THE BLING RING C+
USA (90 mi) 2013
d: Sofia Coppola
Super rich kids with
nothing but fake friends.
—Frank Ocean, “Super Rich Kids” Frank Ocean - Super Rich Kids on Vimeo
YouTube (5:05)
Once again, Sofia Coppola zeroes in on the vacuous and
empty-headed lives of spoiled and pampered, overly rich white kids from
Hollywood whose parents are nearly absent from their lives, so they are
literally consumed by the very public lives of the fabulously wealthy, impressed
by their jewelry, fashion taste, magazine spreads, celebrity television and
movie appearances, and how they love to party in the upscale club scene,
constantly seeing the faces of other young stars in all the tabloids and
magazines, continually wondering why it can’t be them? Adapted by the director from real life
occurrences that were reported in an article “The Suspects Wore Louboutins,” by Nancy Jo Sales from Vanity Fair, March 2010 about a group of Hollywood teens who
burglarized the homes of their idols, stealing their clothes and jewellery, not
to mention large wads of cash, while spending their money at the same clubs where
their favorite stars hung out. Surprised
that the homes were so easy to break into, as usually sliding glass doors were
left open, or keys left under the doormat, it was easy to Google their
addresses and find out what celebrities were out of town for a special event,
leaving their homes vacant. While
stealing over $3 million worth of jewelry, high end clothes, Rolex watches,
fashionable shoes, perfume, makeup, artworks, and stashes of various social
drugs and cash from the homes of Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Orlando Bloom,
Megan Fox, Rachel Bilson, and Audrina Patridge, their favorite house turned out
to be Paris Hilton, returning repeatedly, stealing $2 million dollars alone
from the stuff taken from her home.
Paris Hilton wasn’t even aware anything was missing until months later,
as the group’s undoing came by foolishly posting photos of themselves on
Facebook wearing these newly acquired items, which served as easy evidence of
stolen merchandise for the police once they caught on.
While Coppola has an appealing experimental style that works
best in a non-narrative, stream-of-conscious style, the very lack of definition
suits her highly impressionist form, as her use of music to help fill empty
spaces is usually nothing less than superb.
Using the talent of ace cinematographer Harris Savides in his final film
(dedicated to his memory), they combine to show what architectural beauty can
be expressed by shooting a robbery in progress through a glass house, where the
perpetrators are seen as little more than a movement of shadows, but visually
it’s a captivating moment. Coppola is
hampered here by the repetitive storyline, reflecting the bored lives of the
typically screwed up teenagers who continually return to the same activity like
a drug, often seen bragging about their exploits afterwards in upscale clubs,
obviously trying to impress others, where they are seen as little more than
opportunists in waiting. Inflating one’s
view of oneself is a constant in this film, reflecting the adoring approval
received by their parents who wouldn’t think of reprimanding them, allowing
them to do whatever they want, as these kids are continually taking photos of
themselves with their phones and posting them on their Facebook pages. This dysfunctional group includes Katie Chang
as Rebecca, something of the ringleader, and her adoring follower Marc, Israel
Broussard, a not so great looking guy that loves fashion design, so fits right
into this culture. Their best friends include
sisters Nicki (Emma Watson) and Sam (Taissa Farmiga with a leopard-skin
infatuation), both home-schooled by their clueless mother on how to look their
best and think positively, given Adderall every morning for God knows how long,
while they’re best friends with the more stoic Chloe (Claire Julien). All they ever talk about is what people are
wearing, as that’s all that seems to matter to them. This film pales in comparison to Not Fade
Away (2012), for instance, a much better written David Chase film featuring
teenagers from the 60’s that just knew they would eventually be discovered as
rock stars, as they were only waiting for someone to discover them. Similarly, this group already thinks of
themselves as stars simply because they so completely identify with the
Hollywood culture of attractiveness and glamour, getting their faces plastered
over all the tabloids, and then using that to build a career. It’s interesting that the choices of who to
rob comes from the faces they routinely see in the tabloids and celebrity news
TV programs.
Celebrity worship is nothing new, but this may be the first
time kids feel so entitled to be included among the celebrities simply because
they can copy their fashion sense and be seen in the same public places. It’s hard to fathom, but this group has delusions
of grandeur, where they feel as if it’s their right to steal clothes from the
stars, as emulating their lifestyle is how they’ll be discovered. What’s missing is any likeable person among
the bunch, as all are so hung up on themselves that nobody else matters. In truth, these are thoroughly detestable
people that haven’t a clue what matters in life, as all they’ve learned is to
think exclusively about themselves. They have such a high opinion of themselves
that their egos take the place of sex, which is also missing in these young
kid’s lives. The idea of communicating
with others doesn’t even occur to them, as all they want to do is see
themselves in the mirror. This human
contempt grows tiresome after awhile, as there’s little reason why anyone should
care about any of the subjects in this film, a similar reaction to Coppola’s
earlier candy-colored walk through history with a young empty-headed MARIE
ANTOINETTE (2006). The character of
Nicki is actually based upon Alexis Neiers, her younger sister Gabby, and an
adopted sister Tess Taylor, all pursuing modeling careers managed by their
mother, Andrea Arlington, a former Playboy
playmate who claims she modeled lingerie with Cindy Crawford in the 80’s. They were all subjects of a short-lived
Reality TV show Pretty Wild, which
aired for two months on the E! Network in the spring of 2010. Unfortunately, Alexis was arrested by the
first episode, becoming a convicted felon, where her melodramatic Diva Queen
personality was so overly self-indulgent that its claim to fame may be that it
challenges for the worst show to ever air on TV (Pretty
Wild Might Be the Worst Television Show Ever Made - Gawker). Why all of this should appeal to the
director, or a viewing audience, is an open question, as whatever satiric slant
may have been intended runs thin, where it plays out more as an absurdist
caricature of people that just don’t care, where it appears that celebrity
culture is already too over-exposed and doesn’t need any more public screen
time, as their lives are simply too pathetically empty to be taken
seriously. The question is: does this film raise a larger issue? If this is supposed to represent a cultural
phenomenon about narcissistic kids growing up today who are simply too
infatuated with themselves, showing no interest in the lives of others, there
is too much evidence to suggest otherwise, as students and the youth vote
played a large part in electing and re-electing the first black President
Barack Obama, while children of the elite comprise much of the Occupy Wall
Street Movement. Coppola has always
sympathized with kids, much like herself, raised in a bubble who are simply too
bored to care, emblematic of their celebrity heroes that show the same vacuous
superficiality, but this time she’s hit a wall, never unlocking any revelatory
secrets or exposing a social critique that actually matters.








"Once again, Sofia Coppola zeroes in on the vacuous and empty-headed lives of spoiled and pampered, overly rich white kids from Hollywood whose parents are nearly absent from their lives..." I'm sorry, when was the last time?
ReplyDeleteHow about her previous film Somewhere (2010), but stylistically, other than geographic location, the same could be said for every film she's ever made.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, but what I meant was that your quoted description only fits The Bling Ring: it's her first film about rich white kids from Hollywood. For example the actor protagonist of Somewhere was about 35.
ReplyDeleteThe importance in this is in denying that SC tells the same story over and over again, as your over-simplification implied. She does, however, deal with the same themes and zeitgeist atmospheres. Other than that, I found your points valid and well formed.
It bothers me, why for so many people SC is a problematic film maker. I've heard so often her being described as "talented...but..." as if there was something suspicious about her work, like you were supposed to only admire certain aspects of her films but not really like them. In this respect, the reactions towards her films remind me of those addressed towards Lars von Trier. But unlike von Trier's, SC's films are made with admirable simplicity and economy, so I don't understand what the problem really is. To me Somewhere was, indeed, an awe-inspiring film, perfectly delivering every nuance of the world it tried to convey. Not too many have agreed.
"For example the actor protagonist of Somewhere was about 35."
ReplyDeleteThat's Sofia Coppola's portrait of her own childhood, and without resorting to specific details, it's an impressionistic mosaic of the distance she felt between her own father, who was forever off on the road "somewhere," and rarely at home, where she never really felt like she knew him.
The film Somewhere is very positively reviewed on this site, February 6, 2011, just enter the title in the upper left hand search space and it will find it for you. But I didn't care nearly as much for The Bling Ring, as the telling of a real life story didn't allow her to improvise the material in a more experimental, non-narrative fashion, which stylistically is what she truly excels at, in my view.
I certainly don't think she's a problematic filmmaker, but it is true, Anton, that the director has created her own dilemma by making all her films about spoiled and extravagantly rich white youth, where by now we've seen her tell this story much better in earlier films.
The negativity directed toward Sofia Coppola is about the limitations of her material, nothing like the self-indulgent Lars von Trier, who tends to be a contemptibly offensive human being with narcissistic tendencies, thus he has been banned from attending the Cannes Film Festival where he made an ass of himself there the last time. Sofia Coppola, on the contrary, is the picture of grace, shyness, and a world of interior imagination.