Rosine secretly conspire to find appropriate suitors for Magali, unbeknownst to her and each not knowing of the other’s similar intentions.  Rosine tries to pawn off her old professor, although it appears her motives may also be to keep his paws off her, as he is reluctant to let her go, while Isabelle takes it a step further and places an ad in the personals, attracting a middle aged business man, Gérald (Alain Libolt).  It’s a bit of a surprise when Isabelle herself shows up, obviously wanting to attract his interest, slowly gaining his trust by going out on afternoon soirée’s, garnering attention that she desperately needs.  Only then does she turn the tables and report she’s only been checking him out for a friend.  The befuddled Gérald has no choice but to accept the terms of the game, here completely defined by Isabelle, who then invites him to her daughter’s wedding reception where he can meet Magali, a woman who supposedly has everything in life she could possibly want, except a companion, believing it is too late in life for her to find the right man, so for Gérald an opportunity presents itself. 

Arriving on the scene, there are twists and turns, with disguises and conniving tricks, where this turns into a comedy or errors and misdirection, where motive, opportunity, and misunderstood feelings mix with desire and attraction and a long-felt, pent-up loneliness, where there is more than a hint of melancholy in the air.  Rather than jump right into things like headstrong young lovers, there’s a feeling out process that takes time, where relationships for mature adults in the autumn of their lives resemble the care and attention needed in aging a fine wine, which if drunk too early in youth will never reach its desired complexity.  While it’s all so simple, really, and the story is told in endless conversations where the characters are so perfectly defined through the time the audience spends with them onscreen.  Other than Professor Étienne and suitor Gérald, men are all but absent in this film, mentioned, but disappearing at the first available chance.  Despite a few difficulties along route, the film is surprisingly upbeat, featuring a few exquisite locations and plenty of time with characters sitting around leisurely sipping wine as they pleasantly pass the afternoons away.  The dialogue written by Rohmer is smart, concise, and most important of all engaging, remaining subtly sophisticated and clever.  It’s a non-pretentious style of filmmaking that belongs to Rohmer alone, as there’s nothing large here, very little action to speak of, simply the charm and elegance of observing human behavior, watching people behaving wonderfully most of the time.