Showing posts with label Lars Eidinger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lars Eidinger. Show all posts

Friday, April 19, 2019

High Life





André Benjamin on the set
 



filming on the set
 






Director Claire Denis
 





Director Claire Denis with actress Juliette Binoche
 














HIGH LIFE                C                    
USA  Great Britain  France  Germany  Poland (110 mi)  2018  d:  Claire Denis

At 99 percent of the speed of light, the entire sky converged before our eyes.  The sensation of moving backwards even though we’re moving forwards, getting further from what’s getting nearer.  Sometimes I just can’t stand it.
―Monte (Robert Pattinson)   

While ostensibly a sci-fi flick, this has more in common with prison movies, showing how easily one loses track of time when serving lengthy prison sentences, with much of your psychological vantage point reduced to flashback sequences, as there’s nothing in the present to keep one occupied or focused, nothing to do except except what’s required, so any contemplative moments shift to earlier times when you had a life, when opportunities presented themselves.  You may have screwed them up, but you had a life that was your own.  However, that’s all in the past, as now you’re stuck in a state of paralysis serving time.  French filmmaker Claire Denis views space travel in much the same way, even constructing a story that imagines a crew containing death row inmates, locked up in a box floating in outer space.  Conceiving a space vessel that literally looks like a box, or an enlarged storage chamber, feels rather mundane, where the hallways are cluttered and messy, feeling disorganized, where prison life is no more flattering in outer space than on earth, with the same dire results.  Not really resembling any other outer space movie, you’ll be hard pressed to discover any references here, as there are few, as most of the film spends time with the human cargo contained inside, and it’s not a pretty sight.  No likeable characters here, as these are literally floating criminals in the sky, as wretched out there as they were viewed back on earth, each with their own self-centered motives, where little thought is paid to the others.  Actually it’s an utterly unfascinating premise, poorly written, using next to no special effects, operating on a shoestring budget, becoming more of a character study of an insideous few, with Denis using an elliptical style that has worked well for her in the past, particularly in a challenging film like The Intruder (L’intrus) (2004) which has no coherent narrative, yet she uses music and landscapes to expand the regions of consciousness, where manifestations of one’s imagination alter and replace existing realities, literally infusing the present with the past, real or imagined, creating a sumptuously beautiful work that may be among her best.  But this goes in the other direction, restricting time and space, condensing it all into smaller more compact pieces, then doling out little snippets at a time, where her tendency to intentionally withhold information from viewers actually helps send this film off the rails, as there’s little to no audience involvement, nothing to care about, which includes the coldly inferior video look of the film.  Essentially what’s happening onscreen is an exhausting journey with few signs of hope, where time ceases to matter after a while, with little incentive to go on.  Life in this kind of imprisoned endurance marathon is a life sentence with no chance at parole, where you’re essentially counting time before you die.  Making matters worse, you are hurling into the void of dark space, with no means of escape, and few if any options.  Not a pretty picture. 

Arguably the director’s only misfire, as she may be the greatest female director in history, yet this film has been gestating in her mind over the past 15 years, where each of the different characters were born, holding a greater meaning to her, perhaps, as they are her own creations, yet many of the precious details are lost, largely due to the impersonal indifference, which is suffocating, choking out all signs of life in the process.  Her first film spoken in English, which is the language she imagines would be spoken in outer space (”Definitely not French.”), what piqued her interest was how those spending prolonged time in space stations were so regimented in their use of time, leaving little to chance, spending each of their days painstakingly performing their meticulously detailed experiments and lab tests, where everything is documented, entered into the computer for analysis, spitting out charts measuring whatever the hell it is they measure up there, as it’s essentially a science lab.  This is the overall tone conveyed at the outset, almost entirely told in flashback mode, as Monte (Robert Patterson) and a newborn baby are the last of the survivors, seen jettisoning the remains of each and every last one of them out into the void of space in an eerie spectacle (cueing the title), which only begins to account for just how lonely and isolated his life has become.  Moving backwards to earlier times, the back stories are presented, where we learn these are death row inmates given a chance to reduce or commute their sentences in what appears to be a suicide mission, a search for alternative fuel, heading towards a black hole where their mission is to try to extract energy, following the premise set out by British physicist Roger Penrose.  While there are people running the ship, they are nearly indistinguishable from the inmates, given the ambiguity of the narrative, as there is another evolving storyline that is more accentuated, with Juliette Binoche playing Dr. Debs, a mad scientist in a white smock with sinister motives, a veritable Nurse Ratched from ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST (1975), though here she collects semen from the male prisoners in exchange for sleeping pills, while keeping the women onboard heavily sedated, using them as guinea pigs, implanting the semen into their sleeping bodies, hoping to procreate new life in space.  Like something out of BEHIND THE GREEN DOOR (1972), an early porn flick where a randomly abducted woman is subjected to a series of sexual titillations meant to arouse and inflame her desires, they have concocted a sex room known as “The Fuck Box” where Dr. Debs spends quality alone time in simulated sex, like riding a dildo bareback on a mechanical bull, filled with ecstatic gyrations, which basically serves as the gym for a sexually demanding workout.  Men supposedly use this facility as well, though Monte is the one inmate, known as “The Monk,” who refuses to offer his semen or use the sex room, preferring abstinence.    

Once viewers get the gist of things, things quickly start to deteriorate, minds frazzle, people misbehave in astonishing fashion, some turning against one another, becoming a free-for-all of eroding expectations.  Space can only simulate the experience on earth, where one room is dedicated to growing an overflowing garden, used for food and vegetation, where a combination of various chemicals produces mist and humidity, offering a kind of Edenesque experience, reminding some of what it was like back on earth where they still have family, but no contact.  While there is a lone captain onboard, Lars Eidinger as Chandra, he never once feels in charge, suffering a radiation stroke as they near the black hole, leaving the dubious Dr. Debs in charge, though she has a deranged criminal history as well, having murdered her husband and child, where this is essentially a mental ward where the inmates start to run the asylum.  Debs becomes obsessed with the idea of creating a child (“I am totally devoted to reproduction”), though one senses it feels more like a Frankenstein creation due to the morally dubious methods used, which incudes a rape sequence of a heavily sedated Monte in her quest for the perfect sperm.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, this unorthodox method produces a perfectly healthy baby girl, who is initially kept in an incubator away from the mother, with Debs euphoric over her handywork, but this sensation is juxtaposed over a gruesome image of the young mother covered in milk-like fluids, a grotesque display of biology gone wrong, where micro-managing the natural order of things, playing God, essentially, has consequences, where this group is flirting with disaster.  Things take a turn for the worse, plunging headlong into space horror territory, with one ill-fated calamity leading to another, with catastrophic results, where one by one the crew diminishes in size, leaving only Monte and the baby named Willow, who grows up to become his beautiful teenaged daughter (Jessie Ross), where they are literally stranded in space.  They provide differing psychological mindsets, as all she knows is a life in space, learning about family through computer imagery, endlessly going through the ship files, while Monte is worn out from his experiences, battle weary, struggling to provide a sense of meaning, even as his sense of purpose diminishes, as it feels all for naught, a philosophical burden that grows heavier and more pressing each passing day, still stuck to a regimented daily existence, while Willow has fewer imposed barriers, less negativity, and is more open to exploring new frontiers.  It’s an interesting dynamic, essentially survivers in a battle of attrition, even making contact with another space craft that is identical in every respect, just a different number.  What they discover is frightful, even worse conditions than their own, heading back out into the void of the unknown, continually approaching oblivion, where all they’re left with is essentially nothing to live for, yet they have each other.  It’s a sad and profoundly tragic fate. 

Thursday, January 1, 2015

2014 Top Ten List #3 Clouds of Sils Maria

















CLOUDS OF SILS MARIA               A                       
France  Switzerland  Germany (123 mi)  2014  ‘Scope  d:  Olivier Assayas 

His best film in years, known only as SILS MARIA in France, Assayas stunningly returns to peak form in this modernized twist of his earlier film Irma Vep (1996), a film about the making of film, this time starring Juliette Binoche instead of Maggie Cheung, written by Assayas specifically for her in a project he describes as “A Juliette Binoche movie about Juliette Binoche with Juliette Binoche” in a film about an international theatrical star Maria Enders (Binoche) who is asked to perform in a film adaptation of the play that made her famous twenty years ago, but this time switching roles, no longer playing the beguiling 18-year old rising star actress in the part that made her famous, but the older leading lady, a tired, middle-aged business woman having an affair with the manipulative young female ingénue who eventually drives her weak-willed boss to suicide.  Partially financed by Chanel, which supplied the actresses with clothes, jewelry, accessories and makeup, this also allowed the director to shoot this sumptuously looking film on 35 mm.  Shot on location by cinematographer Yorick Le Saux in the mountainous Swiss Alps towns of Sils Maria as well as Zurich, Switzerland, Leipzig, Germany and South Tyrol, Italy, the locations are an integral part of the story, as Wilhelm Melchior, the author of the aforementioned play Maloja Snake, is a creature of those spectacular mountains, filled with their own secrets and mysteries and naturally occurring phenomenon which begin to take on human characteristics while also offering its own commentary on the changing nature of time passing, which is visibly seen in a fog-like cloud formation that drifts through the valley between the mountains in the form of a snake.  Melchior becomes an unseen central force in the film as Maria, at the height of her stardom but also in the middle of a contentious divorce, is accompanied by her more laid back American personal attendant Valentine, Kristen Stewart in Converse shoes, while traveling to Zurich by train to accept an award on behalf of Melchior, where on route they learn of his sudden death.  Assayas immediately shows us the back side of a famous artist, the side we never see, as Maria seems terribly dependent on the expert social media skills of Valentine, who meticulously plans everything out for her ahead of time, but also acts as a human receptacle for her more candid comments that the public never hears. 

While Maria is obviously shaken by the unexpected death, this doesn’t stop her from doing a planned Chanel dress photo shoot once she arrives at the hotel, where her immediate transformation from ordinary train passenger to international diva is a bit stunning.  Much to her chagrin, they have also invited actor Henryk Walk, Hanns Zischler, a self-centered, autocratic older man in the manner of Erich von Stroheim who took full sexual advantage of the young actress at the beginning of her career, which she has never forgiven, to provide his commentary about Melchior, as they were also close personal friends.  After the Awards ceremony, she meets an in vogue German movie director, Klaus Diesterweg (Lars Eidinger), considered hot property due to his series of successful films, who offers her the older role of his adaptation of Melchior’s play.  While she initially expresses no interest, Val talks her into taking the role, suggesting she would reach an entirely new audience, and with this decision comes the title card announcing “Part 2,” which takes the audience completely by surprise, as there was never any “Part 1.”  This idea of an actress reaching a point in her career (Binoche is 50) when she is no longer considered young and desirable for leading roles, but becomes thought of only for less desirable parts as a character actor, is considered the death of their careers to some actresses, and has been explored before by John Cassavetes and Gena Rowlands (in her late 40’s) in Opening Night (1977), one of the gutsiest films about theater ever made, right alongside Chaplin’s LIMELIGHT (1952) and Desplechin’s ESTHER KHAN (2000).  All are dialogue-driven vehicles featuring extraordinary performances, where Rowlands (whose name Binoche amusingly appropriates when disguising her identity) was pathologically reticent to take the part, not yet ready to cross the threshold, while Binoche is clearly more comfortable as an aging actress, partly because she has continued to work with all the best directors and still receives scripts that are written with her in mind.  She couldn’t appear more natural in a film while still playing a role, always seen as warmhearted and charismatic, but the real surprise is Stewart, who matches her scene for scene throughout the entire film by completely underplaying Binoche’s theatrics.  What’s particularly interesting is how quietly reserved and contemplative Binoche is in English, as if always holding something back, while saving her more extroverted outbursts for French language scenes.  

Some of the best scenes in the film are reserved for Binoche and Stewart who work brilliantly together, retaining a hint of the sexual undercurrent expressed in Melchior’s play while also expressing their own unique feminine personalities quite differently, as they retreat to the Melchior estate in the mountains to prepare for the role, which the playwright’s widow Rosa (Angela Winkler) has graciously offered, as she needs to get away to avoid all the constant reminders of his presence.  As they read through the play’s scenes, offering fresh extemporaneous comments as they go, Assayas intelligently dissects the present through the past, with both women displaying strong-willed characters with probing intelligence and an acerbic wit, but also an affectionate side where they’re simply happy to be in each other’s company.  As they weave in and out of the play, while also preparing elaborate meals or taking long walks through the picturesque mountainside, it’s impossible to tell where the play ends and reality begins, as they seamlessly intersect with a surgical precision.  While both women have their own star power, which is beautifully utilized by Assayas, it’s curiously deferred to the ideas of the play, as if they are mere players in the world of art, expressed without an ounce of pretension.  This honesty is then contrasted with the director’s shrewdly calculating choice to play the ambitious young girl, Chloë Grace Moretz as Jo-Ann Ellis, an actress Maria has never heard of.  As Val thumbs through Google searches, hilarious YouTube videos, and even more demented celebrity interviews where Ellis comes off as a teenage prima donna and a full-time party animal whose center of the universe is never far from herself, Maria finds this ghastly while Val is impressed by her ability to hold the audience through each of these arrest records and real life disasters, where she remains exactly who she is without any hint of compromise.  The fact that she’s a walking disaster in real life means nothing, as she knows how to command the screen.  This contextualization couldn’t be more hilariously insightful about what Hollywood is today, while the scene of the film that takes one’s breath away is the appearance of the snake, which finally appears at a crucial stage in the film, expressed through the eloquence of Arnold Frank’s 1924 ten-minute silent short film CLOUD PHENOMENA OF MALOJA (Das Wolkenphänomen von Maloja), which is an awesome declaration of the artistic significance of cinema in its purest form, literally dwarfing what we see today, given such a beautifully sophisticated articulation by Assayas who has made another truly exhilarating film.    

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Home for the Weekend (Was bleibt)






























































HOME FOR THE WEEKEND (Was bleibt)               B+                   
Germany  (85 mi)  2012  d:  Hans Christian Schmid             Official site [de]

Anyone who has difficulty with family holidays can take heart with this film, especially all those repressed smiles during the Christmas season where emotional dysfunction is gushing out of every withheld thought, where people are afraid to say what they really mean for fear of ruining the festive mood.  This doesn’t go for the jugular like Vinterberg’s Dogma classic THE CELEBRATION (1998) or Desplechin’s sprawling black comedy A CHRISTMAS TALE (2008), but is instead a quiet and elegant chamber drama that focuses on the slow disintegration of an upper class German family of means.  Written by Bernd Lange, who wrote the last two films directed by Schmid as well, the film slowly chips away at the façade of well-mannered politeness, finding a wealth of material in an undiagnosed mental health problem from the family matriarch, Gitte (Corinna Harfouch), who for all practical purposes behaves normally in all social situations, but is heavily shielded and protected by her overreactive family, where one constantly has to watch what they say.  The film is slow to develop, initially appearing like any other family assembly, highlighting the arrival of the guests, each segment acting as introductory pieces, where Marco (Lars Eidinger) is seen arriving late to pick up his young son Zowie with an obviously frustrated wife Tine (Eva Meckbach) who’s been forced to wait, where they’ve been separated for 6-months but he hasn’t announced this news to his family yet.  On the train they accidentally meet Ella (Picco von Groote), who helps him calm his agitated son, and she turns out to be the girlfriend of his brother Jakob (Sebastian Zimmler) waiting for her at the train station.  Supposedly all one big happy family, they soon arrive at the immaculately modernized countryside home of their parents, complete with sliding glass windows opening to a spacious back yard, the kind one only sees in magazines.  It turns out their father Günter (Ernst Stötzner) is selling his publishing house, cashing in before the kindle and e-books phase take over, where he already has plans to travel to the Middle East to research and write a book of his own.  The harmonious mood is shaken when Gitte announces she’s off the medication she’s taken for 30 years, most likely for manic depression, suggesting she’s finally joining the human race, a revelation met with complete silence.  

One by one, they all rush to Gitte hoping to find out the source of this news, but she’s insistent upon giving it a try, failing to mention if any of her doctors are onboard, and no one bothers to call.  She’s a bit surprised not to feel her family’s endorsement of finally depending upon her own free will, something she hasn’t had the strength to use for half her lifetime, and by all indications she feels a relief off her shoulders, while the two brothers begin quibbling about who’s been neglecting her the most, as Jakob lives nearby with a struggling dental practice and looks in on her while Marco lives off in Berlin, himself a successful writer, but on the outside looking in, rarely visiting to see how she is.  While all are worried, the effect it has on the family is to showcase the anxieties and insecurities of all the others, who are suddenly seen by her in a different light, as she’s been too numbed by medication to see clearly, but now that she sees the extent they cover up and hide their protective thoughts, she’s outraged at their patronizing behavior, as if she’s some medical specimen in a jar that they can’t allow to break.  Her anger has a way of clearing the air, as it cuts through the haze of hypocrisy, but once people are allowed to speak more openly, they still remain distant strangers to one another, maintaining what has always been their comfort zone.  Marco acknowledges to his mother that it’s always been easier to smile and remain good natured, being the mediator for other people’s problems, as he is really hiding the ugly truth about his own relationship, something he is not proud to admit, perhaps using her condition as an excuse to keep from being more open, even with his own wife.  Jakob on the other hand is the one that shows actual signs of depression, worried about his finances, constantly doubting his own self-worth, despite having the most supportive girlfriend on the planet.  But instead of Gitte, who everyone worries about, they should probably worry about Jakob, who is easily the most emotionally distraught, having several awkward emotional meltdowns until he eventually leaves altogether, forcing Ella to fend for herself, but he arrives again in the morning with that sheepish tail-between-the-legs look. 

The filmmaker is much more interested in getting underneath the phony pretense, often resorting to wordless sequences that eloquently express the underlying discomfort, reflecting the habits people routinely fall back upon, often thoughtlessly, like a brotherly rivalry where one is more easily hurt than the other, always angry that the more successful brother is trying to show him up, resorting to pettiness and trivialities as a loathsome weapon they have both been forced to deal with all their lives instead of simply admitting their feelings.  By the time the father gets around to addressing his failings, including his longterm distance to his wife, Gitte has disappeared without a trace, simply taking the car and driving off.  Once people realize she’s gone, all the horrible possibilities start flooding through their brains, somehow expecting the worst.  They all go out and search for her, finding the car next to a large forest entrance, but all their efforts are in vain, finding no clues.  While this is a distinctly German family drama, what it’s been searching for all along is the emptiness within, becoming a counterpart to Antonioni’s L’AVVENTURA (1960), where one of the female characters also turns up missing, a film that altered the visual look of cinema, but also explored the bored and meaningless lives of the rich and wealthy.  While Antonioni establishes his existentialist themes during their futile search to find the girl, Schmid expresses his family dysfunction before the character disappears, where they only end up blaming each other afterwards.  When Susanne (Birge Schade) arrives at the door once word gets out that Gitte is missing, she turns out to be Günter’s mistress for the past two years, as he was convinced his marital feelings were over.  This devastating piece of news casts a pall on the search proceedings, as the police are now out looking for her.  Both brothers are floored by their father’s deplorable actions, as now that their mother is suddenly gone, they feel a sudden unattainable closeness to her.  Schmid plays with wish fulfillment dream states and reality, seamlessly blending the two where the viewer is left to judge what they are seeing onscreen, where a chilling sense of eerie loneliness is suddenly cast in a mysterious light, as if shrouded in a surreal fog of mental anguish.  The original music by The Notwist beautifully underscores this contemplative journey, a poetic quest for that elusive place called home.