Showing posts with label Hong Chau. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hong Chau. Show all posts

Monday, January 1, 2024

2023 Top Ten List #4 Showing Up














Writer/director/editor Kelly Reichardt



Reichardt on the set with Michelle Williams


Reichardt and Williams at Cannes
  

















 

 

SHOWING UP                      A-                                                                                                   USA  (107 mi)  2022  d:  Kelly Reichardt

The portrait of an artist takes an unusual turn, immersing viewers inside a defunct art school, the Oregon College Of Art And Craft in Portland, which shut down in 2019, one of the nation’s last remaining craft-focused degree programs, first opening in 1907 as part of a movement reacting against changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution.  According to a recent New Yorker article (The End of the English Major), “In 2022, a survey found that only seven per cent of Harvard freshmen planned to major in the humanities, down from twenty per cent in 2012, and nearly thirty per cent during the nineteen-seventies,” a pattern that is reflective across the national landscape, mirroring a society that denigrates art and literature as purely frivolous, having little to do with the economic realities of the future.  This film begs to differ.  Establishing an alignment within the artistic community, Reichardt takes us through the college from room to room, like a Frederick Wiseman exposé, offering a wordless commentary on the making of art, as this becomes the predominate focus of the film, filling the classroom spaces with Portland-based artists whose pieces are seen throughout the film, exposing viewers to more artworks in this brief timespan than they have likely seen in years, which is a remarkable accomplishment.  Working with actress Michelle Williams in their fourth collaboration, initially seen as a homeless woman trying to find her stolen dog in Wendy and Lucy (2008), then part of a wagon train heading west bound for the Oregon Territory in Meek's Cutoff (2010), and as a domineering matriarch hellbent on building that perfect home in Certain Women (2016), this couldn’t be a more unglamorous role, wearing no make-up, looking frumpy in colorless attire with an unstylized, pageboy haircut, exhibiting little flair or personality, strangely inhabiting the same desolate universe as Barbara Loden’s Wanda (1970), whose very character is personified by a lack of personal drive.  There’s not an ounce of artifice anywhere to be found on the screen, becoming an unflinching portrait of a dour woman who takes little pleasure in doing anything other than working on her art, which dominates every waking minute of her life, spending her time doing small ceramic sculptures of women in various states of motion, while colorful watercolor drawings decorate her studio walls, yet her only companion is a finicky cat who rules the roost with persistent meows.  Returning to Oregon, notably Portland for the umpteenth time, known for its DIY counterculture lifestyle, perhaps more than any film since Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973) this perfectly encapsulates that West coast vibe, where there’s a chill about each of the secondary characters, as nothing is ever rushed, yet they exhibit something eccentric and individualistic about the West coast that simply doesn’t exist anywhere else in the country.  Despite her inestimable talent, Kelly Reichardt is not a household name, though her films can be overpraised to the hilt, yet some find it hard to engage with the lack of onscreen drama.  Still, she can always be counted on to make low-key, quietly naturalistic films in her own distinct style, using minimal plot devices to build contemplative, meditative spaces about ordinary people living life on the margins, where her vast catalogue of independent films also includes River of Grass (1994), Old Joy (2006), Night Moves (2013), and First Cow (2019).  Lizzy Carr (Michelle Williams) lives in a cramped apartment over a garage that she’s turned into a studio, renting space from a longtime friend and fellow artist who lives next door, Jo, played by Hong Chau, so good in Alexander Payne’s mystifyingly weird Downsizing (2017), who makes more dramatically eye-appealing collages of yarn, fabric, and metal that occupy greater dimension and space.  The two exhibit a passive-aggressive relationship throughout the film, not exactly rivals, as their work is so different, yet their approach couldn’t be more different.  Jo is a more celebrated artist-in-residence at the school, surrounding herself with a roomful of admirers, where her home can sometimes resemble a party atmosphere, releasing the tension after being cooped up in an art studio all day, while Lizzy struggles to find time after hours, working alone at home, where solitude works for her, undisturbed by outside forces as she embodies an unspoken ambivalence, where the fragility of her work resembles the intricacy of Tennessee Williams’ The Glass Menagerie.  While Jo earns money from the sale of her work, Lizzy does not, yet in something of a pleasant surprise, Reichardt is completely nonjudgmental about implying any instrinsic value, allowing viewers to decide.  In that sense, her observational style is diametrically opposed to the ostentatiousness of Ruben Östlund’s The Square (2017), which does nothing but make value judgments about class distinctions in a calculated contempt for art.  However, not since Rivette’s LA BELLE NOISEUSE (1991) has a film so comically dealt with some obsessional human eccentricities involved in creating art.

This is the sixth collaboration with Portland screenwriter Jon Raymond, while working with cinematographer Christopher Blauvelt for over a decade, developing a comfort zone working together with films unraveling in a relaxed pace, where there’s something calmly appealing about this film, with an underlying humor that’s often missing from her other films, yet it also carries with it a profound sadness.  Lizzy supports herself by working in an uninspiring desk job at a campus office (where a dog sits in the doorway) which is inexplicably run by her mother Jean (Maryann Plunkett), which allows her access to the facilities, seemingly existing in a state of personal dissatisfaction, where part of her frustration is designing posters for other featured artists, routinely seen sitting alone outside on the steps eating out of her tupperware container, just staring off into space, watching the “Thinking and Movement” class out on the grass, or roaming through the various rooms in an attempt to escape the drudgery of her job, where it’s clear this takes her away from doing what she’d prefer, which is working on her art.  Ironically, she’s surrounded by a multitude of student artists who are doing exactly that, as hanging out is an essential component to making art, each working at their own unhurried pace, where the filmmaker presents the panorama of their works as a kind of collective collage of creative inspiration, where stenciled onto one of the classroom walls is a sign that reads “Do Not Mix Chemical Dyes with Natural Dyes.”  Reichardt works with such a deliberately low-key approach that it resembles a documentary style with fictitious interludes, yet what’s immediately clear is just how ordinary the artists appear to be, as they could be anybody walking down the street, completely unrecognizable from the wide breadth of humanity, yet the extreme degree of focus in their work is as unique as it is exemplary.  With just a few days before an upcoming exhibition, Lizzy’s life is continually interrupted by unexpected events that take her away from what she needs to be doing, starting with her cat, waking her up in the middle of the night as she’s nearly mauled to death a captured pigeon, having already nibbled on one of the wings, leaving it incapacitated and unable to fly, quickly disposing of the bird by sweeping it up and placing it out the window on the end of a broom, leaving it to its fate somewhere else, but like bad karma, it comes back to haunt her.  Jo discovers the injured bird the next morning and immediately attempts a rescue, enlisting Lizzy to help her wrap the wing in a bandage, place the bird in a cardboard box, and leave it right back with a stunned Lizzy to look after before running off to her art studio, as she has two upcoming exhibitions, and a prospective buyer from New York, hilariously described by Guy Maddin in a wonderfully illuminating interview as “It’s almost like a Preston Sturges gag as directed by Kelly Reichardt,” (A Need to Focus: Guy Maddin Interviews Kelly Reichardt About Showing Up).  Meekly reminding Jo that she has no hot water, she’s alarmed at her dismissiveness, but it will have to wait due to more pressing needs.  This is what amounts to drama in this film, as the saga of the injured bird becomes the link between these two women, each passing it off to the other, with Jo expressing less and less interest, while Lizzy develops a certain fascination, alarmed enough to take it to the vet, who suggests there’s little else to do, reminding her that “it’s a pigeon.”  Babysitting duties create a dilemma, as she’s obviously forced to keep the cat away from the bird while she works in her studio, but we see the paws underneath the door, like an ominous reminder.  The quirkiness of the set-up, along with the instant likeability of Jo, who’s mind always takes her to places that demand our attention, like a force of nature, is something rare in film today, as this is a woman who steadfastly follows her instincts, in stark contrast to Lizzy, who seems to be on the short end of the stick most of the time, where this little saga only escalates the mounting tension between them, as Lizzy has no place to shower, becoming a grating nuisance that wears on her after a while, as she’s in a daily battle for basics like hot running water and a decent wage, remaining dedicated to her craft with no discernible financial reward in sight.  Yet we can’t help but be mesmerized by the diverse collection of her artworks that she readies for the exhibition, as each of her “Little Women” exists in their own space and time, exuding distinct personalities that their creator seems to lack.  She enlists the aid of Eric (André Benjamin, aka André 3000, co-founder of Outkast whose flute playing can be heard near the end), an amiable guy who runs the kiln at school, always giving her time to heat and glaze her collection, while others continually drop in to see her latest creations, where there’s a student-generated interest that’s much more enthusiastic than anything we ever see from her, which is one of the fascinating aspects of the film.     

An Artist-in-Residence in the Film Arts program at Bard College since 2006, Lizzy’s life resembles the director’s own, an undervalued artist struggling to make ends meet, writing, directing, and editing films on a shoestring budget while supplementing her income by teaching college students, which also provides her with health insurance, something she doesn’t have within the film industry’s Director’s Guild as she works so infrequently.  With claims that independent filmmaking has not been open to women in any way, Reichardt has spoken candidly about the reality of making low-budget films, saying, “It also just means that I’m not getting paid, and I’m in my 50’s.”  The opening title sequence is beautifully orienting, as it simply lingers on various paintings lining the walls of Lizzy’s studio, which has a way of imprinting the subject into viewer’s imaginations.  Lizzy’s intense fixation on caring for the injured pigeon is mirrored in her complicated family dynamics, as her parents are bitterly divorced, and she’s seemingly the only member of her family that’s consistently concerned about Sean (John Magaro, the gentle frontier chef in First Cow), her unstable brother prone to frequent bouts of paranoid conspiracy theories (described in Variety as a little like one of R. Crumb’s brothers), seen digging a giant hole in his back yard, clearly agitated that Lizzy doesn’t hear the voices that are speaking to him, “You have to listen to what’s not being said,” claiming she’s not listening hard enough.  She’s following in the footsteps of her father (Judd Hirsch), an accomplished pottery artist who’s now retired, yet she’s concerned that two nomadic bohemian guests have moved into his home with no indication of leaving, yet he’s not bothered, as he seems to enjoy their company.  The combined stress of caring for the bird, looking after her family, surviving without hot water, and trying to get her sculptures done in time takes an exasperating toll, leaving Lizzy thoroughly exhausted, yet for all her accumulated fatigue, her exhibition is rather inspiring, as her pieces are unique, like little pieces of herself, well-attended by the people who matter most to her.  While her parents get into a personal dispute that expose the family dysfunction, all is well with the world.  However there’s a beautifully designed sketch involving the bird that plays out through the entire film, often darkly humorous, though it takes everyone by surprise when it suddenly takes flight within the indoor exhibit, drawing the interest of the entire gallery who are spellbound by the unexpected turn, and flies away, with all the patrons moving to the outdoor sidewalk to watch.  It’s a liberating moment that feels effortless, but unusually refreshing, as this kind of thing never happens in a Kelly Reichardt film, as she never resorts to sight gags, but it achieves the desired effect, as there’s such a sense of relief afterwards, as all the built-up tensions are washed away, suddenly of little consequence.  Lizzy and Jo go looking for the bird in the trees, but never seem to find it, and go walking down the street chatting together as if they’re best friends, which they very well may be, while the camera offers a bird’s eye view from one of the tree branches overlooking it all.  It’s a magical moment that delivers, like a much appreciated wave of fresh air that has the effect of joyously cleansing our souls, eradicating all the unnecessary content.  Among her better edited films, viewers are left with a stream of artistic images of rotating art projects, almost like a video instillation, each capturing that moment of surprise when first seen, offering generous support for the creative student artists of the future, where a film like this elevates the cultural significance of art, which is typically among the first programs cut out of public schools, which only shortchanges developing lives.  To put it bluntly, no men are making films like this.  With a nation obsessed by the male-dominated brutality of gun violence and weaponized political views, quiet, contemplative films offer such a peaceful alternative, providing painstaking visual detail of people working on their art, offering a celebratory tribute to the work of rarely seen artists, including Jessica Jackson Hutchins, Michael Brophy, Chris Johanson, Storm Tharp, Johanna Jackson, and others, embracing the idea that artistic communities are a haven for friendship and for working, and that a lack of community, or an each man for himself scenario, is a bad idea, emphasizing what a difference a creative outlet can provide in establishing a human connection while strengthening the ties of any community.  Lizzie’s works are by CYNTHIA LAHTI, a largely unrecognized artist based in Portland, while Jo’s are by Israeli-American artist Michelle Segre, a MacArthur Fellow working out of a Bronx studio, while it’s notable that the uncredited Portland location scouting was done by Janet Weiss, the former drummer for the all-girl rock band Sleater-Kinney. 

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Downsizing


  



Director Alexander Payne


 



DOWNSIZING          C                    
USA  Norway  (135 mi)  2017  ‘Scope  d:  Alexander Payne            Official site [Japan]

Thoroughly disappointing, feeling like a bad Disney film, this overly bright and cheerful film breathes optimism and good fortune despite its downbeat tone about an apocalyptic end of the world, with Christoph Waltz and Udo Kier playing a couple of “wild and crazy guys,” as there’s always some that take advantage of other’s misfortune.  A healthy bit of skepticism apparently ruins this film, populated by despicable people throughout, this film just never gets going, where the concept of shrinking people to five inches tall and going small to eradicate overpopulation is funny for about a minute, but then there’s two more hours left to go, feeling like it takes an eternity to get there.  Like a liberal ecological dream that goes haywire, becoming the world’s worst nightmare, this film starts out with a rush of energy but ends up mired in its own depression and gloom, feeling off-target, even preposterous, failing to generate even an ounce of sympathy, becoming one of the more distinctly banal and unnecessary films seen all year, where one wonders what Alexander Payne ever saw in this film, as it never materializes.  Whatever stabs are meant as satire simply get lost in the incessantly broad stylization, where no one will ever mistake this for serious social commentary, but it lacks humor as well, where the initial positive outlook slowly dissipates, forcing viewers to grit and bear it.  Enter Paul Safranek (Matt Damon, where the joke is nobody can ever pronounce his name correctly), an overly enthusiastic middle class dupe from Omaha who works as an occupational therapist at a local steak manufacturer, basically treating people on the assembly line that use repeated motions to the point of injuring themselves.  Viewed in the best possible light, Paul offers magical elixir cures to ordinary workers through various exercise techniques, advice that never works in the real world, but he receives plenty of thanks here, so already we’re getting this breezy and uplifting version of a life that doesn’t really exist.  That’s the first problem, as there’s no essential reality to speak of that anyone can relate to, instead it’s a sanitized version of harmonious middle class happiness, as if that really exists.  Paul and his wife Audrey (Kristen Wiig) complain of being mired in debt, seeing no way out, but then fall for this ridiculous advertising scheme for a miniaturized world where everyone is a King, living excessively large, free of all worldly concerns, as your money is enormously large in Leisureland, where you can kick back and enjoy all the things you’ve never been able to do in the real world.  Or so goes the pitch.  The problem is, Paul falls for it, especially when an old high school friend, Dave Johnson (Jason Sudeikis) and his wife Carol (Maribeth Monroe) are wheeled out in miniature at one of those boring high school reunions and are an instant hit, basically sealing the deal.  Omaha never looked more exasperatingly dull.  

While researching the pros and cons, Paul is introduced to the work of Norwegian scientist Dr. Jørgen Asbjørnsen (Rolf Lassgard), whose visionary solution to the world’s population problem has become accepted around the world, with miniaturized communities consuming only a fraction of the resources, yet the catch to Paul and his American cohorts is a lifestyle of opulence, where you can afford to buy luxurious things and literally pamper yourself.  Finally agreeing to take the plunge, which involves an extensive procedure, Paul is surprised to learn his wife hasn’t followed him, that she backed out at the last moment, unwilling to leave her family, which obviously leaves Paul in the lurch, especially when he arrives all alone to his luxurious mansion with gorgeous chandeliers and plenty of closet space, all the things he never had before, suddenly unimportant, as his life is in shambles.  A year later his divorce is finalized, having moved into a new apartment complex, Paul is working as a Land’s End telemarketer, very ironic since that’s basically what got him interested in making the “change.”  His new life is dull and uninteresting, going on dates with women he’s barely interested in, having dinner with a new prospect when his upstairs neighbor starts blasting music.  Yelling out the window to keep it down, his neighbor arrives at his door to apologize, none other than Christopher Waltz as Dusan, a Serbian black marketeer, providing items where people don’t ask where they came from, selling Cuban cigars, for instance, suggesting “People become small to have the things only the rich could afford.”  Inviting him to a small gathering of friends that turns out to be a hundred people, Paul’s dinner is a bust anyway, but he couldn’t be more out of place in this chic oversized penthouse suite of the nouveau riche until someone slips him some ecstasy pills, going on a dreamlike adventure into an exotic new world, waking up on the floor the next morning as the cleaning crew arrives.  Dusan finds Paul a hapless loser, as he sweats the small stuff while ignoring the big picture, as he, along with his partner Udo Kier as Konrad, an aging playboy who also happens to be a ship captain, live the good life, free of all worries, where champagne and beautiful women seem enticed by their easygoing, freewheeling style.  Paul is instantly drawn to Ngoc Lan Tran (Hong Chau), one of the cleaning crew, whose notorious story made all the papers, as she was a jailed Vietnamese dissident who was downsized by the government against her will, eventually smuggled out of the country in a television, where all other companions were killed, and she was seriously injured, losing the lower part of her leg, using a prosthetic limb and walking with a noticeable limp.  Calling upon his previous profession, he takes a look at her, believing he can improve her mobility, much to Dusan’s cynical amusement.   

Ngoc Lan Tran speaks broken English throughout, becoming a walking stereotype for a bracingly obnoxious Asian immigrant, as she orders Paul around like a nagging wife, thinking he’s a doctor, or at least the closest thing to it, taking him into her world, which is an overcrowded ghetto just outside the walls of Leisureland, an impoverished wasteland where people are sick with no medical care, or don’t have enough to eat, but exist as if in a state of limbo, not part of the world above or below, aliens or nonentities who are declared persona non grata everywhere else.  This international slum stymies Paul, as he’s never seen anything like this before, yet Ngoc Lan Tran orders him to the bedside of a dying patient, which is certainly beyond his capabilities, but provides opioid pain medicine stolen from the medicine cabinets of Dusan, which helps relieve the pain.  In a gesture that perhaps describes him to a T, Paul accidentally breaks her prosthetic limb when trying to tighten it, making her unable to work, ordering Paul to take her place on the cleaning crew, which Dusan finds hysterical (really moving down the career ladder!), while also gathering food for various residents in need that she regularly distributes.  This essentially alters Paul’s mission in life, becoming Ngoc Lan Tran’s ambassador of good will, helping people in need.  Attempting to offer a way out of this dire situation, Dusan asks Paul to join him and Konrad on a trip to Norway at the invite of Dr. Asbjørnsen, the site of the first successful miniaturized community, as he has an important announcement to make.  Ngoc Lan Tran, in her typical brazen manner, adds her name to the list, claiming Asbjørnsen extended her an open invitation when he first heard about her.  Despite her overcontrolling manner, basically ordering him around like he’s a child (though she tries to be a Vietnamese saint), Paul is a sucker for this woman, actually getting romantically involved, but perhaps an ocean trek into the Norwegian fjords will have that effect upon anyone.  While the imagery is a bit cheesy, where the miniaturization always feels like noticeable CGI effects, Asbjørnsen announces that humanity is doomed, that the toxic levels are irreversible, and human life on the planet will come to an end, offering an underground porthole that has been built to preserve life in the event of this outcome.  Paul jumps at the opportunity, asking Ngoc Lan Tran to join him, as this appears to be their only option for a viable future.  Ngoc Lan Tran, however, is committed to her slum community, while Dusan and Konrad are more skeptical, claiming this apocalypse will be years away, suggesting there’s plenty of life to enjoy in the meantime.  Where does that leave Paul?  Unfortunately this Brave New World is presented like some Twilight Zone episode, as who would really want to get stuck underground in an insulated artificial environment for decades to come?  The Norwegians, apparently, as they are ecstatic at the thought, providing a jubilant and celebratory exit before they freely march down the rabbit hole.  This outcome, however, is never really coherently presented, feeling more like sci-fi, as people take for granted they will survive, yet once in, there’s no way out, as they must be completely sealed into their hermetic existence.  This life or death dilemma is not much to ponder, as no one really knows what to expect in either outcome, leaving an audience perplexed, wondering what all the fuss is about.