 |
| Director Frederic Wiseman |
 |
| Deborah Meier |
Tribute to Frederic Wiseman: HIGH SCHOOL II A USA (220 mi) 1994 d: Frederick Wiseman
High School was the second movie I made, and whether anybody else thinks so or not, I like to think I’ve learned something in the intervening 24 years. —Director Frederick Wiseman
One of the best films about education ever made, alongside Jan Troell’s 1969 Swedish film EENY MEENY MINY MOE, and one of the better Wiseman efforts, simply a brilliant observation of an excellent school as it goes about its business of educating, the first of Wiseman’s films to revisit an earlier subject, a pretty clear answer to what was just his second film, the brilliant HIGH SCHOOL (1968) shot 24 years earlier, choosing in this case the Central Park East Secondary School in Spanish Harlem on Manhattan’s upper East Side, a diverse inner city New York City alternative school of gifted kids that graduates more than 90% of its students, as opposed to 50% for the city as a whole, and has an excellent record in sending and preparing students for college. While the earlier film looked at a predominately white school in Philadelphia, it presented a collage of images and sequences portraying life inside of the school, capturing the way institutions, in this case schools, molded the people operating inside of them, with the teachers doing the majority of the talking, establishing absolute authority, where a teacher was always patrolling the hallways like a prison guard, often relying upon rigid rules of conformity to supersede classroom learning, expecting students to simply obey. What stands out today is how utterly mind-deadening an institution it was, as the school was desperately trying to maintain its position of authority in the face of enormous social change of the 60’s, with the pressure of the Vietnam War and the “counterculture” pushing from the outside, all but ignoring the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King that occurred during the filming, where the ideology and repressive values of the school emerged as they reproduced social conditioning from generation to generation, where even today many will still recognize the familiarity of the experience. The relationship of domination and submission to authority were placed at the same level as the institution’s purely educational missions, becoming, in essence, a time capsule of an earlier era, added to the Library of Congress Film Registry in 1991. Here the student body is largely black or Latino, 45% black, 45% Latino, and 10% white, the faculty and administrative staff are largely white, which is directly brought into the discussion with a black student who claims at times he vehemently dislikes his white teachers, while his mother is there reminding him that he could just as easily dislike a black teacher, that the real focus should be that nothing should deter him from making his best effort in the classroom. Unlike the earlier film, there are scenes of students talking among themselves, as students are encouraged to talk openly, providing a look at styles and behaviors while also offering classroom activities, discussions of race, class, and gender, faculty meetings, family conferences, disciplinary problems, sex education, conflict resolution by students, and student council meetings, all of which illustrate the school’s approach to learning.
A purely observational film, from the very first moments you can tell this school has a completely different agenda from the earlier effort, allowing student input and topical interests, reflective of a more diverse humanity, extolling the virtues of progressive education, where there’s a sincere effort to understand all the different points of view. The nearly four-hour runtime of the film is essential, as it allows Wiseman to follow discussions and their shifting points of view in greater detail, discovering the classroom sizes are smaller, while the subjects being discussed reflect the social realities faced by the students, with an emphasis on tolerance and respect for other minorities. We hear an interesting conversation with the principal, who happens to be one of those fussy grandmotherly types who always seems active and alert along with a few advisors who are talking with a returning 15-year old Latina girl who recently had a baby, with her mother and the baby’s father present, discussing the kinds of problems she would likely encounter, including a possible violent conflict with another girl now out of school who may still have unresolved issues to settle, the huge amount of time a newborn demands, the lack of sleep, the pressures of wanting to be with other kids and still having time for her schoolwork, while politely advising her that there are alternative schools that allow young mothers to bring their babies to class. This is an interesting introduction to some of the school staff while also revealing the special accommodations they are willing to make for students, while at the same time offering a brief glimpse of the student’s home life. Later we see two students called on the carpet for creating a disturbance, where one teacher is trying to get to the bottom of the problem, and is meandering around the subject, never really getting to the point when one kid bluntly states that the other kid is just trying to be annoying, which brings a smile to this kid’s face, like a light goes on in his head that finally somebody understands. An hour or so later on into the film, we see this same kid in a peer mediation group discussing a punching and pushing incident over some ill-advised verbal taunting. This session was one of the more aggravating of the entire film, as they again speak at length talking around the issues, with two older black students as well as a teacher never really holding either kid accountable for their behavior, where the annoying white kid continually states he has no interest in being this black kid’s friend, where the recommended solution is simply to ignore one another, yet they are in every class together, spending more time in each other’s company than with their own families, so this felt like a feeble and untenable solution, never addressing the racial conflict and obvious disrespect the white student was showing his fellow black student.
Without utilizing any narrative, music, or inner-titles, just a fly-on-the-wall approach to observing what is taking place, always withholding judgment and allowing people to figure things out on their own, it’s clear the filmmaker’s respect for civic institutions makes him a champion of democratic values, yet it takes a while to familiarize ourselves with the players, as there are multiple discussions among students about the recent Rodney King incident where four white Los Angeles police officers were legally absolved of any responsibility in the senseless beating of a black man who offered no resistance, despite incontrovertible evidence of a videotape showing the brutality of the violence inflicted, where he may have suffered some brain damage from the severity of their actions. The kids were outraged, so some were organizing a student march to city hall to protest the decision, while also displaying a civility about voicing their displeasure, something they felt was lacking in other schools around the country who advocated or resorted to violence. Of interest, an out of town high school from Michigan was visiting the school, where we witness an all-white, all-girl glee club sing an ultra-whitebread choral rendition that brought many snickers from the audience, all of which was preceded by a young Latino’s speech about getting along, that he was aware of the anger many students felt, reminding them that they needed to greet these kids with respect, that this chorus was not their enemy. We hear a meeting of the faculty discussing the best way to coordinate the curriculum, where the AP teachers appear challenged by the others, as if they are some kind of elite ivory tower establishment separate from the reality that the rest of the school faces. One teacher skillfully reminds them that when she attended an AP seminar earlier in the year where some 40 schools were represented, all were private schools except two public schools from New York City, of which they were one, explaining it was exceedingly difficult to remain competitive with these schools and their seemingly unlimited resources, so any extra push AP classes could provide to prepare their kids for college was not only a fairly common practice, but a vitally necessary one.
We witness classroom sessions discussing the different kinds of love in Shakespeare or Lorraine Hansberry’s changing views on the American Dream, a debate class arguing multiple points of view of the same argument on immigration, a sex education training class for teachers explaining the proper use of condoms, after-school tutoring or in-class help with class assignments or homework, conferences with parents, students and teachers, and occasionally we get views of quiet, empty hallway corridors, where the brightly colored drawings and paintings by the students are decoratively displayed on the walls. What we never see is any physical education or sports activities, focusing entirely on academics. The most devastating segment is near the end, when a young boy is being lectured to and berated by his own mother for not being totally forthcoming about his academic deficiencies, where the teachers are all praising his obvious intelligence and ability, but believe he is coasting along, failing to complete certain assignments. When an interim report of “does not meet expectations” is sent home, the embarrassed mother wants answers, which only places more unbearable pressure on her kid, in a searingly emotional segment that is simply painful to endure. After a long protracted silence filled with tears, when the kid finally begins to stand up for himself, we learn he’s one of the brightest kids in the class, and probably better than most all other students in the exact same categories for which he was being negatively evaluated, where he has to one by one disagree with the teacher’s ratings, offering his own assessment, which by the end of the discussion is accepted by all as probably being closer to the truth, but this is the school’s way of “motivating” him. Despite the obvious good intentions, this is an agonizing scene to witness, which is calmly followed afterwards by an uninterrupted speech by the principal, who is never acknowledged, but turns out to be Deborah Meier, the school’s founder, recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship (as is Wiseman) as an innovative educator, perhaps the most renowned educational reformer in America, as she speaks to a group of disinterested, vacant-faced people, describing for them her reasons for what education can provide in people’s lives, a quiet, analytic perspective on intelligence that began with her approach on capturing the attention of kindergarten-age students, utilizing the same approach for elementary and secondary schools, claiming college should be no different, that life itself is a continuing dialogue that we have with ourselves searching for more than what we already know.
Filmed by John Davey on 16mm, directed, edited, and sound by Wiseman, this is easily one of the most intelligent and skillful approaches to filmmaking that one is ever likely to experience on how to approach the aspirations of knowledge with every new generation, offering as exhibit A an engaging group of students and faculty, capturing some of the more enlivened discussions on the subject of education that we could ever hope to find, with an intensive support system in place, where the remarkable brilliance of youth is simply captivating, where it’s impossible not to be reminded of what it was like to be feverishly young again, a time when our horizons were unclouded, where anything was possible, and where everything that troubles us today was not continually getting in our way of knowing more.
