Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski
DOCTORED C
USA (100 mi) 2012
d: Bobby Sheehan Official site
This is a follow up subject wise to other documentaries like
Burzynski
(2010), which are like cries from the wilderness, literally pleas to the
American public to reconsider their course of standard medical treatment, as
doctors, whether well-intentioned or not, have become joined at the hip to the
pharmaceutical industry, so much so that their end goal after a patient
examination is usually what drug(s) to prescribe, usually long term with
refills, as if this is what the patient wants to hear. While this documentary is largely one-sided,
most likely financed by chiropractors, it initially explores how chiropractors
can often remedy the physical effects of excessive drug use on the human body,
literally bringing a body back to its natural health. Historically, however, they are seen as
“quack” treatment by the American Medical Association that prefers to set the
standards for the industry, and doesn’t take well to outsiders who don’t walk
to the beat of their drum. Repeatedly
those that practice alternative medicines hear this same label, but they exist
largely because patients are dissatisfied with a life of living with pain, or
being sent home to die from some incurable disease, refusing to accept this is
how they’ll be forced to spend the rest of their lives, where they’re
desperately seeking another choice. Some
of the time, the key word being some, the results are miraculous, despite
examining the debilitating effects of chronic pain, frozen shoulder syndrome,
multiple sclerosis, Lyme disease, autism, and cancer, where at least sometimes the
body can heal itself if given the right impetus. Nonetheless, alternative medicine is often
not covered by major insurance companies, including Medicare or Medicaid, where
only a limited amount of services pass government scrutiny, while the rest is
still considered experimental medicine.
Some of the facts presented suggest some children are
mandated to take as many as 26 different immunizations despite the potential
health risks to a small percentage, but when such large numbers are required to
comply with the requirements, these numbers add up, as it’s not just a few
children that suffer adverse affects. A
separate court system has been implemented just for these specific cases, as
you cannot sue the government for requiring immunizations, which have easily
saved millions of lives, but they’ve also damaged quite a few who have been
paid billions as compensation for the adverse effects. No numbers or statistics were provided, only
that the risk is often never explained to the families. When examining the history of large
pharmaceutical companies, they pay out whopping fines as well due to adverse
health effects, including deaths, some payouts in the billions of dollars, which
is considered the cost of doing business, as they are making gargantuan
profits, where the government refuses to shut them down as they also provide so
many other needed medicines. Much of
this plays out like the cigarette manufacturing business, where for decades the
nation was in denial over the health risks, where one of the worse offenses was
the way the industry targeted youth as the next generation of cigarette
smokers. In much the same way, the
pharmaceutical industry is also targeting children, where certain psychiatric
medicine led to inexplicable suicides in young children, where they were used
as guinea pigs, taking medicine where no one really knew the risks involved
until it was too late, sounding very much like the use of lobotomies of the
40’s and 50’s, or thalidomide in the 60’s.
In the 70’s and 80’s the preferred psychiatric medication was Valium and
Xanax, where researchers later discovered the depressed effect they have on the
brain, making them the most misused prescription drugs on the market. The suggestion here is that to pharmaceutical
companies, doctors are simply suppliers, or “whores” as they are called in the
industry, where their aim is to find compliant practitioners to partner their
drugs to patients on a permanent basis in order to make huge profits,
irrespective of the potential ill effects they have on humans, where the kind
of damage they can inflict just from reading the labels often sounds absolutely
ridiculous.
The film improves greatly when they put a human face
onscreen that people recognize, such as John Stockton of the Utah Jazz, whose quick
recovery from ankle sprains was due to his team’s chosen chiropractor, who also
significantly reduced the team number of games missed from aggravated injuries,
as he was able to get these high flying athletes to play pain free.
Olympic skier Picabo Street was also able to recover quickly after a
potentially career ending knee injury using the work of a chiropractor, who
uses a less invasive procedure, taking a more holistic approach to the human
body and how it can best recover. Perhaps the star of the film is a PhD
biochemist Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, the target of multiple harassing lawsuits
to discredit his findings, who has won one of the largest legal battles with
the Food & Drug Administration in U.S. history, a 14-year journey to obtain
FDA approved clinical trials for a cancer fighting treatment known as
antineoplaston therapy. Despite industry claims that his groundbreaking
treatment is unproven, Burzynski is the only scientist in history to have cured
a childhood inoperable brainstem glioma. Among the most effective screen
characters was an Inuit Alaskan Iditarod announcer whose family had a history
of lupus, where her mother eventually committed suicide, yet after considerable
effort in diagnosing her own illness, she discovered it may be the presence of
Lyme disease instead, which through the help of natural health practitioners
could be successfully extracted from her system. Another mother’s infant
child was born prematurely but survived, but the family refused to give such a
small child Phenobarbital for potential seizures, using the hand healing
methods of chiropractics instead which seems to have jump started his brain,
making him a much more active and intelligent kid. While there’s never
any attempt to offer a differing point of view, and often there’s little follow
up on featured patients, the film also makes an overreaching attempt to tackle
genetic modification in the food industry, suggesting there are benefits to
eating organic, but they tackle on too much unsubstantiated information at the
end which only undermines the credibility of the entire film. Overall,
while common sense suggests patients should integrate a whole body approach to
health, including trying the benefits of alternative medicine, the film does
play like a chiropractic infomercial.



No comments:
Post a Comment