BITTER MONEY (Ku Qian) C+
Hong Kong France (152 mi)
2016 d: Wang Bing
This is what it’s like
when you work far from home.
Following 2016
Top Ten List #6 'Til Madness Do Us Part (Feng Ai) (2013), with minimal
budget and just a two or three-man crew, this is a rather sprawling work for a
documentary, a gloomy portrait of a nationwide search for dead end jobs, yet a
film that offers plenty of insights into the horrific working conditions in the
Chinese textile business, but provides few answers, becoming a corrosive exposé
of capitalism, as a country born in socialist economic equalization where
everyone was supposedly equal suddenly comes to grips with the hardships of
converting to an open market society, where everyone dreams of becoming rich,
as workers are led to believe if they work hard they can make something of
themselves. Using only a camera to
observe their efforts, what they discover is a demoralizing bleak reality where
work is dull, hours are long, and pay is meager, as there aren’t enough hours
in the day to actually make any money, feeling as though they’re caught in a
pyramid scheme where only those at the top become rich, while all the rest are
forced to fight for the remaining few scraps, subject to working 12 or 13 hours
a day under grueling sweatshop working conditions with few breaks and no safety
regulations in place, with foremen constantly asking them to work faster,
getting fired if they don’t. What this
amounts to is every man or woman for themselves, as each is pitted against economically
strapped bosses whose only interest is making money, where workers are little
more than replaceable parts. Few work
regular hours, as they’re forced to work beyond a breaking point, so people
work a few days and then quit, endlessly wandering in search of something
better, but the same pattern repeats itself, making them mercenary workers for
troubled times leading a solitary and nomadic existence. Focusing on a few individuals who disappear
as quickly as they appear, the migration pattern forces people from rural
countryside areas into the cities seeking work opportunities, forced to live in
dilapidated housing conditions, often provided by the employer, which resemble
dormitory rooms with no doors, with no concept of privacy. With barely any time to sleep, the pattern is
the same, work, eat, and sleep, until you get fired or you can’t take it anymore. It’s a demanding process, as Wang provides no
narration, but expects viewers to sift through the raw footage, which comes
across like authoritative reference material, with viewers coming away with a
better understanding than they had before.
Allowing scenes to play out at length, mostly what viewers
pick up is from the incessant back and forth conversations among the workers
during down time. Occasionally it
continues while working, with pop songs loudly playing over the whirr of sewing
machines, where there’s no dress code, as men are seen working shirtless,
likely under oppressively hot temperatures, repeating the same motions over and
over again, accumulating piles at their work stations, growing weary from the
monotony. With a camera focusing its
attention on just a few individuals, featuring smaller workshops rather than
larger factories, a collective portrait emerges offering a fairly comprehensive
view of those at the lower rungs of the ladder in Chinese society, where it
would be difficult to place ourselves in their position. The concept of unions doesn’t exist there, so
there is no one looking out for the worker’s interests, no expectations for
improvements, suggesting child labor is routine, where there’s little hope for
the future. Shot over a period of two
years in Huzhou, a budding urban metropolis just two hours west of Shanghai, where
most of the part-time jobs are, considered the center of Chinese economic
development, where most employers are small bosses who are themselves
frequently in trouble, as the people they do business with often shortchange
them, causing cash flow problems where many are routinely owed money. Since this is built into the system,
cheating, underpaying, or exploiting those at the lowest end is typical, forced
to lead marginal lives where they can barely survive. This becomes evident not just to viewers, but
to the workers themselves, who grow easily frustrated, often giving up and
returning home to a more normal, less anxious-ridden life. At least with family, everyone’s in it together,
but out on their own, this solitary existence is a pathetic and meaningless
struggle, not at all what they envisioned at the outset, thinking hard work
would pay off. While there are volcanic
changes taking place in China, this film offers a merciless view of a pitiless
existence for the poor, where lonely downtime on everpresent smartphones offer
their only connection to an outside world that remains outside their grasp,
doomed to a life of futility.
What’s surprisingly missing is any discussion of education,
as the poor remain the most uneducated.
At least in the West, there is a belief that the more education you
receive, the better your prospects become in the job market. This concept is altogether missing in Wang’s
film, which only makes the continuing cycle of poverty more distressing, as
what hope do they have that things will improve? At the outset of the film we see families
lying about the age of their children so they can receive government issued ID
cards for work, despite being under-aged, thinking this is the best option for
the family, who then sends them on a long and arduous train journey into the
cities looking for work. If they
realized ahead of time that this was a sweatshop job opportunity, with little
to be gained, perhaps these teenage kids would be better served by staying in
school. What we don’t see is the
economic deprivation in the heartland where there are no economic opportunities
anywhere, where the cities, by contrast, are bursting with opportunities, just
none that pay well for the uneducated, who will remain exploited until they
receive a better education. Therein lies
the real problem, as rural families are in such desperate straits. Sending their under-aged kids with a
misguided hint of hope is a sign of that desperation. That may actually be a larger story than the
one documented in this film, but remains unexplored. Some of this may simply be the style of the
filmmaker, who is not an essayist offering various points of view, but limits
his films to the world that exists, with his camera capturing the people living
in it, allowing viewers to project their own thoughts about what it means. Surprisingly, the film won the Best
Screenplay award at the Venice Film Festival, which is unusual for a film with
no written screenplay whatsoever. There
is a single scene that stands out in this film, a heated argument in an open air
shop between a husband and wife that goes on for about fifteen minutes, shot
with no breaks, where the husband’s intensity reaches life-threatening
proportions, grabbing her by the throat, threatening to kill her several times. This all spills out onto the streets, where a
dozen or so bystanders observe, but none intervene. Instead there is a family friend that
attempts unsuccessfully to mediate the crisis.
Viewers never learn what specifically caused this episode, though
apparently she asked him for some money (suggesting money is the root of all
evil), with the husband flying off the handle, boasting how many times in a
week they fight, as if this takes the place of sex in their relationship,
without which their lives would have no meaning, introducing domestic violence
as yet another form of exploitation, with the abusive husband hoarding all the
money. There’s a curious moment when she
turns to the cameraman (Wang Bing) and speaks directly to him, “Come on, let’s
go to my sister’s. Follow me.” It’s a rare moment of stark honesty, an
apparent break in the movie, where a glimpse of real-life seeps in, but there’s
no hint of rescue from this dire portrait of forgotten lives and broken
spirits.