Showing posts with label Mike Faist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Faist. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

The Bikeriders


 








































Director Jeff Nichols

Nichols with Mike Faist

Nichols with Jodie Comer and Austin Butler

Nichols with Tom Hardy

Danny Lyons self-portrait
























































THE BIKERIDERS               B                                                                                                      USA  (116 mi)  2023  ‘Scope  d: Jeff Nichols

You can give everything you got to a thing and it’s still just gonna do what it’s gonna do.          —Johnny (Tom Hardy)

The maker of Shotgun Stories (2007), Take Shelter (2011), Mud (2012), Joe (2013), Midnight Special (2016), and Loving (2016) is back after an eight-year hiatus from feature films.  He spent three years working on ALIEN NATION, a big-budget sci-fi remake for Fox, but it fell apart following the Disney acquisition.  Initially picked to write and direct A QUIET PLACE: DAY ONE (2024), part of a blockbuster sci-fi extraterrestrial series, but due to creative differences, as it was never going to be his vision, he unexpectedly left the project to make this film, which couldn’t be more radically different, though in keeping with his unpretentious films about a gradually disappearing America, taking us back to the motorcycle outsider subculture in the 1960’s, which began with gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson writing a 5-page article in The Nation magazine entitled The Motorcycle Gangs: Losers and Outsiders, May 17, 1965, which opens in stunning fashion:

Last Labor Day weekend newspapers all over California gave front-page reports of a heinous gang rape in the moonlit sand dunes near the town of Seaside on the Monterey Peninsula.  Two girls, aged 14 and 15, were allegedly taken from their dates by a gang of filthy, frenzied, boozed-up motorcycle hoodlums called “Hell’s Angels,” and dragged off to be “repeatedly assaulted.”

A deputy sheriff, summoned by one of the erstwhile dates, said he “arrived at the beach and saw a huge bonfire surrounded by cyclists of both sexes.  Then the two sobbing, near-hysterical girls staggered out of the darkness, begging for help.  One was completely nude and the other had on only a torn sweater.”

Thompson spent the next year preparing for a new book while living with and embedded into the Hell’s Angels as one of their own, in particular the San Francisco and Oakland chapters with their president Ralph ‘Sonny’ Barger, earning their trust and unique comradery, allowing Thompson to get close to the gang in a way others had not been able, spending his time traveling through California by motorcycle, describing the contrast between the general lawlessness of the club and the exaggerated fear that very lawlessness engenders in society.  Widely lauded for its up-close and uncompromising look at the Hell’s Angels motorcycle club during a time when the gang was highly feared and accused of numerous criminal activities, Thompson described them as “the one percent who don’t fit and don’t care” before he was himself collectively stomped by the Angels and forced out in a violent reaction to his views against spousal abuse, an incident that is included in the book published in 1967 that launched his career as a writer, [PDF] Hell’s Angels, A Strange and Terrible Saga (186 pages).  This begs the question, how do you tame a wild beast?  Thompson’s embellished treatment of gang-rape and its mix of realism and complete absence of restraint, like some kind of exotic cult ritual, has drawn plenty of controversy over the years, where he was accused of condoning rape.  Mirroring this experience was that of photojournalist Danny Lyon, a graduate of the University of Chicago (a classmate of Bernie Sanders) who began his career in the early 1960’s documenting the Civil Rights movement for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.  A few years earlier in 1957, Jack Kerouac’s culturally defining book On the Road chronicled a group of disillusioned young outsiders wandering the country and searching for answers, embracing art and poetry over conformity and consumerism.  Like many young men, Lyon, who was 15 when On the Road came out, was inspired by the book, so in the summer of 1962, following a semester at the University of Chicago, he asked friends to drop him off along Route 66, the same road Kerouac traveled, where he could follow his own path, hitchhiking to Cairo, Illinois where he saw future congressman John Lewis speak, photographing what he saw.  In 1963 Lyon returned to Chicago and rode with the Chicago Outlaws Motorcycle Club, taking pictures of and recording interviews with the members of a notorious motorcycle gang, effectively becoming their in-house chronicler, knowing the best way to get good pictures was to get involved.  Thompson even warned Lyon to be wary of the unpredictable behavior of biker outlaws, as they can turn on you in a second, but the legitimate Midwest motorcycle clubs at that time were radically different than the outlaws of Sonny Barger’s Hell’s Angels on the West coast.  After four years with the Outlaws (becoming disenchanted with their newfound interest in criminality), Lyon emerged with what has become one of the defining photobooks of the 1960’s, The Bikeriders, originally published in 1968 in paperback with fewer than 100 pages for just $2.95, an unapologetically romantic but edgy book of photographs, where the text consists of interviews with the subjects, yet the importance of this book, and its many reprints with color photos added, is hard to overstate, representing a significant step in 1960’s American photography, a predecessor to Nan Goldin and Larry Clark, while also providing a portrait of the people in this marginalized subculture that was jarringly honest, which helped sear motorcycle counterculture into the American psyche, and was a direct inspiration not only for this film, but also Dennis Hopper’s Easy Rider (1969).  While that film spoke about a 60’s counterculture, this is more of a counter-world to that counterculture, featuring undereducated, mostly all-white outcasts who don’t really fit anywhere else, yet each of the members supports each other, respects the rules and hierarchy of power, and they become, in a weird way, a family.  Going against the grain, this is not exactly an action movie, instead it’s more of an existential angst exposé of a fringe group’s twisted take on the American Dream.  This is obviously an extremely personal project for Nichols, having an emotional connection to the book, which represents an end of an era, like a nostalgic glimpse into a golden age of motorcycles, once viewed as a sign of American independence, and bikers as modern day cowboys, with guys sticking a middle finger to the conventions of society, but the open road of Monte Hellman’s Two-Lane Blacktop (1971) has simply turned less accessible and more unpredictably violent, where it’s difficult to make sense of all the unhinged shootings of today, as that once accepted moral code has been violated by perverted expressions of hatred and rage.   

American motorcycle clubs were fueled by this outlaw spirit, stretching back to the end of WWII when returning veterans were searching for something resembling the unique male bonding experience along with the dangerous risk-taking of the war, settling upon riding motorcycles together, positioning themselves outside the mainstream, showing a defiance and blatant disregard for the rules of society (no helmets, for instance), given a fatalistic live-fast, die-young fervor.  Is there a better metaphor for freedom in America than the open road?  Nichols has a way with films exploring toxic masculinity, from the tortured half-brothers relationship of his first film Shotgun Stories (2007) to this search for identity through the shared camaraderie in a 1960’s motorcycle club called the Vandals, a rag-tag group of blue collar misfits based out of Elmwood Park, a small suburb just outside of Chicago, who share a free-spirited passion for the open road and getting wasted, as they are simply a group of guys who like to ride their bikes, drink beer, chain-smoke, and have a good time.  In this sea of inarticulate masculinity we strangely find a woman at the center, Kathy (British actress Jodie Comer, based on Kathy Bauer in real life), who narrates her story on a readily available recording device held by Danny (Mike Faist).  Winning a Tony for her one-woman Broadway show, Prima Facie, Comer’s thick Chicago nasal accent sets the stage (completely in sync with the original interview tapes on Lyon’s website Bleak Beauty), reflecting the sounds from the city’s huge immigrant Irish, Polish, Serbian, Croatian, Italian, and Ukrainian communities, accents that completely disappear over time.  Led by their founder Johnny (Tom Hardy), a throwback to Marlon Brando from László Benedek’s THE WILD ONE (1953), actually seen watching the movie, getting his idea to form a motorcycle club right then and there, accompanied by Cockroach (Emory Cohen), whose claim to fame is eating bugs, West coast bike mechanic transplant Cal (Boyd Holbrook), the quirky pair of Corky (Karl Glusman) and Wahoo (Beau Knapp), and the moody, perpetually drunk, Latvian odd man out Zipco (Michael Shannon), whose wicked monologue about being rejected by the Army is hilarious, the epitome of what it means to be “undesirable,” yet his right hand man, with a role that resembles a Godfather consigliere, is Brucie (Damon Herriman), who utters the magic words, “Everyone wants to be part of somethin’.  I mean that’s what it really is.  These guys don’t belong nowhere else, so they belong together, you know.”  But none of them hold any interest to Kathy, who’s unimpressed by their foul language, leather and jean jackets everywhere, smelly undershirts smeared with engine oil, and is about to walk out on one of their weird social gatherings until she spots Benny (Austin Butler, who played Elvis in Baz Luhrmann’s ELVIS), The Bikeriders Movie Clip - Shootin the Breeze (2024) YouTube (2:17), a brooding loner who represents the rebellious pulse of the members, as his aloof “I don’t give a fuck” attitude represents the essence of their unbridled freedom, famous for his fearlessness, displaying a calm outer demeanor with an explosive interior, where he has an irresistible impulse to jump into a fight. Much to her surprise, she starts hanging out with him, beautifully captured by their first ride together, which memorably begins with the two of them hurtling over a bridge alone before the rest of the Vandals surge into view behind them and they are engulfed by the roar of the pack, getting swept up in the moment, suddenly riding in perfect formation, where the sheer thrill of it all is exhilarating.  “I’ve had nothing but trouble since I met Benny.  It can’t be love — it must be stupidity,” she chirps.  “Five weeks later, I married him.”  While fictionalized, told largely through interviews and flashbacks from 1959 to 1973, Jeff Nichols’ film remains true to Lyon’s vision, using the same names from the book, exploring self-imposed outsiderdom and tortured masculinity in much the same way, never losing sight of the more marginal characters, but the questionable moral ethics and criminal behavior of an outlaw gang is subverted by an extremely clever use of humor, where the eruption of extreme violence is exaggerated, shot in freeze-frame or slow motion, creating an absurdly comic situation, where that softer touch offsets what we’ve come to understand about the ultraviolence of these disenfranchised men.  Most of the time they’re sitting around in a bar doing next to nothing, just talking and hanging out, minding their own business, while 60’s jukebox music blares in the background (Here Are All the Songs In ‘The Bikeriders’), where some of the choices are positively inspired.  Although shot in color rather than the black-and-white of Lyon’s photographs, there’s a grainy quality to Adam Stone’s 35mm ‘Scope cinematography that lends itself to the original look, yet adds additional textures.        

Inspired by pop culture mythology, while also bearing some similarity with the underground aesthetic of Kathryn Bigelow’s THE LOVELESS (1981), this is an evocation of a lifestyle, capturing the right look and feel, where it’s all about the atmosphere and period detail, as some of these guys have jobs and families, so it might be surprising to think they’re all just playing roles, because at some point in the late 60’s bikers (and other counterculture wannabe’s) started to become mirror images of themselves, no longer the real thing.  Like a photo montage of how they imagine their lives could be, this film evokes a certain charm and even innocence, as none of them are really bad guys, where speeding or running through red lights is the extent of their criminal behavior, The Bikeriders - Official 'Police Chase Clean' Clip (2024 ... YouTube (46 seconds).  Jumping between moments and characters, often stopping in the middle of the action only to return later, dramatic tension is built with expansion of their membership, as new faces from a new generation are more reckless and violently unpredictable, adding a criminal element with a steady escalation of violence, where they dilute the interest from the heart of the group, growing farther and farther from that center core, becoming, essentially, unmanageable. This places an extra burden on Johnny’s rigid view of authority, as it exudes an individualistic Wild West mentality, where there’s always someone to challenge the fastest gun, and as the undisputed leader, he’s the one they challenge in a battle of “fists or knives.”  In the interest of sustaining the uniqueness of the club, a sadly worn-out and world-weary Johnny turns to Benny, exhorting him to take over after him, as he’s got that silent charisma, the person the other members are trying to be because he has nothing and cares about nothing, emblematic of that ultimate freedom to do whatever the Hell he wants, but he doesn’t want the responsibility, as he’s happy just being a free spirit, an iconic James Dean-style figure who imagines himself a rebel without a cause.  This unraveling around the edges, however, is a sign of what’s to come, as their identity changes.  While Kathy offers a romantic perspective, she’s also concerned when things go haywire, and there’s a few shocking instances of brutality, but mostly this plays out like a road movie, as they’re always moving from place to place, even if it’s just around town, with Norman Reedus showing up as the zonked-out California biker Funny Sonny who decides to stay for a while.  But the connecting link between the past and the present are the interviews with Kathy, who is immensely charming, sharply funny, and keenly perceptive, whose matter-of-fact, no-holds-barred outlook adds a fresh perspective to the wall-to-wall machismo on display.  Some of the new club members are returning veterans coming straight back from Vietnam, bringing with them their drug addictions and propensity for senseless violence, giving way to more serious crimes.  Kathy finds herself in the middle of a room surrounded by leering male eyes with intentions of gang-raping her, where the trap she finds herself in is overwhelmingly real, making her quickly understand just how dangerous these guys can be without the proper supervision, offering a palpable sense of fear.  It’s a curious choice to tell a story about masculinity gone wild through the eyes of an outspoken woman who holds nothing back.  Documentary photographs from the book are shown at the end of the film, where it’s clear that what was so successful about the book is capturing the unvarnished essence of who the people are, as that still haunts the filmmaker, who works meticulously to authentically recreate that bygone era, now sharing that experience with a new audience, hoping they can step back in time and absorb this undiscovered world, never glorifying or romanticizing the bikers, instead revealing the loss of an oldschool lifestyle valuing freedom on the road above anything else, where the sardonic irony is the biker club sets up meetings, membership dues, and rules to follow for a bunch of guys who make it their business to ignore all the rules.  The 45 motorcycles in the film are 50 or 60 years old, sourced from the classic collection of stunt coordinator Jeff Milburn and his friends, representing vintage authenticity, which is also true of the rest of the film (while omitting the Swastikas, Iron Crosses, and blatant racial resentment), with most of the dialogue coming directly from the book.  Kathy’s relationship with Benny fuels an irreverent attitude that’s peppered throughout the film, musing on their marriage and the strain that his ties to the Vandals has placed on it, thinking it was only a matter of time before he ended up killing himself on his bike.  Kathy does most of the talking while Lyon listens, patiently recording her words over the course of nearly a decade.  Benny, meanwhile, remains an elusive figure.  While Kathy describes him at length, he barely utters a word and was never interviewed by Lyon.

I’ve had nothin’ but trouble since I married Benny.  I’ve seen more jails, been to more courts and met more lawyers, and it’s only a year.  That’s a short time for so much to happen. 

Benny thinks that when you die, you’re better off than when you’re living.  You know, like when his dad died, he said, “It’s just as well, he’s better off that way.”  When his friends got killed, well, they’re better off that way.  No feelings.

I thought I could change him, you know?  Every woman thinks that she can change a guy.  Not to her own ways, but to be different.  Not to be different, but to be, I don’t know.  Like he’s wild. I used to think he’d get over that.  But he don’t. 

Saturday, June 1, 2024

Challengers


 


















Director Luca Guadagnino


Mike Faist, Zendaya, and Josh O'Connor

The director with Zendaya
































CHALLENGERS        C-                                                                                                              USA  Italy  (131 mi)  2024  d: Luca Guadagnino

JULES AND JIM (1962) this isn’t.  Not sure what the appeal of this movie is, hyped by the money train of gala fashion statements from the press tour, as it’s about as unsubtle as any film seen in years, hitting every cliché imaginable, even becoming a parody of itself, finding no new ground to explore, and can often feel laughable in the overly contrived melodrama, using the often intrusive, adrenaline-pumping, techno house music by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross that sounds right out of the playbook of Giorgio Moroder, feeling more at home at a Monster Truck Jam echoing through an enormous stadium, pushing unsustainable levels of tension that never actually seem to exist.  Nonetheless, this film is a box office hit, easily the director’s most commercial effort yet, despite its propensity for abstraction, currently the #3 film in America behind Ryan Gosling’s THE FALL GUY and the latest STAR WARS adventure, receiving all kinds of critical superlatives, where it plays out like an action movie, mixing elements of an old-fashioned Sergio Leone western, with a good guy versus a bad guy, leading to an ultimate showdown, yet there’s little to no action.  The interest of the film seems to have been driven by a promotional teaser trailer of Zendaya sitting on the bed of a hotel room surrounded by two cute guys as they’re about to engage in a sexual ménage à trois, Challengers | Official Trailer YouTube (2:15), set to the salacious use of Rihanna - S&M YouTube (4:04), no doubt answering the question whether sex still sells in 2024, with Zendaya uttering the line, “I’m taking such good care of my little white boys.”  Setting the drama inside a sports movie leaves us scratching our heads, as it’s not really about tennis at all, conjuring up the dark undertones of Woody Allen’s MATCH POINT (2005), or the ratcheted up tension from Hitchcock, A Face in the Crowd - Strangers on a Train (7/10) Movie CLIP ... YouTube (3:11), but it lacks that kind of psychosexual intrigue and instead feels more like an anti-sports movie, made by someone who doesn’t understand the sport, as it derides the game itself, concentrating instead on the head games that people supposedly play, all the while over-indulging in slow motion shots and trick photography, where the stylistic choices, like the perspective from a tennis ball or from beneath the ground looking up at the server, can be quite kitschy, often looking more like a video game.  Perhaps the biggest flaw is just how unlikable the protagonists are, which is by design, as they are toxic personalities, arrogant and extremely privileged, with an underlying disdain for others, as they’re incapable of empathy, leaving viewers intentionally alienated and distanced, undeserving of our sympathy, feeling all about manipulation, where ethics take a back seat to personal ambition, where we’re fed sports dribble like, “This is about winning the points that matter.”  Written by playwright and novelist Justin Kuritzkes, partner of filmmaker Celine Song who directed Past Lives (2023), another film with a love triangle, collaborating on their next film together as well, QUEER, an adaptation of Beat writer William S. Burrough’s 1985 novel, but the script just never takes us anywhere, lacking narrative finesse, told out of order with continual interruptions, unfolding over 13 years from 2006 to 2019, with the viewer being carried back and forth through time as if it were a tennis ball passing from one side of the court to the other, leaving us in a hollow no-man’s land of what-if’s and could-be’s.  Despite the passage of time, the characters never change at all, but are exactly as we see them in the beginning, showing no signs of development or growth.  Nothing in this film actually delivers, coming up dreadfully short as a sports movie, a sex comedy, a psychodrama, a puzzle film, or a relationship drama, while also failing as a character study, where there’s surprisingly little passion, staying mostly on the surface, so it’s a huge surprise that this is such a critically acclaimed hit, where people are supposedly moved by this, yet it feels more like a manipulative farce, a kind of battle of the sexes, where there are no winners in this movie, which feels dreadfully disappointing, yet that may actually be the point.  First of all, Zendaya was simply brilliant in Sam Levinson’s 2021 #7 Film of the Year Malcom & Marie, much sexier, much smarter, and much more compelling in that role, where her character actually mattered long after the film was over.  Not so here, where the characters are simply forgettable, yet it hits the two boys and a girl love triangle scenario, promising a unique drama that supposedly pushes the boundaries of sex and romance, adding a unique titillation, except it doesn’t, ending up in the same infamous territory as Léos Carax’s POLA X (1999), which featured big stars in steamy roles, yet landed with an empty thud.     

A better tennis/action movie was the television drama I Spy (1965-68), featuring the salt and pepper male combo of Robert Culp and Bill Cosby as undercover intelligence agents posing as a professional tennis player (Culp) and his trainer.  That actually respected the game far more than this does, which exaggerates the physical extremes of the sport, with all its grunts, racket smashes, and thunderous sound effects whenever they hit the ball, never really showing any real athletic prowess, where the operatic excess only works to the film’s detriment.  According to Kuritzkes in Business Insider, this is at least partially inspired by the Serena Williams meltdown at the 2018 U.S Open when she was defeated by 20-year old Naomi Osaka after Williams was charged with three code violations for receiving coaching, racket abuse, and verbal abuse, changing the entire momentum of the match, suggesting that was an “intensely cinematic situation.”  Made by gay Italian film director Luca Guadagnino, creator of the hugely popular summer romance and idyllic gay love story Call Me By Your Name (2017), but also the overly pretentious and equally forgettable I AM LOVE (2009), the director feels mired in a genre rut following his polarizing 2018 American remake of Dario Argento’s horror thriller Suspiria (1977), where he appears to have lost his way, yet he’s raking in the bucks from American producers, in this case MGM/Warner Brothers, where Zendaya is a co-producer alongside former Sony studio head Amy Pascal.  Hollywood is so afraid of losing their audience, they are currently over-spending massively for Marvel comic action figure and super hero movies, dumbing down the product like never before, where in this case the tennis court is like a gladiator spectacle with the combatants entering the arena of the Colosseum for battle, using computer generated VFX effects to enhance an illusion of a sporting event, veering into music video territory, where the dramatic over exaggeration comes across like some Shakespearean Greek tragedy.  While every scene appears over the top, what this film lacks is a heart and soul, seemingly designed for the IMAX experience where loudness matters and big is better.  Centered around a three-set challenge match that extends throughout the length of the film between Art Donaldson (Mike Faist) and Patrick Zweig (Josh O’Connor from Alice Rohrwacher’s La Chimera), best friends since junior tennis but arch-rivals on the court and in love, much of the film is told in flashbacks as the film drifts back and forth in time, immersing us in their series of dramatic entanglements with tennis child prodigy phenom Tashi Duncan (Zendaya), a rising star out of Stanford, a school that receives plenty of product endorsements, as you can’t help noticing the big bold red letters of their sports apparel.  Initially they both fall head over heels by her mix of stunning beauty and overwhelming talent on the court, yet they’re portrayed like dimwitted characters from DUMB AND DUMBER (1994), as they can’t stop staring at her, though leering may be more appropriate.  She seems to get some sort of kick out of their fanboy attention, drawing them both into her sexual lair for a threesome, which seems like a game of cunning manipulation that starts with a fascination with her but they end up groping each other when she removes herself from the picture, with suggestions that this is not strictly heterosexual.  While they claim to be no more than friends, the film drifts into homoerotic territory, but it’s only implied, with plenty of subtext to interpret, never really delivering on that end, delving more into the repressed psyche of the main characters, becoming a film about what drives an athlete, like a buddy movie with inferences of something more.  Claiming she doesn’t want to be a homewrecker, she moves on with her life, and is destined to become a top player until a career-ending injury knocks her out of the game, making use of her sports acumen and psychological insight to become a sought after coach, as she believes every match is about “a relationship” with the opponent.  While the two guys are in a perpetual Sisyphean struggle for her attention, shrugging off the hills and valleys of emotional devastation when they lose, the film drifts into the lurid world behind-the-scenes, suggesting that’s where the drama is, not on the tennis court.  That said, it still spends an inordinate amount of time attempting to build drama on the court, where tennis appears to be a metaphor for pent-up desire, but in a competitive form, featuring crushing volleys with the fury of a WWE wrestling smackdown, then slowed to a crawl between points, with sweat dripping and laser-like stares, only to fizzle out when it matters.      

Improbably, the film is shot by Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s longtime cinematographer Sayombhu Mukdeeprom, who uses obsessive close-ups and the most bizarre and unusual camera angles, perhaps capturing the emotional discombobulation where there is little equilibrium, as nerves are constantly on edge and knocked askew.  This altered perspective reveals the kind of topsy turvy world of professional sport, where one moment you’re among the best in the world, yet in the next it’s all behind you, where you’re struggling to find your identity, which has always been connected to any sport.  The overall central premise of the film is how the mastermind Tashi plays Patrick and Art off of each other, both on and off the court, much more talented than either of them, but forced to sublimate her desires through them, relishing her role as the puppetmaster pulling the strings behind the scenes, yet it unravels in the worst cliché’s, as inflamed desires are reignited in a classic Hollywood windstorm, with trash swirling through the city streets, where winning at tennis means winning the girl, while losing only accentuates all her worst fears about you.  Despite all the talk about how sexy the movie is, suggesting eroticism has returned to the movies post Covid, there’s really no actual sex to speak of, and no nudity except the male anatomy in a locker room setting.  Instead there are swaggering remarks, like trash talk, which always reference power dynamics, with a heightened presence of corporate sponsors, where giant billboards are seen everywhere behind the players, generating very little drama between the onscreen protagonists, which is remarkable for a mainstream movie with more than a two-hour running time.  So what is the compelling factor?  Apparently it’s all about hype and advertising, setting a tone for what this is supposed to be, planting the seed in the minds of viewers, repeatedly telling them what to expect, like the current political practice of repeating a lie so many times until you start to believe it.  It’s hard to believe that actually works in this day and age, yet social media is the driving force behind the media frenzy, and there’s nothing, literally no power on earth holding tweets accountable for the truth.  The heavy-handed nature of the movie gets so monotonous and stupidly repetitive that it’s actually a good film to walk out on, as it simply defies expectations, never even attempting to provide any hint of emotional honesty or cinematic tension, as it’s just a curious effort, to say the least, and something of a nightmare to watch, lost in its own jagged narrative structure and technical wizardry, feeling like all the air has been sucked out of the room.  Cutting back and forth in different time periods, yet supposedly taking place during a decisive tennis match, the narrative continually fills in the back story through flashbacks, à la Mildred Pierce (1945), revealing enough about the three central characters to suggest none of them are worth making a movie about, and yet that’s exactly what Guadagnino has done.  It’s a sad comment on what movies have come to, now so easily accessible through streaming platforms, where you don’t even have to leave your home anymore, suggesting television may actually be winning this battle, though the flipside is streaming services are now typically editing, altering, or censoring movies.  I can count on one hand the number of films I actually wanted to go to a theater to see from this top 100 grossing films of a year ago, 2023 Worldwide Box Office, where most of them are utterly forgettable.  Who is clamoring for all that other crap?  Cinephiles should be appalled.  In earlier generations, like Truffaut and Godard and others, spending time at the local cinematheque watching movies from every era was part of our cinematic education, a vehicle to expanding our artistic appreciation, widening our international horizons, while catching lurid movies on late night television only added to the mystique.  But now that movie theaters themselves show TV commercials before the show, with endless trailers of mind-numbing value, none of which you actually want to see, the era of film festivals and their capacity to provoke thoughtful evaluation may be over, replaced by films like this, which we’re told is a “triumph of filmmaking.”  Unlike other films that we’d eagerly sit through again, like rereading one of our favorite books, it’s hard to imagine sitting through this hot mess of a movie again, even if it plays commercial free on television, as there’s just nothing there.