Showing posts with label Mohammad Rasoulof. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mohammad Rasoulof. Show all posts

Saturday, March 1, 2025

The Seed of the Sacred Fig (Dâne-ye anjîr-e ma'âbed)


 

















Writer/director Mohammad Rasoulof


 Rasoulof at Cannes, photos are actors who are forbidden to leave Iran
Mahsa Amini











THE SEED OF THE SACRED FIG (Dâne-ye anjîr-e ma'âbed)       B-                                France  Germany  (167 mi)  2024  ‘Scope  d: Mohammad Rasoulof

Dictatorial systems succeed and are maintained over time not because of the leaders, but because of the middle management who carry out and often amplify their orders.  The regime is using religion as a political tool, and my films focus on this indoctrination.  The Islamic Republic is a dictatorship that has taken Iranians hostage; repression is its essence.  Any announcement of change is just propaganda.  If they can, they will eliminate any opponent, but I don’t spend a second of my life thinking about it.

—Writer/director Mohammad Rasoulof

Mohammad Rasoulof is a filmmaker with a storied past, interweaving the personal with the political, arrested multiple times, initially accused, along with Jafar Panahi, director of No Bears (Khers nist) (2022), of filming without a permit in 2009, then he was arrested in 2010 for filming a movie about The Green Movement, specifically the protests following the allegedly stolen 2009 presidential elections, which he never finished, where his films were declared “propaganda against the system,” convicted of “intending to commit crimes against the security of the country,” one of several high-profile Iranian filmmakers to be arrested, censored, and condemned by the Iranian regime for his art.  Unfortunately, this kind of thing is the reality in Iran today, which has a long history of corruption and brutality, leading to significant uprisings, including the revolution that brought the Islamic Republic into power in 1979, the 2009 Iranian Green Movement to protest massive fraud in the presidential elections, the 2019 uprising over rising gasoline prices, and now the protests that erupted since the death of Mahsa (Jina) Amini, leading to the Woman, Life, Freedom movement in 2022, mostly women under the age of 25, where the rallying cry has been “Zan, Zendegi, Azadi,” or women, life, freedom, with more than 500 deaths (at least 69 of them children) reported after Iranian security forces fired live ammunition into crowds and killed even more protesters by beating them with batons, where thousands more were subjected to interrogation, arbitrary detention, unjust prosecution, and imprisonment for peacefully exercising their human rights.  The Iranian government, which currently provides drones to the Russian army to bomb Ukraine, by the way, has only intensified its efforts to suppress the fundamental rights of women and girls and crush remaining initiatives of women’s activism, with Amini’s lawyers arrested and ordered to serve a year in prison, while executions in Iran have significantly increased, with a record number of 853 death sentences in 2023 (Iran: Two years after 'Woman Life Freedom' uprising ...).  Stoking the flames of punitive retaliation, Iran’s authoritative judiciary has become a tool of repression and fear, part of a long history of suppressing political opposition, criticism of the country’s human rights record, and other peaceful forms of dissent, using religion as a weapon, where civil servants act against their own consciences and enforce dubious judgments in order not to endanger their own standard of living, which results in the entire Iranian population being held hostage.  Notably, the film also marks the first time since the establishment of the Islamic Republic that Iranian actresses appear onscreen without wearing the mandatory hijab, a detail which carries a tremendous symbolic significance both for the regime and the Iranian public, though they are barred from ever seeing the film.  The maker of The White Meadows (Keshtzar haye sepid) (2009), Goodbye (Bé omid é didar) (2011), Manuscripts Don't Burn (Dast-neveshtehaa nemisoosand) (2013), and 2020 Top Ten List #2 There Is No Evil (Sheytan vojud nadarad) (2020), Rasoulof has had to continuously deal with the security apparatus of Iran, twice serving time in Iranian jails, over a month in solitary confinement, finally exhausting his appeals, ultimately sentenced to eight years in prison as well as a flogging, a fine, and confiscation of his property, which led him to flee the country, crossing the mountains on foot, leaving behind all his electronic devices to avoid being traced, hiding in safe houses before arriving in Hamburg, Germany 28 days after leaving Tehran, where going into exile was something that was never considered until the very last minute, having only two hours to decide, leaving everything else behind.  As a result, this film is Germany’s submission as Best International Film for the Academy Awards, having been made primarily in Iran, but smuggled out of the country, financed, and completed in Germany, which has become the director’s new adopted home, having studied film there as a young man, while his daughter, Baran Rasoulof, who starred in THERE IS NO EVIL, has lived there for years.

Made entirely in secret to evade a previous legal ban that prohibited Rasoulof from making films, with post-production done remotely, this won a Special Jury Award at the 2024 Cannes Film Festival, shown on the very last day, receiving plenty of acclaim for demonstrating a ferocity of spirit and for simply being made at all, yet the film is about as subtle as a runaway bulldozer, where the heavy-handed moralistic approach may leave some cold, as realism is transformed into symbolism, which is so obvious that it is borderline ridiculous, carrying little emotional power.  At nearly three hours long, this meandering morality tale can feel overlong and relentlessly exhausting, making the same point over and over again, becoming a battering ram on the brain, with the filmmaker having a love affair with posted cellphone footage of the protests, where unfortunately he’s not much of a character builder, as his characters don’t really seem real, instead they serve other purposes, personifying allegorical themes instead of any authentic naturalism, which has always been an essential component of the best Iranian films.  Beginning with a story parable, the title refers to an invasive species of fig tree that spreads by “wrapping itself around another tree and eventually strangling it,” seen as a symbol of the theocratic regime in Iran, where more than anything this exposes the toxic patriarchy that is suffocating the life out of its own people.  Written by the director, whose entire career represents continued attempts to understand the authoritarian mindset, the film becomes a political allegory for the relationship between the Iranian state and its people, superimposing the real threats of a brutal theocracy with the fictional story of one family’s struggle under its absolutist rule.  An overtly political film is mixed with a complex, psychological chamber drama, where the internal and external factors become so intermingled that they are virtually indistinguishable, creating a moral conundrum for all involved, where the first two hours of the film take place almost exclusively in the claustrophobic, prison-like confines of a family apartment in Tehran, with poorly lit rooms, the curtains always closed, completely cut off from the combustible force happening right outside on the streets below.  Led by family patriarch Iman (Missagh Zareh), he was recently appointed as an investigator to the Revolutionary court in Tehran, a prestigious position that traditionally leads to becoming a judge, where his wife Najmeh (Soheila Golestani, who was herself arrested in 2022 for demonstrating against Amini’s death) is ecstatic at the prospects of becoming economically secure for life, offering the best possible chance of a better life for their two adolescent daughters, Rezvan (Mahsa Rostami), just entering university, and Sana (Setareh Maleki), who is still in high school, two strong and independent-minded daughters.  Iman initially has misgivings, however, as he’s asked to sign off on death sentences with no investigation and no trial, without even reading the case file, an act his predecessor refused, which created the job opening.  Just as ominously, Iman is given a gun by the government for self-protection, as court officials are often targeted by disgruntled families, placing them at risk.  The film adheres to Anton Chekhov’s narrative principle, described as Chekhov's gun, which suggests that “If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired.  Otherwise don’t put it there.”  Arriving in court at the crack of dawn and not returning until late at night, the court is literally swamped by an avalanche of arrests from the outpouring of protests following the death of a young 22-year old girl, Mahsa Amini (never named in the film), who authorities claimed suffered a heart attack, yet she was severely beaten and died of head injuries while in police custody several days after she was arrested in Tehran by members of the country’s Basiji, or morality police, for violating hijab laws, not for refusing to wear a hijab, but for “not wearing it properly.”  The outrage this generates is unprecedented, much of it captured on cellphones and posted on the internet, where the brutality of the images contrasts with the state news coverage that blames it all on a conspiracy of disobedient lawbreakers who want to overthrow the regime, yet the protests were unlike any the country had seen before, and the most widespread revolt since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

There’s enough foreshadowing in this film to fill all the holes in Albert Hall, where Najmeh is nauseatingly persistent in warning her daughters about the dangers of going on social media or associating with the “wrong” kind of person, as that reflects upon their father’s profession, where any little slipup could derail his career.  “You must be irreproachable,” she warns.  They constantly get harangued with these warnings, each time with greater urgency than the last, but in the secrecy of their bedrooms they spend their time watching cellphone coverage of the protests, witnessing the civil unrest unfolding in real time, where they can see for themselves the television coverage is blatantly false, as the police are simply bashing heads and making sweeping arrests.  When one of Rezvan’s friends living in the university dormitory gets shot in the face with buckshot from a random shot at the students by the police, they are aghast, bringing Sadaf (Niousha Akhshi) home for medical care, as any visit to the hospital would result in her arrest, forcing Najmeh to secretly come to the girl’s aid, cleaning the wound, meticulously removing each pellet, where the camera holds on her battered and bloody face for what feels like an eternity, literally rubbing viewers face with the grotesque nature of the catastrophe, where there is simply no looking away from the crime.  Returning back to the dormitory, she is arrested shortly afterwards and goes missing, as Rezvan sums it up, “They took her beauty – and her future.”  While they keep this incident from Iman, who would not approve, things go off the rails when Iman loses his gun, reminiscent of Akira Kurosawa’s STRAY DOG (1949), frantically searching the house, going through every nook and cranny, turning the entire living space upside down, like a police search, creating chaos in the ranks, which only grows more incendiary when the girls have the unmitigated gall to question their father, who mirrors the Iranian state by blaming it all on criminal deviants, as that’s what he spends his entire time doing, each and every day, working under extreme pressure, signing off on sentences sending protesters to jail or even to death sentences, but the girls know better, part of a generational divide, and this perturbs their father, creating division in the ranks, with Iman proclaiming “Faith knows no questions.”  While we never see Iman at work, what we do see is chillingly surreal, as just walking the hallways reveals giant cardboard cutouts of various Iranian martyrs and dignitaries, whose shadow presence looms over the proceedings.  One of the most surprising images comes when Iman stops his car at a red light and exchanges looks with a young woman in the car next to him, short hair, no hijab, dance music playing on the radio, and a fiercely defiant look.  This is a look at the future.  Perhaps the most eerie sequence is when Iman, desperate to find the gun, has his own family interrogated by a supposed professional who specializes in “psychology and body-language techniques,” which is shockingly disturbing.  When Iman’s identity and address are posted on social media, they head for the country, suddenly feeling like a jailbreak out into open spaces, turning into a long, slow descent into authoritarian horror, as the clashing perspectives spiral into a paranoia-fueled nightmare, where fascism and a growing madness creep into their own family divisions.  Iman loses all sense of balance from the missing gun, afraid he’ll lose his job and be sent to prison if he doesn’t find it, growing more and more unstable, turning into a villain that demands absolute obedience, illustrating he is little more than a cog of the repressive regime, with Najmeh, who has a very pragmatic relationship to her husband’s work in a role similar to that of Sandra Hüller’s Hedwig in Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest (2023), caught in the middle. Where it all leads is into a frenetic, yet heavy-handed Hollywood-style action thriller, fueled by continually escalating suspicions, where everyone is suddenly a potential suspect, turning very grim and darkly sinister, with collateral shrapnel flying in all directions, taking domestic violence to the next level, featuring an alarming road rage car chase, a violent standoff, and a frightening game of hide-and-seek in a hallucinogenic, maze-like labyrinth of an abandoned city in ruins that defies all rationale, but accentuates the deep divisions that exist in this fractured society hell-bent on imposing its will, a common theme, unfortunately, on the global landscape at the moment, where democracy movements are being stifled.   

Mohammad Rasoulof's Top 10 - The Criterion Collection

Friday, January 1, 2021

2020 Top Ten List #2 There Is No Evil (Sheytan vojud nadarad)

 





























Director Mohammad Rasoulof






Baran Rasoulof accepting the Golden Bear for her father











 

THERE IS NO EVIL (Sheytan vojud nadarad)                    A-                                                     Iran  Germany  Czech Republic  (150 mi)  2020 ‘Scope  d:  Mohammad Rasoulof

A disturbing yet meditative essay on the death penalty in Iran, where in the year 2017 the nation of Iran carried out half of the world’s total executions while continuing to execute a higher number per capita than anywhere else in the world (just last year Iran executed 225 people, compared to 22 in the USA), a frightful example of a repressive authoritative state running amok, with the director stringing together four Kafkaesque morality tales, all tragically interconnected, emphasizing freedom of choice and the power of saying “no” in an autocratic society, each commenting differently on the subject, examining in many ways the consequences of one’s actions.  Despite working with a miniscule budget, this is a full-blown art film of the highest standards, where the acting is superb, while the writing offers enough variation to keep viewers on edge, maintaining suspense throughout, named the winner of the Golden Bear for Best Film at the Berlin Festival.  Rasoulof has a long and protracted history with the Iranian government, beginning with his dispute of the 2009 Iranian presidential election of President Ahmadinejad, calling it rigged and a fraud, describing Iran as a dictatorship where artists may no longer speak freely and are routinely arrested and tortured under interrogation, as he was the following year along with filmmaker Jafar Panahi, both sentenced to six years in prison for “conspiring against national security and spreading propaganda against the Islamic government.”  Furthermore, both were banned from making films, writing scripts, giving interviews, or traveling abroad for 20 years, each stripped of their passports, a blatant attempt by the Shiite fundamentalist regime of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to silence two internationally acclaimed directors and politically intimidate any other artistic critics of the regime.  The sentence was later reduced to one year in prison.  Shortly after winning his Golden Bear, he was given the summons to serve the one-year jail sentence that the Iranian Revolutionary Court imposed on him (along with a two-year ban on travel), but he has not complied due to the outbreak of the coronavirus.  Earlier this year, 55,000 Iranian prisoners were released due to concerns about the spread of Covid.  Undeterred, and despite continued harassment and repeated arrests, Rasoulof continues to make films (which are banned in his own country), actually shot by his assistants, where he directs remotely, providing very precise shot lisitings, though his name is never mentioned on the crew lists and production schedules, receiving critical accolades at both the Cannes and Berlin Film Festivals.  In the tradition of Kieslowski’s A SHORT FILM ABOUT KILLING (1988), an expanded sequence on the death penalty from his masterful The Decalogue (Dekalog) (1988), or more recently Boo Jungfeng’s Apprentice (2016), examining execution practices in Singapore, which in the late 90’s led the world in per capita executions, we are reminded of German-born American philosopher Hannah Arendt, who introduced the phrase “the banality of evil,” believing no human is born evil and that people are victims of the systems in which they live.  In covering the trial of Adolf Eichmann, one of the architects of Hitler’s Final Solution who helped identify and coordinate the transportation of millions of Jews from occupied Europe to Nazi death camps, carrying out his duty with a horrible efficiency, yet after examining 3,600 pages of police interrogations, Arendt did not see a monster or psychopath in him but considered him to be a mid-level bureaucrat who would do anything for a promotion.  That is Rasoulof’s assessment as well, where the following incident may have prompted the making of the film, with the director revealing:

Last year, I spotted one of my interrogators coming out of the bank as I was crossing a street in Tehran. Suddenly, I experienced an indescribable feeling. Without his knowledge, I followed him for a while. After ten years, he had aged a bit. I wanted to take a picture of him on my cellphone, I wanted to run towards him, reveal myself to him, and angrily scream at him all of my questions. But when I looked at him closely, and observed his mannerisms with my own eyes, I could not see an evil monster.

How do autocratic rulers metamorphose people into becoming mere components of their autocratic machines? In authoritarian states, the sole purpose of the law is the preservation of the state, and not the facilitation and regulation of people’s relations. I come from such a state.

And driven by such personal experiences, I wanted to tell stories that asked: as responsible citizens, do we have a choice when enforcing the inhumane orders of despots? As human beings, to what extent are we to be held responsible for our fulfillment of those orders? Confronted by this machine of autocracy, when it comes to human emotions, where does the duality of love and moral responsibility leaves us?

While Rasoulof has examined this subject before in Manuscripts Don't Burn (Dast-neveshtehaa nemisoosand) (2013), that film becomes bogged down in the weight of its own subject, yet this is more profoundly lyrical, offering some of the most exquisite locations to ever grace the screen, simply stunning in their beauty, much like an earlier film, The White Meadows (Keshtzar haye sepid) (2010), becoming an allegorical narrative combining four different stories, each shot independently, like film shorts, with a shifting style and genre element, all stunning in their traumatic impact, with each setting growing farther and farther remote.  The opening segment is entitled “There Is No Evil,” a family drama set in the rush of Tehran big city life centered around Heshmat (Ehsan Mirhosseini), a heavy-set man with a beard caught up in a daily routine, performing the mundane ordeals in the everyday life of a typical middle-class family in Iran, calmly enduring the nagging presence of his constantly complaining wife, while trying to appease an overdemanding, spoiled young daughter as well.  As he fights his way through city traffic, with blaring noise and reckless vehicles constantly darting in and out directly in front of him, it’s a relief to finally get home and enjoy some quiet moments.  Taking a nap that extends to the middle of the night, an alarm awakens him at 3 am, when he takes a shower, gets dressed, and is off to work in the wee hours of the morning, parking in a massive garage, finding his way to a non-descript room where he sits and waits.  When a series of green lights appear on a screen, he presses a button that produces a truly shocking surprise, an astounding moment that takes one’s breath away, superbly prefaced by the banality of such ordinary events.  The second episode, “She said, you can do it,” is an equally oppressive setting, with young men jailed in tight prison quarters, yet they wear official uniforms.  Using military conscripts instead of trained professional staff, part of the basic training in fulfilling the 2-year military service forces them to participate in executions of fellow citizens, becoming complicit in the government’s killing apparatus, yet Pouya (Kaveh Ahangar) can’t imagine killing another man.  However, with an honorable discharge, he can apply for a passport and realize his dream of leaving Iran to live abroad with his girlfriend.  Openly tearful, on a cellphone with his girlfriend, he pleads for help finding a way out of this predicament.  The other men chime in, offering their own comments on his moral dilemma, suggesting he’s no better than the rest of them, mostly suggesting soldiers follow orders, as if you don’t they make things very difficult afterwards, increasing your required years of service while refusing passport and driver’s license requests, finding it hard to ever work again.  While the setting is drab and dreary, no windows, all color washed away, it’s a peculiar arrangement to find them imprisoned, as none are accused of committing a crime.  At the bewitching hour when his name is called, Pouya is reluctantly released, with another guard ordering him to get the prisoner, handcuffing himself to that prisoner as they walk down a long, empty corridor, falling occasionally, whimpering with dreaded anticipation, with the guard pulling him up, barking encouragement at him, as the roles are reversed, as the convicted prisoner is perfectly calm while the accompanying military guard is behaving like it’s his own life on the line.  In a split second, however, Pouya grabs the guard’s automatic weapon and locks the two of them up as he makes his escape, a harrowing journey accompanied by pulsating music, suddenly turning into a suspenseful prison escape thriller with an uncertain outcome, brilliantly culminating with an Italian anti-fascist song of resistance, Milva - Bella Ciao - YouTube (2:42).

If the first two segment feature oppressive settings, the next two are mesmerizingly beautiful, capturing the natural world like few films do, magnified even further by being shot in ‘Scope by Ashkan Ashkani, with the third segment entitled “Birthday.”  Opening with magnificent shots of distant mountains, Javad (Mohammad Valizadegan), a young soldier on a three-day pass is crossing the vast openness of the country by train until he arrives at a remote location in a dense forest near the Caspian Sea.  Cleansing himself off in the river, he heads for an isolated home in search of his fiancée, Nana (Mahtab Servati), bringing a ring, asking her father’s permission to propose on her birthday.  But the situation is dour as they’ve just learned of the death of a close family friend, a teacher who was viewed as a son by her father, beloved by all who knew him, yet Nana never mentioned him before, so this revelation comes as an unexpected surprise.  With mixed emotions, the family plans for a funeral service, hiring musicians and holding a personal family ceremony for the recently deceased, including candles lit alongside a giant photograph.  Once Javad takes a look at the photo, his heart sinks, immediately growing ill, throwing himself into the river, as if washing away his sins, drawing the attention of Nana, providing him a dry set of clothes, with Javad realizing his own dark connection to the deceased, having participated in his execution as an enemy subversive, creating a situation where the political becomes personal.  Afterwards they hold an engagement celebration, revealing nothing to the family, yet both appear like zombies or the walking dead, void of all emotion, where the hours pass like years.  When it’s time to return, his fiancée simply walks away without uttering a word.  The final segment is entitled “Kiss Me,” featuring the director’s daughter Baran Rasoulof as Darya, a college student receiving her education as a medical student in Germany, visiting her aunt Zaman (Zhila Shahi) and uncle Bahram (Mohammad Seddighimehr) in what has to be the most remote region in Iran, a hilly yet desolate outpost where they raise bees.  With miles and miles as far as you can see of utter isolation, it soon becomes clear they are living lives of self-imposed exile, visiting with her father’s approval, as Bahram appears near death, having serious episodes coughing up blood, tenderly cared for by his wife, with Darya looking on, wondering why her uncle received a medical degree just like her father, educated at the same school, but then threw it all away to live out in the wilderness tending to bees.  Their story is inexorably connected to earlier episodes, resembling a classic tragedy, morphing into the ethical dilemma of Antigone, depicting what happens when an individual insists upon their moral beliefs and challenges the authority of the state, in this case altering the equilibrium, uprooting their families, exchanging children for their own safety, then living with the consequences of remaining hidden away in secrecy, ultimately leading to questions years later of altered parentage.  Enraged and hurt by the revelation, Darya feels little sympathy, believing it was a selfish decision, yet Bahram calmly stands behind his actions.  With so many transplanted families due to the European migration of refugees, you’d think this is a relatively common practice, yet few films actually touch on this issue.  The final shot resembles one of those magnificently extended final shots from Kiarostami’s Koker Trilogy (1987 – 1994), a perfectly composed shot that poetically expresses the emotional paralysis that sets in, unable to truly comprehend the extent of the personal sacrifice, literally laying it all on the line for one’s beliefs, yet her blazing anger reveals the cost.