Friday, October 9, 2026

Fiume O Morte!



 









Gabriele D'Annunzio

D'Annunzio (in the middle with the stick) in Fiume, 1919

D'Annunzio (in the middle in uniform) with Italian publisher Arnoldo Mondadori




Director Igor Bezinović


Gabriele D’Annunzio, September 1919

Elon Musk Roman/fascist salute during Trump inauguration, January 2025



























FIUME O MORTE!               B+                                                                                         Croatia  Italy  Slovenia  (112 mi)  2025  d: Igor Bezinović

Director Statement, Igor Bezinović

By making this film I wanted to get to know the past of my hometown Rijeka/Fiume, but also to get to understand its present state from a new perspective. During this process I’ve met hundreds of my fellow citizens who wanted to work on the film in front of the camera or behind it. I’ve met drivers, politicians, dustbin collectors, archivists, doormen, cooks, musicians, professors, translators and waiters who all had ideas about what this film should be like. I’ve also met historians of all kinds, from those who saw D’Annunzio as the crazier version of Mussolini to the ones who saw him as the Italian Che Guevara.

Besides meeting new people I’ve also read thousands and thousands of pages on D’Annunzio in Fiume, and while doing it I was not only gathering facts but was also shaping my own political ideas.

One idea, however, stayed clear to me all the way. That idea is formulated in a political pamphlet published in Fiume in 1922, soon after D’Annunzio’s departure: “Long live Fiume, free and independent from any kind of rescuers, liberators and protectors!”

I made a film with my fellow citizens and for my fellow citizens, building a chronological story that we’ll be able, I hope, to retell to new generations. I also hope that our film will help the audiences outside of Rijeka think about how much they know about the histories of their own hometowns and about how these histories got remembered and retold.

In his lesser-known essay from 1960, Pier Paolo Pasolini calls D’Annunzio’s occupation of Fiume a “pagliacciata narcisistica,” “a narcissistic farce.” D’Annunzio saw Fiume as a personal playground, as a place where he could experiment and practice everything that came to his mind.

By making this film I wanted to keep D’Annunzio’s idea of Rijeka/Fiume as a playground, but this time the citizens of Rijeka are the ones who are playing.

Far-right authoritarianism is on the rise around the world, threatening democracies everywhere, with its fascist clutches gripping even the United States, as this film conveys a timely warning against the rise of global far-right authoritarianism.  Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán was the blueprint model for the American right wing, apparently enthralled by the ease in how he systematically dismantled the country’s legal system and changed the election system to ensure future election victories.  By rigging the elections and at the same time stripping the nation’s legal authority to challenge the results, Orbán was also withdrawing media licenses for independent journalists, with ownership of the media increasingly shifting to oligarchs allied with Prime Minister Orbán’s government, making state-owned broadcasters controlled by the ruling party.  If this doesn’t sound like what’s happening in America right now, then you haven’t been paying attention.  But it’s not just happening here, as there are examples throughout history, with this Croatian filmmaker taking a look back at his own country’s turbulent history one hundred years ago, where he decides to recreate a little-known moment in history, while having a little fun in the process, creating a visionary, boldly inventive work of art that is original and genuinely eye opening, while at the same time informative.  Coming from the last generation of Tito’s pioneers, Union of Pioneers of Yugoslavia, Igor Bezinović is a filmmaker born in Rijeka, graduating in film directing at the Academy of Dramatic Art in Zagreb and in Philosophy, Sociology, and Comparative Literature at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zagreb.  Nestled in an inlet of the Adriatic Sea, Rijeka/Fiume is now the third largest city in Croatia, but it has frequently changed hands throughout history, changing its country of origin at least nine different times in the 20th century alone, as just after WWI it belonged to the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, before that partly the Kingdom of Italy and partly the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, and before that the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, before that the Free State of Fiume, before that the Italian Regency of Carnaro, and before that the Austro-Hungarian Empire. 

That’s a bit of a swallow, so to make things easier to comprehend, Bezinović asks citizens of his own city if they know who Gabriele D’Annunzio is, getting many different answers, but most do not, as he’s a forgotten footnote in history, which the filmmaker delightfully brings back to life with the participation of around 100 non‑professional actors and extras, not unlike what Robert Greene constructed with Bisbee '17 (2018), where it’s 30-minutes in before the title card appears, named after his political slogan.  What defines our identity?  What makes us who we are?  Combining archival footage of one of the most photographed events of the time, including video footage, interviews, and reenactments, Bezinović engages about three hundred locals to re-enact a rather surreal 16-month occupation in 1919 when D’Annunzio declared himself the de facto dictator of Fiume, the Italian name for the city, as the decadent Italian poet, playwright, orator, journalist, aristocrat, flamboyant public persona, and Royal Italian Army officer during World War I preached an ultra-right Italian nationalism after the war that was a predecessor to Benito Mussolini’s full-blown fascism.  Bezinović ironically remarks at the beginning of the film that the “film represents a mirror of today’s time,” while visually exploring buildings and streets that bore D’Annunzio’s name during the fascist period, noting “My Italian colleagues warned me not to mention fascism too much in the intro for the sake of Italian viewers, so I’ll stop here.”  But if truth be told, he doesn’t exactly heed their suggestion, as the film is praised in Croatia while attracting little attention in Italy, where D’Annunzio is still celebrated in Italy as a national hero, erecting a statue in Trieste about seventy kilometers away on the 100th anniversary of the occupation of Fiume, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni photographed in front of it, praising D’Annunzio as a man who ruled “with courage and audacity,” while in Croatia he is remembered as a megalomaniacal fascist occupier. 

Amusingly shot by Gregor Božič, there are seven different bald-headed actors drawn from the city streets who play D’Annunzio, with Bezinović announcing each change, while the narrators keep changing as well, each adding a different aspect.  The story of D’Annunzio’s occupation is narrated in the local Fiumano language, a variety of the Venetian dialect historically spoken by the Italian community of Fiume, yet as Bezinović notes in the first parts of the film, this is “no longer spoken or understood by most people in Rijeka,” yet the changing languages is a realistic aspect that reflects upon the city itself, part of the cosmopolitan, multi-cultural history of Rijeka and part of the linguistic tapestry in present-day Croatia, where that diversity is something D’Annunzio despised yet the film revels in, pretty much rubbing our noses in it.  Like Romanian filmmaker Radu Jude, it’s the irreverent absurdity that stands out, where modern-day re-enactments show how the events of the past are still a living reality, yet restaging history in this way also makes it easier to remember, as despite the dry facts on display, what stands out is the mocking tone of the filmmaker, who is not making fun of history, but how it can be remembered today, as the film is much more entertaining and fun than any description implies, where D’Annunzio is a model for contemporary right-wing populists across Europe and elsewhere.  Nearly ten years in the making, Bezinović draws from a treasure trove of 10,000 archival photographs while also using ordinary citizens from town to restage those same images, starting in the present, showing historical pictures of demolished bridges and buildings, and then showing those same sites in Rijeka today, a port city on Kvarner Bay in the northern Adriatic Sea, with plenty of cars and pedestrian traffic buzzing by.  Yet it’s the tongue-in-cheek narration that stands out, continually conveying a message where reviving interest in the city’s history is an essential message, as it makes us pause and take notice, reminding us this has happened before, so maybe we should pay attention to see how this plays out. 

Employing a hybrid, experimental format and satiric restaging technique used in Radu Jude’s I Don't Care if We Go Down in History as Barbarians (Îmi este indiferent daca în istorie vom intra ca barbari) (2018), this is a performative historiography that reconfigures memory through reenactment, documentary observation, archival reappropriation, and collective performances in which contemporary residents of Rijeka restage the historical events.  Focusing on the 1919–1921 occupation of the city of Rijeka/Fiume by the Italian writer and political rabble rouser Gabriele D’Annunzio, who ruled without being elected, the film critically examines the tactics of performance, manipulation, and propaganda employed during the siege, as D’Annunzio was one of the biggest masters of ghastly political showmanship of his time that would ultimately lead to Mussolini, using political theater as a staged reality where the power of pageantry is showcased through a masquerade of images, gestures, and myth as much as through force, exposing the constructed and contingent nature of historical narratives by fragmenting identity, transforming the city into a living memoryscape, FIUME O MORTE! Clip YouTube (1:29). Reflecting on the persistence of extremist ideologies in contemporary society, this is skillfully achieved through participatory performances involving those who live in the city today, as history and memory emerge, skillfully and cohesively edited together by Hrvoslava Brkusic.  At the same time, the film articulates a critical stance towards militarism, political spectacle, and nationalist imagery, positioning memory as a site of communal engagement and critical confrontation with both the past and the present, subversively diagnosing the legacy of fascism.  Winner of the 1st place Tiger Award and Fipresci Prize at the 2025 International Film Festival of Rotterdam, this is the most-watched film in the sixteen years of existence of Rijeka’s 300-seat arthouse Art-kino Theater, and the most-watched documentary in Croatia of all time.

The end of WWI transformed Rijeka/Fiume into a politically contested terrain, where at the time the Rječina River divided it from Sušak, an adjacent town with a predominantly Croatian population which has now been united into one larger city.  Entering the city in a caravan of trucks carrying guns, ammunition, supplies, and soldiers, the so-called legionnaires, D’Annunzio wanted to annex the city for Italy in defiance of his own government, dissatisfied with the outcome of the Paris Peace Conference which proposed handing over the city to the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia), angered by what he considered to be the surrender of an Italian city.  Italy had not, however, made any demands on Rijeka/Fiume, but had instead forgone it in favor of Croatia, leading to a transitory period, the rule of D’Annunzio, where the Italian Regency of Carnaro was a self-proclaimed independent state, as they were successful in seizing control of the city and forced the withdrawal of the Allied occupying forces.  The Italian government opposed this and attempted to pressure D'Annunzio into withdrawing by initiating a blockade of Fiume.  When Italy sought a referendum in Fiume on D’Annunzio’s government, he first agreed but, realizing the vote was against him, sent in the troops to disrupt the vote and nullify the result.  Is anyone in America paying attention?   The song Giovinezza (Youth) is frequently performed, a piece sung by D’Annunzio’s legionnaires during the occupation and later adopted as the anthem of Mussolini’s Italian National Fascist Party (Partito Nazionale Fascista), anthem of the PNF (1924 lyrics, two verses only) YouTube (2:29).  In what was a dry run for fascism, developing in the early stages, D’Annunzio was never formally a member of the fascist movement, though virtually the entire ritual of fascism was invented by him during his occupation of Fiume where he popularized the black shirts (the Arditi), the Roman/fascist salute, the cries of “Eia, eia, eia! Alala!” taken from Achilles’ cry in The Iliad, and the balcony speeches featuring flamboyant rhetoric engaging with a frenzied crowd, all of which later became symbolic pillars of fascism.  

Later ruling with similar charismatic flamboyance, Mussolini was impressed, adapting many of the same strategies, from D’Annunzio’s authoritarian interventions like censorship and violent repression, to the regulation of public life, including the prohibition of the Rijeka Carnival, strikes, and unauthorized public gatherings, while also having his hand in the promulgation of ambitious charters and the entire choreography of uniformed street parades and ceremonies.  Yet while amassing his authoritarian power, D’Annunzio also personally enjoyed cocaine and lavishly eccentric parties, which the Italians reduce to avant-gardism and an eccentric personality, always considering him a great poet, completely overlooking the violent impact of his fascist rule.  While he’s the star of the show, the protagonist in every sense of the word, and a worshipped celebrity, the film is really about the city of Rijeka, the city’s historically fluid and multi-layered identity, and how it survived this occupation, where over the end credits we see the cast celebrating the lively Carnival together after the shooting ends.  In embodying this more complex plurality, the filmmaker subverts the exclusive and homogenizing nationalist agenda advocated by D’Annunzio himself, who described the non-Italian residents of the city as “Slavic bastards” and “filthy Croats,” destroying their buildings in a hate-based agenda aimed at a radical Italianization of the city.  A true “essay film,” Bezinović foregrounds the instability and performative construction of historical identity, while at the same time reveals how interpretations that focus exclusively on the aesthetic or eccentric dimensions of D’Annunzio’s occupation ultimately lead only to confusion, obscuring its darker sides of violence, repression, the dangers of political idolatry, and especially its protofascist tendencies, foreshadowing the many other authoritarians who are yet to come, where we are reminded that billionaire Elon Musk performed the Roman/fascist salute at the second inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump.   

Monday, October 5, 2026

Spring Blossom (Seize printemps)



 

















Writer/director/actress Suzanne Lindon


director on the set











SPRING BLOSSOM (Seize printemps)                    B+                                                               France  (73 mi)  2020  ‘Scope  d: Suzanne Lindon

Having worked together in co-writing the Claire Denis film The Fence (Le Cri des Gardes) (2025), Denis acknowledged having known Lindon since she was a little girl, as she is the daughter of frequently used French actor Vincent Lindon, who starred in her films VENDREDI SOIR (2002), 2013 Top Ten List #6 Bastards (Les Salauds), and Both Sides of the Blade (Avec amour et acharnement) (2022), while her mother is French actress Sandrine Kiberlain, from Maïwenn’s Polisse (2011) and André Téchiné’s Being 17 (Quand on a 17 ans) (2016).  What may be most astonishing is that the young first-time director wrote the script when she was just 15, during the summer before she started high school, and then starred in and directed the film at age 19, recalling Xavier Dolan’s 2010 Top Ten Films of the Year: #7 I Killed My Mother (J’ai Tue Ma Mere) (2009), which was written at the age of 16, placing himself in the lead role and then directed at the age of 19, with both films premiering at the Cannes Film Festival.  This is a subversive take on a coming-of-age genre seen through the impressionable eyes of a young Parisian high school girl named Suzanne, played by the director, exploring the turbulence of adolescence and the allure of first love, where the degree of restraint shown here is uncommon.  The fierce independence of the lead character was an attempt by the director to establish her own identity, hoping to claim creative autonomy from her better known parents.  As we witness how curiosity is so essential to development, Lindon wanted to explore the mindset of a young girl who imagines a more intense reality with an older man and longs to grow up quickly, where it’s more about developing a sense of curiosity and wonderment, exploring first love and youthful curiosity through unspoken glances and dance, only to realize the value of her actual age.  Premiering as one of the First Features at Cannes in 2020, when the festival was largely a virtual experience due to the outbreak of Covid, literally getting lost during the pandemic, the film defies expectations, as it’s not at all what we’re used to seeing, as it navigates a young girl’s infatuation with an older 35-year old man named Raphaël, Arnaud Valois from Robin Campillo’s 2017 Top Ten List #8 BPM (Beats Per Minute (120 battements par minute), yet avoids cliché’s, sexual exploitation, and sensationalism and instead embraces the subtleties of curiosity and self-discovery.  Their intimate moments onscreen together are shown with absolute originality.  Sort of the gender opposite of Agnès Varda’s KUNG-FU MASTER! (1988), with Jane Birkin playing a lonely 40-year old mother who develops a tender, unconventional romance with her daughter's 14-year-old classmate, played by Varda’s real-life son, Mathieu Demy, this film stands in stark contrast to the lurid sexual teen exposé of Maurice Pialat’s À Nos Amours (To Our Loves) (1983), where there’s even a poster in her room of the lead 15-year old character Sandrine Bonnaire, also named Suzanne, who uses sex as a means of rebellion and escape, or Catherine Breillat’s 36 Fillette (1988), showing a brazenly sexual affair of a teen girl and an older man.  These films take us back to our early teenage years when we craved anything new, bored by the stifling monotony of everyday life where nothing ever changed, seemingly stuck in time, always searching for something more, but having no idea how to find it, all of which suggests the life of a teenage girl is more complicated than we thought.   

Moved by the performance of River Phoenix in Sidney Lumet’s Running On Empty (1988), this tender and often poetic introspection of the moods and anxieties of teenagers recalls Gia Coppola’s Palo Alto (2013).  With delicately refined intimacy and an understated elegance, though told in a minimalist and understated social realist style, this contemplative coming-of-age romance resembles a documentary, where the details of ordinary life are stifling and oppressive, as Suzanne finds it hard to relate to boys her age, as they’re so immature, lacking anything resembling intelligence or imagination, yet she’s surrounded by them at school, finding it hard to take any of them seriously.  Always on the edge of conversations, not really listening or paying attention to the groups she’s hanging out with, yet still part of the social scene of her adolescent world, Suzanne comes from a book-filled home with liberal parents, including a supportive mother (Florence Viala from la Comédie-Française), and her busy yet affectionate father, Frédéric Pierrot from François Ozon’s Young & Beautiful (Jeune & Jolie) (2013) and By the Grace of God (Grâce à Dieu) (2019), who are very contemporary in their understanding of their daughters, which also includes a more sociable and energetic older sister Marie, Rebecca Marder from Ozon’s The Crime Is Mine (Mon Crime) (2023) and The Stranger (L'étranger) (2025).  Nothing about her life stands out, as she’s apparently bored and unchallenged even while living in the heart of the picturesque Montmartre district in the 18th arrondissement of Paris and rarely goes out, which her family finds a bit odd, yet despite a quiet and studious presence, she does well in school.  Every day on her way to high school, she passes the Théâtre de l’Atelier, often seeing one of the actors sitting out front having a smoke or sitting in the outdoor café, appearing melancholy and as equally disconnected as she is, where she begins to incorporate Raphaël into her life, even if it’s only in her imagination.  In the dense interiority of adolescence, imagination plays a more prominent role, perhaps even surpassing reality, which may be the epitome of the teenage experience.  In one scene, she is seen kissing her reflection in a mirror, in another she watches as his scooter breaks down, or she sneaks into the theater to watch his rehearsals, showing a keen eye for some of the minute details of the performing arts, yet she is literally transported into this new world.  Suddenly immersed in the world of grown-ups and adult choices, Suzanne begins questioning the pitfalls of blossoming too quickly and missing out on life, namely that of a 16-year-old, which she had struggled so much to enjoy in the same way as her peers.  A character study instead of plot-driven film, Lindon doesn’t shy away from the open contradictions, revealing just how intelligent, observant, yet also extremely naïve she is, developing into a romantic fantasy, where this is the antithesis of the way teens are typically portrayed, usually driven by Lolita-esque sexualized desires and self-centered motivations, or creepy predatory behavior from older men, but there’s an elegant sweetness to the very chaste way this plays out, which brings something entirely different to the viewing experience, allowing us to imagine how quietly romantic a first love really can be, in all its innocence and rhapsodic elegance, as we’re literally experiencing what she experiences, where a schoolgirl crush gets viewed as real love.

By the time she decides to sit in the same café at a neighboring table, seemingly caught up in a Boris Vian book she’s reading, drinking a non-alcoholic mix of grenadine and lemonade, it’s impossible for Raphaël not to notice, so it’s only polite that he say something, yet what happens boggles the mind, as it’s not at all what we expect.  The whole thing plays out like a wistful dream, like maybe it happened, or maybe it didn’t, where it’s all about suggesting a mood, yet the character certainly imagines that it happened, and that’s what the viewers experience, as it becomes something positively delightful, a choreographed table dance right out of the Charlie Chaplin catalogue, similar to the Dance of the Dinner Rolls, “The Oceana Roll” scene from THE GOLD RUSH (1925), Bread dance | "The Gold Rush" YouTube (1:31), yet heard over headphones set to the wondrous music of Vivaldi’s Stabat Mater, with a gorgeous song sung by countertenor Andreas Scholl, both closing their eyes while synchronously moving their hands and facial movements to the music like a table ballet, Spring Blossom - Clip (2020) YouTube (3:41).  This completely alters the tone of the film, as we’ve entered imaginary realms, which is where this film lingers for a good portion of time, using synchronized dance numbers and choreographed movement as a physical language to express unspoken emotions and the abstract intensity of young desire.  Suzanne can be seen joyfully skipping and dancing down the street after being invited on her first date, seen miming the lyrics of French singer Christophe’s catchy hit Señorita YouTube (2:54), reminiscent of Léos Carax in Mauvais Sang (Bad Blood) (1986), with Denis Lavant seen stumbling, cart-wheeling, and then sprinting down the street in a blur of sheer exhilaration set to the music of David Bowie’s Modern Love, Mauvais Sang (Leos Carax, 1986) - Modern Love YouTube (5:06), also emulated by Greta Gerwig in Frances Ha [2013] - Dance in the street - YouTube (1:08), each expressing a sudden rush of youthful liberation, one of those giddy outbursts of spontaneous emotion, followed shortly afterwards with Suzanne doing a slow dance with her mother at home.  Despite the obvious age differences, both are dealing with their own personal struggles, as Raphaël is a frustrated stage actor who has grown tired of reciting the same lines night after night, with Lindon focusing on a shared sense of ennui rather than a physical romance, showing no interest in over-sexualizing her, where there’s no sex, nothing creepy, and not even a full-blown kiss, instead utilizing expressive dance sequences to show an emotional connection.  Shot in ‘Scope, cinematographer Jérémie Attard tenderly captures the intensity of these fleeting moments, as Raphaël does little more than gallantly kiss her hand or gently nuzzle her neck, as we watch them contemplatively staring out at the world or at each other, both caught up in their own silent thoughts, with Suzanne abruptly deciding to pull back before things escalate, crying in her mother’s arms afterwards, “I fell in love with an adult.”  This is a different kind of first love movie, subverting all expectations, as not much happens, yet everything happens, if you’re capable of reading the signs, with Lindon herself singing over the end credits in a very distinct French style, which could just as easily have been from movies of the 60’s or 70’s, Seize Printemps - Suzanne Lindon ⌈sub english⌋ YouTube (2:33).