Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman selected to the Supreme Court
The 4 women who have served on the Supreme Court (left to right), Sandra Day O’Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Elena Kagan
Ruth Bader Ginsburg sharing a moment with her husband Marty
RBG B
USA (98 mi) 2018
d: Julie Cohen and Betsy West
I ask no favors for my
sex. I surrender not our claim to
equality. All I ask of our brethren is
that they will take their feet from off our necks.
―Ruth Bader Ginsburg quoting Sarah Moore Grimké, 19th century
abolitionist, women’s rights actvist and attorney, 1837
Every new generation is imprinted with some notorious
catastrophic event that defines their era, like the Great Depression, WWII, or
the Vietnam War, for instance, but for Ruth Bader Ginsburg growing up in
Brooklyn in the 1950’s, it was McCarthyism, where an overzealous Senate
investigative committee sought to unearth communists hiding under every rock,
believing they were doing the country a great service, but it was more like a
travesty of justice, turning into a rabid witch hunt excoriating the
innocent. How people respond to these
life-defining events is telling, as in Ginsberg’s case she decided to become a
lawyer, enrolling at Harvard Law School in 1956, one of only nine women in a
class of 500 men, where the response from the Dean of Harvard Law was outright
contempt, “How do you justify taking a spot from a qualified man?” As her husband Marty graduated from law
school two years before her, he obtained employment as a prominent tax attorney
in New York City, so she transferred to Columbia Law School, becoming the first
woman to be on two major law reviews, The
Harvard and Columbia Law Reviews, graduating first in her class in 1959, but
no law firm in all of New York City would hire her due to her gender. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter
rejected her as well when applying for a clerkship position, resolutely
refusing to hire a woman despite impeccable recommendations. This was reflective of the era, as women were
viewed as homemakers and mothers, routinely fired for becoming pregnant, where
men were expected to be breadwinners and make all the family decisions, viewing
women as subservient to men, where there were laws on the books prohibiting
women from opening bank accounts or obtaining loans unless co-signed by their
husbands, and men could not be charged for raping their wives. Women were routinely omitted from serving
jury duty, claiming they were needed in the home, so the jury pool for women
initiating court proceedings had few if any women serving in a jury of her
peers. While there was a women’s rights
movement in the 1960’s that started to change prevailing attitudes, more than a
decade after she graduated from law school, the laws remained the same,
thoroughly entrenched with a male-only view.
Of the 113 Supreme Court justices in U.S. history, all but 6 have been
white men.
While Ginsburg is a frail, unimposing figure, probably weighing
less than 100 pounds soaking wet, she became a daunting advocate for women’s
rights in the 1970’s, among the first women to argue cases before the Supreme
Court, where she saw her job there much like that of a kindergarten teacher,
where she had to enlighten and educate the court about conditions they spent no
time whatsoever thinking about, as gender bias did not affect them. As the lead litigator for the ACLU’s Women’s
Rights Project, her job was to convince them that not only did bias exist, but
that its ramifications were injurious to all, not just women, carefully
selecting precedent cases to bring to the court (we hear her read snippets of
her oral arguments), winning five of six Supreme Court cases in the 70’s, which
became landmark events in our nation’s history, for the first time drawing
attention to the idea of sex discrimination and equality of the sexes. Rights that women routinely take for granted
today were obtained through these fundamental court decisions, where Ginsburg
views the Constitution as ever evolving, a framework for developing a more
perfect union. Yet conservative
fundamentalists who insist upon original intent by the framers of the
Constitution do not easily budge from their positions, particularly when it
comes to minority rights or the rights of women, who supposedly have equal
protection under the law from the 14th Amendment, yet their views
were totally excluded by the original 18th century framers of the
Constitution. This seems to be the legal
divide that prevents more breakthroughs, as people are still hung up on
concepts that existed when a budding nation initially ratified the
Constitution, when at the time allowing slavery to exist and refusing women the
right to vote was considered constitutional.
This kind of age-old bigotry is hard to penetrate, as it’s so thoroughly
entrenched in traditional circles, including schools, institutions and places
of employment (where on average women of today earn 80% of what a man earns for
the exact same job). Feminism is a
relatively modern era ideal that is espoused by some, but certainly not all levels
of society, yet Ginsburg was the visionary who championed these views, appointed
to the Supreme Court in 1993, the second female justice to serve on the court, becoming
something of a rock star to many young women of today.
What this film does do is expose and humanize an otherwise
secluded Supreme Court justice, offering personal insights from her husband and
two children, where we discover the law student Ginsburg heroically transcribed
her husband’s law school notes on his behalf while he was bedridden, undergoing
successful cancer radiation therapy, in addition to raising a 14-month child
and doing her own classwork, often working until 4 or 5 am before starting the
next day in class at 9 am. Her character
was defined in those early years by hard work and perseverance, where
preparation was the key to her success.
Her more outgoing husband Marty with his gregarious personality (one of
the marvels of the film) seemed like a perfect match to her more introverted,
studious style, where he sacrificed his own career advancement to allow her to
pursue her own, moving from his lucrative New York City practice to the Capitol
when she was selected in 1980 by President Carter to serve on the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where she served until her
appointment to the Supreme Court. The
legend of her accomplishments may never have reached such exalted status had
she not first been recognized by Presidents Carter and Clinton, who had the foresight
and wisdom to select her. She became
somewhat infamous by making friends with the most staunchly conservative member
of the Court in Justice Anton Scalia, both sharing a love for opera, but also
in hearing a good argument, even if they were not swayed by it. Scalia, apparently, made her laugh,
demonstrating a raucous sense of humor, which was a welcome change to the rigid
decorum followed while serving on the court.
At the age of 85, Ginsburg is also an exercise fanatic, working out for
one hour twice a week with a personal trainer, overcoming two bouts with cancer
herself, still able to maintain a difficult workload, and though the court has
turned more conservative in their decisions, she has become the standard bearer
writing dissenting opinions, still using her voice to make powerful
arguments. Like a popular novelist with
a fan base eagerly awaiting every new printed page, Ginsburg has legions of
young followers who await every written decision, dissecting her analysis as if
it was poetry, often going viral when sharing it on social media. This glamorizing of such a shy and retiring
figure is ironic, as is her portrayal on Saturday
Night Live TV sketches, which we see her watch with obvious glee, easily
amused by the comic absurdity of it all, offering a glimpse of how she loves simple
distractions, allowing all of us to share in her delight. Something of a love letter to the justice
celebrating 25 years of serving on the court, the film is humorous and
emotionally uplifting, at times reaching elegiac heights, with Ginsburg herself
acknowledging that the unlikelihood of her amazing success could only happen in
America. Seeming to enjoy revisiting her
life before a camera, this becomes the perfect eulogy for such a historical trailblazer
who is still very much alive and with us today.
A fitting tribute, where it’s nice to be recognized during one’s
lifetime.
No comments:
Post a Comment