Showing posts with label Rosamund Pike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rosamund Pike. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Hostiles











HOSTILES                 B+                  
USA  (134 mi)  2017  ‘Scope  d:  Scott Cooper

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer.  It has never yet melted.
—D.H. Lawrence

Like a kick in the face, the film starts out as just another white revisionist view of Manifest Destiny, revisiting New Mexico in 1892 as the Indian wars are coming to an end, with a multitude of Indian prisoners languishing in cages, surrounded by cavalry units who spent their careers in endless slaughter and retribution, serving as the living examples of men used to viewing Indians as savages, which more than anything represents a savagery within the American experience itself, as frontier settlers living on what for centuries had been undisputed Indian territory were subject to sporadic raids, with Indians violently attacking them, leaving no one spared in an effort to steal their horses.  Even before the opening credits we experience one such incident, a horrific incident of gruesome violence, with renegade Comanche’s tracking down each man, woman, and child, expressed as a visceral experience through a hail of bullets and arrows, with one woman getting away (Rosamund Pike), holding a dead baby in her arms, all that’s left of her family, long afterwards showing the ferocity and madness that accompany the incident, but also playing into all the stereotypes to justify what for centuries has been a scathingly racist portrait of American history, which leaves out Indian history, telling the story only from one side, excusing America’s own brutality in order to justify wiping out Indians with a policy of genocide.  Even today, history has not been rewritten, but continues to be told from the white perspective only, where racist and demeaning slurs in the names of popular sports mascots and team names, such as the Washington “Redskins” football team, generates millions of dollars in revenue, none of which goes to Native people.  America has not been reeducated on this history, despite scholarly works by Indians and others that tell a different story, but school curriculums haven’t changed, as our perceptions of history have instead largely been formed by the myths and stereotypes generated by John Ford westerns for the last hundred years, including THE SEARCHERS (1956) starring John Wayne, an avowed Indian hater, which is on the pantheon of films listed as the greatest western of them all.  Despite our knowledge and education, what’s changed?  Which is why it’s surprising to begin exactly where previous westerns left off, with Christian Bale as Army captain Joseph Blocker, another openly unforgiving Indian hater, having spent years on the western plains witnessing multiple atrocities, some by his own hand, with no one questioning his use of “wretched savages” to express his outright contempt for Indians of all tribes and nations.  Before anyone is comfortable in their seats, the battle lines have been drawn, with Bale playing the familiar John Wayne character, firm, resolute, irrepressible, and reflective, reading about Julius Caesar’s Gallic Wars (in Latin) by the light of the campfire.

Director Scott Cooper adapted the film from an unpublished story by Donald E. Stewart (who died in 1999, a manuscript discovered by his wife afterwards, choosing Cooper to make the film), integrating familiar actors into the story, having previously worked with Christian Bale in Out of the Furnace (2013), and before that Jeff Bridges (who won Best Actor and Best Song at the Academy Awards) as a down and out country singer on the road in CRAZY HEART (2009), two films that ache with authenticity.  It’s well worth mentioning that Cooper also brought his cinematographer Masanobu Takayanagi to this film, who also shot Spotlight (2015), Silver Linings Playbook (2012), and The Grey (2011), whose unmatched artistry of filming panoramic vistas reaches superb heights, becoming the singlemost important element of the film, as the land is an unspoken character of supreme power, having been there long before white settlers arrived, even before a single human ever set foot upon its shores.  Any historical tribute to the immeasurable American landscape deserves to pay homage to its enormity and beauty, as this element alone provides somber food for thought.  To that end this film is a success, though the immensity of the entire journey tells the story, evolving into something altogether different by the end than it was at the beginning.  In that sense it’s something of a welcome surprise.  Blocker is the heart of the film, as everything revolves around him, and Bale does not disappoint, having worked familiar territory in Terrence Malick’s The New World (2005), though his outwardly racist outbursts in the beginning fall on deaf ears, as he’s known as an honorable soldier, one of the few in command to be trusted with an important mission, in this case a directive from the President of the United States, President Benjamin Harrison, who orders Blocker to accompany released Cheyenne Indian prisoner Chief Yellow Hawk (Wes Studi), stricken with terminal cancer, whose dying wish is to return with his family to his original homeland in the Valley of the Bears in Montana, a wish granted by the President as an expression of good will.  With his retirement looming, Blocker has a history with Yellow Hawk, as mortal enemies, having been on opposite sides of many battles, losing plenty of good men to his “butchery,” retaliating in kind by brutally targeting the Cheyenne with a vengeance, developing an open hatred, but despite his protestations, he’s the one placed in charge of the detail.  No sooner are they out of sight but Blocker places Yellow Hawk and his son Black Hawk (Adam Beach) in irons, looking him in the eye and stating “I know who you are,” though nothing could be further from the truth, while their women, including Black Hawk’s wife, Q’orianka Kilcher from The New World as Elk Woman, walk alongside the men on horses.  As in nearly all westerns, the Indian characters are underwritten, as we barely get a glimpse of their mistreatment and marginalization, even though they play a central part of the film’s development. 

Over time this becomes a redemption tale and a story of forgiveness, fueled by powerful performances, with the mood of the film slowly changing when they discover Rosalie Quaid (Rosamund Pike), a lone homesteader who survived a Comanche raid, losing her husband and four children, still in shock, having temporarily lost her mind, taking care of fictitious children that are already dead, then insisting upon burying them herself, uselessly scratching the dirt with her own fingers before giving way to the soldiers.  Blocker goes to great lengths to give her space and show a calm respect to this woman, promising not to hurt her, offering his tent, fully respecting her gargantuan loss, where she again goes into shock upon seeing the other Indians, literally recoiling at the sight.  Out of sympathy and respect for her obvious pain, the Indian women offer a mourning dress and blankets, with Yellow Hawk calling the Comanche acts repugnant, claiming the rogue warriors are “not of sound mind,” warning the captain however that they will return, asking to be released from irons.  When the attack comes, several men are lost, with the Cheyenne aiding in the battle, with the captain releasing the irons begrudgingly afterwards, as it’s now all hands on deck.  When they discover the last of the Comanche perpetrators dead along the wayside, it’s suggested that Yellow Hawk and his son might have been responsible, secretly acting under cover of darkness, paving the way for safe travel.  By the time they get to Colorado, Blocker agrees to transport a prisoner, Sergeant Charles Wills (Ben Foster), a convicted ax murderer, to a fort where he’ll be hanged, having slaughtered an innocent Indian family.  Rosalie prefers to continue the journey, with no train or stagecoach in the vicinity, at one point asking Blocker if he has faith, contending without it, she’d otherwise have nothing.  His telling response, “Yes I do.  But he’s been blind to what’s been going on here for a long time.”  It’s a tender moment that becomes part of a slow healing process, as the hate eventually subsides, replaced by an altogether different element of earned respect, mirrored in Rosalie as well, who quickly befriends their Indian counterparts.  Adding reinforcements to the detail, one is Ryan Bingham, a singer and actor who previously appeared in CRAZY HEART, actually writing the Best Song, performing another song by campfire, Ryan Bingham - “How Shall A Sparrow Fly” (From HOSTILES ... YouTube (2:57).  The journey is treacherous and costly, a descent into the heart of darkness, a rude awakening thinning the ranks, threatened by a lawlessness that defines the frontier, still uncivilized, yet beautifully photographed, where each has time to examine their own souls, including the prisoner who once rode with the captain in many of his campaigns, suggesting their positions could be reversed, with Blocker reminding him he was always just “doing his job,” a familiar refrain to justify murderous acts (the Adolf Eichmann defense), where viewers can weigh the cost of history and judge for themselves.  Filled with contentious obstacles faced along the way, finally arriving with a view of Yellow Hawk’s homeland, his end is near, with Blocker gently reminding him of the many friends who died by the hand of Yellow Hawk, yet “A part of me dies with you.”  While violence and hatred continue to plague this budding new nation, with open defiance a phony stand-in for freedom, it’s clear law is a concept that has not yet taken hold, where even a President’s decree is just a piece of paper, easily ignored, but what’s clearly evident is a poetry and grace in the final acts, a transformative spirit, with the vitriol cleansed amongst the dead and the weary, replaced by human decency and a noble kindness of the heart, part of the changing interior landscape, with humanity still weighing in the balance.
   
Note
Despite the glimpse of hope expressed in the final shot (from a white perspective, like the beginning of a long, redemptive journey), it should be pointed out that from an Indian point of view there is a complete absence of hope, instead a shock of horror, a reference to “the stolen generations” in Australia and Phillip Noyce’s RABBIT-PROOF FENCE (2002), where from 1910 to 1970 Aboriginal children were removed from their homes by force and raised as Christian whites, with their Native dress, customs, and history purged from their collective memories, leaving little doubt what will happen to that surviving Indian child, whose Native history certainly won’t be part of his Anglicized reeducation, with little honor paid to him for being the grandson of a Cheyenne Indian chief, a despised figure in American culture at that time.         

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Gone Girl














GONE GIRL               C                    
USA  (149 mi)  2014  ‘Scope  d:  David Fincher                      Official Site

Cool Girl speech from the novel Gone Girl, by Gillian Flynn, 2012

That night at the Brooklyn party, I was playing the girl who was in style, the girl a man like Nick wants: the Cool Girl. Men always say that as the defining compliment, don’t they? She’s a cool girl. Being the Cool Girl means I am a hot, brilliant, funny woman who adores football, poker, dirty jokes, and burping, who plays video games, drinks cheap beer, loves threesomes and anal sex, and jams hot dogs and hamburgers into her mouth like she’s hosting the world’s biggest culinary gang bang while somehow maintaining a size 2, because Cool Girls are above all hot. Hot and understanding. Cool Girls never get angry; they only smile in a chagrined, loving manner and let their men do whatever they want. Go ahead, shit on me, I don’t mind, I’m the Cool Girl.

Men actually think this girl exists. Maybe they’re fooled because so many women are willing to pretend to be this girl…Oh, and if you’re not a Cool Girl, I beg you not to believe that your man doesn’t want the Cool Girl. It may be a slightly different version—maybe he’s vegetarian, so Cool Girl loves seitan and is great with dogs; or maybe he’s a hipster artist, so Cool Girl is a tattooed, bespectacled nerd who loves comics. There are variations to the window dressing, but believe me, he wants Cool Girl, who is basically the girl who likes every f***ing thing he likes and doesn’t ever complain. (How do you know you’re not Cool Girl? Because he says things like “I like strong women.” If he says that to you, he will at some point f*** someone else. Because “I like strong women” is code for “I hate strong women.”

One of the more cynical movies seen in awhile, ugly and calculating, a horrible comment on the vapid emptiness of American society, painting a cruel portrait of a soulless age, yet it’s a dark satiric comedy that actually pokes fun of just how clueless the public remains of the hidden truths taking place in their midst, caught up in the windstorm of the latest political hysteria that leaves them blind by the filtered bullshit that passes for news these days, where they become numbed beyond hope, like walking zombies taking the place of what were once human beings.  Fincher’s film is as infuriatingly hopeless as anything Béla Tarr ever concocted, but instead of dreary black and white social realism, it’s a trashy best selling book becoming an equally trashy best selling movie, where the Hollywood production machine is in high gear, pumping out artificiality with great relish.  It’s another marriage on the rocks movie that veers out of control into Mary Harron’s American Psycho (2000), where Ben Affleck as Nick Dunne, pilloried by the public after being suspected of killing his missing wife Amy (Rosamund Pike), is no Christian Bale, where the exaggerated absurdity of the lynch mob public out for blood never compares to the heightened excess on display from Wall Street’s impeccably stylish Me Generation, jump started by Reaganomics opening the doors for unscrupulous business entrepreneurs in the 1980’s to rake in the money like the actual thieves they were.  The difference is the 1991 Bret Easton Ellis novel is actually a hilariously clever critique of the consumer culture of the 80’s, while this unraveling marital thriller exposing the beast that lies within is more like mixing the wildly popular Jacqueline Susann books with a dose of Stephen King, as Gillian Flynn’s airport novel spent more than 71 weeks on the New York Times hardcover best-seller list, and sold more than 6 million copies before it even came out in paperback.  The book (and subsequent movie) is a pale comparison to the shattering portrait of the idealized 1950’s marriage depicted in the excruciatingly personal 1961 Richard Yates novel Revolutionary Road, seemingly the perfect couple to all outsiders, played by the idyllic TITANIC (1997) couple Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio in the 2008 Sam Mendes film version, living in their wonderful dream house in the suburbs, where clearly the foundation of their success was the male-centric world of America in the 1950’s, a deluded American Dream that quickly disintegrates into marital dysfunction, as it denies the aspirations of women. 

In pointed contrast, the superficiality on display in Fincher’s film may turn off many viewers, as it thrives on the artificiality of the surface, literally mocking the shallowness of society while the unhappy lives of the featured couple takes a turn into the dark side, even delving into horror as Fincher’s vision seems designed to make the audience feel as uncomfortable as possible and then leave them in the lurch by providing few answers.  The offensiveness of the smug, overly detached tone, however, may hit everyone differently, where it’s reminiscent of the exaggerated sarcasm of von Trier’s DOGVILLE (2003), which couldn’t be more irritating.  Using a back and forth dual narrative scheme of he said, she said, where we’re privy to his interior narration and also what she writes in her diary, including flashback sequences that reveal her perspective on a crumbling romance, what’s immediately clear is that both narrators are consummate liars and cannot be trusted to convey the truth about their own stories.  Their home is a house of mirrors where they continually pretend to be something they’re not, fuming with displeasure underneath while both playing the part in public of a perfect marriage.  Whatever love or attraction may have been there at the outset has been twisted and contorted into a marriage that is a big lie, where the original romance was a con job, and once their guard has been let down what’s exposed are the frayed nerves, where these two have little use for one another except for keeping up appearances.  While there’s plenty of glib back and forth conversation when they first meet, each trying to be more clever than the other, they are apparently easily charmed, where Nick proposes as if on cue, and the next thing you know they’re married, moving away from their beloved New York to Missouri to be near Nick’s seriously ill mother who dies of cancer, leaving them alone in a gigantic house that feels unlived in and empty most of the time.  While Nick is more comfortable in the Midwest, having grown up there with friends and acquaintances, he runs a non-descript neighborhood bar with his twin sister Margo (Carrie Coon) that gives him an excuse to get away from Amy as much as possible, while she scribbles in her diary (with perfect penmanship) aimless thoughts that barely touch on the extent of her growing resentment. 

Amy’s parents “plagiarized” her life, actually improving upon it in a popular series of children’s books called Amazing Amy, leaving her unsure of her real identity, but always struggling to be better than the rest, where she has become an ice princess that continually speaks in a calm, reassuring, overly breathy voice that feels very much like an over-controlled robotic Stepford wife from THE STEPFORD WIVES (1975), where she has to emote perfection with every spoken word.  Certainly that would drive any man crazy after awhile, especially when used in a patronizing manner of never-ending superiority, where Nick is contemplating walking out on the marriage.  A clue for the audience is the sound of Blue Öyster Cult on the radio singing “(Don't Fear) The Reaper” (Don't Fear) Halloween You Tube (5:11), which figures so prominently in John Carpenter’s slasher horror film HALLOWEEN (1978).  On their 5th wedding anniversary, the date of his planned breakup announcement, he returns home from work in the early afternoon and finds his house broken into, a coffee table smashed, a few blood stains on the wall, and his wife missing.  Within days, he’s the chief suspect, where the investigative team of Detective Boney (Kim Dickens) and Officer Gilpin (Patrick Fugit) keep unearthing new evidence, much of which Nick has no knowledge about.  His sense of indifference to his wife’s life and subsequent absence is more reflective of his lazy and distant self, but once the cameras are parked outside his door, it opens the floodgates to media speculation, where he is raked over the coals in the tabloids and on a FOX TV style station run by a vicious rumor mill host (Missi Pyle) hellbent on using him to avenge all wronged women, where her continual diatribes run endlessly on the neverending TV news cycle, playing even in the local police precinct.  This lynch mob mentality has convicted the guy in public, plastering his face all over the airwaves, destroying his character, calling him a wife killer, reminiscent of the blanket national coverage surrounding Drew Peterson, who was alleged to have killed his third and fourth wives, where the body of the latter has never been found.  A 30-year police veteran, Peterson was familiar with forensic evidence, wasn’t bashful with reporters, and seemed to thrive on all the attention he was receiving in the national spotlight.  

To a large extent, this is a film about character assassination juxtaposed against a murderous assassination, where the impact of the first is a whole lot more damning than the second (where you actually have a day in court), which is a dangerous comment on a society that overlooks reality in order to exist in a self-induced fantasy, continually blaming the other guys for all of society’s woes, while refusing to look in the mirror and take any responsibility.  It has pretensions to Gus van Sant’s To Die For (1995), veering into the crazy psychopathic territory of Tuesday Weld in Pretty Poison (1968), as it plays with this seemingly fixated need for attention, where you’re willing to do anything to get it, which will leave at least some viewers literally refusing to be scammed and manipulated once again by Hollywood’s pretend version of reality.  It ends up being an exaggerated murder farce where the act of murder doesn’t remotely match the damage done by outright lies and misinformation produced by the made-up hypotheses of so-called experts in creating a whirlwind of mass hysteria generated by the media, usually in attack mode smearing someone’s character, for which they take no responsibility, hiding behind 1st amendment rights that it’s only freedom of speech, where people have the right to say anything they please.  Nick is caught up in an illusionary maze of deceit, a puzzle-like trap where he’s left trying to figure out why all this is happening to him and how he can escape.  Turning to an ace defense attorney Tanner Bolt (Tyler Perry) with an expertise in representing maligned offenders who are perceived as being the most vile and contemptible creatures on the planet, he slowly tries to gather some semblance of his life back as the noose is tightened around his neck by this continuing police investigation fed by malicious rumors.  Bolt delivers perhaps the sanest line in the film:  “You two are the most fucked up people I've ever met and I deal with fucked up people for a living.”  Reminiscent of Rolf de Heer’s ALEXANDRA’S PROJECT (2003), another film that turns the tables on an the idea of male idealization, this $61 million dollar Hollywood fiasco feels more like a B-movie where The Stepford Wives meets The Twilight Zone through a wretchedly overwrought Scarlett O’Hara style melodrama that veers into sci-fi territory where aliens are the species pretending to be human, as people have already lost all semblance of their humanity.  While this is obviously the work of a control freak who delights in conniving and manipulating the lives of others, where every film is a variation of PANIC ROOM (2002), Fincher has a reputation as being a perfectionist, where according to producer Ceán Chaffin, Fincher took, on average, as many as 50 takes for each scene, where it should also be pointed out that on the first day on the set, Ben Affleck changed the lens setting on the camera by the slightest degree, betting the crew Fincher wouldn’t notice, only to have Fincher take a look through the lens and exclaim, “Why does the camera look a little dim?” 

Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.

—Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5, 1606