Showing posts with label toxic masculinity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label toxic masculinity. Show all posts

Saturday, March 1, 2025

The Seed of the Sacred Fig (Dâne-ye anjîr-e ma'âbed)


 

















Writer/director Mohammad Rasoulof


 Rasoulof at Cannes, photos are actors who are forbidden to leave Iran
Mahsa Amini











THE SEED OF THE SACRED FIG (Dâne-ye anjîr-e ma'âbed)       B-                                France  Germany  (167 mi)  2024  ‘Scope  d: Mohammad Rasoulof

Dictatorial systems succeed and are maintained over time not because of the leaders, but because of the middle management who carry out and often amplify their orders.  The regime is using religion as a political tool, and my films focus on this indoctrination.  The Islamic Republic is a dictatorship that has taken Iranians hostage; repression is its essence.  Any announcement of change is just propaganda.  If they can, they will eliminate any opponent, but I don’t spend a second of my life thinking about it.

—Writer/director Mohammad Rasoulof

Mohammad Rasoulof is a filmmaker with a storied past, interweaving the personal with the political, arrested multiple times, initially accused, along with Jafar Panahi, director of No Bears (Khers nist) (2022), of filming without a permit in 2009, then he was arrested in 2010 for filming a movie about The Green Movement, specifically the protests following the allegedly stolen 2009 presidential elections, which he never finished, where his films were declared “propaganda against the system,” convicted of “intending to commit crimes against the security of the country,” one of several high-profile Iranian filmmakers to be arrested, censored, and condemned by the Iranian regime for his art.  Unfortunately, this kind of thing is the reality in Iran today, which has a long history of corruption and brutality, leading to significant uprisings, including the revolution that brought the Islamic Republic into power in 1979, the 2009 Iranian Green Movement to protest massive fraud in the presidential elections, the 2019 uprising over rising gasoline prices, and now the protests that erupted since the death of Mahsa (Jina) Amini, leading to the Woman, Life, Freedom movement in 2022, mostly women under the age of 25, where the rallying cry has been “Zan, Zendegi, Azadi,” or women, life, freedom, with more than 500 deaths (at least 69 of them children) reported after Iranian security forces fired live ammunition into crowds and killed even more protesters by beating them with batons, where thousands more were subjected to interrogation, arbitrary detention, unjust prosecution, and imprisonment for peacefully exercising their human rights.  The Iranian government, which currently provides drones to the Russian army to bomb Ukraine, by the way, has only intensified its efforts to suppress the fundamental rights of women and girls and crush remaining initiatives of women’s activism, with Amini’s lawyers arrested and ordered to serve a year in prison, while executions in Iran have significantly increased, with a record number of 853 death sentences in 2023 (Iran: Two years after 'Woman Life Freedom' uprising ...).  Stoking the flames of punitive retaliation, Iran’s authoritative judiciary has become a tool of repression and fear, part of a long history of suppressing political opposition, criticism of the country’s human rights record, and other peaceful forms of dissent, using religion as a weapon, where civil servants act against their own consciences and enforce dubious judgments in order not to endanger their own standard of living, which results in the entire Iranian population being held hostage.  Notably, the film also marks the first time since the establishment of the Islamic Republic that Iranian actresses appear onscreen without wearing the mandatory hijab, a detail which carries a tremendous symbolic significance both for the regime and the Iranian public, though they are barred from ever seeing the film.  The maker of The White Meadows (Keshtzar haye sepid) (2009), Goodbye (Bé omid é didar) (2011), Manuscripts Don't Burn (Dast-neveshtehaa nemisoosand) (2013), and 2020 Top Ten List #2 There Is No Evil (Sheytan vojud nadarad) (2020), Rasoulof has had to continuously deal with the security apparatus of Iran, twice serving time in Iranian jails, over a month in solitary confinement, finally exhausting his appeals, ultimately sentenced to eight years in prison as well as a flogging, a fine, and confiscation of his property, which led him to flee the country, crossing the mountains on foot, leaving behind all his electronic devices to avoid being traced, hiding in safe houses before arriving in Hamburg, Germany 28 days after leaving Tehran, where going into exile was something that was never considered until the very last minute, having only two hours to decide, leaving everything else behind.  As a result, this film is Germany’s submission as Best International Film for the Academy Awards, having been made primarily in Iran, but smuggled out of the country, financed, and completed in Germany, which has become the director’s new adopted home, having studied film there as a young man, while his daughter, Baran Rasoulof, who starred in THERE IS NO EVIL, has lived there for years.

Made entirely in secret to evade a previous legal ban that prohibited Rasoulof from making films, with post-production done remotely, this won a Special Jury Award at the 2024 Cannes Film Festival, shown on the very last day, receiving plenty of acclaim for demonstrating a ferocity of spirit and for simply being made at all, yet the film is about as subtle as a runaway bulldozer, where the heavy-handed moralistic approach may leave some cold, as realism is transformed into symbolism, which is so obvious that it is borderline ridiculous, carrying little emotional power.  At nearly three hours long, this meandering morality tale can feel overlong and relentlessly exhausting, making the same point over and over again, becoming a battering ram on the brain, with the filmmaker having a love affair with posted cellphone footage of the protests, where unfortunately he’s not much of a character builder, as his characters don’t really seem real, instead they serve other purposes, personifying allegorical themes instead of any authentic naturalism, which has always been an essential component of the best Iranian films.  Beginning with a story parable, the title refers to an invasive species of fig tree that spreads by “wrapping itself around another tree and eventually strangling it,” seen as a symbol of the theocratic regime in Iran, where more than anything this exposes the toxic patriarchy that is suffocating the life out of its own people.  Written by the director, whose entire career represents continued attempts to understand the authoritarian mindset, the film becomes a political allegory for the relationship between the Iranian state and its people, superimposing the real threats of a brutal theocracy with the fictional story of one family’s struggle under its absolutist rule.  An overtly political film is mixed with a complex, psychological chamber drama, where the internal and external factors become so intermingled that they are virtually indistinguishable, creating a moral conundrum for all involved, where the first two hours of the film take place almost exclusively in the claustrophobic, prison-like confines of a family apartment in Tehran, with poorly lit rooms, the curtains always closed, completely cut off from the combustible force happening right outside on the streets below.  Led by family patriarch Iman (Missagh Zareh), he was recently appointed as an investigator to the Revolutionary court in Tehran, a prestigious position that traditionally leads to becoming a judge, where his wife Najmeh (Soheila Golestani, who was herself arrested in 2022 for demonstrating against Amini’s death) is ecstatic at the prospects of becoming economically secure for life, offering the best possible chance of a better life for their two adolescent daughters, Rezvan (Mahsa Rostami), just entering university, and Sana (Setareh Maleki), who is still in high school, two strong and independent-minded daughters.  Iman initially has misgivings, however, as he’s asked to sign off on death sentences with no investigation and no trial, without even reading the case file, an act his predecessor refused, which created the job opening.  Just as ominously, Iman is given a gun by the government for self-protection, as court officials are often targeted by disgruntled families, placing them at risk.  The film adheres to Anton Chekhov’s narrative principle, described as Chekhov's gun, which suggests that “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired.  Otherwise don’t put it there.”  Arriving in court at the crack of dawn and not returning until late at night, the court is literally swamped by an avalanche of arrests from the outpouring of protests following the death of a young 22-year old girl, Mahsa Amini (never named in the film), who authorities claimed suffered a heart attack, yet she was severely beaten and died of head injuries while in police custody several days after she was arrested in Tehran by members of the country’s Basiji, or morality police, for violating hijab laws, not for refusing to wear a hijab, but for “not wearing it properly.”  The outrage this generates is unprecedented, much of it captured on cellphones and posted on the internet, where the brutality of the images contrasts with the state news coverage that blames it all on a conspiracy of disobedient lawbreakers who want to overthrow the regime, yet the protests were unlike any the country had seen before, and the most widespread revolt since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

There’s enough foreshadowing in this film to fill all the holes in Albert Hall, where Najmeh is nauseatingly persistent in warning her daughters about the dangers of going on social media or associating with the “wrong” kind of person, as that reflects upon their father’s profession, where any little slipup could derail his career.  “You must be irreproachable,” she warns.  They constantly get harangued with these warnings, each time with greater urgency than the last, but in the secrecy of their bedrooms they spend their time watching cellphone coverage of the protests, witnessing the civil unrest unfolding in real time, where they can see for themselves the television coverage is blatantly false, as the police are simply bashing heads and making sweeping arrests.  When one of Rezvan’s friends living in the university dormitory gets shot in the face with buckshot from a random shot at the students by the police, they are aghast, bringing Sadaf (Niousha Akhshi) home for medical care, as any visit to the hospital would result in her arrest, forcing Najmeh to secretly come to the girl’s aid, cleaning the wound, meticulously removing each pellet, where the camera holds on her battered and bloody face for what feels like an eternity, literally rubbing viewers face with the grotesque nature of the catastrophe, where there is simply no looking away from the crime.  Returning back to the dormitory, she is arrested shortly afterwards and goes missing, as Rezvan sums it up, “They took her beauty – and her future.”  While they keep this incident from Iman, who would not approve, things go off the rails when Iman loses his gun, reminiscent of Akira Kurosawa’s STRAY DOG (1949), frantically searching the house, going through every nook and cranny, turning the entire living space upside down, like a police search, creating chaos in the ranks, which only grows more incendiary when the girls have the unmitigated gall to question their father, who mirrors the Iranian state by blaming it all on criminal deviants, as that’s what he spends his entire time doing, each and every day, working under extreme pressure, signing off on sentences sending protesters to jail or even to death sentences, but the girls know better, part of a generational divide, and this perturbs their father, creating division in the ranks, with Iman proclaiming “Faith knows no questions.”  While we never see Iman at work, what we do see is chillingly surreal, as just walking the hallways reveals giant cardboard cutouts of various Iranian martyrs and dignitaries, whose shadow presence looms over the proceedings.  One of the most surprising images comes when Iman stops his car at a red light and exchanges looks with a young woman in the car next to him, short hair, no hijab, dance music playing on the radio, and a fiercely defiant look.  This is a look at the future.  Perhaps the most eerie sequence is when Iman, desperate to find the gun, has his own family interrogated by a supposed professional who specializes in “psychology and body-language techniques,” which is shockingly disturbing.  When Iman’s identity and address are posted on social media, they head for the country, suddenly feeling like a jailbreak out into open spaces, turning into a long, slow descent into authoritarian horror, as the clashing perspectives spiral into a paranoia-fueled nightmare, where fascism and a growing madness creep into their own family divisions.  Iman loses all sense of balance from the missing gun, afraid he’ll lose his job and be sent to prison if he doesn’t find it, growing more and more unstable, turning into a villain that demands absolute obedience, illustrating he is little more than a cog of the repressive regime, with Najmeh, who has a very pragmatic relationship to her husband’s work in a role similar to that of Sandra Hüller’s Hedwig in Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest (2023), caught in the middle. Where it all leads is into a frenetic, yet heavy-handed Hollywood-style action thriller, fueled by continually escalating suspicions, where everyone is suddenly a potential suspect, turning very grim and darkly sinister, with collateral shrapnel flying in all directions, taking domestic violence to the next level, featuring an alarming road rage car chase, a violent standoff, and a frightening game of hide-and-seek in a hallucinogenic, maze-like labyrinth of an abandoned city in ruins that defies all rationale, but accentuates the deep divisions that exist in this fractured society hell-bent on imposing its will, a common theme, unfortunately, on the global landscape at the moment, where democracy movements are being stifled.   

Mohammad Rasoulof's Top 10 - The Criterion Collection

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

2024 Top Ten List #8 Monster (Kaibutsu)


 





















Director Hirokazu Kore-eda




Kore-eda on the set

Hinata Hiiragi and Sōya Kurokawa





























MONSTER (Kaibutsu)                      A-                                                                                         Japan  (127 mi)  2023 ‘Scope  d: Hirokazu Kore-eda

What actually happened doesn’t matter.                                                                                        —Makiko Fushimi (Yûko Tanaka), school principal

Throughout his career Kore-eda has made heartfelt films known for their subtly crafted storytelling, made with genuine purpose and hope, where the humane spirit he generates makes him one of the few directors you’d actually want to meet and personally hang out with, hopefully delving into endless conversations, as what’s so fascinating about him is his appreciation for what makes us truly human, where perhaps more than any other director it’s his open tolerance and empathetic sensitivity that stand out.  This unusual film starts out like a hot mess, one disaster after another, where it’s all about some hidden trauma, told out of sequence from an adult’s perspective, using a labyrinthine structure that’s hard to follow, before eventually lurching into the protected world of Céline Sciamma’s Petite Maman (2021), with two kids just being themselves, ultimately becoming a film about love and friendship, told with a quiet sensitivity, with an incredible musical score by Ryuichi Sakamoto, his last composition before succumbing to cancer just months before the release, with the film dedicated to him, where the tenderness at the end veers into Miyazaki territory, yet also the imaginary realms of Kurosawa’s DODES’KA-DEN (1970).  This guy does amazing things with kids, probably better than anyone else, as he showed us with Nobody Knows (Dare mo shiranai) (2004), where what he really reveals is that kids have their own secret universe separate and apart from that of adults and their parents, yet it can be transfixing to see them in their own element.  According to Kore-eda, the perspective of children is a world completely inaccessible to adults, who are often unaware of the unintended impact they can have, “As adults, we’re completely ignorant that we might be monsters.”  What’s really surprising is how it appears to be about one thing, but then the perspective is completely altered, revealing an entirely different point of view, actually returning back to the same moment in time, but seeing it with fresh eyes, suggesting truth is elusive, often spiraling out of control, deliberately twisted and contorted into something it is not, where it is often hard to tell the difference.  One of the rare instances when Kore-eda directs a film he didn’t write himself, his first since Maborosi (Maboroshi no hikari) (1995), as the script was written by Yûji Sakamoto, perhaps best known writing for television, winning the Best Screenplay award at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival, yet meticulously staged and skillfully edited by the filmmaker, becoming a triptych puzzle film about subjective perspectives and truths, where a seemingly straightforward narrative is retold from three different points of view and shifts subtly as new details emerge.  What appears to be a film about a teacher bullying a young student ultimately becomes something more complicated, where even the title is ambiguous, with viewers continually changing who they identify as the monster, becoming a fascinating study of the human condition, exposing the full extent of how we misinterpret one another, failing to grasp each other’s full humanity, revealing a sense of disconnect and miscommunication, opening up our eyes to worlds we rarely see, told with exquisite poetry and grace.  This is one of the better films in exposing the nature of bias, as assumptions are made with some but not all the facts, where there are always pieces of a story we never see, some of which remains shrouded under a cloud of lies, making it difficult to ascertain the real truth, but this film exposes the dangers of prematurely drawing conclusions without grasping the whole picture, where our rush to judgment in this day and age of social media may be the real monster, a world of judgment, accusations, fear, and mistrust, where things we don’t really understand are given scornful labels like evil or monster.   

Shot in ‘Scope by Ryûto Kondô, who also shot Shoplifters (Manbiki kazoku) (2018), which won the Palme d’Or at Cannes, carrying over actress Sakura Andô, who was the heart and soul of that film, appearing here as a single mother Saori raising her moody fifth grade son Minato (Sōya Kurokawa), whose existential travails comprise the moral complexity of the film.  In the opening sequence they watch a raging fire completely demolishing a high-rise building, resembling a towering inferno, which brings the image of a catastrophe front and center, accompanied by recurring shots of water streaming out of a dam, offering the possibility that eventually the dam could break.  This sense of foreboding continues throughout the film, suggesting a potential disaster awaits, yet this is a film that continually changes before our eyes, where it takes a while before viewers comprehend just what’s going on, instead remaining indecipherable, as it’s often hard to believe what we see, literally altering our expectations moment by moment.  When Minato comes home from school with bruises, or just one shoe, then inexplicably cuts his hair before disappearing out of the house altogether, she eventually discovers him alone splashing around in the darkness of what appears to be an abandoned railroad tunnel.  Seeking answers for his erratic behavior, his perplexing response is alarming, Monster - Official Clip - Pigs Brain YouTube (1:18).  Concerned for his safety, she seeks out the school authorities in an attempt to find out what’s going on, but rather than offer any understandable explanation, they instead uniformly apologize to her in an exaggerated spectacle that borders on the surreal, robotically repeating the same scripted mantra, “We accept your opinion with seriousness, and we will provide appropriate instruction in the future.”  Undeterred by their non-answers, she makes repeated visits to uncover the truth but is stonewalled each and every time.  By sheer accident, the suspected teacher, Mr. Hori (Eita Nagayama), blurts out that Minato is actually bullying one of his fellow students, Yori Hoshikawa (Hinata Hiiragi), leaving Saori utterly shocked by the accusations, but when she visits the alleged persecuted child, he has nothing but kind things to say about Minato, calling him his friend.  Adding to the mystique is Yori’s alcoholic father, a violent, often abusive man, introducing bizarre, even nonsensical expressions that the kids are often heard repeating, especially when they’re alone, like some kind of game.  The film shifts from Saori’s viewpoint to that of Mr. Hori, revisiting some of the same events through flashback sequences, but they play out substantially differently, as we see the incredibly cruel and demeaning treatment of Yori coming from his fellow classmates, viewing him as being different, like he’s an alien, as he’s always siding with the girls, which is another way of saying they suspect he is gay.  To his credit, Yori (which is primarily a girl’s name in Japan) ignores most of this vicious homophobia playing out in the classroom, but Minato injures himself trying to divert attention away from their sadistic behavior, but relents to pressures of conformity and doesn’t want to appear to be defending Yori, as then he’ll become a target, so he blames Mr. Hori, perhaps a perfect example of the idiom “hurt people hurt people.”  School authorities are seen steering Hori away from the conflict, not wishing to put the school in a negative light, insisting that he apologize for things he didn’t even do.  Eventually, however, he’s the subject of a mob mentality newspaper article blaming him for the ugly scandal in the classroom, where he’s made the scapegoat by school authorities and loses his job, where fear is the driving factor, avoiding outside scrutiny at all costs, viewing truth as an inconvenience, part of a system that devalues both parents and teachers, while actual events reveal he is wrongfully accused, but this knowledge only comes later in the film, challenging viewers to rethink their own perceptions of what they’ve seen.   

The third section explores the depth of the relationship between Minato and Yori, exposing how intimately close they really are to each other, including Minato’s public denials of friendship in front of their classmates, as this film veers into the same territory as Lukas Dhont’s Close (2022), where too much same sex intimacy is subject to hostility and cruel heckling in the classroom, who mercilessly humiliate Yori on a daily basis, where it’s positively stunning how matter-of-factly the queerness of children is repressed (same sex marriage is still illegal in Japan), with the film also winning the Queer Palme for the best LGBTQ story.  Even when they’re alone, Minato instinctively pushes him away during an embrace, not wanting to get drawn into something he doesn’t really understand.  Toxic masculinity is on display, something Yori is routinely used to putting up with, but not Minato, discovering how difficult it is to open himself up after the death of his father, afraid of being seen as vulnerable, so instead he blames his teacher.  Similarly, the school principal Makiko Fushimi (Yûko Tanaka) is equally challenged, as she was the driver in a tragic car accident running over her grandchild, but due to concerns about the school’s reputation, she may have placed the blame on her husband who is currently serving a jail sentence.  Fushimi (a former music teacher) and Minato come together in a beautiful scene where she teaches him to play the trombone, to literally blow his troubles away, reminding him “happiness is something anyone can have,” offering invaluable insight into their character.  These added layers of nuance truly complicate what we see, where there is a constantly shifting canvas, providing a disturbing context of how difficult it is to come to terms with the truth, as parents never know what’s going on at school with their kids, and the teachers never know what’s going on at home with their students.  Rather than the monster he is portrayed to be, Mr. Hori is actually helpful to his students, even out of the classroom, yet his reputation for kindness is trashed by a student who hasn’t any idea of the havoc he’s caused, where the consequences of a schoolroom accusation recall similar exacerbating circumstances in Thomas Vinterberg’s The Hunt (Jagten) (2012).  In much the same way, Yori is not the monster the other kids accuse him of being, as his kind-hearted nature is emotionally affecting, though only Minato seems to pick up on that, yet he’s afraid to publicly come to his defense, as he doesn’t want to become the object of classroom derision and abuse.  He’s not strong enough to ward off that kind of meanness in the world.  When there is word of an approaching typhoon, as in Kore-eda’s After the Storm (Umi yori mo mada fukaku) (2016), the two kids go missing amidst dangerous mudslides in the mountains, causing immense distress for Saori and Mr. Hori, who are willing to bypass a cautionary restricted area and enter the danger zone to look for them.  As tension mounts, accompanied by torrential rain, they grow more frantically desperate in their search.  In a nod to a film like Gaspar Noé’s provocatively controversial Irreversible (Irréversible) (2002), which is actually told backwards in time, opening in horrific tragedy before retreating to a much sunnier time, Kore-eda playfully explores the innocent dynamic of their childhood friendship when it is just them, tucked away in an abandoned railcar with no outside interference, coming very close to an expression of pure love and tenderness in a protected refuge where nothing is taboo, where the soft tones of Sakamoto’s piano are a perfect compliment.  In contrast to the confusing outset of the film, the simplicity of their budding friendship that blossoms into a love affair is a thing to behold, just a marvelous expression of true joy, leaving viewers completely shocked by how quickly our perceptions can change, opening up our eyes to untold possibilities that we didn’t even know exist.  Yet there are no sensational, shocking twists, as we might expect, where the patient, subdued tone leads to an undeniable pleasure, offering a transcendent finale that literally soars, becoming one of the best and more disturbingly complex films of the year.