Friday, October 5, 2018

The Last Movie




Director Dennis Hopper on the set
 




Hopper with cameraman László Kovács
 




Hopper on the set with Sam Fuller (with cigar)
 



Dennis Hopper and wife Daria Halprin at the Jack Tar Hotel, San Francisco
 

Hopper wth Jack Nicholson and Michelle Phillips. Phillips and Hopper were married briefly (all of eight days), and she appears in The Last Movie. She also dated Jack Nicholson, among other stars of that time.
 




THE LAST MOVIE               B-                   
USA  (108 mi)  1971  d:  Dennis Hopper

Very representative of the times (Nixon was in office), written, directed, edited, and starring Dennis Hopper (sensationally covered by the press), though not, however, the long lost masterpiece that many might have been hoping for.  While it’s certainly outside the Hollywood mainstream, nearly indecipherable in terms of content, showing prominent use of experimental or abstract techniques, yet there’s plenty of ugliness to this film, not the least of which is a blatant mistreatment of women, including several scenes of Hopper slapping women to the ground, which does not go unnoticed, as this kind of abusive mistreatment of women actually followed Hopper throughout his life and is not simply overlooked today as it was in the era when it was made.  Unfortunately, this is part of his long-lasting legacy (along with being a model of self-destruction), as it can’t be eradicated or easily removed from his artistic footprint, though to his credit, it’s rare for American directors to explore the effects of emotional violence, where his deplorable onscreen persona is more representative of the deranged psycho maniac that began to define Hopper’s acting choices later in his career, playing roles completely outside of and alienated from society’s mainstream.  While this became his specialty, he’s already fulfilling that role to some degree in this film, something of a follow-up to Easy Rider (1969), where the financial rewards from that film were so ridiculously excessive that Hopper’s descent into alcohol and drug abuse lasted well over a decade, typically consuming half a gallon of rum, 28 beers and three grams of cocaine daily, eventually shooting up speedballs (coke and heroin mixed), the lethal combination that killed John Belushi, almost always accompanied by an assortment of loaded guns he constantly waved around, chronicled in the rarely seen documentary The American Dreamer (1971), with Hopper obsessing over the film’s editing while in the throes of drug and alcohol addiction.  The film, however, is the initial descent into a metaphorical madness, given a million dollars and total artistic control by Universal Studios (which was cynically attempting to exploit the youth market), he set out for the unexplored realms of Peru, bringing along friends and coworkers, making something of a Billy the Kid home movie cowboy western starring Hopper himself (clean-shaven and with a new haircut) as an extra named Kansas in a film being made by an assertive cigar-chomping director, Sam Fuller, which features plenty of outlaws and bandits confronted by a fierce lawman, becoming a shoot-out spectacle of grandiose spills and pratfalls, almost ballet-like in its extended choreography, but an actor is accidentally killed on the set.  While no local Indians are included in Fuller’s film, they are a surrounding presence, like a Greek chorus, silently watching with interest.  Once the shooting’s finished, Hopper sticks around for a while, enjoying the majestic beauty of the mountainous landscape with a beautiful Indian girl from the local whorehouse, Maria (Stella Garcia), thinking he’s found paradise, but all is not as it seems, where his dream gets lost in a haze of alcohol and discontent, reeling from one disappointment to the next, lost in a seemingly mythical universe created by the Hollywood movie industry. 

The initial cut of a more conventional western was never released, though viewed and disparaged by his friend, fellow director Alejando Jodorowsky, urging him to re-edit the film with a more disjointed narrative that showed more cinematic ingenuity, which he apparently did.  When completed, the film was initially screened at the Venice Film Festival in a non-competitive year, with every entered film winning an award, but the studio was devastated at the results, finding a completely non-commercial film that was vilified by critics, quickly pulled from the theaters after a short run, and then remained something of an enigma for decades, something only spoken about but never seen, remaining in hibernation until a recent restoration was released nearly 50 years later.  Interestingly, the inspiration behind the film came from Hopper’s experience working on a John Wayne western directed by Henry Hathaway, THE SONS OF KATIE ELDER (1965), which was shot on location in Durango, Mexico, with Hopper wondering about the effect of the movie crew’s intrusion into the lives of the indigenous population, “I thought, my God, what’s going to happen when the movie leaves and the natives are left living in these Western sets?”  A few years later shooting in the small village of Chincheros located high in the Peruvian Andes (a region known at the time as the world capital of cocaine trafficking), a cadre of friends along with a boatload of cocaine were about to find out, as this becomes the central premise of the film.  The task at hand was having to manage seven tons of equipment that had to be sent to the top of an 11,000 foot mountain, some delivered by cargo plane, while having to negotiate with a military dictatorship that took a curious interest in watching a band of misfit American artists turn a remote mountain village into a drug infested, open-air brothel, all in the pretense of making a film about the adverse effects of colonialism.  Curiously, the movie runs for a full half-hour before the credits appear, “A Film By Dennis Hopper,” and then another fifteen minutes go by before the actual title appears.  This disorienting technique along with ignoring the script happens throughout, including magnificent mountain vistas shot by László Kovács, frequent flashbacks (jarring instantaneous images), flashes of “Segment Missing” onscreen, along with the use of overlapping dialogue and a strangely off-putting sound design.  These inventive techniques, however, are not particularly indicative of a thoughtful or inventive film, feeling clumsy throughout, narratively slight, not even well acted, as no performances stand out, especially the leads.  Instead it seems to survive on male bluster and raw bravado, more like Peckinpah than anything else, given a brush of the avant garde, feeling crude and strangely unfinished.  This is in stark contrast with Peter Fonda’s acid western with Warren Oates released the same year, The Hired Hand (1971), which is a gorgeous cinematic offering, artfully shot by Vilmos Zsigmond, creating dazzling imagery, where Fonda and Verna Bloom are simply brilliant together, often in wordless sequences.  It’s not mere coincidence that Fonda and Hopper were both obsessed and influenced by a fatalistic, existential element from the Gospel of Thomas (The Gospel of Thomas Collection - Translations and Resources) while making their respective films, though each responded quite differently.  To be fair, Fonda’s film is nearly as obscure and was equally dismissed by the critics, but it’s way ahead of its time, where acting and extreme artistic visualization take precedence over plot or narrative, actually foreshadowing the poetic work of Terrence Malick.

The opening sequences reveal a kind of rag-tag collective surrounding the film, given a documentary look as we peer into the makings of a film-within-a-film, with Fuller embracing a somewhat dictatorial style, shouting orders, giving directions, where all the people coming up and speaking to him after each shot feels more like concerted mayhem, a brief insight into the anxious hysteria surrounding filmmaking, where multiple things are continually happening simultaneously, where it’s hard to sense any order.  The refrains of a young Kris Kristofferson (an actor in the film) singing “Me and Bobby McGee” with Rita Coolidge (KRIS KRISTOFFERSON & RITA COOLIDGE - Me And Bobby McGee ... YouTube, 3:16) weave in and out of this opening section along with glimpses of the countryside, with Kansas riding his horse through the open terrain, eventually stumbling onto the movie set in town, getting scolded by the director for interrupting a scene, then falling in line and performing his duties until it’s a wrap, where they all get together for a rambunctious party afterwards (which is basically a collection of Hopper’s friends), featuring plenty of singing, including Michelle Phillips (who was married to Hopper afterwards, an LSD-laced misadventure that lasted all of eight days).  One of the more memorable sequences is a long tracking shot that reveals different singers in every room, each with a distinct character, with Kansas slowly wandering through the rooms, with the camera probing both inside and out, all feeling jumbled together, like a layered effect, each representing a different mindset or state of consciousness, where he breaks down in tears afterwards.  By morning they’ve all vanished, leaving him in the arms of Maria, riding out into the countryside, blending into an Edenesque natural world, seen getting naked and making love under a remote mountain waterfall, made all the more humorous as a band of young children march past on an overhead road led by the priest (Tomas Milian), who continually glances at the carnal scene as they walk by.  While the shot has all the elements of an exotic fantasy, especially as it’s used to enhance interest in Western audiences, it also holds a different meaning, symbolic of the white rape of the indigenous culture, bringing to mind a dictum of filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard, from an interview in 1970, “A movie is not reality, it is only a reflection.  Bourgeois filmmakers focus on the reflection of reality.  We are concerned with the reality of that reflection.”  This becomes more evident as their relationship evolves, as Maria becomes more and more interested in consumer culture, wanting to be showered with Western gifts, treated like a “white” girlfriend, claiming she must have regular beauty treatments, have a General Electric refrigerator, a fur coat, and even a swimming pool, where she can then put all these expensive items on display in front of her own people, like recognizable signs of success.  The most obvious example is a white mink shawl belonging to Mrs. Anderson (Julie Adams), an extravagantly wealthy wife of a millionaire American industrialist in town, repeatedly nagging him until he goes through the depths of raunchy depravity to get it for her, reversing roles, where he becomes the humiliated and sexually demeaned prostitute for a mindlessly sex-crazed American wife.

Like Maria, the local Indian village is equally corrupted by the influence of the movie, bringing chaotic violence and madness to the land, replicating their actions with handmade items resembling fake set construction and a wooden movie camera, with a local leader barking out the orders, while the townspeople play along, getting into fisticuffs, but for real, as they don’t buy into the idea that it’s fake, so people actually get hurt.  When the priest tries to intervene, offering a return to existing order, they ignore him, caught up in this wild new idea that allows them to play out their own indigenous fantasies of mimicking Hollywood.  But in projecting this new world, all moral order disappears, with villagers actually shooting and killing their neighbors (invoking a blood sacrifice).  The priest brings in Kansas to educate villagers about making movies, but he is ignored as well, suggesting cinema is not an educating mechanism, and instead he is thrown into the role of the actor chosen to die, where he grows fearful they may mistakenly kill him for real, ironically becoming the Fay Wray sacrificial figure from King Kong (1933).  Hollywood exports the sex and violence in movies almost exclusively for commerce, with little thought about the inevitable consequences.  The cultural insensitivity of this film is glaring, where the poisonous influence is immediate and crudely visceral, leaving a terrible stain of violent excess and moral decay that includes excessive drinking and Western debauchery, as Kansas spends nearly all of his time in raunchy bordellos and saloons, with a perpetual bottle in his hand, getting drunk, chasing other women, and then treating Maria like crap, thinking only of himself.  This myopic view symbolizes the senseless repetition of similar films coming out of Hollywood, refusing to develop a social conscience, instead it’s all about the bottom line, beholden to the almighty dollar.  Yet it’s clear society is influenced by what happens onscreen, creating stereotypes and myths that last for decades, like the mythological macho bravado of John Wayne as the virile cowboy on the range, while continually stereotyping Indians as savages, who get little if any character development, never perceived as “human” when for over a century they have been projected as “subhuman.”  Hollywood also provides fairy tale endings, like the handsome prince that always saves the young princess, which is little more than a fantasy, yet it becomes an intrinsic aspect of every young woman’s dreams, wondering why they never meet anyone as handsome or charming as the Hollywood elite, like Bogart, Clark Gable, or Errol Flynn, as their glamorous image becomes an impossible to replicate aspect of young girls growing up who are sure to be disappointed, yet the industry bears no responsibility whatsoever and rarely engages in a meaningful discussion with the audience, instead it’s a one-way conversation.  In that vein, Hopper insists upon providing no happy ending, making a film that is deliberately told out of order, accentuating the flaws and imperfections of cinema, turning his film into an abstract expression of grim futility, directly challenging the Hollywood notion of cinematic illusion and the idea of success, featuring the John Buck Wilkin song “Only When It Rains,”  The Final 'Only When It Rains' Segment of Dennis Hopper's 'The Last ...  YouTube (4:30).  At heart, this is a subversive take on the Hollywood dream, but the sloppy execution is a bawdy tale of drug and alcohol-fueled excess, perhaps not the right canvas to deliver this message.  

Monday, October 1, 2018

Fahrenheit 11/9





Michael Moore with Donald Trump Jr. at the release of Sicko, 2007




Richard Ojeda running for Congress in West Virginia



Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez running for Congress from Queens
Rashida Tlaib from Michigan with no opposition, expected to be the first Muslim-American woman to be elected to Congress




Moore with Parkland survivor David Hogg




Parkland survivors





Emma González at the student-led March for Our Lives rally in Washington




Michael Moore














FAHRENHEIT 11/9              B+                  
USA  (128 mi)  2018  d:  Michael Moore

Actually much better than advertised, reflective of the somber mood in the country at the moment, Moore has created a cautionary essay on democracy that is clear and easy to digest, and is not an excoriation of Trump, as some may have been lead to believe, but views him as a symptom of a larger problem that was decades in the making, where the largest political party in America are those who don’t care enough to vote (currently 100 million).  So instead of lampooning Trump and going right after him with unrelenting satire, as he did with Bush in FAHRENHEIT 9/11, which proved ultimately unsuccessful as Bush won re-election anyway, much of it due to a wave of Republican resentment “against” writer/director Michael Moore himself, who was viewed at the time as the last bastion of the progressive left in the United States, this film offers a sober analysis of what went wrong in America.  Moore has lost much of his influence with the public, including much of his audience since all the praise heaped upon that earlier film, which was wildly entertaining and overwhelmingly profitable, made for just $6 million dollars, yet earning well over $200 million dollars.   This film pales in comparison in terms of public interest and doesn’t have the “Wow” factor of the earlier film, yet it does a much better job explaining how something like this could have happened, contending the rise of Trump is not an anomaly or even that much of a surprise, as despite overwhelming Russian interference and a last minute decision by FBI director James Comey to re-open an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s personal emails just days before the election, the real contributor to Trump’s election victory were some questionable decisions made within the Democratic Party itself, including a baffling superdelegate system of appointed party officials in the primary elections that stacked the deck in favor of one candidate, Clinton, at the expense of actual democratic votes, allowing Clinton to claim victory in states where a majority of voters actually voted for Bernie Sanders, including West Virginia where all 55 counties voted for Sanders, yet Clinton won a majority of delegates, which had a huge effect in suppressing the wave of newly energized Sanders supporters, who were turned off by the crass hypocrisy on display where votes didn’t count.  The other, perhaps even more inexplicable act was carried out by a tone-deaf President Obama who turned a blind eye to the Flint water crisis, all but guaranteeing that the Republican officials who orchestrated a mass poisoning of a large black urban community in America would not be held accountable, which had a similar effect of suppressing the black vote.  By letting the real culprits off the hook, many of the most fervently enthused Democratic supporters stayed at home on Election Day, as the Democratic Party simply allowed a no-name group of Republicans to fill the void.

The film opens with a wave of pre-election euphoria, as Hillary Clinton and her supporters were all lead to believe she would be anointed into the Presidency on Election Day, as nearly all political prognosticators (including Fox News) were in unanimous agreement that Clinton would win in a landslide, booking a modern era hotel with actual glass ceilings for her victory celebration, which was packed with supporters, while down the street there were few Trump hopefuls in a less than enthusiastic crowd, where a grim atmosphere greeted the victory with few smiles or any hint of celebration, as they were thoroughly unprepared for what happened.  All the Hollywood royalty, one by one, were caught laughing on camera while declaring “Trump would never be President,” as if it could not happen here, all totally dumbfounded with the results.  In typical Michael Moore fashion, this is all prefaced with a wistful query, “Was it all a dream?”  And once reality drops like a ton of bricks, he asks more earnestly, “What the fuck happened?”  The rest of the film pretty much answers that question.  As Trump dispatches each of his Republican rivals, basically bullying them off the stage with ferocious insults, we see glee in the eyes of CBS CEO Les Moonves declaring the country may be in crisis, but the networks ultimately win with Trump in power, turning him into a media darling, willingly offering him free air time, as he’s like a performance magnet holding a TV audience, where people are riveted to the screens to see what monstrosity will happen next, as he’s literally an accident waiting to happen, running his campaign like a demolition derby, forcefully assaulting anyone who gets in his path.  In Trump’s view, this is simply good business, continually surrounding himself with all the accoutrements of wealth, where it’s only natural that people serve him, not the other way around which is how the Constitution envisioned it.  But Democrats didn’t play fair with the Constitution either, so what example did they set?  Who are they to cry foul?  Moore actually traces the beginnings back to President Bill Clinton, which began the strange and twisted journey of centrist Democrats being more Republican than the Republicans, outflanking Senator Robert Dole to the right in his re-election bid, introducing harsher drug penalties, incarcerating blacks in record numbers, aligning themselves with Wall Street and Big Business, and then signing a Welfare Reform bill that didn’t contain a single Democratic legislator’s signature, that allowed each state to determine their own provisions, effectively returning States’ Rights to prominence, perhaps the centerpiece of the Reagan era vision of New Federalism.  Obama continued these same policies with his Auto industry and Wall Street bailouts, claiming some banks and businesses were simply too big to fail, lending them Federal money, quickly making recoveries while individuals permanently lost their homes, pension benefits, or health care plans during the economic crisis, with many never recovering afterwards, blaming the Democrats for their neglect. 

Actually, in this film, Trump is a secondary figure, though there is a rather queasy segment where he fixates on his daughter’s beauty and sexual prowess, claiming he would be dating her if she wasn’t his daughter, which is simply too creepy to watch.  Easily the strongest section is about the Flint water crisis, demonstrating astute journalistic acumen in a documentary film, suggesting this may have been the initial subject of the film, as Moore outlines exactly how the Republican Party, led by Governor Rick Snyder, a business executive and former CEO of Gateway Computers, shamefully implemented a cheaper plan in Moore’s hometown of Flint, Michigan, to stop using clean water from nearby Lake Huron and instead use the polluted water from the Flint River that actually flows through town, a move that was designed to save millions, but at what expense?  In a criminal cover-up, Snyder’s officials continually pronounced the water safe, even as they knowingly failed to filter out the lead from the older water pipes, resulting in scientific readings that were consistently elevated above acceptable levels.  By ignoring the facts, however, and in some cases cooking the books and altering the measurements, the Republicans devised a strategy of lying publicly to an overwhelmingly impoverished black community, offering no alternative but to drink poisoned water for a year and a half until finally acknowledging a mistake, but only after 12 died when the lead poisoning caused an outbreak of Legionnaires’ Disease, resulting in four resignations, four firings, five suspensions, and fifteen criminal indictments, currently providing residents with bottled water for drinking, cooking, cleaning, and bathing.  This moral outrage is heartbreakingly rendered, using black people and especially their children as pawns, saving the auto industry, as the polluted water was ruining their machinery, quickly switching them back to clean water from Lake Huron, but left a community in crisis to suffer the consequences. When President Obama arrived to announce the system would be fixed under his watch, and wrongdoers would be held accountable, just the opposite happened, with Obama foolishly staging a drink of water as proof everything was all right (it wasn’t and still isn’t, as the lead-filled pipes won’t be fully replaced until 2020), leaving the citizens utterly demoralized afterwards, turning them off to any idea that government actually works for them, basically leaving them to live with the consequences for the rest of their lives, as lead never leaves the system, and without ever holding Michigan Governor Rick Snyder accountable.  Significantly (though underreported), the Democratic primary in Flint had a much larger turnout in 2016 than the general election held just a few months later, where the obvious conclusion is that Obama’s visit had the effect of suppressing the Democratic vote.  To one local community leader, he told Moore, “When President Obama came here, he was my President.  When he left, he wasn’t.”  In a surreal follow-up, the U.S. Army used the abandoned buildings of Flint, Michigan to stage military assault maneuvers WITHOUT warning local residents, who literally freaked out over what was happening.

Moore takes us to West Virginia where we meet Richard Ojeda, a physically fit Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran running for Congress, who’s tired of conditions in his town that leave one out of four homes in a dilapidated state, telling Moore, “I can take you five minutes from here and show you where our kids have it worse than the kids I saw in Iraq and Afghanistan.”  These conditions are not brand new, but have been lingering for decades, made worse by the opioid crisis which was ignored by both political parties.  While Michigan and West Virginia have two Republican Governors, their accomplices are lined with Democrats, with Ojeda claiming this is how people lose faith in their government, as neither party actually works to improve their lives.  Among the more inspirational voices are West Virginia teachers, who are more than classroom instructors, as they’re also social workers and mothers, with one teacher claiming she had 8 students in her class that listed her as “Mom” on their cellphones, as those children had no real mothers.  While the teachers grapple with the idea of what to do, as many are paid so little they end up on Food Stamps, they receive little help from their teacher’s union, urged not to strike, as they may lose their jobs.  But their conditions are so dire they felt they had no other choice, first going out in one county, another the next day, eventually combining all their forces and going on a work stoppage, which they were told was illegal, holding boisterous rallies on the steps of the State capitol, where after a week their union generated an offer, but only for the teachers, not the accompanying bus drivers, janitors and kitchen staff, so they held out some more until everyone was on board.  It was a thrilling display of solidarity because it had a happy ending.  There are thousands of stories that don’t end so well.  But this wildcat strike led to more in Kentucky and Oklahoma, bringing attention to the plight of underpaid teachers.  This stark contrast between an overwhelmingly black population in Flint, Michigan and a decimated, almost exclusively white community in West Virginia suggests they have more in common than they’d like to believe, as both live in misery and deprivation, repressive conditions that have existed for so long that residents have simply given up on voting or believing they’ll ever receive help from their government.  It is to Moore’s credit that he doesn’t shy away from matters of race and class in America, as indifference and neglect are the same everywhere, as is disappointment, suggesting these conditions are inextricably intertwined.   

Easily the weakest and most controversial segment is when Moore outlines similarities with Trump and Hitler, with Republicans and the Nazi Party, mimicking archival footage of a Hitler speech with Trump’s words.  While this is somewhat cringeworthy, it knocks the film off the rails with exaggerated overkill, as Nazi comparisons are extremely odious and far off the mark, though it is meant to be a warning shot across the bow, suggesting this could happen in America.  Trump’s fascination with growing autocratic power around the globe is no secret, where we can easily imagine him having his Charlie Chaplin moment bouncing an inflated globe off his feet in THE GREAT DICTATOR (1940), The Great Dictator - complete globe scene YouTube (3:44), and Trump is a specialist in creating false illusions, where he could easily invent a national emergency scenario, suspending the Constitution and all future elections, but we’re not at that point yet, and it’s not in the foreseeable future unless some catastrophe happens, though doomsday thoughts of this nature may cross the minds of many Americans, suggesting we live in more fearful times.  Moore even resurrects the legitimate fears of 99-year old Benjamin Berell Ferencz, the last living Nuremberg prosecutor, claiming he’s seen conditions like these before, suggesting all it takes is a spark, creating anxiety and panic, allowing the power mongers to take over.  Before people realize what’s happened, it’s too late, as they’ve been caught off-guard.  While this comes across as idle speculation, the central thread of the film is that you can’t trust the system, which exists for the elite and powerful, who make their own rules, while everybody else is just a pawn in their game.  In direct response, Moore singles out a new breed of politician, including the previously mentioned Ojeda, but also Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive socialist that we see going door-to-door in her Queens neighborhood of New York, defeating the Chair of the Democratic House Caucus, certainly offering a change from what we’re used to, who may run into a brick wall of resentment and distrust, but she may surprise us as well with her enthusiasm.  Rashida Tlaib from Moore’s home state of Michigan will be the first Muslim-American woman elected to Congress, as she’s running unopposed, succeeding John Conyer’s seat, where she’s also connected to socialist grass roots, but demonstrates an infectious enthusiasm in working for her constituents.  Moore seems much more fascinated by passing the torch to the younger generation, including the Parkland survivors who are still too young to vote, but mobilized millions in a student-led March for Our Lives rally in Washington and around the world protesting our gun laws, with Emma González offering positively riveting testimony (timed to match the exact amount of time it took for the shooting at her high school, which closes the film, cue Bob Dylan to sing an orchestral version of “With God On Our Side” over the credits).  These are feel-good stories that offer a more powerful glimpse of the future, as if it’s in good hands, as kids today are aware of so much more, with one Parkland student acknowledging that her maturity comes from being raised by social media. They offer a different kind of savvy and know-how than what we’re used to, but their presence offers a sign of something better to come.  It’s a challenging and provocative film that speaks to our better angels and our most nightmarish fears, at times infuriating, yet offering an incisive analytical view of what led us here, while offering hope as our roadmap to the future.