AFTER LOVE (L'Économie du couple) B
France Belgium (100 mi)
2016 ‘Scope d : Joachim Lafosse Official
site [UK]
One might have loved to see this in Xavier Dolan’s hands, as
the explosive moments, simmering anguish, and shifting visual dynamic might
have turned this into an emotional powerhouse of a film. As is, it’s an elegantly restrained, yet
astute, chamber drama about the disintegration of a marriage, using no
backstory or flashbacks to reveal how we arrived at this state, but the film
begins in the midst of family turmoil, as the husband (filmmaker turned actor) Cédric
Kahn as Boris arrives unexpectedly on a day that violates the separation
agreement, causing his wife Marie (Bérénice Béjo) to fume about the ensuing
chaos this causes in the home, as instead of getting ready for a bath, the two
kids Jade and Margaux (appropriately played by two sisters named Jade and
Margaux Soentjens) want to play with their Daddy. What’s confusing, however, is that the couple
hasn’t actually separated, due to the financial instability of Boris, whose tenuous
work history is on and off, finding it difficult to hold a steady job, so he’s
still living in the home, having his own separate room. What is clear, however, is that Marie has had
enough of Boris, where every little move he makes bothers her, finding him a
nuisance who is more trouble than he is worth, continually making her upset,
where it takes all her energy just to contain herself and act normal in front
of the children, as inside she is seething with anger. Béjo’s fiery temper is held in check, but she
is pushed to the edge in the film, while Kahn is another matter altogether, as
it’s clear there’s a pronounced element of shame and self-loathing, so he acts
in a much more despicable manner, often the result of how he perceives he is
being treated, as he has a tendency to lash out at others, blaming Marie every
chance he gets, though it’s clear throughout that she’s the stable partner,
financially and emotionally, with unquestionable mothering skills, while Kahn
is more hit or miss, trying to be there for his kids, but often he misses the
mark, promising more than he can deliver.
With few blistering moments, more of a carefully
choreographed drama of dissonance and clashing emotions, the film doesn’t have
the surgical precision it may have intended, but is more about trying to
preserve every last shred of humanity while you are totally exposed, every
defect in plain view, as your marriage is falling apart directly in front of
your children, who are innocent bystanders in this incendiary flame-out of what
was once a happy love affair. The
troubling aspect is that you can’t hide the obvious dysfunction, where you’re
as apt to behave in a bizarre manner or blurt out something inappropriate, all
against your own will, but you simply can’t control yourself, as you are
relying on instincts that don’t work anymore, becoming overly paranoid or
aggressive, always thinking the worst of your partner, as if they are tying to
undermine not just you, but everything you stand for. This results in continual bickering and constant
flare-ups, where Marie couldn’t be more agitated, but Boris acts like he’s done
nothing to provoke her, like there’s still a chance, always acting innocent,
yet he’s easily the more hurtful of the two, routinely accusing her, even
stooping to blaming her for his own personal failings. Marie just wants him out, the sooner the
better, but shows sympathy for his financial situation by allowing him to
continue living there, as she’s always covered for his losses, that’s been the history
of their marriage, so she continues to tide him over until he can stand on his
own two feet. The problem is that day
never comes, and it only gets worse. The
children, as they seem to be in nearly all French films, couldn’t be more
natural, where the acting throughout is nothing less than exquisite, most of it
taking place within the claustrophobic four walls of the house, which is the
real bone of contention, as Boris wants half what it’s worth, even though Marie
is the one paying all the bills. Boris
argues that his carpentry skills helped rebuild it when they moved in,
significantly improving its market value.
And while that may be true, elevating his share to half is a stretch,
considering she paid nearly the entire mortgage, so she thinks offering a third
is more than generous. This squabble
keeps them busy throughout, though the numbers hide what’s really going on underneath,
as both feel diminished in each other’s presence.
The film premiered in Director’s
Fortnight at Cannes in 2016, as did PRIVATE LESSONS (2008), one of the
director’s earlier films, while OUR CHILDREN (2012) premiered in Un Certain Regard at Cannes under a different
title, LOVING WITHOUT REASON, where Belgian Actress Émilie Dequenne won Best
Actress, as she did in competition at Cannes for the Dardenne brother’s earlier
film ROSETTA (1999). So this Belgian
director has built some prominence, at least in France, though he’s not well
known here. Nonetheless, the film has a
graceful style, accentuated by the precision of Bach piano music, where this
family, after fifteen years of marriage, is clearly out of synch, breaking
apart at the seams, where almost unnoticed is the class difference between the
two of them, which is never really explored.
The bravura scene of the film is a dinner sequence right out of Maurice
Pialat’s À
Nos Amours (To Our Loves) (1983), where Pialat himself devastated the
actors on the set, who had no advance notice, unexpectedly dominating the
scene, verbally undermining each and every guest at the table, literally laying
waste to what was otherwise a polite moment of bourgeois stability, where he
clears the deck of any and all pretense.
Kahn is a lightweight, by comparison, but the implication is the same,
as he, in the same manner as Pialat, arrives on the scene completely by
accident, where Marie is having dinner with several guests on their outdoor
patio, drinking several bottles of wine, expressing her continual anguish at
having to put up with the infantile behavior of her husband, who makes a scene
out of everything, perhaps with the knowledge that he’s soon to be out of the
picture altogether, so why not go out with a bang? As if on cue, he enters through a back gate,
but out of courtesy (or perhaps pity) one of the guests asks if he’d like to
share a glass of wine. Politely
accepting the offer, knowing his wife is fuming at his presence (suddenly gone
silent), so he extends the invitation to include a taste of whatever’s sitting
on the table uneaten, where it’s probably the best food he’s eaten in months,
as he’s excluded in his own household, so he takes full advantage of the
situation. He fills the eerie silence
with sarcastic remarks that are intentionally rude, challenging each one to
confess what his wife has said about him.
Despite being told to leave, he refuses, so the guests decide they’ll
leave, but Marie intervenes, claiming she made a cake for the occasion. Boris immediately remarks that he’d love a
piece of cake. Growing ever more
discomforting, this kind of prolonged agony is at the heart of the film, as all
they have left is the power to destroy one another, having lost any traces of
love. What’s left of their marriage is
summed up in a final rendering of the judge’s decision, where the two are left
speechless, drained of all emotion, as a perfectly harmonious Bach Prelude plays
over the end credits.



















No comments:
Post a Comment