Showing posts with label Tindersticks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tindersticks. Show all posts

Monday, January 23, 2023

Stars at Noon



 























novelist Denis Johnson

Director Claire Denis


Denis accepting Grand Prix award at Cannes

Denis flanked by Joe Alwyn and Margaret Qualley

Margaret Qualley

Alwyn and Qualley

Denis with Alwyn and Qualley










STARS AT NOON                B                                                                                                    France  Panama  USA  (135 mi)  2022  ‘Scope  d: Claire Denis

Fuck is a good word.  Fuck is the property of the whole world.                                                  —Coyote (Alexis Quintero)

The films of Claire Denis have been surprisingly absent from the competition selections at the Cannes Film Festival, as after her first film Chocolat (1988) was selected, she waited 34 years before she was welcomed back again, with her films instead appearing in Un Certain Regard or Director’s Fortnight, or premiering in other festivals.  Perhaps correcting a lifelong oversight, this film was selected at Cannes and shared the Grand Prix (2nd place) award with Lukas Dhont’s Belgium film CLOSE (2022), a prestigious honor for what many are considering one of her weaker efforts, taking critics completely by surprise, inspiring a divisive critical reception, with many dismissing it as a misfire, barely screening at all in the United States before quickly moving to various screening platforms.  Artists like Denis often face a wall of critical rejection, always a little ahead of the curve, defying expectations and baffling viewers with the complexity of her work, but her films typically find renewed interest and gain a more positive critical reappraisal over time, where she is arguably the greatest female director who ever walked the planet.  You simply can’t go wrong watching any of her films.  A political thriller that doesn’t really care about politics or action, this is more of an observational commentary on the misadventures of an oddly misplaced couple adrift in a foreign territory they no longer recognize, offering surprisingly astute commentary on the effects of colonialism without ever politicizing the subject.  A French director shooting a film in a Spanish language country where the protagonists are speaking English may explain everything, as this is more of a state of mind film, exploring the interiority of the characters.  Viewed as a road trip to Hell, somewhat reminiscent of an earlier Denis film, White Material (2010), which was set amidst the turmoil of a civil war in a French colonial African country, this also accentuates the same lush, dreamy landscape, adding a love angle, becoming a heated romantic thriller of personal betrayal and political intrigue, something along the lines of Hitchcock’s NOTORIOUS (1946) or Peter Weir’s THE YEAR OF LIVING DANGEROUSLY (1982), yet reminiscent of Nicholas Ray’s outlaws on the run movie, They Live By Night (1948).  Mysteriously set in Nicaragua on the eve of the heavily militarized Sandinista revolution in 1984, the film is updated into the pandemic-era present, masks included, representing an all-encompassing police state presence, with uniformed men carrying automatic weapons patrolling every corner, where a darkened sense of foreboding and violence are seen and felt everywhere.  Adapted from the 1986 novel by Denis Johnson, expressing a ruthlessly honest, stream-of-consciousness characterization about the failed and the desperate, whose portrait is seen at the end of the film, he is perhaps best known for his 1992 collection of short stories entitled Jesus’ Son, which was also turned into a very successful indie movie in 1999.  This feminist reappraisal, however, takes us into the bowels of an inferno, a spiritual allegory of hell on earth, a nightmarish bad dream evolving into a near hallucinogenic depiction of psychological dread and despair, yet from this ash heap of fear rises a most unexpected romance between two white foreigners, turning Godard’s über colorful outlaws on the run movie Pierrot le Fou (1965) on its ear, instead expressing a dangerous labyrinth of lies and conspiracies, featuring a depressing setting spent mostly in beds and bedrooms, moving from the comfort of an air-conditioned tourist hotel to small local motels to literally horribly run-down motels, mostly having sex and drinking their troubles away as they experience a world coming apart at the seams with seemingly no way out.  Since its independence in 1821, Nicaragua has had a troubled history, and two hundred years later Nicaraguans are still struggling to define their nation’s post-colonial identity, as the Marxist Sandinista rule of the 80’s was a decades-long attempt to liberate the small Central American country from both a repressive dictatorship and the corporate subjugation of Latin America from U.S. imperialism, leaving ordinary citizens caught in the middle.  The Sandinistas promised a wave of reforms, and had only been in power for a short time when a right-wing rebel group known as the Contras, encouraged and financed by the United States, emerged to challenge their power, part of the post-war communist Domino theory that plagued American foreign policy for decades until the Contra-wars of the 80’s took more than 40,000 lives, where names like Iran-Contra (The Real Story of the Iran-Contra Affair | by Gena Vazquez) and Dark Alliance (The Storm over "Dark Alliance" - The National Security Archive) recall a toxic mixture of drugs, cash, and arms.  The Sandinista government’s nationwide popularity was always questionable, but the Contra forces squandered many opportunities to gain support by engaging in brutal atrocities and human rights abuses of their own.  Ironically, Daniel Ortega, leader of the Sandinistan Revolution, was the Presidential winner of that 1984 general election in Nicaragua, voted out of office in 1990, but is once again in power, having been re-elected President since 2007, basically dismantling all institutions of democracy.  Without identifying any specific political parties, the background of the film remains murky, with Denis intentionally avoiding any backstory or historical detail, instead providing a militarized landscape of fear, exposing a cesspool of power and corruption, as if wading into the end of Coppola’s APOCALYPSE NOW (1979) transported to South America, where a growing sense of evil and madness lurks everywhere. 

It was only after the death of Denis Johnson in 2017 that Denis felt a sense of urgency to make this film, something she had previously discussed with the author, yet for him it was a traumatic memory, making it difficult to relive the personal experience.  While the film is told through the eyes of an aspiring female journalist, it was Johnson who went to Managua in the midst of the Nicaraguan Revolution wanting to become a journalist, with the novel expressing the journey of his own failed dreams.  Vividly recreating that aura of disillusionment and self-deception through a rapturously lyrical cinematic vision of Claire Denis, adapted by Léa Mysius, Andrew Litvack, and the director, the film was shot in ‘Scope by Éric Gautier, primarily filmed in Panama in the fall of 2021.  Trish Johnson (Margaret Qualley), a woman in dire straits, becomes the central focus, arriving in the country as a bilingual Witness for Peace human rights observer but quickly finds herself at the mercy of a devalued black market currency, insisting she is a journalist, but is unable to find work, harshly rebuked by a travel magazine editor (John C. Reilly in a hilarious cameo appearance), as no one wants to pay for her gloomy war crimes articles about murders and disappeared persons, only to end up hanging around the upscale hotel bar of the Intercontinental Hotel in Managua, drinking herself into oblivion while picking up stray men for American dollars.  Languid and seductive, enlivened by a freewheeling, charismatic performance by Qualley, many of the film’s best early passages consist of little more than watching her walk the streets of Managua to a largely improvised jazz score by Tindersticks, perhaps a riff on Jeanne Moreau’s famous Paris-by-night scenes in Louis Malle’s Elevator to the Gallows (Ascenseur pour l'échafaud) (1958), creating a moodily impressionistic and deeply sensory experience, with an opening jolt into an abruptly realistic sex scene where an army lieutenant (Nick Romano) views her as a prized possession, taking her whenever he likes, feeling more like rape, as she views a photograph of a young Che Guevara on the wall during sex to divert her attention, an objectification of exoticized men, and in return he provides some of life’s necessities, hardly a fair exchange, as he keeps her passport hostage as well, so she has no means of escape.  This establishes the savagery of her mindset, a down on her luck woman having to survive by her wits, able to surveil the landscape and take advantage of opportunities, stealing what she can, becoming a scavenger in a desolate wasteland that seems like the end of the world, where rampant fear and unending violence have taken a toll on an emotionally exhausted and economically starved society.  There’s nothing likeable about Trish or anyone else in this doomed world, at times appearing relentlessly naïve, feeling like an overly entitled American used to privilege, looking down on everyone around her, showing little empathy or respect, describing this as a “hopeless country,” ultimately running into a handsome and well-groomed Englishman at a bar named Daniel (Joe Alwyn), easily recognizable in his white suit, like a knight in shining armor, conveying a suave, James Bond style of coolness.  The music of Tindersticks sets the mood, Tindersticks - Hotel Bar (Stars at Noon OST) - YouTube (4:33), slipping back into his hotel room as much for the cooling relief from the sweltering heat as the money, with the camera exposing sensual close-ups of her face and naked body, eventually discovering Daniel is different, supposedly working as an oil consultant, yet she wonders why any rational business would send anyone into such an economically depraved part of the world, opening up questions about who he is and what he’s really doing, questions that remain unanswered, part of the fog of ambiguity that comes with living in such a neglected territory.  But her suspicions are aroused over the breakfast buffet, helping herself to heaping portions even after being ushered away as she’s not a paying guest, yet she recognizes an undercover Costa Rican cop (Danny Ramirez) meeting with Daniel, another Miami Vice style man in a white suite with designer shades pretending to be a friend and business associate, but she knows better, even after the overly smug Daniel refuses to believe her, convinced he’s in the clear.  Nonetheless, the cop follows them, just as she predicted, forcing them to take extreme measures to ditch him, taking refuge in her ratty motel room, suddenly feeling like giddy outlaws on the run, strangers in a strange land, where escape seems like the only sensible thing to do in this quagmire of discarded dreams, both seemingly helpless to navigate safe passage in this labyrinth of death.  

Among the more stunning critiques of the remnants of colonialism, expressing a steep decline in moral standards, the filmmaker creates a lurid depiction of eroticism, mutual lies, and vagueness, building a huge impressionistic tapestry with Qualley’s eyes, hands, and entire body, always up close, then through the streets of a city whose walls, full of graffiti, are blurred in tracking shots viewed through taxi windows.  Without realizing it, thoroughly distracted by an encroaching police threat, Daniel has been unceremoniously checked out of his hotel, taking his money, credit cards, and belongings, leaving him a narrowing window of available options, putting them both in the same precarious position.  Trish seeks help from a protective relationship with a vice-minister of tourism (Stephan Proaño), who has ensured she could live in peace in her hotel, but he cuts off all ties, claiming she’s gotten too dangerous, suddenly fearing for his own safety, having been threatened by police, no longer wanting to have anything to do with her, finding herself stuck in a filthy flophouse with no money or passport to fly back home.  She gets the same response when she tries black market remedies, as even they refuse to help her, while a man promising to sell them a car for their escape suddenly discovers his car go up in flames, creating an extravagant visualization of the surrounding chaos, an eerie landscape of deserted streets, filled only with military personnel, with burning flames seen alongside dead bodies shot and killed from routine traffic stops.  With the government, once again, postponing elections, on the brink of social and economic collapse, instilling fear and hopelessness in the population, it’s a unique environment for an erotic love story to develop, where one has to question everyone’s motives, especially the lead protagonists, as truth is a nonexistent commodity.  Both retreat to an underground bar, taking refuge from the storm, finding themselves alone in a deserted subterranean universe that seems to exist only for them, like a projected fever dream of inflamed senses, expressed in a Tindersticks trance-like, slow dance of heated passion, Stars at Noon by tindersticks - YouTube (3:38), taking their relationship to a new level, discovering love and disillusionment amidst the ruins of destruction.  There is something remarkable about the undefined nature of the situation, the cloudy threat, turned into murder and violence on the one hand, but at the same time the relationship feels amorphous, as they don’t fully trust each other, each apparently with different aims, probably lying to each other, yet they can’t help themselves, remaining inseparable, where she despairs and is full of tears when he seems to have disappeared, apparently overwhelmed by it all, only to act cool and confident when he turns up again.  With Trish initially displaying a playfully erotic nonchalance, featuring lots of nudity and some fiery sex, things get serious as the situation becomes more dangerous, turning into a timeless, feverishly erotic tropical adventure as they attempt to flee together for the southern border of Costa Rica.  An outlaw on the run saga turns into a staggering identity crisis with constantly shifting perspectives, evidence of the sensuality of Claire Denis films, as she doesn’t make action adventures, but explores the space between the action instead, existing in its own sensual rhythm of movement and grace.  This journey couldn’t be more deglamorized, atypical of a travel adventure, instead growing more fraught with danger at every turn, with Trish meeting an American who is no ordinary American, but a CIA man (Benny Safdie), taking inordinate interest in her traveling companion, suggesting he is working for the “other” side, pressuring her to give him up, to turn the tables, offering incentives, suggesting everything has a price, informing her “This country is kind of like a gambler’s paradise.  Everybody’s giving the odds a shake, whichever game they feel like playing.”  Trish finds him a grotesque throwback to the past when America treated Latin America as a banana republic, a position grounded in white supremacy and colonialism, leaving countries under the economic stranglehold of foreign-owned companies or industries, with the U.S. government continually meddling into the affairs of poor and politically unstable nations, dangling economic investment or reconstruction development projects as a means to wield influence, yet this stronghanded approach was primarily concerned with serving only U.S. interests.  As if walking into a dream, the couple gets deeper into the wilds of the jungle, turning into a James Conrad Heart of Darkness scenario, with smaller villages and fewer signs of civilization, revealing a ghostly detachment with reality fraying at the edges, reducing the dramatic intensity to a slow crawl, growing more and more inexpressible and incomprehensible, yet vaguely mystical and poetic, like the end of the road, a place where all hopes and dreams come to die, becoming more vividly dark and despairing, ending on a cloud of ambiguity and uncertainty.    

Saturday, October 15, 2022

Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement)









 










Director Claire Denis





novelist Christine Angot

Denis with Angot and Juliette Binoche

Denis with Vincent Lindon and Binoche

Juliette Binoche and Vincent Lindon















 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BOTH SIDES OF THE BLADE (Avec amour et acharnement)         B+                                       aka:  Fire                                                                                                                                  France  (116 mi)  2022  ‘Scope  d: Claire Denis

She had lost herself somewhere along the frontier between her inventions, her stories, her fantasies and her true self.  The boundaries had become effaced, the tracks lost; she had walked into pure chaos, and not a chaos which carried her like the galloping of romantic riders in operas and legends, but which suddenly revealed the stage props: A papier-mache horse.   —Anaïs Nin, A Spy in the House of Love, 1954

A film that may haunt you for days, somehow changing the French title from With Love and Fury, which works extremely well, to the entitled Tindersticks song that concludes the film, Tindersticks - Both Sides of the Blade (Official Video) - YouTube (4:05), Claire Denis has made yet another boldly provocative film that dissects modern relationships with a curious eye, emphasizing betrayal and the fractious state of our lives, revealing how easily the past protrudes into the present, rupturing the status quo with a destabilizing force.  Premiering at the Berlin Film Festival, Denis won the Silver Bear as Best Director, with the film introduced under the title Fire, yet Denis strongly objected, claiming it was not fitting, choosing a better title that represented what the film is about.  Using familiar faces in Claire Denis films, co-written (with Denis) and adapted from Christine Angot’s 2018 novel, Un tournant de la vie, or A Turning Point in Life, Angot’s influence is built around introspective studies of women’s desire for men, as she is the same playwright of Let the Sunshine In (Un Beau Soleil Intérieur) (2017), both starring Juliette Binoche, among the more courageous actresses of our era, again playing a flawed woman making questionable choices, bringing back Vincent Lindon from VENDREDI SOIR (2002) and 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds), Mati Diop from 2010 Top Ten Films of the Year: #1 35 Shots of Rum (2008), while in the same film Grégoire Colin was her boyfriend, making this his eighth appearance in a Denis film, only 16 when he first worked with her, also appearing in Nenette and Boni (Nénette et Boni) (1996), Beau Travail (1999), The Intruder (L’intrus) (2004), and 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds).  Hardly a happy reunion, what starts out as an affectionate portrait of a healthy relationship suddenly turns sour, as Sara (Juliette Binoche) is a middle-age Parisian radio host who engages in constructive on-air social justice commentary, hosting real-life commentators that include Lebanese educator Hind Darwish and French soccer star-turned-activist Lilian Thuram, who discusses the idea of being locked into “white thinking,” a topic that turns into the disruptive impact of the French colonial past and how it continues to wreak havoc on the present, troublesome subjects that mirror the unraveling of this seemingly perfect relationship.  Sara is financially and professionally secure in her decade-long relationship with her unemployed boyfriend Jean (Vincent Lindon), a former professional rugby player with a prison record, but everything changes when Sara catches a random glance on the street of her ex-boyfriend François, Grégoire Colin, a heartthrob in DREAMLIFE FOR ANGELS (1998) and since then almost always playing the object of desire, unexpectedly reemerging after a ten-year absence, sending her into an emotional tailspin, bringing in a rush of new sensations that completely disrupt and alter her world, violating the opening Edenesque tranquility on the beaches of Corsica (apparently shot with an iPhone) that is so eloquently presented.  A long single take through a dark railway tunnel as the couple returns to Paris seems to have ominous implications, completely darkening their outlook, like one of those playful twists in Rivette’s CÉLINE AND JULIE GO BOATING (1974).  Ostensibly an elaborate character study constructed around the derailing repercussions spiraling out of control emanating from the dubiously shady François, a kind of nefarious film noir character that feels more like an apparition or a figment of the imagination, yet he forges a business relationship with Jean (deftly avoiding the prison sentence that Jean served), working as a talent scout identifying young developing rugby players.  The couple is haunted by his reappearance, not just a former lover of Sara’s but a former best friend of Jean’s, having left François for Jean, yet Sara is understandably ecstatic as she holds her emotions in check, with Binoche’s head poking through the bathroom door like an eerie reference to Jack Nicholson in THE SHINING (1980), Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement) new clip official from Berlin Film Festival 1/2 YouTube (1:27), outwardly pretending she has no ulterior motive while encouraging Jean that this might present an excellent opportunity, both dancing around the topic like a hot potato, each one hiding something.  Immediately red flags are raised, as a growing suspicion develops between the lead couple, yet never acknowledged, as they become more testy with each other, where there are signs everywhere that they blindly ignore, like Jean and François regularly meeting on the corner outside their apartment, never inviting him up, almost always conducting their business at night, Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement) new clip official from Berlin Film Festival 2/2 YouTube (44 seconds), creating a brooding, underlying tension that borders on a thriller.

Few filmmakers have been able to demonstrate the kind of range that Denis has managed to achieve throughout her career, from post-colonial explorations to innovative experimentations within various genres, a director who tends to work instinctively, developing relationships with her collaborators, and refuses to spell things out for her audience, yet broadens the reach of the “female gaze” in every picture while remaining an essential part of the contemporary landscape of cinema.  Part of her skill is amassing sensual detail as she poetically realizes texture and rhythm in establishing continually shifting moods, often wordlessly, leaving gaping holes in the narrative while finding new ways to tell stories, moving her characters around like chess pieces, yet one constant is just how intelligently she imbues each film with her own existentialist perspective.  While Christine Angot’s earlier work was a sex comedy, this is a darker subject, more exasperating, with Denis adding a female counterpoint to her male-dominated 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds), plunging into the depths of personal destruction, exploring the intensely personal interiority of a love triangle, with Sara at the center, as her startled reaction at seeing François sets the story in motion, more of a melodramatic swoon, arousing something deeply unsettling stirring inside, drawing all three lives into a web of deception and desire as François tries to wedge his way back into her life, yet the obvious question is why does he matter so much?  Denis spares us the details, and only slowly provides any backstory, as all that matters is that her life implodes with a stunning force as she starts living a lie, exploring how love moves in unpredictable ways, often from one partner to the next.  It’s like watching poetry in motion to see the extent that Binoche becomes a master of artful deception, a heroine in distress yearning to test the waters once again, with the past coming back with a ferocity, reminding her of memories that have been missing in her life, though it happens imperceptibly at first.  The way she immediately succumbs at seeing him only heightens the significance of the mysterious François, kept out of sight mostly, allowing the inexplicable allure of his murky character to literally inhabit the couple, each in their own way, carefully concealing their private thoughts from the other, seemingly dwelling in darker spaces.  Creating a sports agency, they eventually choose a location for their business, having an opening night party with friends and family invited, yet Jean hesitates to invite Sara, as if afraid a spark might reignite, so he downplays this decision with Sara, acting casual, like she can certainly come if she wants, but he’ll be busy with invited guests, not really having time to spend with her.  This only heightens her anticipation, getting all worked up, vacillating between love and fury, unable to set foot inside, disturbed by what she’s really feeling, as she could publicly lose herself in the moment, so instead she remains outside, calling Jean, who puts François on the phone, and all bets are off, as she literally melts at the sound of his voice.  Agnès Godard has been the regular cinematographer for Claire Denis since 1990, providing that lushly visualized poetic texture she is known for, yet she was unavailable in 2021, so this is the director’s first venture with Éric Gautier, who worked on and off with Olivier Assayas, Arnaud Desplechin, and Alain Resnais, more recently with Jia Zhang-ke in Ash Is Purest White (Jiang hu er nv) (2018), utilizing close-ups with a sense of urgency, especially during heated arguments, with the camera holding close to Binoche’s remarkable reactions filled with naked emotion, a wise choice, subjecting each character with a sense of scrutiny, as it tells the interior story, seemingly trapped by the moment, exposing all underlying tensions.  Shot during the Covid pandemic, using only a few locations, revealing a somewhat desolate city, requiring occasional scenes with masks, one recurring visual motif is the use of the apartment balcony overlooking the rooftops of Paris, like a character unto itself, with the Basilica of the Sacré Cœur seen off in the distance, as Jean typically takes business calls from François out there as his own private domain, yet the invasion of that territorial space leads to disastrous consequences, culminating into a series of excruciating fights.       

Jean is a complex character, yet always authentic, carrying the weight of a man who has struggled in his life and found it difficult to be happy, with Lindon, at times, on the verge of bashing in walls from frustration, while also showing a surprising amount of restraint, especially how he interacts with his biracial son Marcus, Issa Perica from Ladj Ly’s Les Misérables (2019), who is being raised by Jean’s very sweet elderly mother (Bulle Ogier), given custody after his ex-wife took off when he went to jail, both having difficulties with him, as he’s restless and wanders the streets, yet also on the verge of being expelled from school, another example of how the past comes back to haunt the present.  Yet it’s revealing how he tries to take control over the poor decisions Marcus is making, hoping he’ll realize the error of his ways, though hardly setting a good example himself, framing his arguments by suggesting his son has to make his own decisions, an apparent contradiction when he’s attempting to make the best decisions for him, with Jean distanced and estranged from the racial circumstances Marcus is facing, blinded by his own white perspective, feeling more like a helpless outsider watching his son’s life fall apart, the same role he unfortunately takes with Sara, becoming something of a jealous spectator.  This family visit, however, offers insight into his own tenuous relationship with Sara, where he also tries to control the narrative through his passive/aggressive tendencies, always suspecting she’s cheating on him, but she’s quick to deny his accusations through her own sense of moral outrage, indignant at his insinuations, leading to a kind of charade of changing emotions, as she always reassures him of her love even as she’s cheating behind his back.  What really stands out is the grown-up feel to this film, sparing nothing, exposing the vulnerabilities of each character, though much of it is told from a female perspective, with the initial pangs of desire felt so intensely by Sara, yet anxiety develops about decisions made in the past that now lead to recklessly impulsive acts, featuring interior passages from Binoche that no other director would have included, like continually murmuring his name in an elevator, or finding herself in the bathroom at night with rhapsodic soliloquies of sexual infatuation, suggesting “old loves never really die,” fearlessly surrendering to a resurgence of former passions, like blood rushing to her head, while at the same time betraying her partner, yet she’s one of the few major female stars who would allow their reputations to be stained by a duplicitous character like this.  It seems a bit like a newly revised version of VENDREDI SOIR, which also featured Vincent Lindon in a spontaneous one night stand, appearing here 20 years later in a more mature context, infused with adult responsibilities, yet he’s embroiled in another morality tale, but instead of falling for someone new, this film explores the eruptive force of an old flame.  Both rely upon a poetic female perspective, visually impressive, psychologically astute observations, featuring strong naturalistic performances, with a vibrant soundtrack by Stuart Staples from Tindersticks, a British alt-rock band that has composed every one of the director’s film scores except one (Beau Travail in 1999) since Nenette and Boni (Nénette et Boni) (1996), yet Denis always finds a unique angle to subvert familiar stories, going off the rails with blistering back and forth arguments at the heart of the drama that become a scream fest of unleashed fears, all initiated by a betrayal that was covered up in a wealth of lies.  Her own confusion feels outrageously melodramatic, yet that’s the novelty of the film, so over-exposed, so vulnerable, with so much to lose, yet she can’t help herself, lying every step of the way, creating a corrosive fissure in their built-up trust, blowing it wide open, where the more she’s caught, the more she covers up, ultimately ensnared by her own deceit.  While the brutality from the verbal fireworks can feel exhaustive, recalling the cruel explosions in Ingmar Bergman’s Scenes from a Marriage (Scener ur ett äktenskap) (1973), there’s also an element of humor, as her phone, the instrument of her betrayal, making appointments and leaving text messages, has all the contents erased after she accidentally on purpose drops it in the bathwater while attempting to conceal the evidence.  It’s only fitting, perhaps, that her darkly acerbic day of reckoning quite literally disconnects her from her past, with the picture continuing to play out as the closing credits roll, adding another interesting development, a clever device rarely utilized in cinema.    

Claire Denis and Jim Jarmusch In Conversation - YouTube  Rendez-Vous with French Cinema at Film at Lincoln Center, March 2022 (1:07:03)